Biomechanical and biological factors of sexual dimorphism in anterior knee pain: Current concepts.

Female gender is one of the commonly mentioned risk factors for anterior knee pain (AKP), among a spectrum of other factors including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological elements contributing to its development. Despite the focus on individual risk factors, there's a notable gap in comprehending how gender influences and interacts with other risk factors. The objective of this review was to identify and emphasize the connections between these interactions, gender-related risk factors for AKP, and the potential mechanisms that explain their associations with other risk factors, aiming to aid in the creation of precise prevention and treatment approaches. Gender influences the majority of risk factors for AKP, including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological factors. Women have on average smaller patellae, higher patellofemoral cartilage stress and for AKP, disadvantageous trochlear morphology, ligament and muscle composition and unfavorable neuromuscular control pattern. In contrast, men show on average an increased ability to strengthen their hip external rotators, which are both protective against AKP. Particularly in kinetic and kinematic analysis, men have been shown to have a distinctly different risk factor profile than women. Sex hormones may also play a role in the risk of AKP, with estrogen potentially influencing ligamentous laxity, increasing midfoot loading and affecting neuromuscular control of the lower extremities and testosterone positively affecting muscle mass and strength. The higher incidence of AKP in women is likely due to a combination of slightly increased risk factors. Although all risk factors can be present in both men and women and the holistic evaluation of each individual's risk factor composition is imperative regardless of gender, knowing distinctive risk factors may help with focused evaluation, treatment and implementing preventive measures of AKP.

Editorial Commentary: Absent Extreme Bony Malalignment: Medial Patellofemoral Reconstruction Is a Sufficient Primary Surgery for Adolescents With Recurrent Patella Instability.

When planning an adolescent's primary surgery for recurrent patella instability, the surgeon must weigh the failure risk of performing medial patellofemoral reconstruction (MPFLR) versus the potential morbidity of adding a concomitant bony procedure, such as tibial tubercle osteotomy. In this age group, isolated MPFLR is an excellent operation with high clinical success, low failure rates, and favorable complication profile. Patients with high grade J-sign and severe trochlea dysplasia, apprehension into deep flexion, and extremes of bony malalignment, including elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, may benefit from "doing more" than MPFLR alone. Other factors to be considered include patella alta, generalized ligament laxity, femoral rotation, tibial torsion, and valgus malalignment. In challenging situations, such as syndromic patients (e.g., neuromuscular disorders), congenital (habitual) patella dislocation, fixed dislocations, and failed prior to MPFLR, a combined surgical approach is likely needed. Patients who require "unloading" for symptomatic chondrosis also benefit from combined bony and soft tissue surgery. However, for the majority of patients with recurrent instability and no prior surgery, an isolated soft tissue reconstruction is a rational, safe, efficient, and evidence-based selection.