Survival benefits of interventional radiology and surgical teams collaboration during primary trauma surveys: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A team approach is essential for effective trauma management. Close collaboration between interventional radiologists and surgeons during the initial management of trauma patients is important for prompt and accurate trauma care. This study aimed to determine whether trauma patients benefit from close collaboration between interventional radiology (IR) and surgical teams during the primary trauma survey. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to an embolization group (EG), a surgery group (SG), or a combination group (CG) according to their treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival at hospital discharge compared with the probability of survival (Ps) and the time course of treatment. RESULTS: The analysis included 197 patients, consisting of 135 men and 62 women, with a median age of 56 [IQR, 38-72] years and an injury severity score of 20 [10-29]. The EG, SG, and CG included 114, 48, and 35 patients, respectively. Differences in organ injury patterns were observed between the three groups. In-hospital survival rates in all three groups were higher than the Ps. In particular, the survival rate in the CG was 15.5% higher than the Ps (95% CI: 7.5-23.6%; p < 0.001). In the CG, the median time for starting the initial procedure was 53 [37-79] min and the procedure times for IR and surgery were 48 [29-72] min and 63 [35-94] min, respectively. Those times were significantly shorter among three groups. CONCLUSION: Close collaboration between IR and surgical teams, including the primary survey, improves the survival of severe trauma patients who require both IR procedures and surgeries by improving appropriate treatment selection and reducing the time process.

High-Concentration Insulin Glargine Overdose: Polyphasic Patterns of Blood Insulin Levels.

In the treatment of diabetes mellitus, there is a growing trend towards using high-concentration insulin, with Lantus XR (Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC), which has a drug concentration three times higher than that of conventional Lantus (100 U/mL; Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC), being a prominent example. This type of high-concentration insulin is known for its smaller injection volumes, leading to a slower absorption rate and maintenance of more consistent blood insulin levels. When administered in high doses, the pharmacological effects of insulin are generally prolonged; however, insulin glargine overdose rarely occurs, and its pharmacokinetics remain unclear. We encountered a case of an insulin overdose in a 19-year-old female patient, who had self-injected glargine (Lantus XR) 1,350 units and aspart (NovoRapid; Bagsværd, Denmark: Novo Nordisk A/S) 600 units. We measured blood glucose and insulin levels over time. Bimodal peaks in blood insulin levels were observed, and we adjusted high doses of intravenous infusion with a 50% glucose solution until the blood insulin levels returned to the normal range. Consequently, the patient was treated without inducing severe hypoglycemia. U300 glargine overdose may lead to both a multimodal elevation in blood insulin levels and prolonged hypoglycemia compared to U100 glargine. Therefore, monitoring blood insulin levels and adjusting treatment accordingly may contribute to safer patient management. This study represents the initial documentation of blood insulin levels measured in a U300 glargine overdose patient, revealing a bimodal peak.