Clinical effectiveness of four neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir) for children with influenza A and B in the 2014-2015 to 2016-2017 influenza seasons in Japan.

The clinical effectiveness of four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) (oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir) for children aged 0 months to 18 years with influenza A and B were investigated in the 2014-2015 to 2016-2017 influenza seasons in Japan. A total of 1207 patients (747 with influenza A and 460 with influenza B) were enrolled. The Cox proportional-hazards model using all of the patients showed that the duration of fever after administration of the first dose of the NAI was shorter in older patients (hazard ratio = 1.06 per 1 year of age, p < 0.001) and that the duration of fever after administration of the first dose of the NAI was shorter in patients with influenza A infection than in patients with influenza B infection (hazard ratio = 2.21, p < 0.001). A logistic regression model showed that the number of biphasic fever episodes was 2.99-times greater for influenza B-infected patients than for influenza A-infected patients (p < 0.001). The number of biphasic fever episodes in influenza A- or B-infected patients aged 0-4 years was 2.89-times greater than that in patients aged 10-18 years (p = 0.010), and the number of episodes in influenza A- or B-infected patients aged 5-9 years was 2.13-times greater than that in patients aged 10-18 years (p = 0.012).

Therapeutic efficacy of azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin against macrolide-resistant and macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify therapeutic effects of azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin against macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) pneumonia and against macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MSMP) pneumonia in pediatric patients. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter observational study was conducted from July 2013 to August 2015. The therapeutic effects of azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin were evaluated in 59 patients with pneumonia caused by MRMP and in 50 patients with pneumonia caused by MSMP. In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were also measured. RESULTS: Mean durations of fever following commencement of treatment in patients infected with MRMP and MSMP were 5.2 and 1.9 days, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). Among patients infected with MRMP, mean durations of fever were 4.6, 5.5, 1.0 and 7.5 days for patients treated with azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). Among patients infected with MSMP, mean durations of fever were 2.5, 1.7, 0.9 and 4.3 days for patients treated with azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.0162). The MIC90s of azithromycin and clarithromycin among the 27 isolates of MRMP were 64 and 256 µg/ml, respectively, and those among the 23 isolates of MSMP were <0.000125 and 0.001 µg/ml, respectively. The MIC90s of minocycline and tosufloxacin among the 27 isolates of MRMP were 1.0 and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively, and those among the 23 isolates of MSMP were 1.0 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both minocycline and tosufloxacin showed good in vitro activities against MRMP. Minocycline, but not tosufloxacin, shortened the duration of fever in pediatric patients infected with MRMP compared to the duration of fever in patients treated with macrolides.

Comparative Study of 5-Day and 10-Day Cefditoren Pivoxil Treatments for Recurrent Group A beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus pharyngitis in Children.

Efficacy of short-course therapy with cephalosporins for treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis is still controversial. Subjects were 226 children with a history of at least one episode of GABHS pharyngitis. Recurrence within the follow-up period (3 weeks after initiation of therapy) occurred in 7 of the 77 children in the 5-day treatment group and in 1 of the 149 children in the 10-day treatment group; the incidence of recurrence being significantly higher in the 5-day treatment group. Bacteriologic treatment failure (GABHS isolation without overt pharyngitis) at follow-up culture was observed in 7 of the 77 children in the 5-day treatment group and 17 of the 149 children in the 10-day treatment group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. A 5-day course of oral cephalosporins is not always recommended for treatment of GABHS pharyngitis in children who have repeated episodes of pharyngitis.

Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for intrafamilial transmission of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

BACKGROUND: The role of chemoprophylaxis for household contacts of patients with acute streptococcal disease is uncertain. METHODS: The subjects were 1440 sibling contacts of 1181 index patients with group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. Instances of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis in sibling contacts who received chemoprophylaxis and in a control group without prophylaxis were compared. RESULTS: Of the 948 siblings in the prophylaxis group, 507 were treated with cephalosporins and 441 were treated with penicillins for 3 to 5 days. Subsequent GABHS pharyngitis occurred within 30 days in 28 (3.0%) of the 948 siblings in the prophylaxis group and in 26 (5.3%) of the 492 siblings in the control group. Among siblings in the prophylaxis group, subsequent GABHS pharyngitis occurred in 9 (1.8%) of the 507 siblings in the cephalosporin prophylaxis group and in 19 (4.3%) of the 441 siblings in the penicillin prophylaxis group. When these data were each compared with that in the control group (5.3%), a significant statistical difference was seen in the cephalosporin prophylaxis group (P = 0.003) but not in the penicillin prophylaxis group (P = 0.542). Only 5-day cephalosporin prophylaxis showed significant reduction in the rate of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis compared with that in the control group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the low incidence of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis in the nonprophylaxis group, the usual self-limited nature of GABHS pharyngitis, the cost of prophylaxis and the risk for selecting resistant flora, routine chemoprophylaxis against GABHS pharyngitis for sibling contacts is not recommended.