RESUMEN
Background: Increasing evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) exists. However, no study has been conducted to eliminate the potential influence of a placebo effect associated with this procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of cooled RFA compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful knees due to OA. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, participants were randomly assigned to receive cooled RFA of the knee (cooled RFA group, n = 20) or a sham procedure (sham group, n = 20). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful responders at the three-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were successful responders at one and six months; pain intensity of the knee; functional status; medication; and satisfaction at one, three, and six months after the procedures. Results: For the primary outcome, the successful responder rate was significantly higher in the cooled RFA group (76.5%) than in the sham group (33.3%) (p = 0.018). For the secondary outcome, more successful responders were observed in the cooled RFA group than in the sham group at one and six months after the procedure (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). The decreased knee pain intensity was maintained throughout the six-month follow-up period in the cooled RFA group. No differences were observed in functional status, medication change, or satisfaction in both groups. Conclusions: The cooled RFA of genicular nerves offers significant pain relief and surpasses the effects attributable to a placebo.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Articulación de la Rodilla/inervaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the duration of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) application may affect the effectiveness of PRF in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 68 patients were randomly allocated to two groups: a 6-minute group, in which PRF was applied at 42 °C for 2 minutes followed by a 2-minute pause, repeated three times; and a 12-minute group, with a continuous application at 42 °C for 12 minutes. The total application time in each group was equal. After PRF, 2 to 3 mL of 1% lidocaine with 5 mg of dexamethasone was injected. The primary outcome was the intensity of leg pain measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS) three months after the procedure. The secondary outcomes were intensities of leg and back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS), the Global Perceived Effect of Satisfaction (GPES), and the incidence of adverse events during follow-up. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect model in the modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Each group comprised 34 patients. Three patients in each group did not receive the allocated intervention owing to alleviation of pain. The estimated NRS mean of leg pain at three months was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.2-4.9) and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.6-5.4) in the 6- and 12-minute groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (estimated mean difference, -0.5; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0.8; p = 0.436). Regarding the intensities of leg and back pain, ODI, MQS, and GPES, there was no significant difference between the two groups except for GPES at six months. No adverse events were observed in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic LRP, a prolonged PRF application of 12 minutes, compared with 6 minutes, caused no significant difference in leg pain intensity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number under the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea for the study is KCT0003850; https://cris.nih.go.kr.
RESUMEN
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. In recent years, cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has become a viable treatment option for knee OA. This review thoroughly evaluated the existing literature on CRFA therapy for knee OA. It delved into the mechanisms behind CRFA, evaluated its clinical efficacy, and investigated potential avenues for future research and application. The insights gained from this review are crucial for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers, offering an updated perspective on CRFA's role as a viable therapeutic option for knee OA.
RESUMEN
Background: Recent attention has been directed towards fatty infiltration in the cervical extensor muscles for predicting clinical outcomes in several cervical disorders. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between fatty infiltration in the cervical multifidus and treatment response following cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) in patients with cervical radicular pain. Methods: The data of patients with cervical radicular pain who received CIESIs between March 2021 and June 2022 were reviewed. A responder was defined as a patient with a numerical rating scale decrease of ≥ 50% from the baseline to three months after the procedure. The presence of fatty infiltration in the cervical multifidus was assessed, along with patient characteristics, and cervical spine disease severity. To assess cervical sarcopenia, fatty infiltration in the bilateral multifidus muscles was evaluated at the C5-C6 level using the Goutallier classification. Results: Among 275 included patients, 113 (41.1%) and 162 (58.9%) were classified as non-responders and responders, respectively. The age, severity of disc degeneration, and grade of cervical multifidus fatty degeneration were significantly lower in responders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-procedural symptoms (radicular pain with neck pain, odd ratio [OR] = 0.527, P = 0.024) and high-grade cervical multifidus fatty degeneration (Goutallier grade 2.5-4, OR = 0.320, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with an unsuccessful response to CIESI. Conclusions: These results suggest high-grade cervical multifidus fatty infiltration is an independent predictor of poor response to CIESI in patients with cervical radicular pain.
RESUMEN
AIM: Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) is a major treatment method for cervical precancerous lesions. However, recurrence rates were estimated to be 15%, and the risk is increased if a surgical margin is involved by dysplastic cells. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for recurrence of cervical precancerous lesions in patients with positive margins. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent LEEP between 2012 and 2014 and had a positive surgical margin. Clinicopathologic factors were collected, including age, parity, menopausal status, smoking, human papilloma virus infection, results of cytology/biopsy/LEEP, and specimen size and volume. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients with positive margins were included, and 26 (22.2%) patients had recurrence. According to a multivariate analysis, the recurrence rates were significantly higher in parous women (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-8.49), but positive margins at the exocervix (adjusted HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.91) and volume ≥4000 mm3 (adjusted HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.82) showed negative correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence for cervical precancerous lesions increased in patients with a history of previous delivery, positive margin at the endocervix, and specimen volume of LEEP <4000 mm3 . These results could help gynecologists determine optimal treatment options for patients with positive margins.
Asunto(s)
Displasia del Cuello del Útero , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Electrocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conización/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: With the aging population, the incidence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is increasing. Sarcopenia is an age-related muscular decrease. Although epidural balloon neuroplasty is effective in patients with LSS refractory to conventional treatments, its effect has not been assessed in patients with sarcopenia. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of epidural balloon neuroplasty in patients with LSS and sarcopenia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the following details from the electronic medical records: patient characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, stenosis grading, pain duration, location, pain intensity, and medications. Back and leg pain intensity was evaluated before and after the procedure at one, three, and six months during the follow-up period. A generalized estimating equations model was used at six months follow-up. Patients were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups using the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the level of L3 on magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 477 patients were included (sarcopenia group: 314 patients, 65.8%; non-sarcopenia group: 163 patients, 34.2%). Age, sex, body mass index, and medication quantification scale III were statistically different between both groups. The generalized estimating equations analyses-with unadjusted and adjusted estimation-revealed a significantly reduced pain intensity after the procedure compared to the baseline in both groups. The difference in pain intensity between both groups was not statistically different. Conclusions: Percutaneous epidural balloon neuroplasty may be considered for patients with chronic lumbar LSS regardless of accompanying sarcopenia.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Anciano , Estenosis Espinal/complicaciones , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Catéteres , Constricción Patológica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the contralateral oblique (CLO) view at 50°±5° is clinically useful for cervical epidural access, no previous studies have confirmed its safety. This prospective observational study was conducted to assess the safety profile, including the risk of dural puncture, in fluoroscopically guided cervical epidural access using the CLO view. METHODS: In cervical epidural access using the CLO view, the incidence of dural puncture was investigated as the primary outcome. Other intraprocedural complications, including intravascular entry, subdural entry, spinal cord injury and vasovagal injury, and postprocedural complications were investigated as secondary outcomes. Procedural variables including first-pass success, final success, needling time, total number of needle passes and false loss of resistance (LOR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 393 patients who underwent cervical interlaminar epidural access were included for analysis, no instances of dural puncture or spinal cord injury were observed. The incidence of intravascular entry, vasovagal reaction and subdural entry were 3.1%, 0.5% and 0.3%, respectively. All procedures were successfully performed, with 85.0% of first-pass success rate. The mean needling time was 133.8 (74.9) s. The false-positive and false-negative LOR rates were 8.2% and 2.0%, respectively. All needle tips were visualized clearly during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The fluoroscopy-guided CLO view at 50°±5° avoided dural puncture or spinal cord injury and decreased the incidence of false LOR during cervical epidural access with a paramedian approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04774458.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Inyecciones Epidurales/métodos , Espacio Epidural/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluoroscopía/métodos , PuncionesRESUMEN
Background: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is frequently associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and conservative treatments such as epidural steroid injection do not have long-term benefits in LSS patients with DLS. This study evaluated the effectiveness of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a balloon catheter in patients with LSS and DLS. Methods: Patients' sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, stenosis grading, pain duration, location, pain intensity, and medications were retrieved from electronic medical records. At 1, 3, and 6 months following the procedure, data on pain severity, medication usage, and physical functional status were analyzed. A generalized estimating equations model was used at the six-month follow-up. Patients were divided into those with DLS (the spondylolisthesis group) and those without DLS (the no spondylolisthesis group) to evaluate whether the effects of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a balloon catheter were different. Results: A total of 826 patients were included (spondylolisthesis: 433 patients, 52.4%; no spondylolisthesis: 393 patients, 47.6%). Age, body mass index, hypertension, pain location, and stenosis grading were statistically different between the two groups. The generalized estimating equations analyses with unadjusted and adjusted estimation revealed a significant improvement in the estimated mean numerical rating scale of pain intensities compared to that at baseline in both groups (P < 0.001). Any adverse events that occurred were minor and temporary. Conclusions: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty using a balloon catheter may be an alternative treatment option for patients with chronic LSS, regardless of accompanying DLS, who have had failed conservative management.
RESUMEN
Percutaneous epidural balloon neuroplasty (PEBN) can be used to perform balloon decompression combined with percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN), leading to significant pain relief and functional improvement in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of PEBN and supported its relatively long-term outcomes (at least 6 months, sustained for up to 12 months). Balloon neuroplasty appears to be superior to conventional PEN. Moreover, it has been shown to be effective in patients unresponsive to conventional PEN or in those with post lumbar surgery syndrome. In addition, balloon neuroplasty achieved successful outcomes regardless of the approach used, such as retrodiscal, transforaminal, contralateral interlaminar, or caudal. Chronic lumbar radicular pain without back pain, neurogenic claudication, and minimal neuropathic component were favorable predictors of successful PEBN from a symptomatic perspective. A short duration of pain after lumbar surgery, lumbar foraminal stenosis caused primarily by degenerative disc, mild foraminal stenosis, and perineural adhesion by degenerative discs were associated with successful outcomes of PEBN from pathological aspects. Ballooning ≥ 50% of the target sites and complete contrast dispersion after ballooning seemed to be crucial for successful outcomes from a technical perspective. In addition, PEBN was effective regardless of the accompanying redundant nerve roots or a mild degree of spondylolisthesis. Studies on balloon neuroplasty have reported occasional minor and self-limiting complications; however, no PEBN-related significant complications have been reported. Given the present evidence, balloon neuroplasty appears to be a safe and effective procedure with minimal complications for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic patients with chronic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) accompanied by redundant nerve roots (RNR) have poor treatment outcomes. Recently, epidural balloon neuroplasty has been shown to be effective in patients with chronic LSS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of epidural balloon neuroplasty in patients with chronic LSS accompanied by RNR. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single pain clinic of a tertiary medical center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. METHODS: Patients with chronic LSS were divided into groups with (RNR group) and without RNR (non-RNR group). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural balloon neuroplasty in both groups based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) score for pain intensity, Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III), and proportion of functional improvement at one, 3, and 6 months postprocedure. RESULTS: GEE analyses showed a significant reduction of pain intensity in NRS-11 and functional improvement compared to baseline throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups (P < 0.001), without differences between groups. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, the NRS-11 of leg pain one month after the procedure in the RNR group was reduced less than that in the non-RNR group (P = 0.016), although we did not find a significant time and group interaction. After adjustment, less functional improvement was observed 3 months after the procedures in the RNR group than in the non-RNR group (P = 0.001), with a significant interaction between time and group (P = 0.003). The estimated mean MQS III values were unchanged at 6 months regardless of adjustment in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and a lack of information on adjuvant nonpharmacologic therapies. CONCLUSION: Epidural balloon neuroplasty may be an effective option for reducing pain in patients with chronic LSS accompanied by RNR.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Espinal , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estenosis Espinal/complicaciones , Estenosis Espinal/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Infected pelvic hematoma is a serious complication of hysterectomies. Pelvic drainage can help reduce complications. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of vaginal vault drainage in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic drain insertion for benign gynecological diseases between January 2008 and December 2015 were enrolled retrospectively in the study. They were grouped according to drain insertion sites, that is, through the abdomen (group 1) and vaginal vault (group 2). The postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 504 women were included. No significant differences were observed in the prevalence of postoperative fever, readmission, and reoperation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Given the discomfort associated with holding and removing the abdominal drain, inserting a closed pelvic gravity drain through the vaginal vault appears to be a feasible alternative to an abdominal drain.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The fluoroscopic-guided epidural access is occasionally challenging; therefore, the contralateral oblique (CLO) view has emerged as an alternative approach. The CLO view appears to be optimal for mid-thoracic epidural access; however, evidence on its utility is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the CLO view at 60°±5° compared with the lateral (LAT) view using fluoroscopic-guided mid-thoracic epidural access. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to undergo mid-thoracic epidural access under the fluoroscopic LAT view (LAT group) or CLO view (CLO group). The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of mid-thoracic epidural access. The secondary outcomes were procedural pain intensity, patient satisfaction, needling time, number of needle passes, and radiation dose. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher in the CLO group than in the LAT group (68.3% vs 34.2%, difference: 34.1%; 95% CI 13.3 to 54.8; p=0.003). Procedural pain intensity was significantly lower in the CLO group than in the LAT group. Patient satisfaction was signiï¬cantly greater in the CLO group than in the LAT group. The needling time and the number of needle passes were significantly lower in the CLO group than in the LAT group. Radiation dose in the CLO group was significantly reduced compared with that in the LAT group. CONCLUSIONS: The fluoroscopic CLO view at 60°±5° increased the success rate and patient satisfaction and reduced the procedural time and patient discomfort compared with the LAT view when performing mid-thoracic epidural access. Therefore, the CLO view at 60°±5° can be considered for mid-thoracic epidural access under fluoroscopic guidance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0004926.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cervical epidural steroid injection is associated with rare but potentially catastrophic complications. The contralateral oblique (CLO) view may be a safe and feasible alternative to the lateral (LAT) view for fluoroscopic-guided cervical epidural steroid injection. However, evidence for the clinical usefulness of the CLO view for cervical epidural steroid injection is lacking. We assessed the clinical usefulness of the CLO view for cervical epidural steroid injection in managing cervical herniated intervertebral discs. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive fluoroscopic-guided cervical epidural steroid injection under LAT view or CLO view at 50±5° degrees groups. The primary outcome was the needling time comparison between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were comparison of first-attempt success rate, needle tip visualization and location, total number of needle passes, final success rate, crossover success rate and false-positive/negative loss of resistance. Complications and radiation dose were also compared. RESULTS: The needling time significantly decreased in the CLO than in the LAT group. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the CLO compared with the LAT group. The needle tip was clearly visualized (p<0.001) and located more often on (or just anterior to) the ventral interlaminar line (p<0.001) in the CLO than in the LAT group. There were significantly fewer needle passes (p=0.019) in the CLO than in the LAT group. There were no significant differences in the final success, crossover success, false-positive/negative loss of resistance or radiation dose between the groups. Two (5.9%) cases in the LAT group experienced complications. CONCLUSION: The CLO view may be recommended for fluoroscopic-guided cervical epidural steroid injection, considering its better clinical usefulness over the LAT view.
Asunto(s)
Espacio Epidural , Agujas , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales , EsteroidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have reported that 40%-90% of the patients with celiac plexus-mediated visceral pain benefit from the neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB), but the predictive factors of response to NCPB have not been evaluated extensively. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the immediate analgesic effectiveness of NCPB in patients with intractable upper abdominal cancer-related pain. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 513 patients who underwent NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain. Response to the procedure was defined as (1) a decrease of ≥ 50% or ≥ 4 points on the numerical rating scale (NRS) in pain intensity from the baseline without an increase in opioid requirement, or (2) a decrease of ≥ 30% or ≥ 2 points on the NRS from the baseline with simultaneously reduced opioid consumption after NCPB. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with successful responses to NCPB. RESULTS: Among the 513 patients included in the analysis, 255 (49.8%) and 258 (50.2%) patients were in the non-responder and responder group after NCPB, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.644, P = 0.035), history of upper abdominal surgery (OR = 0.691, P = 0.040), and celiac metastasis (OR = 1.496, P = 0.039) were the independent factors associated with response to NCPB. CONCLUSIONS: Celiac plexus metastases, absence of diabetes, and absence of prior upper abdominal surgery may be independently associated with better response to NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain.
RESUMEN
The tumor suppressors PTEN and p53 are often downregulated in various human cancer types, which has been associated with a poor prognosis. Recent evidence implies that PTEN downregulation may induce growth arrest of kidney cells and cancer cells. In the present study, the role of PTEN in the proliferation and survival of cervical cancer cells was investigated. It was found that PTEN silencing promoted apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest, accompanied by a significant decrease in the proportion of cells in the S1 phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, PTEN silencing in cervical cancer cells increased levels of p53, p27, p21, phospho-ERK and cleaved caspase-3, and decreased levels of cyclin A2 and cyclin D1. Furthermore, PTEN knockdown significantly impacted the viability of cervical cancer cells. P53 silencing did not affect the ability of PTEN knockdown to induce apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. Taken together, the present study results imply that PTEN silencing induces apoptosis and decreases proliferation in cervical cancer cells; hence, PTEN inhibition may represent a promising strategy for the treatment of cervical cancer.
RESUMEN
Background: The ganglion impar (ganglion of Walther) block has been used to manage coccygeal and perineal (perianal and genital) pain due to both benign and malignant causes. However, the factors associated with successful responses to ganglion impar block are unknown. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to identify the independent factors associated with successful responses to ganglion impar block in patients with chronic pain in coccygeal and perineal regions. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2017, we performed a retrospective review of 106 patients who underwent ganglion impar block. Patients were considered successful responders if they reported a decrease of more than 50% or 4 points on the 11-point (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) numerical rating scale 1 month after the procedure, while others were considered non-responders. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with successful responses at 1 month after the procedure. Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that cancer-related causes were significantly associated with successful responses at 1 month after ganglion impar block (odds ratio = 2.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.05 to 6.43, P = 0.038). Conclusion: Ganglion impar block may be more effective in cancer-related pain than pain due to benign causes.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Ganglios Simpáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Bloqueo Nervioso/estadística & datos numéricos , Neuralgia/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Dolor en Cáncer/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Perineo/inervación , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Región Sacrococcígea/inervación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Chronic lumbar radicular pain often accompanies neuropathic pain. The treatment may follow a screening for probable neuropathic pain rather than the definitive diagnosis, which is often difficult in daily practice. However, interventional management may have limited effects on symptoms in patients with neuropathic radicular pain refractory to conservative treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors associated with successful responses after lumbar epidural intervention in patients with chronic lumbar neuropathic radicular pain determined by Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 221 chronic lumbar radicular pain patients using a DN4 questionnaire prior to the epidural interventional procedure. The patients were divided into two groups according to the DN4 questionnaire: <4-point DN4 and ≥4 DN4. The numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity, changes in physical functional status, and the use of pain medication were obtained before and 1 month after the procedure. Successful responder was defined based on robust combination of outcome parameters. The factors associated with successful response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression. Results: We found 170 (76.9%) patients with DN4 <4 and 51 (23.1%) with a score ≥4. Among the total 221 patients, 129 (58.4%) were successful responders and 92 (41.6%) were non-responders regardless of DN4 score. We observed a significantly lower proportion of successful responders among patients with a DN4 score ≥4 (22, 43.1%) than patients with a score <4 (107, 62.9%) (P=0.012). After adjusting in multivariate regression analysis, the DN4 score was independently associated with response after lumbar epidural intervention (odds ratio [OR]=0.838; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.718-0.978; P=0.025). In subgroup logistic regression analysis according to the DN4 score, adjuvant administration of hypertonic saline during epidural interventions in patients with a DN4 score ≥4 (OR=3.71; CI=1.142-12.457; P=0.029) was associated with the success of the lumbar epidural procedure at 1 month. Conclusion: The adjuvant use of hypertonic saline in lumbar epidural interventions may be effective at least 1 month after the intervention in patients with probable neuropathic lumbar radicular pain ≥4 using the DN4.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Neuralgia/terapia , Solución Salina Hipertónica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
An autologous epidural blood patch (EBP) is a mainstay of treatment in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). EBP, however, is less effective for SIH than post-dural puncture headaches. Therefore, patients with SIH frequently require an additional EBP. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with poor response to EBP. This single-center retrospective observational study used the institutional registry records of 321 patients who underwent EBP between September 2001 and March 2016. Patients were divided into two groups, a poor responder group, consisting of patients who underwent EBP at least three times or more, and a good responder group of patients who experienced sufficient symptom relief after two or fewer EBP. The demographic characteristics, clinical features, radiologic findings, procedural data, and laboratory data were analyzed. Univariate analysis showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; p = 0.004) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.015) were significantly lower in poor than in good responders. Multivariate analysis found that NLR was the only independent factor associated with a poor response (odds ratio = 0.720; p = 0.008). These findings indicate that a low NLR was associated with three or more EBP administrations for the sufficient improvement of symptoms in patients with SIH.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) are performed either by interlaminar (IL) or transforaminal (TF) approaches; however, there is controversy over which is better for safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: This clinical trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of the parasagittal IL and TF approaches for cervical ESI in patients who were suffering from cervical radicular pain. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized assessor-blind study. SETTING: The study took place at a single pain clinic within a tertiary medical center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. METHODS: This prospective randomized, assessor-blind trial included 80 patients with cervical radicular pain. We randomly assigned patients to the TF or parasagittal IL approach for cervical ESI. The effectiveness of the 2 groups was compared based on pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) at 1 and 3 months. The Neck Disability Index (NDI), Medication Quantification Scale (MQS), and responders at 1 and 3 months between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The pain intensity of both groups significantly reduced after 1 and 3 months after each procedure (P < 0.001). Two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance showed no significant interaction between group and time for cervical radicular pain (P = 0.266), although NRS-11 pain score was lower in the TF group than the parasagittal IL group after 1 month (P = 0.010). NDI, MQS, and successful responders were not different between the 2 groups at 1 and 3 months after the procedure. We observed 7 cases (18.4%) of vascular visualization in the TF group, although no serious complications were found in either group. LIMITATIONS: This study had no placebo control group and limited follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Parasagittal IL ESI may be recommended over the TF ESI in reducing cervical radicular pain, considering both clinical effectiveness and safety.