Drug-induced liver injury associated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) have been established in prospective clinical trials. Liver function test elevations were observed in a greater proportion of patients receiving ETI compared with placebo; however, the relatively small number of patients and short duration of study preclude detection of rare but clinically significant associations with drug-induced liver injury (DILI). To address this gap, we assessed the real-world risk of DILI associated with ETI through data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: Disproportionality analyses were conducted on FAERS data from the fourth quarter of 2019 through the third quarter of 2022. Comparative patient demographics, onset time and outcomes for ETI-DILI were also obtained. RESULTS: 452 reports of DILI associated with ETI were found, representing 2.1 % of all adverse event reports for ETI. All disproportionality measures were significant for ETI-DILI at p < 0.05; the reporting odds ratio (ROR) (2.82) was comparable to that of drugs classified by FDA as "Most-DILI concern". The most notable demographic finding was a male majority (5:4 male to female ratio) for ETI-DILI compared to a female majority (4:5 male to female ratio) for non ETI-DILI. Median ETI-DILI onset time was 50.5 days, and hospitalization was the second most common complication. CONCLUSION: Using FAERS data, ETI was found to be disproportionately associated with DILI. Future research is needed to investigate the hepatotoxic mechanisms and assess potential mitigation strategies for ETI-induced hepatotoxicity.

Unraveling the Enzyme-Substrate Properties for APOBEC3A-Mediated RNA Editing.

The APOBEC3 family of human cytidine deaminases is involved in various cellular processes, including the innate and acquired immune system, mostly through inducing C-to-U in single-stranded DNA and/or RNA mutations. Although recent studies have examined RNA editing by APOBEC3A (A3A), its intracellular target specificity are not fully characterized. To address this gap, we performed in-depth analysis of cellular RNA editing using our recently developed sensitive cell-based fluorescence assay. Our findings demonstrate that A3A and an A3A-loop1-containing APOBEC3B (A3B) chimera are capable of RNA editing. We observed that A3A prefers to edit specific RNA substrates which are not efficiently deaminated by other APOBEC members. The editing efficiency of A3A is influenced by the RNA sequence contexts and distinct stem-loop secondary structures. Based on the identified RNA specificity features, we predicted potential A3A-editing targets in the encoding region of cellular mRNAs and discovered novel RNA transcripts that are extensively edited by A3A. Furthermore, we found a trend of increased synonymous mutations at the sites for more efficient A3A-editing, indicating evolutionary adaptation to the higher editing rate by A3A. Our results shed light on the intracellular RNA editing properties of A3A and provide insights into new RNA targets and potential impact of A3A-mediated RNA editing.

Drug-drug interactions involving CFTR modulators: a review of the evidence and clinical implications.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by mucus accumulation impairing the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (ivacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and lumacaftor) significantly improve lung function and nutritional status; however, they are substrates, inhibitors, and/or inducers of certain CYP enzymes and transporters, raising the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) with common CF medications. AREAS COVERED: A literature search was conducted for DDIs involving CFTR modulators by reviewing new drug applications, drug package inserts, clinical studies, and validated databases of substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. Clinically, CYP3A inducers and inhibitors significantly decrease and increase systemic concentrations of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, respectively. Additionally, lumacaftor and ivacaftor alter concentrations of CYP3A and P-gp substrates. Potential DDIs without current clinical evidence include ivacaftor and elexacaftor's effect on CYP2C9 and OATP1B1/3 substrates, respectively, and OATP1B1/3 and P-gp inhibitors' effect on tezacaftor. A literature review was conducted using PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Dosing recommendations for CFTR modulators with DDIs are relatively comprehensive; however, recommendations on timing of dosing transition of CFTR modulators when CYP3A inhibitors are initiated or discontinued is incomplete. Certain drug interactions may be managed by choosing an alternative treatment to avoid/minimize DDIs. Next generation CFTR modulator therapies under development are expected to provide increased activity with reduced DDI risk.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Drug-Drug Interactions between Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor and Tacrolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment has potential benefits in lung transplant recipients, including improvements in extrapulmonary manifestations, such as gastrointestinal and sinus disease; however, ivacaftor is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and may, therefore, pose a risk for elevated systemic exposure to tacrolimus. The aim of this investigation is to determine the impact of ETI on tacrolimus exposure and devise an appropriate dosing regimen to manage the risk of this drug-drug interaction (DDI). The CYP3A-mediated DDI of ivacaftor-tacrolimus was evaluated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach, incorporating CYP3A4 inhibition parameters of ivacaftor and in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters of tacrolimus. To further support the findings in PBPK modeling, we present a case series of lung transplant patients who received both ETI and tacrolimus. We predicted a 2.36-fold increase in tacrolimus exposure when co-administered with ivacaftor, which would require a 50% dose reduction of tacrolimus upon initiation of ETI treatment to avoid the risk of elevated systemic exposure. Clinical cases (N = 13) indicate a median 32% (IQR: -14.30, 63.80) increase in the dose-normalized tacrolimus trough level (trough concentration/weight-normalized daily dose) after starting ETI. These results indicate that the concomitant administration of tacrolimus and ETI may lead to a clinically significant DDI, requiring the dose adjustment of tacrolimus.

Safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dose reduction: Mechanistic exploration through physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and a clinical case series.

INTRODUCTION: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment is associated with significant improvement in lung function in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF); however, some patients experience adverse effects (AEs) including hepatotoxicity. One potential strategy is dose reduction in ETI with the goal of maintaining therapeutic efficacy while resolving AEs. We report our experience of dose reduction in individuals who experienced AEs following ETI therapy. We provide mechanistic support for ETI dose reduction by exploring predicted lung exposures and underlying pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) relationships. METHOD: Adults prescribed ETI who underwent dose reduction due to the AEs were included in this case series, and their percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1 ) and self-reported respiratory symptoms were collected. The full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of ETI were developed incorporating physiological information and drug-dependent parameters. The models were validated against available pharmacokinetic and dose-response relationship data. The models were then used to predict lung concentrations of ETI at steady-state. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent dose reduction in ETI due to AEs. Clinical stability without significant changes in ppFEV1 after dose reduction was observed in all patients. Resolution or improvement of AEs occurred in 13 of the 15 cases. The model-predicted lung concentrations of reduced dose ETI exceeded the reported half maximal effective concentration (EC50 ) from measurement of in vitro chloride transport, providing a hypothesis as to why therapeutic efficacy was maintained. CONCLUSION: Albeit in a small number of patients, this study provides evidence that reduced ETI doses in pwCF who have experienced AEs may be effective. The PBPK models enable exploration of a mechanistic basis for this finding by simulating target tissue concentrations of ETI that can be compared with drug efficacy in vitro.

Programmable Tissue Folding Patterns in Structured Hydrogels.

Folding of mucosal tissues, such as the tissue within the epithelium of the upper respiratory airways, is critical for organ function. Studying the influence of folded tissue patterns on cellular function is challenging mainly due to the lack of suitable cell culture platforms that can recreate dynamic tissue folding in vitro. Here, a bilayer hydrogel folding system, composed of alginate/polyacrylamide double-network (DN) and hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels, to generate static folding patterns based on mechanical instabilities, is described. By encapsulating human fibroblasts into patterned HA hydrogels, human bronchial epithelial cells form a folded pseudostratified monolayer. Using magnetic microparticles, DN hydrogels reversibly fold into pre-defined patterns and enable programmable on-demand folding of cell-laden hydrogel systems upon applying a magnetic field. This hydrogel construction provides a dynamic culture system for mimicking tissue folding in vitro, which is extendable to other cell types and organ systems.

Futile trauma transfers: An infrequent but costly component of regionalized trauma care.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate interfacility transfers are a key component of highly functioning trauma systems but transfer of unsalvageable patients can overburden the resources of higher-level centers. We sought to identify the occurrence and associated reasons for futile transfers within our trauma system. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data from our system database, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify patients who underwent interfacility transfer to our American College of Surgeons level I center. Adult patients from June 2017 to June 2019 who died, had comfort measures implemented, were discharged, or went to hospice care within 48 hours of admission without significant operation, procedure, or radiologic intervention were examined. Futility was defined as resulting in death or hospice discharge within 48 hours of transfer without major operative, endoscopic, or radiologic intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1,241 patients transferred to our facility during the study period. Four hundred seven patients had a length of stay less than or equal to 48 hours. Eighteen (1.5%) met the criteria for futility. The most common reason for transfer in the futile population was traumatic brain injury (56%) and need for neurosurgical capabilities (62%). Futile patients had a median age and Injury Severity Score of 75 and 21. The main transportation method was ground 9 (50%) with 8 (44.4%) being transported by helicopter and 1 (5.6%) being transported by both. Combining transport costs with hospital charges, each futile transfer was estimated to cost US $56,396 (interquartile range, 41,889-106,393) with a total cost exceeding US $1.7 million. With an estimated 33,000 interfacility transfers annually for trauma in the United States, the cost of futile transfers to the American trauma system would exceed 27 million dollars each year. CONCLUSION: Futile transfers represent a small but costly portion transfer volume. Identification of patients whose conditions preclude the benefit of transfer due to futility and development of appropriate support for referral will significantly improve appropriate allocation of health care resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic; Care management, level IV.

Public Regulatory Databases as a Source of Insight for Neuromodulation Devices Stimulation Parameters.

OBJECTIVE: The Shannon model is often used to define an expected boundary between non-damaging and damaging modes of electrical neurostimulation. Numerous preclinical studies have been performed by manufacturers of neuromodulation devices using different animal models and a broad range of stimulation parameters while developing devices for clinical use. These studies are mostly absent from peer-reviewed literature, which may lead to this information being overlooked by the scientific community. We aimed to locate summaries of these studies accessible via public regulatory databases and to add them to a body of knowledge available to a broad scientific community. METHODS: We employed web search terms describing device type, intended use, neural target, therapeutic application, company name, and submission number to identify summaries for premarket approval (PMA) devices and 510(k) devices. We filtered these records to a subset of entries that have sufficient technical information relevant to safety of neurostimulation. RESULTS: We identified 13 product codes for 8 types of neuromodulation devices. These led us to devices that have 22 PMAs and 154 510(k)s and six transcripts of public panel meetings. We found one PMA for a brain, peripheral nerve, and spinal cord stimulator and five 510(k) spinal cord stimulators with enough information to plot in Shannon coordinates of charge and charge density per phase. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of relevant entries from public regulatory databases reveals use of pig, sheep, monkey, dog, and goat animal models with deep brain, peripheral nerve, muscle and spinal cord electrode placement with a variety of stimulation durations (hours to years); frequencies (10-10,000 Hz) and magnitudes (Shannon k from below zero to 4.47). Data from located entries indicate that a feline cortical model that employs acute stimulation might have limitations for assessing tissue damage in diverse anatomical locations, particularly for peripheral nerve and spinal cord simulation.