Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 14(8): e27772, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36106236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The grading of the severity of head trauma plays a vital role in acute patient management and planning a case-appropriate follow-up protocol. Few studies have been published regarding the Rotterdam scoring. In this study, we have established a correlation between the Rotterdam scores, need for sequential CTs, and the cumulative radiation dose. This correlation has helped develop a preliminary protocol that can be followed for patients hence bringing about better planned and efficient patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  From August 2014 to December 2020, 88 cases of traumatic head injury on whom a minimum of one sequential CT was performed, with no surgical intervention, were included and studied. Sequential head CTs of each patient were evaluated by skilled radiologists with a minimum experience of five years, all of whom were blinded to the findings of the initial and previous head CT findings. The serial head CTs were evaluated for the Rotterdam CT score (RCTS).  Results: Among the patients with extradural hemorrhage (EDH), only 28.6% (8) progressed over successive CTs and 75.5% (34) of patients with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) showed significant progression over sequential CTs. Maximum number of serial CTs were obtained for cases presenting with a score of 3 (34 cases) with about three of them requiring up to a total of three CTs. However, no significant change in findings was noted on serial CTs. On the contrary, significant disease progression was noted in patients with baseline scores of 4 (76.9%) and 5 (100%), with statistical significance obtained on further analysis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We are of the opinion that there is no additional role of sequential CT for the cases with Rotterdam score of 1 or 2 in the initial CT unless there is clinical evidence of deterioration. Rotterdam score 3 needs sequential CT after 24 hours and Rotterdam scores 4 and 5 need sequential CT after 12 hours if surgical intervention is delayed. The Rotterdam score may help predict any further need for a second CT, hence decreasing the unwanted radiation exposure.

2.
Pol J Radiol ; 82: 240-243, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28533826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) evaluated in CT imaging as well as Rotterdam CT Score (RCTS) are proven independent predictors of outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). To date, no study has correlated ONSD on admission CT scan with RCTS. MATERIAL/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comprised of consecutive patients undergoing CT imaging for traumatic brain injury recruited between January and October 2015. Bilateral ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the eyeball in axial and sagittal planes and mean value was calculated. RCTS was assessed on the same CT images, bias was eliminated by blinding RCTS to ONSD measurement. RESULTS: 150 patients were included; mean age in the group was 42.94±16.7 years. ONSD in mild TBI, RCTS 2 and 3 were 3.3 mm (SD 0.39 mm) and 4.1 mm (0.047 mm), respectively. Mean ONSD in moderate and severe TBI (RCTS score 4 and above) was 4.83 mm and above, SD 0.4 mm. Mean ONSD correlated with occurrence of diffuse cerebral oedema, presence of subdural and extradural hematoma; however in isolation there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ONSD was observed in patients with moderate and severe TBI, correlating with admission RCTS of 4 and above. Subsequent increase in ONSD was also found with increase in RCTS. ONSD could serve as an initial triage tool in the emergency department as well as a method of determining the need for sequential CT in patients with mild TBI.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...