The efficacy and influence factors analysis of Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone in the treatment of incomplete abortion.

To analyze the efficacy and influencing factors of Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone sequential therapy (Femoston) in the treatment of incomplete abortion. This retrospective cohort study included 93 patients with incomplete abortion. All patients took 50 mg of Mifepristone 2 times a day for 5 days and then took Femoston once a day (starting with estradiol tablets/2 mg) for 28 days. Without any indication of intrauterine residue by ultrasonic examination was judged to be effective. According to statistical analysis, this study calculated the effective rate and analyzed its influencing factors. A 2-sided value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The total response rate of the treatment regimen was 86.67%. body mass index was a significant influencing factor for treatment outcome (OR 0.818, 95% confidence interval 0.668-0.991, P = .041). For patients with incomplete abortion, Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone sequential therapy has a remarkable therapeutic effect. Patients with a lower body mass index may respond much more significantly to this treatment regimen.

A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, after TCRA, 31 patients received a special IUB, and 38 patients received an IUD. The Fisher exact test, logistic regression method, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for statistical analysis. A two-sided value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The readhesion rate significantly differed between the IUB group and IUD group, at 15.39% and 54.06%, respectively (P = 0.002). For recurrent moderate IUA, patients in the IUB group had lower scores than patients in the IUD group (P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in the intrauterine pregnancy rate of IUA patients in the IUB group and IUD group after treatment, with rates of 55.56% and 14.29%, respectively (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients in the special IUB group had better outcomes than those in the IUD group, which has a certain guiding significance for clinical work.