Contemporary Role of Radiation Therapy in Testicular Cancer.

Testicular cancer is a rare but curable male malignancy. Seminoma represents the majority of germ cell tumors and is considered radiation sensitive. Radiation treatment plays a role in adjuvant therapy after orchiectomy of stage I, IIA, and IIB seminomas. Radiation dose de-escalation has been effective in preventing tumor recurrences while also limiting acute and long-term toxicities. However, long-term risks, including the prevailing concern of secondary malignancy risk, between adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy play a role in recommendations. Ongoing work continues to be performed to reduce radiation field and dose in combination with chemotherapy while still maintaining excellent outcomes.

Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy.

Objective.Hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy (RT) is a cancer treatment option to broaden access to proton RT. Additionally, with a refined treatment planning method, hybrid RT has the potential to offer superior plan quality compared to proton-only or photon-only RT, particularly in terms of target coverage and sparing organs-at-risk (OARs), when considering robustness to setup and range uncertainties. However, there is a concern regarding the underestimation of the biological effect of protons on OARs, especially those in close proximity to targets. This study seeks to develop a hybrid treatment planning method with biological dose optimization, suitable for clinical implementation on existing proton and photon machines, with each photon or proton treatment fraction delivering a uniform target dose.Approach.The proposed hybrid biological dose optimization method optimized proton and photon plan variables, along with the number of fractions for each modality, minimizing biological dose to the OARs and surrounding normal tissues. To mitigate underestimation of hot biological dose spots, proton biological dose was minimized within a ring structure surrounding the target. Hybrid plans were designed to be deliverable separately and robustly on existing proton and photon machines, with enforced uniform target dose constraints for the proton and photon fraction doses. A probabilistic formulation was utilized for robust optimization of setup and range uncertainties for protons and photons. The nonconvex optimization problem, arising from minimum monitor unit constraint and dose-volume histogram constraints, was solved using an iterative convex relaxation method.Main results.Hybrid planning with biological dose optimization effectively eliminated hot spots of biological dose, particularly in normal tissues surrounding the target, outperforming proton-only planning. It also provided superior overall plan quality and OAR sparing compared to proton-only or photon-only planning strategies.Significance.This study presents a novel hybrid biological treatment planning method capable of generating plans with reduced biological hot spots, superior plan quality to proton-only or photon-only plans, and clinical deliverability on existing proton and photon machines, separately and robustly.

Differences in Rural Versus Urban Patients With Prostate Cancer in Diagnosis and Treatment: An Analysis of a Population-Based Cohort.

PURPOSE: Patients living in rural communities have greater barriers to cancer care and poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that rural patients with prostate cancer have less access and receive different treatments compared with urban patients. METHODS: We used a population-based prospective cohort, the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study, to compare differences in prostate cancer diagnosis, access to care, and treatment in patients by geographic residence. The 2013 rural-urban continuum code (RUCC) was used to determine urban (RUCC 1-3) versus rural (RUCC 4-9) location of residence. RESULTS: Patients with rural residence comprised 25% of the cohort (364 of 1,444); they were less likely to be White race and had lower income and educational attainment. Rural patients were more likely to have <12 cores on biopsy (47.1% v 35.7%; P < .001) and less likely (40.8% v 47.6%; P = .04) to receive multidisciplinary consultation. We observed significant differences in treatment between urban and rural patients, including rural patients receiving less active surveillance or observation (22.6% v 28.7%), especially in low-risk cancer (33.2% v 40.7%). On multivariable analysis that adjusted for patient and diagnostic factors, rural residence was associated with less use of active surveillance or observation over radical treatment (ie, surgery or radiation therapy; odds ratio, 0.49 v urban; P < .001) in patients with low-risk cancer. CONCLUSION: Patients with prostate cancer who live in rural versus urban areas experience several differences in care that are likely clinically meaningful, including fewer cores in the diagnostic biopsy, less utilization of multidisciplinary consultation, less use of active surveillance, or observation for low-risk disease. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy of interventions in mitigating these disparities.

Prognostic Significance of Immune Cell Infiltration in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation: A Secondary Analysis of RTOG 0524 and RTOG 0712.

Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is a treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Using a novel transcriptomic profiling panel, we validated prognostic immune biomarkers to CRT using 70 pretreatment tumor samples from prospective trials of MIBC (NRG/RTOG 0524 and 0712). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by genes correlated with immune cell activation. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess group differences. Clustering of gene expression profiles revealed that the cluster with high immune cell content was associated with longer DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.10; p = 0.071) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97; p = 0.040) than the cluster with low immune cell content. Higher expression of T-cell infiltration genes (CD8A and ICOS) was associated with longer DFS (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.75; p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.94; p = 0.033). Higher IDO1 expression (IFNγ signature) was also associated with longer DFS (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.88; p = 0.021) and OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.99; p = 0.048). These findings should be validated in prospective CRT trials that include biomarkers, particularly for trials incorporating immunotherapy for MIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed patient samples from two clinical trials (NRG/RTOG 0524 and 0712) of chemoradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer using a novel method to assess immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Higher expression of genes associated with immune activation and high overall immune-cell content were associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival for patients treated with chemoradiation.

Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology: Impact for Our Patients and for Practicing Radiation Oncologists.

With rising costs of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship, financial burdens on patients with cancer and negative effects from high costs, called financial toxicity (FT), are growing. Research suggests that FT may be experienced by more than half of working-age cancer survivors and a similar proportion may incur debt or avoid recommended prescription medications due to treatment costs. As FT can lead to worse physical, psychological, financial, and survival outcomes, there is a discrete need to identify research gaps around this issue that constrain the development and implementation of effective screening and innovative care delivery interventions. Prior research, including within a radiation oncology-specific context, has sought to identify the scope of FT among patients with cancer, develop assessment tools to evaluate patient risk, quantify financial sacrifices, and qualify care compromises that occur when cancer care is unaffordable. FT is a multifactorial problem and potential solutions should be pursued at all levels of the health care system (patient-provider, institutional, and systemic) with specific regard for patients' individual/local contexts. Solutions may include selecting alternative treatment schedules, discussing financial concerns with patients, providing financial navigation services, low-cost transportation options, and system-wide health policy shifts. This review summarizes existing FT research, describes tools developed to measure FT, and suggests areas for intervention and study to help improve FT and outcomes for radiation oncology patients.

Income level and treatment selection in prostate cancer: analysis of a North Carolina population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in treatment selection based on socioeconomic status for prostate cancer exist. However, the association between patient-level income with treatment selection priorities and treatment received has not been studied. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 1382 individuals with newly diagnosed prostate cancer was enrolled throughout North Carolina prior to treatment. Patients self-reported household income and were asked about the importance of 12 factors contributing to their treatment decision-making process. Diagnosis details and primary treatment received were abstracted from medical records and cancer registry data. RESULTS: Patients with lower income were diagnosed with more advanced disease (P < .01). Cure was deemed to be "very important" by more than 90% of patients at all income levels. However, patients with lower vs higher household income were more likely to rate factors beyond cure as "very important" such as cost (P < .01), effect on daily activities (P = .01), duration of treatment (P < .01), recovery time (P < .01), and burden on family and friends (P < .01). On multivariable analysis, high vs low income was associated with increased utilization of radical prostatectomy (odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.33 to 3.04; P < .01) and decreased use of radiotherapy (odds ratio = 0.48, 95% confidence interval = 0.31 to 0.75; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: New insights from this study on the association between income and treatment decision-making priorities provide potential avenues for future interventions to reduce disparities in cancer care.

The effect of integrating knowledge-based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT.

Knowledge-based planning (KBP) and multicriteria optimization (MCO) are two powerful tools to assist treatment planners in achieving optimal target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this work is to investigate if integrating MCO with conventional KBP can further improve treatment plan quality for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A two-phase study was designed to investigate the impact of MCO and KBP in prostate SBRT treatment planning. The first phase involved the creation of a KBP model based on thirty clinical SBRT plans, generated by manual optimization (KBP_M). A ten-patient validation cohort was used to compare manual, MCO, and KBP_M optimization techniques. The next phase involved replanning the original model cohort with additional tradeoff optimization via MCO to create a second model, KBP_MCO. Plans were then generated using linear integration (KBP_M+MCO), non-linear integration (KBP_MCO), and a combination of integration methods (KBP_MCO+MCO). All plans were analyzed for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, OAR constraints, and plan quality metrics. Comparisons were generated to evaluate plan and model quality. Phase 1 highlighted the necessity of KBP and MCO in treatment planning, as both optimization methods improved plan quality metrics (Conformity and Heterogeneity Indices) and reduced mean rectal dose by 2 Gy, as compared to manual planning. Integrating MCO with KBP did not further improve plan quality, as little significance was seen over KBP or MCO alone. Principal component score (PCS) fitting showed KBP_MCO improved bladder and rectum estimated and modeled dose correlation by 5% and 22%, respectively; however, model improvements did not significantly impact plan quality. KBP and MCO have shown to reduce OAR dose while maintaining desired PTV coverage in this study. Further integration of KBP and MCO did not show marked improvements in treatment plan quality while requiring increased time in model generation and optimization time.

Androgen Deprivation and Sleep Disturbance: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of Remote Assessment and Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC) are at risk for cardiovascular comorbidities and cognitive changes. Interventional research involves in-person assessment of physical fitness/activity and cognitive function, which has been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Androgen deprivation therapy-related hot flashes and nocturia increase risk for insomnia. Insomnia is associated with fatigue and may exacerbate ADT-related cognitive changes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this mixed-methods pilot was to (1) determine feasibility/acceptability of remotely assessing physical fitness/activity, cognitive function, and sleep; (2) deliver telehealth cognitive behavioral training for insomnia (teleCBT-I) to improve sleep; and (3) garner qualitative feedback to refine remote procedures and teleCBT-I content. METHODS: Fifteen men with PC receiving ADT completed a 4-week teleCBT-I intervention. Videoconferencing was used to complete study assessments and deliver the weekly teleCBT-I intervention. RESULTS: Self-report of sleep quality improved ( P < .001) as did hot flash frequency ( P = .04) and bother ( P = .025). Minimal clinically important differences were detected for changes in insomnia severity and sleep quality. All sleep logs indicated improvement in sleep efficiency. Remote assessment of fitness/cognitive function was demonstrated for 100% of participants. Sufficient actigraph wear time allowed physical activity/sleep assessment for 80%. Sleep actigraphy did not demonstrate significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: Remote monitoring and teleCBT-I are feasible/acceptable to men with PC on ADT. Further research to confirm teleCBT-I efficacy is warranted in this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preliminary efficacy for teleCBT-I interventions was demonstrated. Remote assessments of physical fitness/activity, sleep, and cognitive function may enhance clinical trial access for rural or economically disadvantaged PC survivors.

Variations in Medical Necessity Determinations Across Commercial Insurance Carriers for Prostate Cancer Procedures.

PURPOSE: Variation in commercial insurance coverage may lead to disparity in access to quality cancer care. We evaluated commercial insurance coverage determinations to assess the degree of variation across a national sample. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified the predominant carrier of commercial insurance in each state based on the 2020 US Government Accounting Office (GAO-21-34) report on insurance. For each state, publicly available medical policies from January 1, 2021 to January 31, 2021 were analyzed for coverage of 3 widely accepted procedures: hydrogel spacer, fluciclovine- positron emission tomography (PET), and intensity modulated radiation in low volume metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS: We analyzed 83 commercial medical policies across 51 states and District of Columbia. There was widespread variation in coverage policy. Hydrogel spacer was determined medically necessary in 9 states, mixed coverage in 8, not medically necessary in 22, and no available public policy in 12. Use of fluciclovine-PET required a minimum prostate specific antigen level of 2 ng/mL in 9 states, 1 ng/mL in 17, any minimum prostate specific antigen in 7, mixed coverage in 12, and no publicly available policy in 6. Intensity modulated radiation in low volume metastatic prostate cancer was medically necessary in 17 states, not necessary in 7, and not stated in 27. Insurance carriers often used external utilization management companies such as AIM-Healthcare and Evicore Healthcare. These determinations were more restrictive than carriers which did not use utilization management. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial medical policies vary widely in medical necessity determinations for novel prostate cancer treatment procedures that are Food and Drug-approved and covered by Medicare. These data suggest a need for more consistent methodology for medical necessity determination to mitigate the current state where patients have unequal access to cancer procedures due to the location of residence and age.

Comparison of two validated instruments to measure financial hardship in cancer survivors: comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) versus personal financial wellness (PFW) scale.

PURPOSE: Financial distress and financial toxicity are recognized challenges in cancer survivorship. Financial toxicity includes both objective measures of hardship and subjective distress. We hypothesized that subjective financial distress is correlated to overall holistic financial toxicity. We compared two widely accepted instruments to measure financial distress and financial toxicity. METHODS: Patients in the follow-up phase of care at a single institution were surveyed regarding demographic and economic status. Financial toxicity was measured using the comprehensive score for financial toxicity-functional assessment of chronic illness (COST-FACIT) and financial distress using the personal financial wellness (PFW) scale. Surveys were analyzed for correlation and internal consistency. Patient score distributions were compared. Associations between survey scores and patient factors were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included. Scores from the COST-FACIT showed a strong correlation with PFW scores (r = 0.90, p < 0.0001). Scale reliability was high for both the COST-FACIT (α = 0.92) and PFW (α = 0.97) surveys. Score distributions exhibited left skew for both surveys, with 9.5% of patient scores falling in the worst quartile of possible scores on each respective survey. The strongest predictors of financial distress and financial toxicity included young age, lower monetary savings, lower household income, and less perceived social support during cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The COST-FACIT measure of financial toxicity correlated strongly with PFW measure of financial distress. Although these instruments were designed to assess different concepts (financial distress vs financial toxicity), they gave strikingly similar results. Either instrument may be used as a meaningful patient-reported outcome for study of financial distress in cancer survivors. However, the COST-FACIT construct of financial toxicity does not appear to add additional information beyond financial distress.

Patient Decision-Making Factors in Aggressive Treatment of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is underutilized for low-risk prostate cancer. This study examines decision-making factors associated with AS vs aggressive treatment in a population-based cohort of low-risk patients. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients (n = 599) were enrolled through the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry from 2011 to 2013 and surveyed regarding 5 factors that may impact treatment decision making: perceived cancer aggressiveness, aggressiveness of treatment intent, most important goal (eg, cure, quality of life), primary information source, and primary decision maker. We examined the association between treatment decision-making factors with patient choice for AS vs aggressive treatment using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: This is a sociodemographically diverse cohort reflective of the population-based design, with 37.6% overall (47.6% among very low-risk patients) choosing AS. Aggressive treatment intent (odds ratio [OR] = 7.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.57 to 11.01), perceived cancer aggressiveness (OR = 4.93, 95% CI = 2.71 to 8.97), most important goal (cure vs other, OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.63), and primary information source (personal and family vs physician, OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.10 to 2.82) were associated with aggressive treatment. Overall, 88.4% of patients (92.2% among very low-risk) who indicated an intent to treat the cancer "not very aggressively" chose AS. CONCLUSIONS: These data from the patient's perspective shed new light on potentially modifiable factors that can help further increase AS uptake among low-risk patients. Helping more low-risk patients feel comfortable with a "not very aggressive" treatment approach may be especially important, which can be facilitated through patient education interventions to improve the understanding of the cancer diagnosis and AS having a curative intent.

Estimation of Patient Out-of-Pocket Cost for Radiation Therapy by Insurance Type and Treatment Modality.

PURPOSE: Financial toxicity is increasingly identified as an important issue in cancer care. Limited data are available on direct out of pocket (OOP) costs for radiation therapy, which are important for providers and patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective analysis of 247 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic breast and prostate cancer treated with curative intent. Data were collected on demographics, treatments received and insurance plan specifications, including annual OOP maximum, deductibles, co-insurance rates, OOP already paid prior to starting radiation therapy, and actual estimated OOP for radiation therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between insurance factors, radiation technique, concurrent systemic therapy, and month of treatment with a patient reaching OOP maximum with radiation treatment. RESULTS: In the study, 137 and 110 patients with breast and prostate cancer were evaluated. Mean plan specified annual OOP maximum for commercial and Medicare Advantage plans were $4064 and $4661, respectively; 100% of commercially insured patients and 54.7% Medicare Advantage patients reached their OOP maximum with radiation therapy. Annual OOP maximum for Medicare plus supplement, Medicaid, and Tricare were minimal. On multivariable analysis, concurrent systemic therapy (odds ratio 6.20, P = .03) was associated with patient reaching OOP maximum, but radiation technique was not. CONCLUSIONS: Out of pocket cost for radiation therapy services may be reasonably estimated based on insurance type and structure. Medicare plus supplement and Medicaid plans have negligible OOP, while all patients with commercial plans reached annual OOP maximums. This study provides practical information to help providers to better counsel patients.

Trastuzumab with trimodality treatment for oesophageal adenocarcinoma with HER2 overexpression (NRG Oncology/RTOG 1010): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1-2 or T2-3N0-2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm]) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 h) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2, intravenously over 30-60 min) for 6 weeks with radiotherapy 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions (chemoradiotherapy) followed by surgery, with or without intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg in week one, 2 mg/kg per week for 5 weeks during chemoradiotherapy, 6 mg/kg once presurgery, and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 13 treatments starting 21-56 days after surgery). The primary endpoint, disease-free survival, was defined as the time from randomisation to death or first of locoregional disease persistence or recurrence, distant metastases, or second primary malignancy. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01196390; it is now closed and in follow-up. FINDINGS: 606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4-5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5-26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5-23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71-1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis). INTERPRETATION: The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Genentech.

Narrative review of management strategies and outcomes in node-positive prostate cancer.

Pelvic nodal involvement is present in 13% of new prostate cancer diagnoses each year and is associated with a poor prognosis compared to localized disease. Grouped as stage IV along with distant metastatic disease, node-positive nonmetastatic patients historically received systemic therapy alone as primary treatment. This treatment paradigm has shifted as data have demonstrated that these patients may benefit from aggressive locoregional therapy and are potentially curable. There is currently a lack of randomized evidence to define the optimal management for node-positive patients. While a few trials have included node-positive patients, the majority of data are derived from large multi-institutional series or population-based series. This narrative review summarizes the current literature supporting curative-intent management strategies for patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic clinically node-positive prostate cancer (cN1M0), as well as patients found to have pathologic nodal disease at the time of surgery (pN1M0). Treatment of both scenarios requires multimodality considerations including surgery, radiation therapy (RT) and systemic therapy to minimize the risks of both locoregional and distant recurrence. Future considerations include developments in enhanced imaging and systemic therapy. Inclusion of node-positive patients on prospective, randomized trials such as NRG GU 008 is needed to enhance our understanding of optimal management strategies.

Ultra-central Thoracic Re-irradiation Using 10-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tumors: Preliminary Toxicity and Efficacy Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We report our clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors with ultra-central (UC) location treated with hypofractionated 10-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (hSBRT) in the context of thoracic re-irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted from 2009 to 2017 on 20 patients with recurrent NSCLC from previous thoracic radiation treatment who underwent hSBRT to 21 total UC located recurrent tumors. The planning target volumes (PTVs) that overlapped with previous treatment fields (within the 50% isodose line) were included in this analysis with endpoints of overall survival, tumor control, and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 17.8 months. The median total dose of hSBRT and total biologically effective dose (BED10) were 65 Gy and 107.25 Gy, respectively. The median time from previous treatment was 14.6 months. The 1-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 68%, 35%, and 83%, respectively. The median time to local progression was 13.3 months. The most common toxicity was grade 2 or above pneumonitis (35%). One patient, whose tumor was abutting the esophagus, experienced grade 3 esophagitis. Two (10%) patients died from "unlikely" treatment-related hemorrhage from local tumor progression at 10 and 24 months after hSBRT. Bronchoscopic evaluation of 1 patient suggested endobronchial tumor progression, and clear radiographic evidence of treated hilar tumor progression was documented in the second patient's case. CONCLUSION: Despite having a high-risk population with recurrent ultra-central NSCLC tumors in the setting of re-irradiation, our results demonstrate that ablative doses of hSBRT may serve as a feasible option for these challenging cases and concur with current reported literature.

Assessing the Financial Toxicity of Radiation Oncology Patients Using the Validated Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity as a Patient-Reported Outcome.

PURPOSE: The financial burden of cancer care may significantly affect patient quality of life and clinical outcomes. However, the financial effect of radiation therapy on patients remains difficult to characterize, in part owing to the lack of standardized methods to measure patient distress related to treatment costs. Here, we assessed financial burden in the radiation oncology population by applying the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), a patient-reported outcome measure, which has been validated in medical oncology patients.   METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients from a single academic radiation oncology clinic were recruited. Participants completed the 11-item COST-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy questionnaire, with total possible scores ranging from 0 to 44. Scores were collected along with data regarding patient demographics, insurance, diagnosis, and treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with higher financial burden as measured by COST. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients completed the COST questionnaire. Lower COST scores indicated higher financial toxicity. The population's mean COST score was 21.9 (95% confidence interval, 20.5-23.3). Fifteen percent of participants reported grade 2 to 3 COST toxicity, corresponding to a moderate or severe effect on quality of life. Use of concurrent or previous systemic therapy was significantly associated with lower COST scores on univariate analysis (P = .03), but not significant on multivariate analysis. A subset analysis of posttreatment follow-up patients identified rural residence and recent completion of radiation therapy as significant correlates of worse COST scores on univariate analysis, and rural residence remained independently associated on multivariate analysis (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS:  COST effectively identified a significant number of radiation oncology patients experiencing financial toxicity, indicating its prevalence in this population. A correlate of financial toxicity in this population is the use of systemic therapy. Of those who have completed radiation therapy, rural residence was independently associated with worse financial toxicity.

The Impact of Radiotherapy Facility Volume on the Survival and Guideline Concordance of Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Receiving Bladder-preservation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Higher facility surgical volume predicts for improved outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who undergo radical cystectomy. We investigated the association between facility radiotherapy (RT) case volume and overall survival (OS) for patients with MIBC who received bladder-preserving RT, and the relationship with adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for bladder preservation. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic MIBC from 2004 to 2015 and received RT at the reporting center. Facility case volume was defined as the total MIBC patients treated with RT during the period. Facilities were stratified into high-volume facility (HVF) or low-volume facility at the 80th percentile of RT case volume. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Rates of compliance with NCCN guidelines regarding the use of transurethral resection of the bladder tumor before RT, planned use of concurrent chemotherapy, and total RT dose were compared. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate predictors of OS. RESULTS: There were 7562 patients included. No differences in age, Charlson-Deyo score, T stage, or node-positive rates were observed between groups. HVFs exhibited greater compliance with NCCN guidelines for bladder preservation (P<0.0001). Treatment at an HVF was associated with the improved OS for all patients (P=0.001) and for the subset of patients receiving NCCN-recommended RT doses (P=0.0081). Volume was an independent predictor of OS (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at an HVF is associated with improved OS and greater guideline-concordant management among patients with MIBC.

Opportunities for use of radiation therapy in penile cancer based on patterns of care in the United States from 2007 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective modality for the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the penis. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends consideration of primary radiation for penile preservation, in surgically unresectable tumors, and as adjuvant therapy for positive margins, bulky groin nodes or pelvic nodes. We performed a population-based analysis to evaluate the usage of RT in penile cancer from 2007 to 2013. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to identify men diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis from 2007 to 2013. Patients were grouped as early stage (T1-T2N0), locally advanced (T3-T4N0), node-positive (T1xN1-3) and metastatic. We used linear regression model to test for factors associated with adjuvant radiation in node-positive patients. RESULTS: We identified 2200 men diagnosed with penile cancer between 2007 and 2013. Of these, 66.4% had early stage, 10.7% had locally advanced, 15.5% had node-positive, 3.2% had metastatic cancer. Among patient with early stage cancer, RT was used in 14 patients (1.0%) and postoperative radiation in an additional 45 patients (3.1%). Among 340 patients with node-positive cancer, 62.1% received surgery alone, 5.6% radiation alone, 21.8% surgery with adjuvant radiation, and 10.6% neither surgery nor radiation. Of patients who had surgery, 26.0% had adjuvant radiation. On univariate analysis, higher nodal stage (N2-3 versus N1) was associated with adjuvant radiation (p = 0.02), while there was a trend for higher T-stage (T3/T4 versus T1/T2) (p = 0.08) and history of prior malignancy (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, only higher nodal stage (N2-3 versus N1) was associated with use of adjuvant radiation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, p = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of patient who are eligible for primary or adjuvant RT in the United States receive this treatment. Further work should be done to assess barriers to use of radiation in patients with penile cancer.

MRI findings of absorbable hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer therapy: a pictorial review.

Prior studies have shown that dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer improves clinical outcomes. However, this is associated with increased rectal toxicity. Hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer therapy is an effective way of decreasing rectal toxicity in the late post-therapeutic stages. In some occasions, the gel spacer may not be placed symmetrically between the rectum and prostate. There are several forms of a malpositioned spacer, including lateral displacement, rectal wall infiltration, and prostate capsule infiltration. This manuscript is aimed at evaluating appropriately positioned and malpositioned gel spacers, primarily via magnetic resonance imaging. There are limited educational imaging guides that address what radiologists should evaluate on post-spacer placement imaging. This pictorial review will specifically evaluate post-injection pitfalls such as asymmetry, rectal wall infiltration, and subcapsular injection.