RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 2017 political violence against the Rohingya people in the state of Rakhine resulted in a large influx of displaced populations into Bangladesh. Given harsh conditions and experiences in Myanmar, and the harrowing journey to the border, raised levels of child neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) and mental health problems were expected. METHODS: A team of child development professionals, physicians, psychologists, and developmental therapists screened 622 children in clinics within the refugee camps using the Developmental Screening Questionnaire (DSQ; 0-<2 years), and the Ten Questions Plus (TQP) for NDDs, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; 2-16 years) for mental health problems. Any child positive on the DSQ or the TQP was assessed for NDDs. RESULTS: Only 4.8% children aged 0-<2 years and 7.3% children aged >2-16 years screened positive for NDDs, comparable with a local Bangladesh population. However, 52% of children were in the abnormal range for emotional symptoms on the SDQ, and 25% abnormal for peer problems. Significant risk factors were being parentless and having lost one or more family members in the recent crisis. CONCLUSIONS: This screening study provides objective evidence of the urgent need for psychosocial support of Rohingya children within camps, with special attention to those without parents, including monitoring of their well-being and counselling of families and other care providers.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trauma Psicológico/epidemiología , Campos de Refugiados , Refugiados , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , Adolescente , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Niño , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Mianmar/etnología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Trauma Psicológico/diagnóstico , Trauma Psicológico/terapia , Refugiados/psicología , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Medio Social , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are among the leading causes of maternal and perinatal death in low-income countries, but the aetiology remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between salinity in drinking water and the risk of (pre)eclampsia and gestational hypertension in a coastal community. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted in Dacope, Bangladesh among 202 pregnant women with (pre)eclampsia or gestational hypertension, enrolled from the community served by the Upazilla Health Complex, Dacope and 1,006 matched controls from the same area. Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from all participants. Urinary sodium and sodium levels in drinking water were measured. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals. FINDINGS: Drinking water sources had exceptionally high sodium levels (mean 516.6 mg/L, S.D 524.2). Women consuming tube-well (groundwater) were at a higher disease risk than rainwater users (p<0.001). Adjusted risks for (pre)eclampsia and gestational hypertension considered together increased in a dose-response manner for increasing sodium concentrations (300.01-600 mg/L, 600.1-900 mg/L, >900.01 mg/L, compared to <300 mg/L) in drinking water (ORs 3.30 [95% CI 2.00-5.51], 4.40 [2.70-7.25] and 5.48 [3.30-9.11] (p-trend<0.001). Significant associations were seen for both (pre)eclampsia and gestational hypertension separately. INTERPRETATION: Salinity in drinking water is associated with increased risk of (pre)eclampsia and gestational hypertension in this population. Given that coastal populations in countries such as Bangladesh are confronted with high salinity exposure, which is predicted to further increase as a result of sea level rise and other environmental influences, it is imperative to develop and evaluate affordable approaches to providing water with low salt content.
Asunto(s)
Agua Potable/química , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/etiología , Preeclampsia/etiología , Sodio/análisis , Adolescente , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Bangladesh , Presión Sanguínea , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Sodio/orina , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To validate a rapid neurodevelopmental assessment tool for use by child care professionals to determine neurodevelopmental impairments (NDIs) in children ages 5-9 years (61-108 months) in Bangladesh. STUDY DESIGN: In a convenience sample of community children (n = 18), interrater reliability was determined between 6 testers. Validity was determined in 121 children by simultaneous administration of a test of adaptive behavior (AB) (ie, the Independent Behavior Assessment Scale, or Gold Standard I) and IQ tests (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence or the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, or Gold Standard II) by child psychologists. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was excellent (kappa = 1.00). Significantly lower scores were obtained on AB and IQ tests in those identified with "any (≥1) NDI" and most specific NDIs. Sensitivity and specificity for "any NDI" with (a) "significant difficulties" (defined as AB z-scores < -2 SD and/or IQ < 70) or (b) "mild difficulties included" (AB z scores < -1 SD and/or IQ < 85) were 84% and 57%; and 83% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The rapid neurodevelopmental assessment tool shows promise as a tool for use by a range of professionals for identifying NDIs in children of primary school age. Further refinement for identifying specific impairments is needed.
Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastornos Psicomotores/diagnóstico , Bangladesh , Niño , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/diagnóstico , Preescolar , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Trastornos del Lenguaje/diagnóstico , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Validate a tool to determine neurodevelopmental impairments (NDIs) in >2- to 5-year-old children in a country with limited child development expertise. METHODS: Rapid Neurodevelopmental Assessment (RNDA) is a tool designed to detect functional status and NDIs across multiple neurodevelopmental domains. Validity was determined in 77 children enrolled by door-to-door sampling in Dhaka and who were administered the RNDA by 1 of 6 testers (4 developmental therapists, 2 special education teachers) and simultaneously administered a test of adaptive behavior (AB; Independent Behavior Assessment Scale) and intelligence quotient (IQ) tests (Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence) by psychologists. RESULTS: Interrater reliability ranged from good to excellent. There were significant differences in AB in mean percentile scores on the Independent Behavior Assessment Scale for motor (P = .0001), socialization (P = .001), communication (P = .001), and full-scale (P = .001) scores in children with ≥1 NDI ("any NDI") versus no NDI. Significant differences in those with versus those without "any NDI" were found on IQ scores. Sensitivity and specificity for "significant difficulties" (defined as AB z-scores < -2 SDs and/or IQ <70) and "mild difficulties included" (AB z-scores < -1SD and/or IQ <85) were 90% and 60% and 80% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RNDA validity results are promising for use by child care professionals in field and clinical settings, but the tool needs further replication and refinement for assessment of specific impairments of vision, hearing, and seizures.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Examen Neurológico/normas , Adaptación Psicológica , Bangladesh , Preescolar , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Inteligencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , MuestreoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of a comprehensive assessment procedure for ascertaining neurodevelopmental status of children aged 0 to 24 months for use by multidisciplinary professionals in a developing country. METHODS: We developed the Rapid Neurodevelopmental Assessment (RNDA) to determine functional status in the following domains: primitive reflexes, gross motor, fine motor, vision, hearing, speech, cognition, behavior, and seizures. Reliability was determined for 50 children who were aged <3 months and 30 children who were aged > or =3 to 24 months and were administered the RNDA by 8 different professionals (3 physicians, 4 therapists, and 1 special teacher). Validity was determined on 34 children aged <3 months in hospital and 81 children aged > or =3 to 24 months in urban (n = 47) and rural (n = 34) community-based populations by any 1 of the 8 professionals, with simultaneous administration of the adapted Bayley Scales of Infant Development II by a psychologist as the gold standard. RESULTS: Mean kappa coefficients of agreement among professionals in overall and individual domains in the 2 age groups ranged from good to excellent. For both younger and older children, there was good concurrent validity (ie, significantly lower mean Mental Development Index and Psychomotor Development Index scores) for children with > or =1 neurodevelopmental impairment and for children with impairments in most functional domains, compared with children with no impairments. Significantly more impairments were found in children from disadvantaged compared with socioeconomically more advantaged communities, indicating good discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The RNDA can be used by professionals from a range of backgrounds with high reliability and validity for determining functional status of children who are younger than 2 years. The study findings have important practical implications for early identification and intervention to mitigate neurodevelopmental impairments in large populations that live in developing countries where professional expertise is sparse.