RESUMEN
Remote triage (RT) allows interprofessional teams (e.g., nurses and physicians) to assess patients and make clinical decisions remotely. RT use has developed widespread interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and has future potential to address the needs of a rapidly aging population, improve access to care, facilitate interprofessional team care, and ensure appropriate use of resources. However, despite rapid and increasing interest in implementation of RT, there is little research concerning practices for successful implementation. We conducted a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of practices that impact the implementation of RT for adults seeking clinical care advice. We searched MEDLINE®, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through July 2018. We included 32 studies in this review. Our review identified four themes impacting the implementation of RT: characteristics of staff who use RT, influence of RT on staff, considerations in selecting RT tools, and environmental and contextual factors impacting RT. The findings of our systemic review underscore the need for a careful consideration of (a) organizational and stakeholder buy-in before launch, (b) physical and psychological workplace environment, (c) staff training and ongoing support, and (d) optimal metrics to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of implementation. Our findings indicate that preimplementation planning, as well as evaluating RT by collecting data during and after implementation, is essential to ensuring successful implementation and continued adoption of RT in a health care system.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina , Triaje , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypothyroidism is associated with increased ischemic stroke risk but paradoxically results in more favorable outcomes once a stroke occurs. Whether a similar pattern emerges in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective stroke center database was performed to analyze the clinical presentation and outcomes of hypothyroid patients with spontaneous ICH. Patients were classified into groups with no history of thyroid disease (n=491) versus those with hypothyroidism (n=72). Hypothyroid patients were further classified into patients receiving thyroid replacement on admission or those without replacement. The Glasgow Coma Scale, ICH score, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were used to assess the initial severity. Outcome was assessed by admission to discharge change in the NIHSS and modified Barthel Index (mBI), in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition and mortality, and the mBI at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: There were 563 patients in the analysis. Seventy-two patients had a history of hypothyroidism, and of these, 63% received thyroid hormone replacement. Patients receiving replacement had significantly lower NIHSS at presentation (median 4 [IQR 1, 11]) compared with either the control group (median 8 [IQR 3, 16]) or hypothyroid patients without replacement (median 9 [IQR 3.8, 15.5]; P=.004). There was no difference in in-hospital and 3-month mortality or functional outcomes at 3 and 12 months among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the history of hypothyroidism does not affect clinical severity or outcome after ICH.