Usefulness of the over-the-wire microelectrodes catheter in treatment of ventricular arrhythmia arising from the left ventricular summit.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) microelectrodes catheter in coronary venous system (CVS) mapping and treatment of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA) arising from the vicinity of the left ventricular summit (LVS). METHODS: Consecutive 62 patients with idiopathic OTVA in whom the OTW microelectrodes catheter was routinely used for CVS mapping were analyzed. CVS mapping was performed for both main trunk (from great cardiac vein to anterior interventricular vein) and branches including the annular branch or septal branch. RESULTS: The earliest activation site (EAS) was within the CVS in 21 patients. Among them, the EAS was within the main trunk of the CVS in seven (33%) and within the branch of the CVS in 14 (67%) patients. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was started at an anatomically adjacent site to the EAS, which eliminated OTVA in 16 (76%) patients　(the endocardial LVOT in 10 and the aortic sinus of Valsalva in six patients). For the remaining five patients with unsuccessful catheter ablation at an anatomically adjacent site, targeted OTVA was eliminated by catheter ablation at the EAS within the CVS in two patients and by chemical ablation with ethanol injection in one patient, resulting in the overall success rate of 90% (19/21). CONCLUSION: The OTW microelectrodes-guided ablation of OTVA from the vicinity of the LVS was effective. In maximizing the efficacy of ablation, CVS branch mapping is important since the earliest activation was commonly recorded not in the main trunk but within the branch of the CVS.

Effect of Endovascular Treatment on Systemic Vascular Resistance in Patients with Lower-Limb Peripheral Artery Disease.

Objective: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for lower-limb peripheral artery disease patients reduces blood pressure (BP) and improves prognosis. This study retrospectively examined hemodynamics during EVT to clarify the mechanism. Materials and Methods: Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was measured using a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system during EVT. Furthermore, ankle brachial index was measured before and after EVT. Results: The study included 88 lesions of 56 patients (hypertension in 98%). SVR significantly decreased from 2409.1±746.8 dynes·s·cm-5 to 2033.7±635.0 dynes·s·cm-5 (p<0.0001). The difference in SVR before and after EVT was significantly greater in the Fontaine IV group than in the Fontaine IIa group (554.7±406.6 dynes·s·cm-5 vs. 312.9±245.7 dynes·s·cm-5, p=0.0151). The change in SVR was correlated with a change in mean BP in the upper limb (p=0.0026). When the change in pressure gradient between the upper limb and the diseased lower limb was large, mean BP of the upper limb significantly decreased (p=0.0022). Conclusion: EVT can reduce SVR and BP by canceling the pressure gradient between central BP and diseased lower-limb BP.

Anomalous origin of the coronary artery coursing between the great vessels presenting with a cardiovascular event (J-CONOMALY Registry).

AIMS: Anomalous origin of the coronary artery (AOCA) with an inter-arterial course (IAC) between the great vessels poses a risk for a life-threatening cardiovascular event. We assessed, in a registry-based study, the clinical features, treatment strategies, and prognoses of life-threatening cardiovascular events ensuant to AOCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Included were 65 AOCA patients (48 men/17 women, aged 41 ± 23 years) from 40 clinical centres who had experienced sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) (n = 30), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n = 5), angina (n = 23), or syncope (n = 7). The anomalous vessel was the right coronary artery in 72% of patients and left coronary artery in 28%; the ostium was slit-like in 42%. Coronary luminal narrowing ≥75% was absent in patients with SCA or syncope (86% and 57%, respectively), but occlusion or narrowing was seen in those with AMI (100%) or angina (52%). Age ≤40 years, male sex, sporting activity, absence of prodromal symptoms, acutely angled (≤30°) take-off from the aorta, and absence of luminal narrowing of the IAC segment were associated with SCA in this patient group. Coronary vasospasm was inducible in 12 of 17 patients without coronary narrowing. Management included surgical revascularization (n = 26) percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 9), and medical treatment (n = 26). Four SCA patients died while hospitalized; no others died during the median 5.0 (range, 1.8-7.0)-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AOCA, age ≤40 years, male sex, sporting activity, and an acute take-off angle appear to be risk factors for SCA. Appropriate management can be beneficial. Confirmation in a large-scale study is warranted.

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis by Excimer Laser Coronary Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon: Serial Assessment with Optical Coherence Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the results of neointimal modification before drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment with excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) plus scoring balloon predilation versus scoring balloon alone in patients presenting with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Treatment of ISR with ELCA typically results in superior acute gain by neointima debulking. However, the efficacy of combination therapy of ELCA and DCB remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 42 patients (44 ISR lesions) undergoing DCB treatment with ELCA plus scoring balloon (ELCA group, n = 18) or scoring balloon alone (non-ELCA group, n = 24) were evaluated via serial assessment by optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed before, after intervention, and at 6 months. RESULTS: Although there was significantly greater frequency of diffuse restenosis and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) after intervention in the ELCA group, comparable result was shown in %DS, late lumen loss, and binary angiographic restenosis at follow-up. On OCT analysis, a decreased tendency in the minimum lumen area and a significant decrease in the minimum stent area were observed in the ELCA group between 6-month follow-up and after intervention (-0.89 ± 1.36 mm2 vs. -0.09 ± 1.25 mm2, p = 0.05, -0.49 ± 1.48 mm2 vs. 0.28 ± 0.78 mm2, p = 0.03, respectively). The changes in the neointimal area were similar between the groups, and target lesion revascularization showed comparable rates at 1 year (11.1% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater %DS after intervention, ELCA before DCB had possible benefit for late angiographic and clinical outcome.

Efficacy and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban taken preoperatively for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation compared to uninterrupted warfarin.

PURPOSE: Data on uninterrupted rivaroxaban taken preoperatively for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. The aim was to evaluate safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban taken in the morning for AF ablation, especially with regard to asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE) and anticoagulation parameters. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 147 consecutive patients who underwent RFCA (mean age 66, 110 patients with paroxysmal AF), 76 of whom were on rivaroxaban, 71 on warfarin. The drugs were continued throughout the periprocedural period, including the morning of RFCA. Heparin infusion was maintained during RFCA to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) of >300 s. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basic patient characteristics and ablation procedure between the two groups. ACT during the procedure correlated significantly with prothrombin time and international normalized ratio in each group (correlation coefficient 0.799 in rivaroxaban, 0.705 in warfarin, p < 0.01). D-dimer level was more elevated after RFCA in the warfarin group than in the rivaroxaban group (warfarin 0.37 ± 0.28 to 0.67 ± 0.81, rivaroxaban 0.41 ± 0.33 to 0.51 ± 0.25, p = 0.02). One major bleeding event (1.3%), a cardiac tamponade, was observed in the warfarin group. No symptomatic thromboembolic complications were observed in either group. Two patients (3%) in each group had minor bleeding, specifically, groin hematoma. Postprocedural MRI indicated ACE in 5/46 (11%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 4/39 (10%) in the warfarin group (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Uninterrupted rivaroxaban taken preoperatively for AF ablation is clinically effective and safe. Its ACE profile is similar to warfarin. ACT is sufficient for monitoring anticoagulation.