The Rise and Fall of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Throughout the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Database Study. OBJECTIVE: Investigate utilization of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2) between 2004 and 2014. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The utilization, particularly off-label utilization, of BMP-2 has been controversial and debated in the literature. Given the concerns regarding cancer and potential complications, the risk benefit profile of BMP must be weighed with each surgical case. The debate regarding the costs and potential side effects of BMP-2 compared with autologous iliac crest bone harvest has continued. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for the use of BMP-2 (ICD-9-CM 84.52) between 2004 and 2014 across 44 states. The NIS database represents a 20% sample of discharges, weighted to provide national estimates. BMP-2 utilization rates in spine surgery fusion procedures were calculated as a fraction of the total number of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusion surgeries performed each year. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2014, BMP-2 was utilized in 927,275 spinal fusion surgeries. In 2004, BMP-2 was utilized in 28.3% of all cases (N=48,613). The relative use of BMP-2 in spine fusion surgeries peaked in 2008 at 47.0% (N=112,180). Since then, it has continued to steadily decline with an endpoint of 23.6% of cases in 2014 (N=60,863). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the United States, the utilization of BMP-2 in thoracolumbar fusion surgeries increased from 28.3% to 47.0% between 2004 and 2008. However, from 2008 to 2014, the utilization of BMP-2 in thoracolumbar spine fusion surgeries decreased significantly from 47.0% to 23.4%. While this study provides information on the utilization of BMP-2 for the entire United States over an 11-year period, further research is needed to the determine the factors affecting these trends.

Pelvic parameters directly influence ideal S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of the S2 Alar-Iliac (S2AI) screw provides an optimal method of spinopelvic fixation. The free-hand placement of these screws obviates the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy and relies heavily on sacropelvic anatomy; variations of this anatomy could alter the ideal screw trajectory. The S2AI corridor is near several neurovascular structures, thus an accurate trajectory is critical. The reported angles of trajectory vary within the literature and a paucity of data exists on how patient morphometry influences ideal screw trajectory. We sought to examine the relationship between ideal screw trajectory and pelvic parameters. METHODS: The records of 99 consecutive patients with degenerative thoracolumbar pathology were reviewed and pelvic parameters including sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence were measured with preoperative standing radiographs. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstructions, an ideal S2AI trajectory was defined and anteroposterior (horizontal) and cephalocaudal (sagittal) angles were recorded. RESULTS: Pelvic tilt was found to have a moderate inverse correlation with cephalocaudal screw trajectory (r=-0.467, p-value=0.006). Pelvic incidence and sacral slope had weaker correlations with cephalocaudal screw angle. In subgroup analysis, patients with high pelvic tilt (>20°) had a significantly lower cephalocaudal screw trajectory (24.9 ± 3.7° versus 29.8 ± 2.8°, p-value=<0.001) compared to those with a normal pelvic tilt (≤20°). CONCLUSIONS: This study found an inverse relationship between pelvic tilt and cephalocaudal S2AI screw trajectory. Therefore, the sagittal angle of insertion becomes increasingly more perpendicular to the floor (less caudally orientated) as pelvic tilt increases in reference to a patient positioned prone on an operating table parallel to the floor. This may bolster safety and efficacy when utilizing the free-hand technique for placement of the S2AI screw as it allows the surgeon to plan a more ideal trajectory by accounting for pelvic parameters.

Job Selection After Orthopedic Surgery Training: Why Are Our Trainees Failing to Select the Right Job?

A survey was administered to a random sampling of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) members to determine the rate at which recently trained orthopedic surgeons switch their first job and to identify factors affecting the job selection process. There were 351 (21%) respondents. Respondents considered practice location (41%), practice type (28%), and family proximity (23%) as most important while research opportunity (54%) and signing bonus (33%) were considered least important in their first job. Half of the respondents (51%) left their first job before the completion of their fifth year; most left for financial reasons (34%) or because the practice was not as advertised (31%). Many (53%) stated they had minimal training in selecting their first job and most (88%) felt inadequately prepared for the business side of orthopedics. Further studies are needed to evaluate the high rate of initial post-training job attrition to decrease the personal and societal costs of this phenomenon.

Utilization and Economic Impact of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the economic and age data concerning primary and revision posterolateral fusion (PLF) and posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for patients who underwent primary or revision PLF and PLIF/TLIF between 2011 and 2014. Age and economic data included number of procedures, costs, and revision burden. The National Inpatient Sample database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2014, the annual number of PLF and PLIF/TLIF procedures decreased 18% and increased 23%, respectively, in the Unites States. During the same period, the number of revision PLF decreased 19%, while revision PLIF/TLIF remained relatively unchanged. The average cost of PLF was lower than the average cost of PLIF/TLIF. The aggregate national cost for PLF was more than $3 billion, while PLIF/TLIF totaled less than $2 billion. Revision burden (ratio of revision surgeries to the sum of both revision and primary surgeries) remained constant at 8.0% for PLF while it declined from 3.2% to 2.9% for PLIF/TLIF. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a steady increase in PLIF/TLIF, while PLF alone decreased. The increasing number of PLIF/TLIF procedures may account for the apparent decline of PLF procedures. There was a higher average cost for PLIF/TLIF as compared with PLF. Revision burden remained unchanged for PLF but declined for PLIF/TLIF, implying a decreased need for revision procedures following the initial PLIF/TLIF surgery.

Instrumentation complication rates following spine surgery: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality database.

BACKGROUND: Objective of this study is to evaluate demographics, risk factors, and incidence of instrumentation related complications (IRC) in spinal surgeries from 2009-2012. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality (M&M) database has tremendous value in orthopaedic surgery. SRS gathers surgeon-reported complications, including instrumentation failure, visual complications, neurological deficits, infections, and death. Limited literature exists on the incidence of perioperative instrumentation complications in deformity surgery. We utilized the SRS database to evaluate demographics, risk factors, and incidence of IRC in spinal surgeries from 2009-2012. METHODS: The SRS M&M database was queried for IRC in patients undergoing surgery for scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, and kyphosis from 2009-2012. Demographics, comorbidities, diagnoses, curve magnitude, and intraoperative characteristics were analyzed. Intraoperative characteristics included surgical approach, performance of fusion or osteotomy, operative times, blood loss, instrumentation used, and documented instrumentation complication. RESULTS: A total of 167,972 patients were identified, including 311 IRC. The overall IRC rate was 0.19% (18.5 per 10,000 patients), which decreased significantly from 2009-2012 (0.37% vs. 0.19%, P<0.001). The mean age of patients with IRC was 38.5±25.5 years. Most common comorbidities included hypertension (23.5%), pulmonary disease (13.5%), diabetes (10.6%), smoking (8.7%), and vascular disease (7.1%). IRC occurred in 206 (66.2%) patients with scoliosis, 58 (18.6%) with spondylolisthesis, and 45 (14.5%) with kyphosis. Compared to patients with spondylolisthesis, patients with kyphosis (0.27% vs. 0.11%, P<0.001) and scoliosis (0.21% vs. 0.11%, P<0.001), experienced significantly more IRC. IRC included implant failure (23.3%), migration (28.3%), and malpositioned implants (48.6%). New perioperative neurologic deficits were reported in 146 (46.9%) patients, and 84 (27%) of these implants were removed. CONCLUSIONS: IRC occur in approximately 18.5 per 10,000 deformity patients, with a rate significantly higher in patients with kyphosis. The potentially avoidable occurrence of implant malpositioning represents nearly 50% of these complications. Closer attention to posterior bony anatomy, improved intraoperative imaging with utilization of navigation or robotic guidance may decrease these complications.

Defining the Critical Elements of the Most Common Arthroscopic Procedures: A Consensus of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeons.

Objective To define the critical elements of common procedures in arthroscopic surgery. Methods A survey was administered to surgeons associated with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) to determine the critical elements for four common arthroscopic procedures: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, knee arthroscopy with meniscal debridement or repair, rotator cuff repair (RCR), and capsulorrhaphy for anterior glenohumeral instability (Bankart repair). Respondents were asked which steps necessitated their direct supervision. The level of experience and practice demographics were also recorded. Results For all applicable procedures, patient positioning and closure were not considered critical steps. Establishing arthroscopic portals was critical for all procedures, except knee arthroscopy. Diagnostic arthroscopy was only critical in ACL reconstruction. Private practice surgeons considered every step of these common procedures to be critical elements. Less experienced surgeons were more likely to regard certain aspects of a procedure critical. Surgeons with >15 years of experience considered diagnostic arthroscopy critical to all procedures, whereas those with <15 years of experience did not. Unlike surgeons with a resident as first assist, surgeons with a physician assistant (PA) or nurse practitioner (NP) found every step of each procedure to be critical except closure and positioning. Conclusion Across all procedures, only patient positioning and closure were consistently regarded as non-critical elements. There were significant differences in responses according to experience and practice setting. Future research is necessary to determine the implications of these findings and guide the definition of the "critical portions" of surgery.

Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no current consensus on subscapularis mobilization during total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective, randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and radiographic outcomes of the more traditional subscapularis tenotomy (ST) versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). METHODS: This study enrolled 60 shoulders in 59 patients with primary osteoarthritis. Thirty shoulders were preoperatively randomized to each group. Preoperative and 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative data were collected. Ultrasound was performed at 3 months to evaluate subscapularis healing in tenotomy subjects, whereas radiographs were used to evaluate osteotomy healing. Intraoperative data included operative time, tenotomy or osteotomy repair time, and osteotomy thickness. RESULTS: No significant differences in range of motion or clinical outcomes occurred at baseline or 1 year postoperatively between the 2 groups. The mean total case duration for ST was significantly less than that for LTO (129.3 minutes vs 152.7 minutes), along with a significantly shorter subscapularis repair time for ST (34.3 minutes vs 39.3 minutes, P = .024). At final follow-up, 27 of 29 LTO shoulders (93.1%) showed bone-to-bone healing on radiographs, whereas 26 of 30 ST shoulders (86.7%) had no full-thickness tear of the subscapularis on ultrasound at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques produced successful objective and subjective clinical outcomes. LTO heals more reliably than ST. Mean total case and subscapularis repair times were significantly greater for LTO than for ST.

Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement in midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) with intraoperative cone beam navigation.

BACKGROUND: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws have been recently described as a method of lumbosacral fixation. These screws are typically inserted under fluoroscopic guidance with a medial-to-lateral trajectory in the axial plane and a caudal-to-cephalad trajectory in the sagittal plane. In an effort to reduce surgeon radiation exposure and improve accuracy, CBT screws may be inserted under navigation with intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CT). However, the accuracy of CBT screw placement under intraoperative navigation has yet to be assessed in the literature. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of CBT screw placement using intraoperative cone beam CT navigation. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent CBT fixation with 618 screws under intraoperative navigation were analyzed from May 2016 through May 2018. Screws were placed by one of three senior spine surgeons using the Medtronic O-Arm Stealth Navigation. Screw position and accuracy were assessed on intraoperative and postoperative CT scans using 2D and 3D reconstructions with VitreaCore software. RESULTS: The majority of surgeries were primary cases (73.1%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 61.5±10.0 years and the majority of patients were female (61.2%). Most patients underwent surgery for a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (47.8%) followed by mechanical collapse with foraminal stenosis (22.4%). Ten violations of the vertebral cortex were noted with an average breach distance of 1.0±0.7 mm. Three breaches were lateral (0.5%) and seven were medial (1.1%). The overall navigated screw accuracy rate was 98.3%. The accuracy to within 1 mm of error was 99.2%. There were no intra-operative neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications related to the placement of the CBT screws. CONCLUSIONS: CBT screw fixation under an intraoperative cone beam CT navigated insertion technique is safe and reliable. Despite five breaches greater than 1mm, there were no complications related to the placement of the CBT screws in this series.

Optimal Management of Tethered Surgical Drains: A Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Tethered drains are a complication of drain usage and may result in unintentional retained broken drains, as well as anxiety and uncertainty for the surgeon and the patient. To date, no study has examined the optimal approach for management and removal of tethered drains. METHODS: The study design sought to identify suture size, mechanism of drain fixation (through versus around), points of constriction (one versus multiple) and the efficacy of weighted traction as potential sources of tethered drains by means of four study arms. (1) Arm one compared drains sutured through the tubing versus a tight closure of the surrounding fascia, which were then subjected to weighted suspension. (2) Arm two compared drains sutured into the fascia using eight each of 4-0, 2-0 and 0 vicryl and then subject to manual traction. (3) Arm three compared drains sutured to the fascia through the tubing versus local tissue incarceration followed by manual traction. (4) Lastly, group four examined drains tethered at two distinct points after which they were subject to manual traction. RESULTS: Our results showed a 25% drain retention rate when manual traction was applied to 0 vicryl and 2-0 vicryl suture. In contrast, there were no instances of drain retention when suture was closed with 4-0 vicryl. When evaluating for multiple points of fixation, drains tethered in two locations were retained in 87.5% of trials versus drains with a single tether point (25%) representing a statistical significance (P = 0.041). There was no difference in rates of drain retention when pierced through the tubing versus incarcerated in local fascia. Only one of the 16 drains was successfully removed by weighted suspension (8.3%). Attempts at manual traction following weighted suspension resulted in a 50% drain retention rate which was higher than the rates of immediate manual traction (18.8%). CONCLUSION: Our results found that manual traction is a reasonable first line approach to address drains tethered by all methods and suture sizes. The use of weighted traction for the management of tethered drains is less effective than manual traction and may result in more retained drain fragments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Dynamic changes in the reflex exam of patients with sub-axial cervical stenosis.

Though dynamic changes in the physical exam of patients being evaluated for cervical spine pathology have been reported, there is limited information on the prevalence and clinical features associated with reflex changes in a population undergoing surgical evaluation for cervical spine pathology. Fifty-one patients with at least grade 1 cervical stenosis on MRI underwent initial surgical evaluation for cervical spine pathology. All patients received complete neurologic examinations including dynamic reflex testing in three positions (neck neutral, extended, and flexed) by 2 spine surgeons. The average age was 58.7 years (range, 34-80), with 28 (55%) patients being male. Stenosis at the symptomatic levels was grade 1 in 18 patients (35%), grade 2 in 11 (21%), and grade 3 in 22 (43%). Twenty-one patients (41%) had a dynamic change in reflex exam. The most common change in reflex exam was seen in the Hoffman's reflex with 14 patients (28%). Patients with grade 3 stenosis were more likely to have a static Hoffman's reflex (64%) compared with grade 1 (17%) and grade 2 (18%) (p < 0.05). Patients with grade 3 stenosis had a higher rate of either a static or dynamic Hoffman's reflex (82%) compared with grade 1 (44%) (p < 0.05), but there was no difference between grade 3 and grade 2 (64%) (Table 2). Dynamic changes in reflex exam are commonly seen in patients being evaluated for symptomatic cervical stenosis. The routine neurologic exam can be supplemented with dynamic reflex testing, especially in cases where clinical history or imaging is concerning for cervical myelopathy.

Evaluation of a more ventral starting point for thoracic pedicle screws: higher maximal insertional arc and more medial and safer screw angulation.

OBJECTIVETo demonstrate that a more ventral starting point for thoracic pedicle screw insertion, produced by aggressively removing the dorsal transverse process bone down to the superior articular facet (SAF), results in a larger margin for error and more medial screw angulation compared to the traditional dorsal starting point (DSP). The margin for error will be quantified by the maximal insertional arc (MIA).METHODSThe study population included 10 consecutive operative patients with adult idiopathic scoliosis who underwent primary surgery. All measurements were performed using 3D visualization software by an attending spine surgeon. The screw starting points were 2 mm lateral to the midline of the SAF in the mediolateral direction and in the center of the pedicle in the cephalocaudal direction. The DSP was on the dorsal cortex. The ventral starting point (VSP) was at the depth of the SAF. Measurements included distance to the pedicle isthmus, MIA, and screw trajectories.RESULTSTen patients and 110 vertebral levels (T1-11) were measured. The patients' average age was 41.4 years (range 18-64 years). The pedicle isthmus was largest at T1 (4.04 ± 1.09 mm), and smallest at T5 (1.05 ± 0.93 mm). The distance to the pedicle isthmus was 7.47 mm for the VSP and 11.92 mm for the DSP (p < 0.001). The MIA was 15.3° for the VSP and 10.1° for the DSP (p < 0.001). Screw angulation was 21.7° for the VSP and 16.8° for the DSP (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSA more ventral starting point for thoracic pedicle screws results in increased MIA and more medial screw angulation. The increased MIA represents an increased tolerance for error that should improve the safety of pedicle screw placement. More medial screw angulation allows improved triangulation of pedicle screws.

Robotic versus freehand S2 alar iliac fixation: in-depth technical considerations.

Achieving fixation and fusion across the lumbosacral junction has been a challenge for spinal deformity surgeons ever since the development of instrumentation. The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) trajectory has been introduced as a method of pelvic fixation to decrease strain on S1 screws. The S2AI screws differ in several ways from traditional iliac screws. The trajectory of these screws helps avoid the use of offset connectors due to the screws alignment with the proximal pedicle screw instrumentation. Current literature shows that S2AI screws are effective with low complication rates, but the path of these screws is intimately associated with major neural and vascular structures. Use of robotic guidance to obtain the correct trajectory has been shown to be both safe and effective in obtaining proper trajectory of S2AI screws with over 95% accuracy. Herein, we report on the technical considerations and radiographic outcomes surrounding robotic and freehand insertion of S2AI screws.

Postoperative Surgical Site Infection After Spine Surgery: An Update From the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity and Mortality Database.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity & Mortality (M&M) database to assess the incidence and characteristics related to postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal deformity surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Infections involving spinal instrumentation are associated with greater rates of disability. Rates of postoperative SSI after spinal deformity surgery range from 1.9% to 4.4%. Postoperative SSI rates of 4.2% for adult kyphosis, 2.1% for adult spondylolisthesis, and 3.7% for adult scoliosis have been reported. METHODS: The SRS M&M database was evaluated to define patient demographics, perioperative factors, and infection characteristics of spinal deformity patients with postoperative spine infections after deformity surgery in 2012. RESULTS: Of the 47,755 procedures reported to the SRS in 2012, there were 578 (1.2%) diagnosed SSIs. Infection rates for patients with kyphosis were significantly higher compared with patients with scoliosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%, p < .0001) or spondylolisthesis (2.4% vs. 1.1%, p < .0001). Spinal fusions were performed in 86.3% of patients, 75.1% of which were performed posteriorly. Osteotomies were performed in 30.1% of patients. Deep infections below the fascia accounted for 68.0% of infections. Methicillin-sensitive (41.9%) and methicillin-resistant (17.0%) Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly isolated pathogens, whereas gram-negative bacteria accounted for 25.4% of cases. Long-term antibiotic suppression was required in 18.9% of patients, and overall complications from antibiotics occurred in 4.5% of patients. Operative treatment was required in 81.8% of SSI cases. CONCLUSION: SSIs occur in 1.2% of spine deformity patients, with a rate significantly higher in patients with kyphosis. Approximately 25% of these infections are secondary to gram-negative species. Antibiotic complications occur in 4.5% of patients being treated for SSI. Despite advancements in surgical technique and infection prophylaxis, postoperative SSI remains one of the most common complications in spinal deformity surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring throughout the United States over a recent decade: an analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: To identify temporal changes to the demographics and utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) throughout the United States (U.S.). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for IONM of central and peripheral nervous electrical activity (ICD-9-CM 00.94) between 2008 and 2014. The NIS database represents a 20% sample of discharges from U.S. Hospitals, weighted to provide national estimates. Demographic and economic data were obtained which included the annual number of surgeries, age, sex, insurance type, location, and frequency of routine discharge. RESULTS: The estimated use of IONM of central and peripheral nervous electrical activity increased 296%, from 31,762 cases in 2008 to 125,835 cases in 2014. Based on payer type, privately insured patients (45.0%), rather than Medicare (36.8%) or Medicaid patients (9.2%), were more likely to undergo IONM during spinal procedures. When stratifying by median income for patient zip code, there was a substantial difference in the rates of IONM between low (19.9%) and high-income groups (78.1%). IONM was significantly more likely to be utilized at urban teaching hospitals (72.9%) rather than nonteaching hospitals (25.0%) or rural centers (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, there has been a massive increase of 296% in utilization of IONM during spine surgery. This is likely due to its proven benefit in reducing neurologic morbidity in spinal deformity surgery, while introducing minimal additional risk. While IONM may improve patient care, it is still rather isolated to teaching hospitals and patients from higher income zip codes.

Permanent implantation of antibiotic cement over exposed instrumentation eradicates deep spinal infection.

In this case series, we describe an infection treatment protocol involving permanent implantation of antibiotic cement that is effective in eradicating deep infection. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a devastating complication of spine surgery. Unlike the gold-standard two-stage revision in North American hip and knee arthroplasty, there exists no standardized, accepted protocol for the management of deep SSI with instrumentation. Because removal of hardware in an unstable, instrumented spine can result in serious neurologic sequelae, retention of instrumentation with elimination of bacterial colonization on implants is the goal. Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, institutional medical records were queried to identify all posterior spinal procedures performed by the senior surgeon from 2008 through 2014. Thirty-four patients were identified as having an implant-associated SSI. Exclusion criteria included: (I) superficial SSI, and (II) those with less than 36 months of follow-up. The study population consisted of ten patients with deep implant-associated SSI who underwent our novel protocol of operative debridement and permanent coating of exposed implants with high-dose antibiotic cement. Postoperative infection presented after an average of 41.4±57.5 days (range, 6.0-207.0 days) from the index procedure. The mean follow-up was 64.4±18.1 months (range, 44.0-98.0 months). At final follow-up, none of the ten patients (0%) in our series had evidence of continued deep infection and none required removal of hardware. Ten of the ten patients (100%) were able to clear infection with a single stage debridement and coating with antibiotic cement. Only 1 of the 10 patients (10%) developed a pseudarthrosis. In conclusion, permanent implantation of antibiotic cement over exposed instrumentation is effective in preserving spinal instrumentation during infection eradication, preventing infection recurrence, and minimizing operative debridements.

Utilization of Interspinous Devices Throughout the United States Over a Recent Decade: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVES: Analysis of economic and demographic data concerning interspinous device (ID) placement throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for patients who underwent insertion of an interspinous process spinal stabilization device (ICD-9-CM 84.80) between 2008 and 2014 across 44 states. Demographic and economic data were obtained which included the annual number of surgeries, age, sex, insurance type, location, and frequency of routine discharge. The NIS database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals, which is weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: There was a 73% decrease in ID implanted from 2008 to 2014. The mean cost associated with insertion of the device increased 28% from $13 653 in 2008 to $17 515 in 2014. The mean length of stay (LOS) increased from 1.8 to 2.4 days. Patients aged 45 to 64 years increased from 14.1% to 34.3% while patients aged 65 to 84 years decreased from 74.4% to 60.6%. By region, 34% of ID placement occurred in the South followed by 19.7% that occured in the Northeast. When stratifying by median income for patient zip code, the procedure was performed more in cities designated as higher rather than lower income areas (74.2% and 19.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the United States, there was a progressive decline in the insertion of interspinous spacers by 73% over the study period. The total costs for the procedure increased by 28% while the aggregate national charges decreased by 55.6% between 2008 and 2014.

The posterior superior iliac spine and sacral laminar slope: key anatomical landmarks for freehand S2-alar-iliac screw placement.

OBJECTIVE: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw is an increasingly popular method for spinopelvic fixation. The technique of freehand S2AI screw placement has been recently described. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate, through a CT imaging study of patients with spinal deformity, that screw trajectories based on the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and sacral laminar slope result in reliable freehand S2AI trajectories that traverse safely above the sciatic notch. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 years) who underwent primary spinal deformity surgery were included in the study. Simulated S2AI screw trajectories were analyzed with 3D visualization software. The cephalocaudal coordinate for the starting point was 15 mm cephalad to the PSIS. The mediolateral coordinate for the starting point was in line with the lateral border of the dorsal foramina. The cephalocaudal screw trajectory was perpendicular to the sacral laminar slope. Screw trajectories, lengths, and distance above the sciatic notch were measured. RESULTS: The mean sagittal screw angle (cephalocaudal angulation) was 44.0° ± 8.4° and the mean transverse angle (mediolateral angulation) was 37.3° ± 4.3°. The mean starting point was 5.9 ± 5.8 mm distal to the caudal border of the S1 foramen. The mean screw length was 99.9 ± 18.6 mm. Screw trajectories were on average 8.5 ± 4.3 mm above the sciatic notch. A total of 97 of 100 screws were placed above the sciatic notch. In patients with transitional lumbosacral anatomy, the starting point on the lumbarized/sacralized side was 3.4 mm higher than on the contralateral unaffected side. CONCLUSIONS: The PSIS and sacral laminar slope are two important anatomical landmarks for freehand S2AI screw placement.

Sacropelvic Fixation: When, Why, How?

The indications for sacropelvic fixation continue to evolve with emerging instrumentation technologies and advancing techniques. Common indications include long construct fusions, high-grade spondylolisthesis, sacral fractures, sacral tumors, and global sagittal and/or coronal imbalance among others. The authors' preferred technique is through use of a freehand S2-alar-iliac screw placement.

Complications following single-level interbody fusion procedures: an ACS-NSQIP study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the ability of various lumbar interbody fusion techniques to realign global and regional balance and their effect on patient outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study to compare thirty-day postoperative outcomes between anterior and posterior interbody fusion techniques within a large national database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database included 2,372 (29.9%) single-level anterior/direct lateral interbody fusions (ALIF/DLIF) and 5,563 (70.1%) single-level posterior/transforaminal lateral interbody fusions (PLIF/TLIF) between 2013 and 2014. Emergent cases, fracture cases, and preoperative compromised wounds were not analyzed. Primary thirty-day outcomes included mortality, return to operating room, readmission, length of stay, and other major complications. Minor outcomes included urinary tract infection, superficial incisional site infection, and perioperative blood transfusion within 72 hours. RESULTS: ALIF/DLIF was performed more for degenerative lumbar disc disease (31.0% vs. 13.9%, P<0.001), whereas PLIF/TLIF was utilized more for spondylolisthesis (19.1% vs. 24.4%, P<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher with ALIF/DLIF (0.3% vs. 0.1%, P=0.021) in the univariate analysis and persisted in the multivariate analysis (OR =12.8; 95% CI, 1.37-119.6; P=0.025). Significantly more PLIF/TLIF patients required blood transfusions within 72 hours of surgery (9.6% vs. 7.6%, P=0.005). This difference did not persist in the multivariate analysis after controlling for covariates. Elevated ASA physical status classification, age >60, prior bleeding disorder, and preoperative anemia were significantly associated with blood transfusion requirement. More deep venous thrombosis occurred (DVT) with ALIF/DLIF compared to PLIF/TLIF (1.0% vs. 0.6%, P=0.025), which persisted in the multivariate analysis (OR =2.03; 95% CI, 1.13-3.65; P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous techniques can be utilized in the treatment approach to various lumbar pathologies, anterior approaches have an increased risk of developing a perioperative DVT and early mortality. Transfusion risk is more strongly associated with elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, increased age, preoperative anemia, and patients with bleeding disorders.

National Trends for Primary and Revision Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Throughout the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVES: Analysis of economic and demographic data concerning lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent primary or revision LDA between 2005 and 2013. Demographic and economic data included total surgeries, costs, length of stay, and frequency of routine discharge. The National Inpatient Sample database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: Primary LDA decreased 86% from 3059 to 420 from 2005 to 2013. The mean total cost of LDA increased 33% from $17 747 to $23 804. The mean length of stay decreased from 2.8 to 2.4 days. The mean routine discharge (home discharge without visiting nursing care) remained constant at 91%. Revision procedures (removal, supplemental fixation, or reoperation at the treated level) declined 30% from 194 to 135 cases over the study period. The mean revision burden, defined as the ratio of revision procedures to the sum of primary and revision procedures, was 12% (range 6% to 24%). The mean total cost of revisions ranged from $12 752 to $22 282. CONCLUSIONS: From 2005 to 2013, primary LDA significantly declined in the United States by 86% despite several studies pointing to improved efficacy and cost-efficiency. This disparity may be related to a lack of surgeon reimbursement from insurance companies. Congruently, the number of revision LDA cases has declined 30%, while revision burden has risen from 6% to 24%.