Caregiver descriptions of dystonia in cerebral palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how caregivers describe dystonia in people with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, paper surveys were administered to caregivers between September 7, 2021 and October 28, 2021 during CP Center visits at a large tertiary care center. Caregivers were asked to describe involuntary movements triggered by voluntary movement or triggered by tactile stimulation in the people with CP they cared for. Their CP Center medical provider separately assessed people with CP for dystonia. Movement features described exclusively by caregivers of people with CP and dystonia were determined using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: 113 caregivers responded on behalf of 56 people with and 57 people without dystonia. If caregivers noted that both voluntary movement and tactile stimulation triggered involuntary movements, that had a 92% positive predictive value for a dystonia diagnosis. Movement features exclusively described in people with CP and dystonia included: (1) stiffening, tensing, or tightening (15% of respondents); (2) involvement of the head (10%), torso (5%), or feet (5%); and (3) triggers of stretching (12.5%), excitement (5%), or transfers (5%). INTERPRETATION: In addition to a thorough exam, asking caregivers of people with CP to describe involuntary movements triggered by voluntary movement or tactile stimulation may inform clinical dystonia diagnosis.

Top 10 Research Themes for Dystonia in Cerebral Palsy: A Community-Driven Research Agenda.

Dystonia in cerebral palsy (DCP) is a common, debilitating, but understudied condition. The CP community (people with CP and caregivers) is uniquely equipped to help determine the research questions that best address their needs. We developed a community-driven DCP research agenda using the well-established James Lind Alliance methodology. CP community members, researchers, and clinicians were recruited through multiple advocacy, research, and professional organizations. To ensure shared baseline knowledge, participants watched webinars outlining our current knowledge on DCP prepared by a Steering Group of field experts (cprn.org/research-cp-dystonia-edition). Participants next submitted their remaining uncertainties about DCP. These were vetted by the Steering Group and consolidated to eliminate redundancy to generate a list of unique uncertainties, which were then prioritized by the participants. The top-prioritized uncertainties were aggregated into themes through iterative consensus-building discussions within the Steering Group. 166 webinar viewers generated 67 unique uncertainties. 29 uncertainties (17 generated by community members) were prioritized higher than their randomly matched pairs. These were coalesced into the following top 10 DCP research themes: (1) develop new treatments; (2) assess rehabilitation, psychological, and environmental management approaches; (3) compare effectiveness of current treatments; (4) improve diagnosis and severity assessments; (5) assess the effect of mixed tone (spasticity and dystonia) in outcomes and approaches; (6) assess predictors of treatment responsiveness; (7) identify pathophysiologic mechanisms; (8) characterize the natural history; (9) determine the best treatments for pain; and (10) increase family awareness. This community-driven research agenda reflects the concerns most important to the community, both in perception and in practice. We therefore encourage future DCP research to center around these themes. Furthermore, noting that community members (not clinicians or researchers) generated the majority of top-prioritized uncertainties, our results highlight the important contributions community members can make to research agendas, even beyond DCP.

Diagnostic preferences include discussion of etiology for adults with cerebral palsy and their caregivers.

AIM: To determine the views of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and their caregivers (CP community members) about carrying a CP diagnosis, an etiological diagnosis, or both diagnoses together. METHOD: We surveyed CP community members across two registries querying their views on carrying a CP diagnosis, one type of etiological diagnosis (specifically, a genetic diagnosis), or both. Open-ended responses were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of 197 respondents (108 adults with CP and 89 caregivers), most (75%) valued knowing the cause of their CP. Of those with a diagnostic preference, most preferred carrying both CP and etiological diagnoses together (68%). When compared with carrying an etiological diagnosis alone, significantly more respondents felt a CP diagnosis helped anticipate symptom evolution (84% vs 54%), explain symptoms to others (86% vs 48%), access services (86% vs 48%), and join support communities (78% vs 50%) (p <  0.01, χ2 test). INTERPRETATION: Most CP community members surveyed want to know the cause of their CP and would prefer carrying both CP and etiological diagnoses together. Clinical practice should evolve to meet these community needs.

The cerebral palsy research network: Building a learning health network for cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the growth of the Cerebral Palsy (CP) Research Network towards becoming a Learning Health Network in order to guide future development. METHODS: Thirteen CP Research Network leaders completed the Network Maturity Grid (NMG) which consists of six domains with eight to 10 components each. The six domains are Systems of Leadership, Governance and Management, Quality Improvement, Engagement and Community, Data and Analytics, and Research. Radar mapping was utilized to display mean scores on a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = not started to 5 = idealized state) across domains and for individual components within domains. Consensus was reached for top priorities for the next 3-5 years. RESULTS: Domain scores ranged from 2.4 in Quality Improvement to 3.2 in System of Leadership. The lowest scoring component was clinician clinical decision support and the highest was common purpose. The following priority areas of focus were agreed upon moving forward: development of leaders, financial sustainability, quality improvement education and training, patient reported data, data quality and validation, and primary data collection. CONCLUSION: Results from this project will be utilized for strategic planning to improve the network. Conducting regular self-assessments of the network with the NMG will be useful in achieving the network's ultimate goal to improve care and outcomes for individuals with CP.

Setting a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy: a participatory action research initiative.

AIM: To establish a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: We engaged a large cross-section of the extended community of people living with CP and those providing healthcare to people with CP ('the community') in an educational series and collaborative survey platform to establish an initial list of prioritized research ideas. After online workshops, a facilitated Delphi process was used to select the 20 highest priorities. Select participants attended an in-person workshop to provide comment and work toward consensus of research priorities. RESULTS: A research agenda for CP was developed by the community, which included consumers, clinicians, and researchers interested in advancing the established research agenda. The results included the top 16 research concepts produced by the process to shape and steward the research agenda, and an engaged cross-section of the community. INTERPRETATION: It has been shown that proactively engaging consumers with clinical researchers may provide more meaningful research for the community. This study suggests that future research should have more focus on interventions and outcomes across the lifespan with increased emphasis on the following outcome measures: function, quality of life, and participation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy was established. Comparative effectiveness of interventions, physical activity, and understanding ageing were leading themes. Longitudinal studies across the lifespan, clinical spectrum, and ages were highly ranked. Participants reported high value for participation outcomes. Participants reported great appreciation for the engagement between consumers and clinician researchers.

Caregiver knowledge and preferences for gross motor function information in cerebral palsy.

AIM: To determine caregiver knowledge and preferences for gross motor information and examine differences across Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels. METHOD: A questionnaire was developed. Respondents reported GMFCS knowledge, preference for knowledge, and experience with GMFCS and motor curve information. RESULTS: In total, 303 caregivers of children with cerebral palsy (CP) (GMFCS level I: 22%; GMFCS level II: 16%; GMFCS level III: 15%; GMFCS level IV: 23%; GMFCS level V: 24%) completed the questionnaire. Forty-five per cent of caregivers knew the GMFCS level at survey, and only 31% knew how their child's motor development compared with others of similar age and level. Caregiver education level was associated with knowledge (p<0.001). Most prefer discussing motor development with a therapist. Of caregivers who knew their child's GMFCS level at survey, 83% reported it would be helpful to revisit the topic over time. Compared with GMFCS level IV and V, caregivers of children in GMFCS levels I to III preferred to learn at the same time as CP diagnosis, (p=0.04) and were more likely to report having received visual aids (p=0.04). Caregivers of children in GMFCS levels IV and V found it more difficult to learn their child's level (p<0.001) versus those caring for children of GMFCS levels I to III, and reported seeing pictures with descriptions more informative (p=0.03). INTERPRETATION: Caregivers of children with CP may not know GMFCS and motor curve information, and vary in experience and preferences for this information. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Fewer than half of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy (CP) know their child's Gross Motor Function Classification System level. Most want to know how their child's function compares to other children with CP. The majority of caregivers would like to revisit the topic over time. Caregivers want to discuss gross motor information with the therapist and doctor.