RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low status has recently gained attention because of the potential therapeutic benefits of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in breast cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the concordance of HER2 status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and subsequent surgical resection specimens focusing on the HER2-low status. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in 1,387 patients with invasive breast cancer whose HER2 status was evaluated in both CNB and surgical resection specimens. The discordance rates between CNB and surgical resection specimens and the clinicopathological features associated with HER2 status discordance were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall concordance rates of HER2 status between CNB and surgical resection specimens were 99.0% (κ = 0.925) for two-group classification (negative vs. positive) and 78.5% (κ = 0.587) for three-group classification (zero vs. low vs. positive). The largest discordance occurred in CNB-HER2-zero cases with 42.8% of them reclassified as HER2-low in surgical resection. HER2 discordance was associated with lower histologic grade, tumor multiplicity, and luminal A subtype. In multivariate analysis, tumor multiplicity and estrogen receptor (ER) positivity were independent predictive factors for HER2-zero to low conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of HER2-low category in HER2 status interpretation reduces the concordance rate between CNB and surgical resection specimens. Tumor multiplicity and ER positivity are predictive factors for conversion from HER2-zero to HER2-low status. Therefore, HER2 status should be re-evaluated in resection specimens when considering ADCs in tumors exhibiting multiplicity and ER positivity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Femenino , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismoRESUMEN
Purpose: Breast cancer is known to be influenced by genetic and environmental factors, and several susceptibility genes have been discovered. Still, the majority of genetic contributors remain unknown. We aimed to analyze the plasma proteome of breast cancer patients in comparison to healthy individuals to identify differences in protein expression profiles and discover novel biomarkers. Methods: This pilot study was conducted using bioresources from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital's Human Bioresource Center. Serum samples from 10 breast cancer patients and 10 healthy controls were obtained. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed proteins. Results: We identified 891 proteins; 805 were expressed in the breast cancer group and 882 in the control group. Gene set enrichment and differential expression analysis identified 30 upregulated and 100 downregulated proteins in breast cancer. Among these, 10 proteins were selected as potential biomarkers. Three proteins were upregulated in breast cancer patients, including cluster of differentiation 44, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-α kinase 3, and fibronectin 1. Seven proteins downregulated in breast cancer patients were also selected: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, α-enolase, heat shock protein member 8, integrin-linked kinase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, and 14-3-3 protein gamma. All proteins had been previously reported to be related to tumor development and progression. Conclusion: The findings suggest that plasma proteome profiling can reveal potential diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer and may contribute to early detection and personalized treatment strategies. A further validation study with a larger sample cohort of breast cancer patients is planned.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Advances in chemotherapeutic and targeted agents have increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) has been suggested to accurately evaluate pCR. This study aims to confirm the non-inferiority of the 5-year disease-free survival of patients who omitted breast surgery when predicted to have a pCR based on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and VAB after NST, compared with patients with a pCR who had undergone breast surgery in previous studies. METHODS: The Omission of breast surgery for PredicTed pCR patients wIth MRI and vacuum-assisted bIopsy in breaST cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (OPTIMIST) trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-inferiority study enrolling in 17 tertiary care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients must have a clip marker placed in the tumor and meet the MRI criteria suggesting complete clinical response (post-NST MRI size ≤ 1 cm and lesion-to-background signal enhancement ratio ≤ 1.6) after NST. Patients will undergo VAB, and breast surgery will be omitted for those with no residual tumor. Axillary surgery can also be omitted if the patient was clinically node-negative before and after NST and met the stringent criteria of MRI size ≤ 0.5 cm. Survival and efficacy outcomes are evaluated over five years. DISCUSSION: This study seeks to establish evidence for the safe omission of breast surgery in exceptional responders to NST while minimizing patient burden. The trial will address concerns about potential undertreatment due to false-negative results and recurrence as well as improved patient-reported quality of life issues from the omission of surgery. Successful completion of this trial may reshape clinical practice for certain breast cancer subtypes and lead to a safe and less invasive approach for selected patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05505357. Registered on August 17, 2022. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007638. Registered on July 25, 2022.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a relevant imaging technique for early breast cancer diagnosis and is increasingly being used as a supplementary tool for mammography. This study compared the performance of ABUS and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) in detecting and characterizing the axillary lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with recently diagnosed early breast cancer (≤ T2) who underwent both ABUS and HHUS examinations for axilla (September 2017-May 2018). ABUS and HHUS findings were compared using pathological outcomes as reference standards. Diagnostic performance in predicting any axillary LN metastasis and heavy nodal-burden metastases (i.e., ≥ 3 LNs) was evaluated. The ABUS-HHUS agreement for visibility and US findings was calculated. RESULTS: The study included 377 women (53.1 ± 11.1 years). Among 385 breast cancers in 377 patients, 101 had axillary LN metastases and 30 had heavy nodal burden metastases. ABUS identified benign-looking or suspicious axillary LNs (average, 1.4 ± 0.8) in 246 axillae (63.9%, 246/385). According to the per-breast analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of ABUS in predicting axillary LN metastases were 43.6% (44/101), 95.1% (270/284), 75.9% (44/58), 82.6% (270/327), and 81.6% (314/385), respectively. The corresponding results for HHUS were 41.6% (42/101), 95.1% (270/284), 75.0% (42/56), 82.1% (270/329), and 81.0% (312/385), respectively, which were not significantly different from those of ABUS (P ≥ 0.53). The performance results for heavy nodal-burden metastases were 70.0% (21/30), 89.6% (318/355), 36.2% (21/58), 97.3% (318/327), and 88.1% (339/385), respectively, for ABUS and 66.7% (20/30), 89.9% (319/355), 35.7% (20/56), 97.0% (319/329), and 88.1% (339/385), respectively, for HHUS, also not showing significant difference (P ≥ 0.57). The ABUS-HHUS agreement was 95.9% (236/246; Cohen's kappa = 0.883). CONCLUSION: Although ABUS showed limited sensitivity in diagnosing axillary LN metastasis in early breast cancer, it was still useful as the performance was comparable to that of HHUS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Axila/diagnóstico por imagen , Axila/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
(1) Background: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is preferred over fine needle aspiration (FNA) as it has higher sensitivity and specificity and enables immunohistochemical evaluation. However, breast FNA remains widely used because of its low cost, minimally invasive nature, and quick results. Studies analyzing the effects of each test on the prognoses of patients with breast cancer are scarce and controversial, and the criteria for test selection remain unknown. (2) Methods: This study included adult female patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at 102 general hospitals. The trend of breast biopsies over time was analyzed, and the prognoses of patients with breast cancer who underwent CNB and FNA were compared. (3) Results: This study included 73,644 patients who underwent FNA (n = 8027) and CNB (n = 65,617). A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients diagnosed using FNA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than those diagnosed using CNB. In the subgroup analysis, patients with breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 5 lesions, palpable tumors, or centrally located tumors had significantly worse OS and BCSS with FNA than with CNB. (4) Conclusions: CNB should be performed preferentially instead of FNA in patients with BI-RADS 5 lesions and nonpalpable or centrally located tumors.
RESUMEN
Background: This study aimed to discuss several surgical approaches for advanced-stage breast cancer-related lymphedema and compared their treatment outcomes. Methods: The patients who underwent surgery with International Society of Lymphology stage III lymphedema were included in this study. The three surgical methods used here were (1) suction-assisted lipectomy with lymphovenous anastomosis, (2) autologous breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap combined with inguinal lymph node transfer, and (3) vascularized lymph node transfer with free omental flap. Analysis of the postoperative outcomes in the patients was based on the difference in volume between patients pre- and postoperatively, LYMPH-Q questionnaire, and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results: Eighty-seven patients with stage IIb or higher disease underwent surgery. 38 patients underwent suction-assisted lipectomy + lymphovenous anastomosis, 23 underwent autologous breast reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer + lymphovenous anastomosis, and 26 underwent right gastroepiploic omental vascularized lymph node transfer with lymphovenous anastomosis. The LYMPH-Q questionnaire, which evaluates patients' subjective satisfaction, showed that the autologous breast reconstruction group showed the greatest improvement, whereas in bioimpedance analysis, the omental flap group demonstrated the greatest postoperative improvement compared with preoperative values. However, suction-assisted lipectomy was considered the most effective surgical method for reducing limb volume in patients with high-stage lymphedema accompanied by fibrosis and volume increase. Conclusions: We observed slightly different clinical effects for each surgical method; however, all surgical methods demonstrated a reduction in the degree of edema and an increase in patient satisfaction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To develop a breast cancer prediction model for Korean women using published polygenic risk scores (PRS) combined with nongenetic risk factors (NGRF). METHODS: Thirteen PRS models generated from single or multiple combinations of the Asian and European PRSs were evaluated among 20,434 Korean women. The AUC and increase in OR per SD were compared for each PRS. The PRSs with the highest predictive power were combined with NGRFs; then, an integrated prediction model was established using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) tool. The absolute breast cancer risk was stratified for 18,142 women with available follow-up data. RESULTS: PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB, a combination of Asian and European PRSs, had the highest AUC (0.621) among PRSs, with an OR per SD increase of 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.31-1.61). Compared with the average risk group (35%-65%), women in the top 5% had a 2.5-fold higher risk of breast cancer. Incorporating NGRFs yielded a modest increase in the AUC of women ages >50 years. For PRS38_ASN+PRS190_EB+NGRF, the average absolute risk was 5.06%. The lifetime absolute risk at age 80 years for women in the top 5% was 9.93%, whereas that of women in the lowest 5% was 2.22%. Women at higher risks were more sensitive to NGRF incorporation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined Asian and European PRSs were predictive of breast cancer in Korean women. Our findings support the use of these models for personalized screening and prevention of breast cancer. IMPACT: Our study provides insights into genetic susceptibility and NGRFs for predicting breast cancer in Korean women.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Factores de Riesgo , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , República de Corea/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Several predictive models have been developed to predict the pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); however, few are broadly applicable owing to radiologic complexity and institution-specific clinical variables, and none have been externally validated. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning model that predicts pCR after NAC in patients with breast cancer using routinely collected clinical and demographic variables. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients with advanced breast cancer who underwent NAC before surgical resection between January 2017 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patient data from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Five machine learning techniques, including gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine, random forest, decision tree, and neural network, were used to build predictive models, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared to select the best model. Finally, the model was validated using an independent cohort from Seoul National University Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1,003 patients were included in the study: 287, 71, and 645 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Overall, 36.3% of the patients achieved pCR. Among the five machine learning models, the GBM showed the highest AUC for pCR prediction (AUC, 0.903; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.833-0.972). External validation confirmed an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI, 0.800-0.865). CONCLUSION: Commonly available clinical and demographic variables were used to develop a machine learning model for predicting pCR following NAC. External validation of the model demonstrated good discrimination power, indicating that routinely collected variables were sufficient to build a good prediction model.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mammography screening has been proven to detect breast cancer at an early stage and reduce mortality; however, it has low accuracy in young women or women with dense breasts. Blood-based diagnostic tools may overcome the limitations of mammography. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of a three-protein signature in patients with suspicious breast lesions. FINDINGS: This trial (MAST; KCT0004847) was a prospective multicenter observational trial. Three-protein signature values were obtained using serum and plasma from women with suspicious lesions for breast malignancy before tumor biopsy. Additionally, blood samples from women who underwent clear or benign mammography were collected for the assays. Among 642 participants, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy values of the three-protein signature were 74.4%, 66.9%, and 70.6%, respectively, and the concordance index was 0.698 (95% CI 0.656, 0.739). The diagnostic performance was not affected by the demographic features, clinicopathologic characteristics, and co-morbidities of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: The present trial showed an accuracy of 70.6% for the three-protein signature. Considering the value of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of breast malignancies, further evaluation of this proteomic assay is warranted in larger, population-level trials. This Multi-protein Assessment using Serum to deTermine breast lesion malignancy (MAST) was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service of Korea with the identification number of KCT0004847 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteómica , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , MamografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumor (PT) is a rare fibroepithelial neoplasm of the breast. The proper extent of resection is still under debate. This study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical margin to prevent recurrence after surgery for PT and to evaluate risk factors for local recurrence (LR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort database was performed. Patients who underwent curative surgery for PT at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between July 2003 and February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 439 patients included, 285 were benign, 129 were borderline, and 25 were malignant. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between margin-negative and margin-involved patients (87.3% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.081). When patients were classified into groups, according to margin status, as conventional (≥ 1 cm from tumor), close (< 1 cm from tumor), or involved, 5-year DFS rates were also similar (100% vs. 86.9% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.170). In subgroup analysis for different histologic grades, 5-year DFS was not affected by margin involvement. In univariate analysis, large tumor size (> 5 cm; hazard ratio [HR] 2.857, p = 0.028) and infiltrative tumor border (HR 3.096, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for LR. Further multivariate analysis found both factors to be prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence was not significantly influenced by margin status in all histological grades. In benign and borderline tumors, local excision without wide surgical margins could be sufficient, and watchful waiting could be an option for patients with positive margins after initial surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Tumor Filoide , Humanos , Femenino , Tumor Filoide/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicacionesRESUMEN
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR. Methods: All patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images. Results: A total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81â mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15â mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being. Conclusion: Preserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer plays an essential role in carcinogenesis and disease progression. Recently, tumors with low level (1%-10%) of ER expression have been separately defined as ER low positive (ERlow). It is suggested that ERlow tumors might be morphologically and behaviorally different from tumors with high ER expression (ERhigh). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort database was performed. Patients who underwent curative surgery for early breast cancer and had available medical records were included for analysis. Difference in clinicopathological characteristics, endocrine responsiveness and five-year recurrence-free survival was evaluated between different ER subgroups (ERhigh, ERlow, and ER-negative [ER-]). RESULTS: A total of 2,162 breast cancer patients were included in the analysis, Tis and T1 stage. Among them, 1,654 (76.5%) were ERhigh, 54 (2.5%) were ERlow, and 454 (21.0%) were ER- patients. ERlow cases were associated with smaller size, higher histologic grade, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, negative progesterone receptor, and higher Ki-67 expression. Recurrence rate was highest in ER- tumors and was inversely proportional to ER expression. Recurrence-free survival was not affected by hormonal therapy in the ERlow group (p=0.418). CONCLUSION: ERlow breast cancer showed distinct clinicopathological features. ERlow tumors seemed to have higher recurrence rates compared to ERhigh tumors, and they showed no significant benefit from hormonal therapy. Future large scale prospective studies are necessary to validate the treatment options for ERlow breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Receptores de Estrógenos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Estrógenos , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The relationship between obesity and breast cancer stage is not well-known in the Korean population. This study aimed to identify the effect of body mass index (BMI) on initial breast cancer stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer (stages 0-III) from June 2003 to December 2018, we analyzed 4510 patients for whom there were BMI data. RESULTS: The average BMI of our patients was 23.5 (14.2-44.9). In total, 4.6% and 24.2% of the patients had a BMI of ≥30 and 25-29.9, respectively. In the patients with obesity, the proportion of T2 to T4 was 41.4%, which was higher than that in patients with a BMI of 25 to 29 (28.4%; P = .001) or a BMI of <25 (23.3%; P < .001). There was no difference in positive rates of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor with BMI, but obese patients were less likely to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive. Patients with higher stages were more likely to have a higher BMI. The effect of BMI on stage was stronger in patients <50 years (odds ratio, 2.439; 95% CI, 1.783-3.335). Although there was no statistical significance, tumors >2 cm were less likely to be palpable in obese patients than in patients of normal weight (nonpalpable in 33.8% and 27.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that obesity is associated with a more advanced breast cancer stage, which represents a poor prognosis, and large tumors tend to be less palpable in women with obesity.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , PronósticoRESUMEN
Monitoring of patient and tumor during chemotherapy is important to determine whether the chemotherapy is effective to the patient. Variants affect drug enzyme activities and altered enzyme activities can be potential predictors for chemotherapeutic agents including cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Response to chemotherapy is primarily based on somatic mutations but germline variants may predict cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, patient's genetic variation of immune system was reported to be associated with drug response and toxicity. Recently, the somaric and germilne genomic variation influences the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy and these variation can be biomarkers for chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Humanos , PaclitaxelRESUMEN
Autologous reconstruction using abdominal flaps remains the most popular method for breast reconstruction worldwide. We aimed to evaluate a prediction model using machine-learning methods and to determine which factors increase abdominal flap donor site complications with logistic regression. We evaluated the predictive ability of different machine learning packages, reviewing a cohort of breast reconstruction patients who underwent abdominal flaps. We analyzed 13 treatment variables for effects on the abdominal donor site complication rates. To overcome data imbalances, random over sampling example (ROSE) method was used. Data were divided into training and testing sets. Prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power (AUC) were measured by applying neuralnet, nnet, and RSNNS machine learning packages. A total of 568 patients were analyzed. The supervised learning package that performed the most effective prediction was neuralnet. Factors that significantly affected donor-related complication was size of the fascial defect, history of diabetes, muscle sparing type, and presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. The risk cutoff value for fascial defect was 37.5 cm2. High-risk group complication rates analyzed by statistical method were significant compared to the low-risk group (26% vs 1.7%). These results may help surgeons to achieve better surgical outcomes and reduce postoperative burden.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Automático , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We combined the abbreviated and ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with the standard MRI protocol and compared lesion characterization quantitatively and qualitatively to the standard MRI protocol.Fifty-six patients with breast cancer who underwent MRI from June 2017 to May 2018 and fulfilled our inclusion criteria were included. Three radiologists measured the lesion sizes, described the MRI findings using BI-RADS lexicon, and demarcated the regions of interest to extract the volumetric quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. We used Pearson's correlation analysis comparing the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. To evaluate the inter-observer variability, we calculated the intra-correlation coefficient (ICC). We also analysed the correlation in BI-RADS lexicon.There were 45 (80.4%) luminal and 11 (19.6%) non-luminal breast cancers, and the most common tumour subtype was invasive carcinoma (nâ=â48, 85.7%), followed by ductal carcinoma in situ (nâ=â8, 14.3%). Regarding correlation between the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters, K significantly correlated with the wash-in factor (r, 0.862; Pâ<â.001) and AUC value (r, 0.951; Pâ<â.001). The lesion size measured by standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast phases and that from the surgical pathological specimens showed moderate agreement (ICC range, 0.516-0.578). The ICCs among the 3 readers were excellent for lesion size measurement, BI-RADS lexicon regarding lesion type, mass shape, margin, internal enhancement, non-mass enhancement distribution, and internal enhancement by the standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast protocols.The use of the modified and combined abbreviated-ultrafast MRI protocol provides a reliable measurement of the quantitative parameters and may aid in the screening of breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant endocrine therapy is an integral component of care for hormone-dependent breast cancer. Tamoxifen is a potent inducer of ovarian function and consequent hyperestrogenism in premenopausal women. However, the incidence rate and risk factors associated this phenomenon remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of patients younger than 60 years who received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for hormone-dependent breast cancer (stages 0-III) and who underwent regular follow-up of laboratory results for follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinicopathologic factors related to ovarian hyperstimulation. RESULTS: Among 205 patients, 19 (9.3%) showed high values of serum estradiol during tamoxifen therapy. The mean (± SD) serum concentrations of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone were 1047.97 ± 638.8 pg/mL and 11.5 ± 7.3 mIU/mL, respectively. A mean of 400.83 days elapsed from the start of the single administration of tamoxifen to the initial detection of a high concentration of estradiol. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that younger age (< 40 years) and only endocrine therapy without chemotherapy were significantly related to a higher prevalence of ovarian hyperstimulation (P = .015, relative risk = 7.49 for age < 40 years; P = .017, relative risk = 32.9 for no chemotherapy). Pathologic stages and tumor characteristics were not related to the manifestation of ovarian hyperstimulation. CONCLUSION: Young age (< 40 years) and endocrine treatment without chemotherapy were risk factors for the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation during tamoxifen treatment. Close monitoring of endocrine parameters during treatment with tamoxifen especially in this patient group is essential.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/inducido químicamente , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/epidemiología , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/patología , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A positive resection margin after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is the most important risk factor for tumor recurrence. In 2012, Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) breast surgery team developed a nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before BCS to provide individual surgical plans that could reduce local recurrence without increasing re-excision rates. The purpose of this study was to validate this nomogram using an external cohort and to test if addition of surgeon-related factor could improve its use as a predictive model. METHODS: A total of 419 patients with breast cancer who underwent BCS from January to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Using the SNUH BCS nomogram, risk score for positive resection margins was calculated for 343 patients. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was assessed, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the nomogram's predictive variables. RESULTS: The positive resection margin rate of the current external validation cohort was 13.5% (46 out of 343), compared to 14.6% (151 out of 1034) of the original study. The discrimination power of the SNUH BCS nomogram as measure by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.656 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.576-0.735]. This result is lower than expected value of 0.823 [95% CI 0.785-0.862], the AUC of the original study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that, among the five nomogram variables, presence of tumor size discrepancy greater than 0.5 cm between MRI and ultrasonography (OR 2.445, p = 0.019) and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ on needle biopsy (OR 2.066, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with positive resection margins. Finally, the nomogram score was re-calculated by adding each surgeon's resection margin positive rate as odds ratio and the AUC was increased to 0.733. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the SNUH BCS nomogram was not successful in the current study as much as its original publication. However, we could improve its predictive power by including surgeon-related factor. Before applying a published nomogram as a preoperative predictive model, we suggest each institution to validate the model and adjust it with surgeon-related factor. Addition of new factors to currently available nomograms holds promise for improving its applicability for breast cancer patients at the actual clinical level.