Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(13): S208-S216, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36502382

RESUMEN

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) supports international partners in introducing vaccines, including those against SARS-CoV-2 virus. CDC contributes to the development of global technical tools, guidance, and policy for COVID-19 vaccination and has established its COVID-19 International Vaccine Implementation and Evaluation (CIVIE) program. CIVIE supports ministries of health and their partner organizations in developing or strengthening their national capacities for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination programs. CIVIE's 7 priority areas for country-specific technical assistance are vaccine policy development, program planning, vaccine confidence and demand, data management and use, workforce development, vaccine safety, and evaluation. We discuss CDC's work on global COVID-19 vaccine implementation, including priorities, challenges, opportunities, and applicable lessons learned from prior experiences with Ebola, influenza, and meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine introductions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
2.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 15(Suppl 2): 105, 2017 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29297361

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Researchers and policy-makers alike increasingly recognise the importance of engaging diverse perspectives in implementation research. This roundtable discussion presents the experiences and perspectives of three decision-makers regarding the benefits and challenges of their engagement in implementation research. DISCUSSION: The first perspective comes from a rural district medical officer from Uganda and touches on the success of using data as evidence in a low-resource setting. The second perspective is from an Afghani Ministry of Health expert who used a community-based approach to improving healthcare services in remote regions. Finally, the third perspective highlights the successes and trials of a policy-maker from India who offers advice on how to grow the relationship between decision-makers and researchers. Overall, the stakeholders in this roundtable discussion saw important benefits to their engagement in research. In order to facilitate greater engagement in the future, they advise on closer dialogue between researchers and policy-makers and supporting the development of capacity to stimulate and facilitate engagement in research and the use of evidence in decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Toma de Decisiones , Política de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Formulación de Políticas , Participación de los Interesados , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Personal Administrativo , Afganistán , Creación de Capacidad , Participación de la Comunidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , India , Aprendizaje , Ejecutivos Médicos , Investigadores , Características de la Residencia , Uganda
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...