RESUMEN
Far lateral disc herniations account for between 7% and 12% of all disk herniations and occur predominantly at L3/4 and L4/5.1,2 They can cause severe radicular pain due to dorsal root ganglion involvement and are exacerbated by lateral bending to the side of the lesion. Back pain is less of a feature with this pathology.3 The Wiltse approach was first described in the 1960s as an approach to L5/S1 noninstrumented fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis4; its use in pedicle screws and far lateral discs was described in 1988.5 It has been shown to reduce muscle atrophy, wound infection, and blood loss.6,7 The Wiltse approach for a far lateral disc herniation provides a direct route to the disc pathology and as such is useful in cases with this isolated pathology. It confers less extensive muscle dissection and therefore less postoperative pain, minimal bone resection with preservation of the integrity of the facet joint, and it does not rely on endoscopy (rather the traditional operating microscope). It can also be used where endoscopy is contraindicated such as in revision cases. Here we present the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with several weeks of back pain and right L3 radiculopathy, as well as right hip flexion and knee extension weakness. A Wiltse approach microdiscectomy was proposed for her far lateral disk herniation, and the patient consented to the procedure. At 6 weeks of follow-up, her radicular pain had resolved and there was improvement in hip flexion and knee extension. Image at 5:50 of Surgical Video is used with permissions from the Wiltse, L, Bateman, JD, Hutchinson, RH, and Nelson, WE. The Paraspinal Sacrospinalis-Splitting Approach to the Lumbar Spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(5):919-926. Copyright © 1968 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumors (MMNSTs) are rare tumors of presumed neural crest origin. Here, we present a 21-year-old female with a left L5/S1 MMNST along with a review of approximately 70 spinal cases reported in the literature, the majority of which were either local recurrences or metastases. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 21-year-old female presented with 3 months of severe left L5 distribution radicular leg pain and sensory loss. The MR revealed a dumbbell-shaped, heterogenously enhancing lesion centered on the left L5/S1 foramen; the intracanalicular component displaced the thecal sac to the right, while the extraforaminal portion of tumor extended anteriorly into the retroperitoneal space. Gross total resection was performed after a L5/S1 facetectomy. In the immediate postoperative period there were no complications, and the patient had full lower limb power. Four months later, the patient experienced generalized seizures, headache, and multiple cranial nerve palsies due to local and diffuse CNS dissemination. The MRI of the brain and whole spine revealed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement along the full length of the spinal cord into the brainstem and cerebrum along with a focally recurrent epidural soft-tissue lesion located posterolaterally on the left at the L4/5 level (i.e., measuring 12 mm × 10 mm). An external ventricular drain and subsequent ventriculoperitoneal shunt were inserted, followed by craniospinal irradiation. She was discharged 3 months later with residual distal lower limb weakness. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the rapid disease progression of MMNST despite gross total resection. Further such lesions should be aggressively treated locally, and followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Purely extradural spinal meningiomas (ESMs) are exceptionally rare and are often incorrectly diagnosed as metastases, hematological malignancies, or schwannomas. Here, we report a 66-year-old female who presented with an isolated extradural ESM. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 66-year-old female presented with a 2.5-year history of a progressive paraparesis (i.e. T7 level) associated with a T5 sensory level. The MR showed a heterogeneously enhancing lesion circumferentially involving the spinal cord from T3 to T5, with left-sided T4/5 foraminal extension. Following a Simpson Grade 2 resection, the patient rapidly recovered full neurological function. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of the rarely encountered purely ESM are benign. Although gross total resection is optimal, additional adjunctive treatments are available for those treated with subtotal resections.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefit of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in gliomas remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of outcomes with iMRI-guided surgery in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs). METHODS: Databases were searched until November 29, 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBS) comparing iMRI use with conventional neurosurgery. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios were evaluated with the random-effects model. Outcomes included extent of resection (EOR), gross total resection (GTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and length of surgery (LOS), stratified by study design and glioma grade. RESULTS: Fifteen articles (3 RCTs and 12 OBS) were included. In RCTs, GTR was higher in iMRI compared with conventional neurosurgery (RR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.73; I2, 7%) overall, for LGGs (1.91; 95% CI, 1.19-3.06), but not HGGs (1.24; 95% CI, 0.89-1.73), with no difference in EOR, PFS, OS, and LOS. For OBS, GTR was higher (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.90; I2, 4%) overall, and for LGGs (1.63; 95% CI, 1.17-2.28; I2, 0%) and HGGs (1.62; 95% CI, 1.36-1.92; I2, 19%). EOR was greater with iMRI (6%; 95% CI, 4%-8%; I2, 44%) overall, in LGGs (5%; 95% CI, 2%-8%; I2, 37%) and HGGs (7%; 95% CI, 4%-10%; I2, 13%). There was no difference in PFS, OS, and LOS with iMRI. CONCLUSIONS: IMRI use improved GTR in gliomas, including LGGs. However, no PFS and OS benefit was shown in the meta-analysis.
