Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma with Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignant tumor with peritoneal thickening. Tuberculous peritonitis also shows peritoneal thickening, so differentiating between the two is important but difficult if latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is present. We herein report a patient with MPM and LTBI. A 79-year-old man was diagnosed with peritoneal thickening on computed tomography. Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) results were positive, suggesting tuberculous peritonitis. He underwent a laparoscopic omental biopsy and was diagnosed with MPM, which can occur together with LTBI. If peritoneal thickening is observed, an IGRA should be performed early, and the possibility of LTBI should be considered.

Significance of fecal hemoglobin concentration for predicting risk of colorectal cancer after colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: As the significance of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in patients who previously underwent a colonoscopy is unknown, this study aimed at investigating the association between fecal hemoglobin concentration and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed FIT-positive patients who underwent a colonoscopy through our opportunistic annual screening program from April 2010 to March 2017 at the Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital. We stratified them into no colonoscopy and past colonoscopy (>5 years or ≤5 years) groups based on whether they had a history of undergoing a colonoscopy and analyzed the correlation between fecal hemoglobin concentration and advanced neoplasia or invasive cancer detection in each group. We analyzed 1248 patients with positive FIT results. There were 748 (59.9%), 198 (15.9%), and 302 (24.2%) patients in the no colonoscopy, past colonoscopy (>5 years), and past colonoscopy (≤5 years) groups, respectively. In the no colonoscopy group, the advanced neoplasia detection rate significantly increased with the fecal hemoglobin concentration (P < 0.001). However, no significant trend was observed in the past colonoscopy (both >5 years and ≤5 years) group (P = 0.982). No invasive cancer was detected in the past colonoscopy (≤5 years) group. CONCLUSION: The risk of CRC might be low even if fecal hemoglobin concentration was high, especially in those who underwent colonoscopy within 5 years.

Risk of colorectal cancer for fecal immunochemistry test-positive, average-risk patients after a colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Because the risk of colorectal cancer has not been well examined in fecal immunochemistry test (FIT)-positive patients who previously underwent colonoscopy, this study aimed to investigate this topic. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational study of prospectively collected data in Japan. FIT-positive, average-risk patients who underwent colonoscopy were divided into groups as follows: those who never underwent colonoscopy in the past (no colonoscopy group), those with a history of colonoscopy between 6 months and 5 years (0.5- to 5-year colonoscopy group), and those with a history of colonoscopy more than 5 years ago (> 5-year colonoscopy group). We investigated the prevalence of advanced neoplasia and invasive cancer among these groups using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Detection rates of advanced neoplasia in the no colonoscopy group, 0.5- to 5-year colonoscopy group, and > 5-year colonoscopy group were 14.8% (240/1626), 3.9% (13/330), and 6.9% (17/248), respectively. Detection rates of invasive cancer in each aforementioned group were 5.7% (92/1,626), 0.3% (1/330), and 1.2% (3/248), respectively. Odds ratios of advanced neoplasia in the 0.5- to 5-year colonoscopy group and > 5-year colonoscopy were 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.42) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.24-0.68), respectively, in multivariate analysis. The odds ratios of invasive cancer in each aforementioned group were 0.05 (95% CI: 0.01-0.37) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.06-0.61), respectively. CONCLUSION: Re-screening with the FIT should not be recommended for at least 5 years for average-risk patients after colonoscopy without high-risk neoplasms, because the risks of colorectal cancer are low in such patients.

Feasibility of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Single Center Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) has emerged as an alternative technique for the resection of colorectal lesions. This study aimed to evaluate our initial experience using U-EMR. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective case series study. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent U-EMR in our endoscopy center, from December 2015 to February 2017. RESULTS: Our analysis included 64 lesions, contributed by 38 patients, with a mean age of 68.6 years (range, 25 to 90 years). The study sample included 33 right-sided and 25 left-sided colon lesions, and seven rectal lesions, with an average size of 16.2 mm (6 - 40 mm). Of these, 46 lesions were polypoid and 18 ones non-polypoid. Histologically, 31 lesions were low-grade adenomas, eight ones were high-grade adenomas, 11 were mucosal cancers, four were submucosal cancers, and 10 were classified as "others". En bloc resection was achieved in 52 (81%) lesions, with an en bloc resection rate of 95% for lesions < 20 mm and 55% for lesions ≥ 20 mm. Complete resection of neoplastic epithelial lesions, defined by a negative pathological margin, was achieved in 32 of 59 neoplastic epithelial lesions (54%). We identified three cases (5%) of post-procedural bleeding and one case of perforation (2%). CONCLUSIONS: U-EMR can be feasibly used for resection of colonic lesions, including lesions ≥ 20 mm, although the en bloc resection rate for these lesions was lower than for lesions < 20 mm.

Multiple small intestinal ulcers associated with protein-losing enteropathy secondary to cholesterol crystal embolism:a case report.

A 78-year-old man with hypertension, nephrosclerosis, and angina pectoris visited his family doctor with a history of fatigue and leg edema. He had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention 5 years prior, and was taking low-dose aspirin. Blood tests revealed hypoalbuminemia, gastrointestinal 99mTc-HSA scintigraphy was positive, and alpha-1 antitrypsin clearance was high;therefore, the hypoalbuminemia was thought to be secondary to a protein-losing enteropathy. A small bowel series revealed multiple, ring-shaped, longitudinal ulcers in the ileum. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy from the anus showed severe stenosis with an ileal ulcer. Since we were not able to diagnose the ulcers, mesalazine and supplemental nutritional care were provided. Four years after the hypoalbuminemia had been diagnosed, the patient died because of pulmonary congestion secondary to renal failure. An autopsy revealed severe atherosclerosis in his aorta and multiple cholesterol embolisms in his small intestine, kidney, stomach, colon, liver, and spleen. The multiple ulcers in the small intestine were thought to be caused by cholesterol crystal embolism, which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of small intestinal ulcers in elderly men or patients after cardiovascular intervention.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Intra-Abdominal Abscess after Gastric Perforation in a Patient Receiving Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Gastrointestinal perforation is a serious adverse event that occurs in approximately 1% of patients receiving ramucirumab and paclitaxel. A 67-year-old man with unresectable advanced gastric cancer was admitted to our hospital and treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel. Gastric perforation occurred during the second cycle of chemotherapy. Although the patient's condition improved without surgery, an abscess developed in the intra-abdominal fluid collection resulting from the perforation. We performed endoscopic ultrasound-guided abscess drainage. The patient improved and was discharged in satisfactory condition. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage is a treatment option for patients with intra-abdominal abscess following gastric perforation due to ramucirumab.

Examination time as a quality indicator of screening upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for asymptomatic examinees.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The significance of examination time of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for asymptomatic examinees is yet to be established. We aimed to clarify whether endoscopists who allot more examination time can detect higher numbers of neoplastic lesions among asymptomatic examinees. METHODS: We reviewed a database of consecutive examinees who underwent EGD in our hospital from April 2010 to September 2015. Staff endoscopists were classified into fast, moderate, and slow groups based on the mean examination time of EGD without a biopsy. Neoplastic lesion detection rate among these groups was compared using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 55 786 consecutive examinees who underwent EGD, 15 763 asymptomatic examinees who were screened by staff doctors were analyzed. Mean examination time of 13 661 EGD without biopsy was 6.2 min (range, 2-18 min). When cut-off times of 5 and 7 min were used, four endoscopists were classified into the fast (mean duration, 4.4 ± 1.0 min), 12 into the moderate (6.1 ± 1.4 min), and four into the slow (7.8 ± 1.9 min) groups. Neoplastic lesion detection rates in the fast, moderate, and slow groups were 0.57% (13/2288), 0.97% (99/10 180), and 0.94% (31/3295), respectively. Compared with that in the fast group, odds ratios for the neoplastic lesion detection rate in the moderate and slow groups were 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.40) and 1.89 (95% CI, 0.98-3.64), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopists who do not allot adequate examination time may overlook neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.