RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of brief cognitive screening instruments is essential in the assessment of dementia. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of use and perceived characteristics of cognitive screening instruments among Canadian psychogeriatric clinicians. METHODS: Members of the Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry (CAGP) and attendees to the 2010 Annual Scientific Meeting were asked to complete a computerized survey. This survey assessed the perceived characteristics and frequency of use of 14 instruments. RESULTS: The survey had a 55% response rate, with a total of 155 respondents. The most commonly used instruments are the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Delayed Word Recall. Effectiveness, ease of administration, and speed of administration were the perceived characteristics of instruments most correlated with frequency of use. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous surveys, a small number of cognitive screening instruments are used by the majority of clinicians. Use of the CDT and the MMSE were comparable. To our knowledge, this is the first survey demonstrating that the MMSE is not the most commonly used tool, and other, newer instruments like the MoCA, are gaining prominence.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To study the relationship between initiating therapy with an antipsychotic medication and a subsequent new diagnosis of a drug-induced movement disorder other than parkinsonism in older adults with dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Ontario residents aged 66 and older with a diagnosis of dementia newly started on treatment with typical or atypical antipsychotic therapy. MEASUREMENT: Estimated relative risk of developing a drug-induced movement other than parkinsonism in the 1-year follow-up period after starting therapy with an antipsychotic medication. RESULTS: From April 1, 1997, to March 31, 2001, 21, 835 older adults with dementia who were newly started on antipsychotic medications were identified. Nine thousand seven hundred ninety subjects were started on atypical antipsychotics and 12,045 subjects started on typical antipsychotics. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were 5.24 cases of tardive dyskinesia (TD) or other drug-induced movement disorder per 100 person-years on therapy with a typical antipsychotic and 5.19 cases per 100 person-years on therapy with an atypical antipsychotic. The risk of developing drug-induced movement disorder while being treated with an atypical agent was not statistically different from that with a typical antipsychotic (relative risk=0.99, 95% confidence interval=0.86-1.15; P<.93). CONCLUSION: Older adults with dementia who are treated with typical or atypical antipsychotic therapy are at risk for developing TD and other drug-induced movement disorders.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate the priority-setting element of a hospital's strategic planning process. METHODS: Qualitative case study and evaluation against the conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness' of a strategic planning process at a large urban university-affiliated hospital. RESULTS: The hospital's strategic planning process met the conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness' in large part. Specifically: the hospital based its decisions on reasons (both information and criteria) that the participants felt were relevant to the hospital; the number and type of participants were very extensive; the process, decisions and reasons were well communicated throughout the organization, using multiple communication vehicles; and the process included an ethical framework linked to an effort to evaluate and improve the process. However, there were opportunities to improve the process, particularly by giving participants more time to absorb the information relevant to priority-setting decisions, more time to take difficult decisions and some means to appeal or revise decisions. CONCLUSION: A case study linked to an evaluation using 'accountability for reasonableness' can serve to improve priority-setting in the context of hospital strategic planning.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Prioridades en Salud/clasificación , Planificación Hospitalaria/métodos , Responsabilidad Social , Comunicación , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Hospitales Urbanos/organización & administración , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Ontario , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Objetivos Organizacionales , Técnicas de Planificación , Investigación Cualitativa , Asignación de RecursosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reliability should be considered when selecting a scoring system since it influences validity. CDT reliability has rarely been assessed in population based studies and in developing countries. The aim of the present study was to determine intra and inter-rater reliabilities of the CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method, in elderly with very low formal educational level from Brazil. METHODS: CDTs performed by a random sample of 202 subjects of a population-based cohort of elderly were scored on two occasions by the same rater and by two independent raters. Reliability was measured using the kappa statistic, weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Data were stratified according to gender, age and schooling level. RESULTS: Intra and inter-rater reliabilities were excellent when CDTs were classified as 'normal' (scores 4 or 5) or 'abnormal' (scores 0 to 3) (kappa = 0.99 and 0.94, respectively) and were in the good to excellent range when scored from 0 to 5 (kappa = 0.88 and 0.74, respectively). Difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests were found. CONCLUSIONS: The CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method appears to have good to excellent reliability in an elderly population with very low formal educational level. However, difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests suggest these scores may not be totally adequate for this population. Further studies are necessary to determine the consistency of our results in similar populations.