Menstrual Cramps in Anovulatory versus Normally Ovulatory Cycles - SARS-COV-2 Pandemic Daily Data Plus a Meta-Analysis of Cramps and Anovulation.

Purpose: It is asserted that primary dysmenorrhea/menstrual cramps only occur in ovulatory menstrual cycles. Our first objective was to present detailed menstrual cramps information in normally ovulatory versus anovulatory cycles from a single-cycle cohort study during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Secondly, we reviewed the literature for cohort studies documenting both menstrual cramps and ovulation. Participants and Methods: The Menstruation and Ovulation Study 2 recruited 108 women ages 19-35 years to a prospective, observational single-cycle study, recording cramps daily (0-4 scale) in the Menstrual Cycle Diary© and assessing normal ovulation (luteal length ≥10 days) by the validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (Mean Temperature Method). We searched databases for « primary dysmenorrhea ¼ / ¼ menstrual cramps ¼; « menstrual cycles ¼; « anovulation ¼, finding four valid publications. Results: In 75 women/cycles during the Pandemic, mean age was 28.5, body mass index 23.5, and higher education (16 years); 40 normally ovulatory and 35 anovulatory cycles had similar lengths (29.5-30.0 days), respectively (P=0.571). However, anovulatory cycles recorded significantly worse menstrual cramps versus normally ovulatory cycles; anovulatory median intensity was 1.9 versus 1.6, and Cramp Score was 8 versus 6 in normally ovulatory cycles (P=0.017). Four publications in 273 women (991 cycles) showed cramps in both anovulatory and ovulatory cycles; three were in adolescent/young adult women, one of which documented a significantly greater percentage of cramps in ovulatory cycles. The 694 cycles in premenopausal women (20-41 years) showed similar percentages of symptomatic cramps in cycles of both ovulatory types. Meta-analysis documented significantly higher cramp prevalence in ovulatory cycles (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.31, 3.37; P=0.002). Conclusion: This is the first documentation of more intense and frequent cramps in anovulatory cycles. However, meta-analysis showing the presence of symptomatic cramps in both ovulatory and anovulatory cycles documented they were twice as prevalent in ovulatory menstrual cycles.

"Worse Menstrual Cramps in Anovulatory Cycles". Medicine has long believed that menstrual cramps only occur in ovulatory menstrual cycles that release an egg and have high progesterone levels that decrease before the next period. The notion was that dropping progesterone levels triggered release of prostaglandins that cause the pain and uterus muscle contractions of menstrual cramps. This research studied 75 community women aged 19­35 years for a single cycle during COVID-19. Forty women had normally ovulatory cycles and 35 had anovulatory cycles with a similar mean cycle length of 29.7 days. Women in both groups were similar in age, weight, education and other reproductive characteristics. Women recorded Menstrual Cycle Diary© daily experiences for cramp presence and intensity (scored 0­4). Ovulation was documented by daily first morning temperatures analyzed by the valid Quantitative Basal Temperature© method. Results showed menstrual cramps occurred in both normally ovulatory and anovulatory cycles. Surprisingly, anovulatory compared with ovulatory cycles had cramps that lasted longer (4 rather than 3 days), were more intense (1.9 versus 1.6) and with significantly higher Cramp Scores (of 8 versus 6). We also found four other published studies showing cramps occurred in both anovulatory and ovulatory cycles. A meta-analysis of these, however, showed that cramps were twice as frequent in ovulatory cycles. These results matter because they stimulate the search for more accurate understandings of why menstrual cramps occur. They will likely stimulate more effective therapies for the rare, intense menstrual cramps that currently are not effectively treated by anti-inflammatory medicines such as ibuprofen.

Experiences of women living with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A pilot case-control, single-cycle, daily Menstrual Cycle Diary study during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) affects many people and is often distressing. Much medical literature about diagnosis and treatment exists, but little is known about PCOS menstrual cycle-related experiences except that cycles tend to be far-apart and unpredictable. Our purpose was to examine the menstrual cycle and daily life experiences in those with PCOS having approximately month-apart cycles compared with age and BMI-matched cohort controls using data from the Menstruation & Ovulation Study 2 (MOS2) during the first 1.5 years of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We hypothesized that those with PCOS would experience lower self-worth and more negative moods. This is a single-cycle prospective case-control study in community-dwelling women ages 19-35 years. Eight reported physician-diagnosed PCOS and were matched (1:3 ratio) with controls by age (within .6 years) and BMI (within .19 BMI units). Experiences were recorded daily (Menstrual Cycle Diary©, Diary). All kept daily morning temperatures to assess luteal phase lengths by the validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© analysis method. From 112 in MOS2, 32 women were compared: eight with PCOS versus 24 controls. Demographic, socioeconomic, comorbidities and lifestyle variables were not different between the two groups. Cycle lengths were similar in PCOS and controls (one PCOS and control each had oligomenorrhea; most lengths were 21-35 days, P = .593). Unexpectedly, luteal phase lengths were also similar between PCOS and controls (P = .167); anovulation occurred in 5 with PCOS, and in 9 controls. There were no significant Diary differences between the two groups except for greater "outside stress" in the PCOS group (P = .020). In contrast to our hypotheses, there were no significant differences in feelings of self-worth, anxiety nor depression. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was a stressful time for women. MOS2 captured granular menstrual cycles, ovulation and daily experiences in women with PCOS compared with age- and BMI-matched controls. These pilot data in women with milder PCOS are the first of more research required to understand the daily experiences in those living with PCOS.

Bone health and prevalent fractures in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis and endocrine-context pathophysiology review.

INTRODUCTION: Bone health in those with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is complex, but the general consensus is that cortical areal bone mineral density (aBMD) sites will be higher in PCOS than in age- and BMI-similar controls. However, spine aBMD sites may be lower, especially in non-obese PCOS. Whether or not incident fracture risk is increased in PCOS is currently controversial; no meta-analysis has yet assessed prevalent fractures. AREAS COVERED: We assessed the bone effects of PCOS-related ovarian hormone alterations, e.g. androgen excess, tonically normal/higher estradiol, and lower-than-normal progesterone levels. We also highlighted evidence that common PCOS medications (e.g. combined hormonal contraceptives [CHC], metformin, and spironolactone) have important bone effects. In adolescents, meta-analysis of CHC showed significant negative aBMD changes. Inflammation has negative PCOS bone effects and is linked with CHC use. EXPERT OPINION: Is fracture risk altered by PCOS? Our meta-analysis showed a 25% increased risk of prevalent fracture in PCOS versus controls; this did not reach statistical significance. Future prospective research needs to collect and evaluate ovulation characteristics, progesterone exposure, and adolescent CHC use, in addition to the complex variables that may influence risks for prevalent or incident fragility fractures and/or for cortical and cancellous aBMD values in PCOS.

A one-year observational cohort study of menstrual cramps and ovulation in healthy, normally ovulating women.

This is a prospective, observational community cohort study with the objective of investigating menstrual cramp occurrence related to ovulatory characteristics. Women reported cramp intensity on daily Menstrual Cycle Diary© records over one year. Ovulation and luteal phase lengths were assessed by validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT) analysis. Healthy, normal-weight, non-smoking community dwelling premenopausal women ages 21-41 years with two consecutive, normally ovulatory, normal-length menstrual cycles were enrolled. All 53 women, with 13.6 ± 2.8 cycles per woman, reported at least one cramp episode of median intensity 1.5 [0-4 scale; range 1.0-3.5], and 2.2 days' [range 1.0-10.2] duration. Within the 49 women who experienced all ovulatory cycle types (normal, short luteal length [SLL < 10 days] and anovulatory), median cramp intensity was greater in normal-length cycles having subclinical ovulatory disturbances (SLL and anovulatory; median 1.4 [range 0.0-2.8]) than in normally ovulatory cycles (median 1.2 [range 0.0-2.3]) (P = 0.023). Cramp Scores did not differ by ovulatory status within the 19 women having both normally ovulatory and anovulatory cycles (P = 0.222). Within-woman 1-year Cramp Scores were not different in anovulatory and normally ovulatory menstrual cycles but were more intense with ovulatory disturbances.

Cyclic Progesterone Therapy in Androgenic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)-A 6-Month Pilot Study of a Single Woman's Experience Changes.

Background and Objectives: Women with androgenic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) have increased endometrial cancer risk that cyclic progesterone will prevent; it may also reverse PCOS's neuroendocrine origins. This pilot study's purpose was to document 6-month experience changes in a woman with PCOS taking cyclic progesterone therapy because she was intolerant of combined hormonal contraceptive therapy, the current PCOS standard of care. A 31-year-old normal-weight woman with PCOS had heavy flow, irregular cycles, and was combined hormonal contraceptives-intolerant. She was prescribed cyclic oral micronized progesterone (OMP) (300 mg/h.s. cycle days 14-27). She kept Menstrual Cycle Diary© (Diary) records, starting with the 1st treatment cycle for six cycles; she was on no other therapy. Statistical analysis a priori hypothesized progesterone decreases high estradiol (E2) experiences (flow, cervical mucus, fluid retention, front-of-the-breast tenderness and anxiety); analysis focused on these. Our objectives: (1) changes from cycles 1 to 6 in E2-related experiences; and (2) follicular phase E2-related changes from cycle 1 (no therapy) to cycles 3 and 6. Materials and Methods: Data from consecutive Diaries were entered into an SPSS database and analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Objective #1) within-person whole cycle ordinal data, and (Objective #2 follicular phase) repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Cyclic OMP was associated with regular, shorter cycles (±SD) (28.2 ± 0.8 days). Comparison of cycles 1-6 showed decreased fluid retention (p = 0.001), breast tenderness (p = 0.002), and cervical mucus (p = 0.048); there were no changes in flow or anxiety. Fluid retention in the follicular phase also significantly decreased over time (F (1.2, 14.7) = 6.7, p = 0.017). Conclusions: Pilot daily Diary data suggest women with PCOS have improved everyday experiences on cyclic progesterone therapy. Larger prospective studies with more objective outcomes and randomized controlled trials of this innovative PCOS therapy are needed.