Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 38(9): 958-966, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31274832

RESUMEN

Bacteria compete with each other for local supremacy in biologic and environmental niches. In humans, who host an array of commensal bacteria, the presence of one species or strain can sometimes prevent colonization by another, a phenomenon known as "bacterial interference." We describe how, in the 1960s, infants (and later adults) were actively inoculated with a relatively benign strain of Staphylococcus aureus, 502A, to prevent colonization with an epidemic S. aureus strain, 80/81. This introduced bacterial interference as a clinical approach to disease prevention, but little was known about the mechanisms of interference at that time. Since then, much has been learned about how bacteria interact with each other and the host to establish carriage, compete for niches and shift from harmless commensal to invasive pathogen. We provide an overview of these findings and summarize recent studies in which the genome and function of 502A were compared with those of the current epidemic strain, USA300, providing insight into differences in their invasiveness and immunogenicity. Although staphylococcal vaccines have been developed, none has yet been approved for clinical use. Further studies of staphylococcal strains and the molecular characteristics that lead to exclusion of specific bacteria from some niches may provide an alternative path to disease prevention.


Asunto(s)
Antibiosis , Portador Sano/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Epidemias , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Meticilina/farmacología , Ratones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Simbiosis , Virulencia , Factores de Virulencia
2.
Pediatrics ; 134(1): 24-30, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913796

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When varicella vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1995, there were concerns that childhood vaccination might increase the number of adolescents susceptible to varicella and shift disease toward older age groups where it can be more severe. METHODS: We conducted a series of 5 cross-sectional studies in 1994 to 1995 (prevaccine), 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 in Kaiser Permanente of Northern California to assess changes in varicella epidemiology in children and adolescents, as well as changes in varicella hospitalization in people of all ages. For each study, information on varicella history and varicella occurrence during the past year was obtained by telephone survey from a sample of ∼8000 members 5 to 19 years old; varicella hospitalization rates were calculated for the entire membership. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2009, the overall incidence of varicella in 5- to 19-year-olds decreased from 25.8 to 1.3 per 1000 person-years, a ∼90% to 95% decline in the various age categories (5-9, 10-14, and 15-19 years of age). The proportion of varicella-susceptible children and adolescents also decreased in all age groups, including in 15- to 19-year-olds (from 15.6% in 1995 to 7.6% in 2009). From 1994 to 2009, age-adjusted varicella hospitalization rates in the general member population decreased from 2.13 to 0.25 per 100,000, a ∼90% decline. CONCLUSIONS: In the 15 years after the introduction of varicella vaccine, a major reduction in varicella incidence and hospitalization was observed with no evidence of a shift in the burden of varicella to older age groups.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Pediatrics ; 131(5): e1389-96, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23545380

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1995 for individuals ≥12 months of age. A second dose was recommended in the United States in June 2006. Varicella incidence and vaccine effectiveness were assessed in a 14-year prospective study conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. METHODS: A total of 7585 children vaccinated with varicella vaccine in their second year of life in 1995 were followed up prospectively for breakthrough varicella and herpes zoster (HZ) through 2009. A total of 2826 of these children received a second dose in 2006-2009. Incidences of varicella and HZ were estimated and compared with prevaccine era rates. RESULTS: In this cohort of vaccinated children, the average incidence of varicella was 15.9 per 1000 person-years, nine- to tenfold lower than in the prevaccine era. Vaccine effectiveness at the end of the study period was 90%, with no indication of waning over time. Most cases of varicella were mild and occurred early after vaccination. No child developed varicella after a second dose. HZ cases were mild, and rates were lower in the cohort of vaccinated children than in unvaccinated children during the prevaccine era (relative risk: 0.61 [95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that varicella vaccine is effective at preventing chicken pox, with no waning noted over a 14-year period. One dose provided excellent protection against moderate to severe disease, and most cases occurred shortly after the cohort was vaccinated. The study data also suggest that varicella vaccination may reduce the risks of HZ in vaccinated children.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , California/epidemiología , Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Herpes Zóster/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación/métodos
4.
Vaccine ; 29(38): 6592-7, 2011 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21763385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Associations between vaccinations, particularly hepatitis B, and onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported, but examined in few large-scale studies. METHOD: Onset of RA cases and dates of vaccination against hepatitis B, tetanus, and influenza were identified in a retrospective chart review of approximately 1 million Kaiser Permanente Northern California members ages 15-59 years from 1997 through 1999. In a cohort analysis, rates of new-onset RA were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated within 90, 180, and 365 days. In a case-control analysis, rates of vaccination during exposure intervals (90, 180, 365, and 730 days) were compared between cases and controls using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: 378 RA cases were included in the cohort analysis; 37 additional cases were included in the case-control analysis. In the cohort analysis the relative risks of RA onset within 90, 180, or 365 days of hepatitis B vaccination were not significant (R.R.=1.44, p=0.53; R.R.=1.67, p=0.22; R.R.=1.23, p=0.59 respectively). We found a possible association between RA and influenza vaccine in the previous 180 and 365 days in the cohort analysis (R.R=1.36, p=0.03; R.R.=1.34, p=0.01 respectively), but in the case-control analysis, cases were no more likely than controls to have received any of the three vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study we found no statistically significant association between exposure to hepatitis B vaccine and onset of RA. A possible association between RA and influenza vaccination in the cohort study was not borne out in the larger case-control analysis.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/inducido químicamente , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Toxoide Tetánico/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Toxoide Tetánico/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
5.
Vaccine ; 28(27): 4335-9, 2010 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20452430

RESUMEN

Glycoconjugate vaccines have been proven safe and effective against various diseases in children. Although these vaccines have a history of effectiveness, there are still many unanswered questions to be addressed, including conjugate interference when multiple vaccines are administered at one time, expansion of serotype coverage, effectiveness in special populations, and issues relating to conjugate vaccine use in the developing world. This paper focuses on the use of CRM(197) as a carrier protein, contrasting it to other carrier proteins used in single-antigen pediatric vaccines as well as identifying areas for future study.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
6.
PLoS One ; 5(12): e15885, 2010 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21209964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) is a major cause of hospitalization for children in China, while the etiological diagnosis of ALRI remains a challenge. This study was performed to evaluate the utility of the blind Nasotracheal aspiration (NTA) in the pathogen detection in ALRI through an evaluation of the test's specificity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A hospital-based study of children ≤3 years was carried out from March 2006 through March 2007 in Suzhou University Affiliated Children's Hospital, including 379 cases with ALRI from the respiratory wards, and 394 controls receiving elective surgery. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and NTA specimens were taken on admission. S. pneumoniae was isolated from 10.3% of NTA samples from ALRI children, H. influenzae from 15.3%, and M. catarrhalis from 4.7%. The false positive rate--the strains from NTA in control group children--was 8.4% (95% CI: 5.8%-11.4%) for S. pneumoniae, 27.2% (95% CI: 22.7-31.5%) for H. influenzae, and 22.1% (95% CI: 18.0%-26.2%) for M. catarrhalis. The agreement between NPS and NTA in the control group was over 70%. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The blind NTA test is not a useful test for etiologic diagnosis of ALRI.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Niño , Preescolar , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Neumología/métodos , Respiración , Succión/efectos adversos
8.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 23(1): 1-15, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19135913

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus is an unusually successful and adaptive human pathogen that can cause epidemics of invasive disease despite its frequent carriage as a commensal. Over the past 100 years and more, S aureus has caused cycles of outbreaks in hospitals and the community and has developed resistance to every antibiotic used against it, yet the exact mechanisms leading to epidemics of virulent disease are not fully understood. Approaches such as bacterial interference have been effective in interrupting outbreaks, but to better prevent staphylococcal disease, we will need to be vigilant about environmental factors that facilitate its spread. Even more importantly, we need to understand more about the mechanisms that lead to its virulence and transmission. With such information, it may be possible to develop a vaccine that will prevent endemic and epidemic staphylococcal disease.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/historia , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión
9.
J Infect Dis ; 197 Suppl 2: S139-42, 2008 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419387

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccine currently is recommended for children between 12 and 18 months of age. However, rates of breakthrough varicella have been reported to be higher among children vaccinated before 14 or 15 months of age and to increase with time since vaccination. METHODS: An ongoing study at the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program is evaluating vaccine efficacy in 7585 children vaccinated with Varivax in 1995, when they were between 12 and 23 months of age. Cases of chickenpox are identified by telephone interviews with each child's parent(s) every 6 months. Mean age at varicella onset and mean time from vaccination to onset were calculated on the basis of age, in months, at vaccination. Logistic regression was used to test for trend, and the chi2 test was used to test for differences in rates of breakthrough varicella by age. RESULTS: Over the first 8 years of the study, a total of 1161 cases of breakthrough varicella were reported, for an average rate of 21.7 cases/1000 person-years. Vaccine effectiveness was 83.6% at year 8. The rate of breakthrough varicella did not change for each additional month of age at vaccination (P = .864), and no difference in the rate of breakthrough varicella was found between children vaccinated at <15 months of age and those vaccinated at > or =15 months of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not show a difference in vaccine effectiveness with age at vaccination and thus support the current recommendations for initial vaccination between 12 and 18 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , California , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
J Infect Dis ; 197 Suppl 2: S152-5, 2008 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419390

RESUMEN

A quadrivalent vaccine combining measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella antigens (MMRV) was developed to increase the coverage of varicella vaccine and reduce the number of injections children receive. Although the varicella antigen is as immunogenic in the latest formulation of MMRV vaccine as when it is administered alone, up to 14% of vaccine recipients do not achieve protective levels of anti-varicella antibodies after a single dose, which can result in breakthrough varicella. A second dose of varicella vaccine raises response rates to 99% and was recently recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Giving the second dose 3 months after the first (at approximately 15 months of age) would provide more protection against varicella but would necessitate a change in the childhood vaccination schedule, which currently calls for a second dose of MMRV vaccine between the ages of 4 and 6 years.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Paperas/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación
11.
J Infect Dis ; 195(6): 826-32, 2007 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17299712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When the decision was made to prepare for a deliberate release of smallpox, the United States had approximately 15 million doses of Wyeth Dryvax vaccine, which was known to induce significant morbidity when used undiluted; Sanofi Pasteur, Inc., later identified approximately 85 million additional doses in storage. METHODS: Eleven vaccine-dose groups, each with 30 vaccinia-naive subjects, were given diluted Dryvax vaccine or 1 of 2 lots of Sanofi Pasteur smallpox vaccine and were evaluated for vaccination success rates, morbidity, and immune responses. RESULTS: Estimated doses of 10(6.6)-10(8.2) pfu of virus/mL induced major reactions (or "takes") in 93%-100% of subjects in each dose group. No differences in vaccination take rates, lesion size, erythema, and induration or in serum neutralizing-antibody response were detected between the groups. However, systemic reactogenicity and missed activities were significantly lower for the vaccine groups given doses of 10(6.6)-10(7.2) pfu/mL than for those given doses of 10(7.6)-10(8.2) pfu/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of a higher dilution of Wyeth Dryvax vaccine and Sanofi Pasteur smallpox vaccine, given that the resulting morbidity should be significantly lower without loss of vaccine effectiveness. A plan for use of higher dilutions would create an enormous stockpile of vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Viruela/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Alantoides/virología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Formación de Anticuerpos , Embrión de Pollo , Corion/virología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Vacuna contra Viruela/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Virus de la Viruela/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Viruela/fisiología
12.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 160(12): 1277-83, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17146026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether influenza vaccination of pregnant women prevents visits for respiratory illness in their infants born during the influenza season. DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study. SETTING: Four managed care organizations in the United States. Patients A total of 41 129 infants (3160 and 37 969 born to vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers, respectively) born between 1995 and 2001. Main Exposure Maternal influenza vaccination. Infants were considered exposed if their gestational age at birth was at least 30 weeks, if the time from maternal vaccination to birth was at least 28 days, and if they were exposed to at least 14 days of the influenza season. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of acute respiratory illnesses (outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient settings combined) and incident rate ratios (IRRs) for infants exposed and unexposed to maternal vaccination during the following 4 periods: peak influenza, respiratory syncytial virus predominant, periseasonal, and summer weeks. The time to the first acute respiratory illness during peak influenza weeks was also assessed. RESULTS: During the peak influenza weeks, infant visit rates were 15.4 and 17.1 per 100 person-months for exposed and unexposed infants, respectively (IRR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.02). Adjusted IRRs for the 4 periods found a protective effect of infant female sex, whereas Medicaid status and maternal high-risk status increased infant visit rates. Maternal influenza vaccination did not reduce visit rates during any of the 4 time periods (IRR for peak influenza season, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.07) and did not delay the onset of first respiratory illness. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate that maternal influenza vaccination reduces respiratory illness visit rates among their infants.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
JAMA ; 296(16): 1990-7, 2006 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17062862

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Beginning with the winter season of 2004-2005, influenza vaccination has been recommended for all children 6 to 23 months old in the United States. However, its safety in young children has not been adequately studied in large populations. OBJECTIVE: To screen for medically attended events in the clinic, emergency department, or hospital after administration of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 6 to 23 months old. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort using self-control analysis, with chart review of significant medically attended events at 8 managed care organizations in the United States that comprise the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Participants were all children in the Vaccine Safety Datalink cohort 6 to 23 months old who received trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine between January 1, 1991, and May 31, 2003 (45,356 children with 69,359 vaccinations). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Any medically attended event significantly associated with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in risk windows 0 to 3 days, 1 to 14 days (primary analysis), 1 to 42 days, or 15 to 42 days after vaccination, compared with 2 control periods, one before vaccination and the second after the risk window. All individual ICD-9 codes as well as predefined aggregate codes were examined. RESULTS: Before chart review, only 1 diagnosis, gastritis/duodenitis, was more likely to occur in the 14 days after trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (matched odds ratio [OR], 5.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-24.81 for control period 1, and matched OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.23-15.21 for control period 2). Thirteen medically attended events were less likely to occur after trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, including acute upper respiratory tract infection, asthma, bronchiolitis, and otitis media. After chart review, gastritis/duodenitis was not significantly associated with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (matched OR, 4.00; 95% CI, 0.85-18.84 for control period 1; matched OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 0.92-12.11 for control period 2). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest population-based study to date of the safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in young children, there were very few medically attended events, none of which were serious, significantly associated with the vaccine. This study provides additional evidence supporting the safety of universally immunizing all children 6 to 23 months old with influenza vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Lactante , Vigilancia de la Población , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados
14.
Hum Vaccin ; 2(5): 205-14, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17035730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (ProQuad, Merck & Co., Inc, West Point, PA) was evaluated in five clinical trials. Use of ProQuad would result in fewer injections for children and would facilitate universal immunization against all four diseases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the combined results obtained from the studies conducted during the clinical development program for ProQuad. METHODS: A total of 5833 healthy children, 12-23 months of age, and 399 healthy children, 4-6 years of age, received 1 or 2 doses of ProQuad in five controlled clinical trials. M-M-R II and VARIVAX were used as the control for most studies. Safety was evaluated for six weeks postvaccination and immunogenicity was assessed six weeks after each dose by a sensitive assay (ELISA or gpELISA). RESULTS: A single dose of ProQuad in 12- to 23-month-old children was shown to be as immunogenic as a single dose of M-M-R II and VARIVAX and was generally well tolerated. ProQuad can be used concomitantly with other vaccines (hepatitis B and Hoemophilus influenzoe b). A higher rate of fever was reported after 1 dose of ProQuad compared to M-M-R II and VARIVAX, but fever episodes were transient without long-term sequelae. Both a 2-dose regimen of ProQuad in 12- to 23-month-olds and use of ProQuad in place of M-M-R II at 4-6 years were shown to be immunogenic and well tolerated. The incidence of adverse experiences following a second dose of ProQuad was lower than that following the initial dose. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of ProQuad is as immunogenic as M-M-R II and VARIVAX and is well tolerated in a 1- or 2-dose schedule. ProQuad should easily fit into the routine immunization schedule.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna Antisarampión/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Parotiditis/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Rubéola/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Vacuna Antisarampión/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Parotiditis/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Vacuna contra la Rubéola/inmunología , Vacunas Combinadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología
15.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 25(9): 768-73, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16940831

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whole-cell pertussis (wP) and measles vaccines are effective in preventing disease but have also been suspected of increasing the risk of encephalopathy or encephalitis. Although many countries now use acellular pertussis vaccines, wP vaccine is still widely used in the developing world. It is therefore important to evaluate whether wP vaccine increases the risk of neurologic disorders. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed at 4 health maintenance organizations. Records from January 1, 1981, through December 31, 1995, were examined to identify children aged 0 to 6 years old hospitalized with encephalopathy or related conditions. The cause of the encephalopathy was categorized as known, unknown or suspected but unconfirmed. Up to 3 controls were matched to each case. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze the relative risk of encephalopathy after vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines in the 90 days before disease onset as defined by chart review compared with an equivalent period among controls indexed by matching on case onset date. RESULTS: Four-hundred fifty-two cases were identified. Cases were no more likely than controls to have received either vaccine during the 90 days before disease onset. When encephalopathies of known etiology were excluded, the odds ratio for case children having received DTP within 7 days before onset of disease was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-3.31, P = 0.693) compared with control children. For MMR in the 90 days before onset of encephalopathy, the odds ratio was 1.23 (95% confidence interval = 0.51-2.98, P = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of more than 2 million children, DTP and MMR vaccines were not associated with an increased risk of encephalopathy after vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías/etiología , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Encefalitis/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 25(9): 779-81, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16940833

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A World Health Organization (WHO) working group in 2001 developed a method for standardizing interpretation of chest radiographs in children for epidemiologic purposes. We reevaluated radiographs from the Kaiser Permanente Pneumococcal Efficacy trial using this method. METHODS: Seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was evaluated in a randomized, controlled study including 37,868 infants. Effectiveness against pneumonia was previously evaluated using the original treating radiologist reading. There were 2841 sets of radiographs from this trial and all available radiographs were scanned and read blindly by 2 WHO crosstrained readers (A and B); discordance between the 2 primary readers was resolved through a consensus reading by an adjudicating panel of 2 radiologists. RESULTS: Of the 2841 radiographs, 2446 were available for scanning and were reviewed using WHO-defined descriptive categories. Two hundred fifty of the 2446 radiographs were read as positive by both readers. An additional 129 were read as positive by reader A only and 142 by reader B only for a total of 521 radiographs that were read as positive by one or both of the reviewers. The concordance rate between the 2 reviewers was 250 of 521 (48%). Of the 271 discordant radiographs, 45 of 129 (34.9%) of reader A and 66 of 142 (46.5%) for reader B were finalized as positive by the adjudicating panel. Overall, 361 radiographs were finalized as positive (12.7%). With these 361 images as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of reader A were 82% and 97%, respectively, and for reader B, 88% and 97%, respectively. Kappa between the 2 readers was 0.58. Of 25 control radiographs read as positive by both A and B, 80% were also read as positive by the panel and all 25 control negative radiographs were read as negative by the panel. Using original readings by point-of-care radiologists, efficacy against first episode of radiograph confirmed pneumonia was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8-28.9%) in intent-to-treat and 20.5% (95% CI = 4.4-34%) in per protocol. Using the WHO method, the efficacy against first episode of radiograph confirmed pneumonia adjusting for age, gender and year of vaccination of 25.5% (95% CI = 6.5-40.7%, P = 0.011) for intent-to-treat and 30.3% (95% CI = 10.7-45.7%, P = 0.0043) for per protocol. CONCLUSION: Using WHO criteria for reading of radiographs increased point estimates of vaccine efficacy presumably as a result of improved specificity.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Meningococicas/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía/prevención & control , Radiografía/normas , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Radiografía/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Organización Mundial de la Salud
17.
Vaccine ; 24 Suppl 2: S2-65-9, 2006 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16823932

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous bacterial species that causes serious disease in certain settings. S. aureus disease is difficult to treat, and antibiotic-resistant strains have become common. A vaccine to protect against infection would therefore be beneficial. However, the virulence of S. aureus is determined by a number of different factors, which makes design of a widely effective vaccine difficult. Here, various bacterial virulence factors and attempts to develop vaccines based on these factors are briefly reviewed. In particular, the success of a Phase 3 clinical study of a vaccine directed at capsular polysaccharides types 5 and 8 is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Polisacáridos Bacterianos/inmunología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Estafilocócicas/inmunología , Antígenos Bacterianos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Polisacáridos Bacterianos/química , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/inmunología , Staphylococcus aureus/inmunología , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Factores de Virulencia/inmunología
18.
Vaccine ; 24 Suppl 2: S2-79-80, 2006 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16823937

RESUMEN

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was introduced for routine use in infants and toddlers in the United States in March 2000. We report on the impact of the introduction of this vaccine on disease epidemiology in young children as well as secondary effects due to herd immunity in unvaccinated children and adults. As of March 2003, 157,471 children had received one or more doses of PNCV7, but only 24% of those less than two years of age received all four doses as a result of shortages of vaccine. During the last year of observation, no cases of vaccine serotype disease were seen in children less than one year of age compared with an incidence ranging between 51.5 and 98.2 cases/100,000 person years (16-34 cases per year) in the years before vaccine introduction. Similar reductions were seen in children less than five years of age. There was no evidence of any concomittant increase in pneumococcal disease caused by non-vaccine serotypes. High-level resistance of pneumococci to penicillin fell from a peak of 15% in year 2000 to 5% in the first half of 2003.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Vacunas Meningococicas/inmunología , Resistencia a las Penicilinas , Infecciones Neumocócicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 25(7): 615-22, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16804432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was conducted to demonstrate that each of 3 consistency lots of a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (MMRV) would be well tolerated, induce clinically acceptable and similar immune responses to each antigen and induce immune responses similar to measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) administered concomitantly with varicella vaccine (V). An additional objective was to evaluate the persistence of antibodies 1 year postvaccination. METHODS: Study participants 12 to 23 months of age received a single injection of either one of 3 consistency lots of MMRV or MMR + V administered at separate injection sites. RESULTS: A total of 3,928 healthy children were enrolled at study sites in the United States and Canada. Immune responses to measles, mumps, rubella and varicella in children immunized with each of 3 lots of MMRV were similar and the combined response to all 3 lots was comparable to that of the control group. The 1-year antibody persistence rates for measles, mumps, rubella and varicella viruses were each greater than 95% and comparable among the recipients of the 3 consistency lots of MMRV and the control group. All vaccines were generally well tolerated during the 42 days after vaccination and the overall incidence of adverse experiences was comparable between recipients of MMRV and MMR + V. Rates of fever (temperature >or=38.9 degrees C oral equivalent or tactile) were greater in recipients of MMRV than in recipients of MMR + V (39.1% versus 33.1%, P = 0.001). Fevers were transient and there was no difference in the incidence of febrile seizures. CONCLUSIONS: MMRV was generally well tolerated and had comparable immunogenicity and overall safety profiles to MMR + V administered concomitantly. Long-term persistence of antibodies after receipt of MMRV is expected based on similar antibody titers against all 4 antigens 1 year postvaccination compared with recipients of MMR and V.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/biosíntesis , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/normas , Paperas/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/normas
20.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 25(4): 293-300, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16567979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of routine vaccination with heptavalent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine has changed the overall incidence of bacteremia in children 3 months-3 years old. OBJECTIVE: To describe the changing incidence and etiology of bacteremia in previously healthy toddlers presenting to outpatient clinical settings. METHODS: Retrospective case series of all blood cultures obtained between September 1998 and August 2003 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California outpatient clinics and emergency departments from previously healthy children 3 months-3 years old. RESULTS: Implementation of routine vaccination with the conjugated pneumococcal vaccine resulted in an 84% reduction of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia (1.3-0.2%) and a 67% reduction in overall bacteremia (1.6-0.7%) in the study population. The rate of blood culture isolation of contaminating organisms remained unchanged at 1.8%; therefore, by the end of the study, >70% of organisms identified in blood cultures were contaminants. During the 5 study years, total blood cultures drawn decreased by 35% in outpatient pediatric clinics but remained unchanged in emergency departments. By 2003, one-third of all pathogenic organisms isolated from blood cultures were Escherichia coli, one-third were non-vaccine serotype S. pneumoniae, the majority of the remaining one-third were Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp., Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pyogenes. In our population of children routinely immunized with the conjugated pneumococcal vaccine, a white blood cell count >15,000 by itself is a poor predictor of bacteremia in the febrile toddler (sensitivity, 74.0%; specificity, 54.5%; positive predictive value, 1.5%; negative predictive value, 99.5%). CONCLUSION: In the United States, routine vaccinations with Haemophilus influenzae type b and S. pneumoniae vaccines have made bacteremia in the previously healthy toddler a rare event. As the incidence of pneumococcal bacteremia has decreased, E. coli, Salmonella spp. and Staphylococcus aureus have increased in relative importance. The use of the white blood cell count alone to guide the empiric use of antibiotics is not indicated. New guidelines are needed to approach the previously healthy febrile toddler in the outpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Preescolar , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...