Selecting an Endourology Society Fellowship Program: The Candidates' Perspectives.

Introduction: Understanding the factors that influence the decision of urology residents to pursue an Endourology Society (ES) fellowship and the criteria used by applicants to rank programs may help residents and program directors (PDs) optimize the match process. In the present study, we surveyed current ES fellows to gain better insight surrounding their decision-making process. Materials and Methods: A survey was emailed to all ES fellows, comprising Endourology and Stone Disease (ESD), Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery (MIS), and combination of ESD/MIS (COM) programs. A Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was used. The survey captured demographics such as geographic region, program type, duration, applicants' reasons for pursuing fellowship, criteria for ranking programs, and perceived improvements in surgical comfort levels at the end of their training. Results: Out of the 60 fellows who were surveyed, 40 (66.7%) responded. Among the respondents, 9 (22.5%) pursued ESD, 10 (25%) pursued MIS, and 21 (52.5%) pursued COM programs. The primary reason for seeking a fellowship was to improve surgical skills while increasing earning potential and enhancing research opportunities were deemed the least important. Fellows enrolled in 1-year programs were less likely to pursue fellowships for academic reasons. The two most significant factors in selecting a program were both related to gaining operative experience. Lastly, there was an increase in the level of comfort performing all endourological surgeries independently after fellowship. Conclusions: ES fellowship is seen as an opportunity to hone surgical skills and increase job competitiveness. When selecting a program, operative experience is the most important factor, and fellowship improves operative confidence. The information obtained from this study may mutually help guide future applicants and PDs in the decision process of the Endourology Match.

Comparative proteomic profiling of uric acid, ammonium acid urate, and calcium-based kidney stones.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney stone matrix proteins may help explain cellular mechanisms of stone genesis. However, most existing proteomic studies have focused on calcium oxalate stones. Here, we present a comparative proteomic analysis of different kidney stone types. METHODS: Proteins were extracted from the stones of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Approximately 20 µg of protein was digested into tryptic peptides using filter aided sample preparation, followed by liquid chromatography tandem-mass-spectrometry using an EASY-nLC 1200 and Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. A standard false discovery rate cutoff of 1% was used for protein identification. Stone analysis was used to organize stone samples into similar groups. We selected the top 5% of proteins based on total ion intensities and used DAVID and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to identify and compare significantly enriched gene ontologies and pathways between groups. RESULTS: Six specimens were included and organized into the following four groups: 1) mixed uric acid (UA) and calcium-based, 2) pure UA, 3) pure ammonium acid urate (AAU), and 4) pure calcium-based. We identified 2,426 unique proteins (1,310-1,699 per sample), with 11-16 significantly enriched KEGG pathways identified per group and compared via heatmap. Based on number of unique proteins identified, this is the deepest proteomic study of kidney stones to date and the first such study of an AAU stone. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that mixed UA and calcium-based kidney stones are more similar to pure UA stones than pure calcium-based stones. AAU stones appear more similar to pure calcium-based stones than UA containing stones and may be related to parasitic infections. Further research with larger cohorts and histopathologic correlation is warranted.

Reverse Trendelenburg Positioning Minimizes Stone Retropulsion During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Purpose: Retropulsion of stone fragments during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URSLL) remains a challenge for urologists and is associated with increased operative time and reduced stone-free rate (SFR). In this study, we compared the rate of retropulsion of ureteral stones during URSLL between the standard dorsal lithotomy (SDL) position and dorsal lithotomy position with reverse Trendelenburg (RT). Materials and Methods: Patients with ureteral stones requiring surgical intervention between May 2019 and January 2022 were randomized to undergo URSLL in either SDL or RT positions. The primary outcome of this study was stone retropulsion. Secondary outcomes included retropulsion to the kidney, SFR, operative time, 30-day emergency department visits and complications, and the need for conversion from semirigid to flexible ureteroscope. Differences between groups were evaluated using the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or t-test. Results: A total of 114 patients were included in the study, with 57 patients in each group. There were no differences between groups in terms of baseline demographics or stone characteristics. Retropulsion was significantly less frequent in the RT group (68.4% vs 10.5%, p < 0.01). Similarly, the RT group was favored for lower risk of retropulsion into the kidney (40.4% vs 5.3%, p < 0.01), operative time (43.5 vs 33.0 minutes, p = 0.02), and need for ureteroscope conversion (16.7% vs 2.2%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in the SFR (100% vs 95%, p = 0.49). Conclusions: RT positioning during URSLL for ureteral stones significantly decreases the rate of stone retropulsion, operative time, and the need for conversion from semirigid to flexible ureteroscope.

Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Lower pole renal stones are associated with the lowest stone-free status of any location in the urinary tract during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Prior work has suggested displacing lower pole stones to a more accessible part of the kidney to improve stone-free status. We sought to prospectively compare the efficacy of laser lithotripsy in situ vs after displacement during retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2017 and May 2022 patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones were randomized into an in situ or displacement group. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were documented. Primary outcome was stone-free status, determined by combination of abdominal x-ray and renal ultrasound at 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included operative time, 30-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (69 per group) were enrolled and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Stone-free status significantly favored the displacement group over the in situ group (95% vs 74%, P = .003, n=62 in each group). Operative time, total laser energy usage, 30-day complications, and 30-day emergency department visits or hospital readmissions were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis only study group allocation was significantly associated with stone-free status (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Basket displacement of lower pole stones results in a significantly higher stone-free status compared to in situ lithotripsy. The technique is simple, atraumatic, and requires no additional equipment costs and little additional operative time, making it a practical tool in the treatment of lower pole stones.

A prospective randomized study evaluating the necessity of narcotics following ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics and preoperative counseling in managing postoperative pain and narcotic use following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS). METHODS: Adult patients at a single academic center undergoing URS for nephrourolithiasis were recruited. After informed consent, subjects were randomized into three groups: NARC-15 tablets oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg (A-OXY), 2. NSAID-15 tablets ibuprofen (IBU) 600 mg, 3. CNSL-15 tablets A-OXY, 15 tablets IBU, and preoperative counseling from the surgeon to avoid narcotic if possible. Patients who did not receive an intraoperative stent were excluded. At the time of stent removal subjects completed the Universal Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), and a pill count was performed. USSQ pain indices were the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Of 115 patients enrolled, 104 met the primary endpoint and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were noted in patient demographic, clinical, or operative characteristics. No differences were noted in median USSQ pain indices. The CNSL group used a significantly lower median number of A-OXY pills compared to the NARC group (2.4 vs. 5.4, p = 0.001) and less IBU compared to the NSAID group (3.1 vs. 5.9, p = 0.008). No differences in median total pill count, office calls, medication requests, nor ED visits were noted. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients can achieve equivalent postoperative analgesic satisfaction with non-narcotics compared to opiates following URS. Further, counseling patients on postoperative pain before surgery can reduce the total number of postoperative narcotic and non-narcotic medications taken. We suggest surgeons strongly consider omission of narcotic prescriptions following non-complicated URS.