Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Biochem ; 113: 40-44, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36586570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This aim of this audit was to assess the extent of serum calcium testing and the frequency of hypercalcaemia in the primary care setting. We also assessed the appropriateness of subsequent investigations with repeat serum calcium and PTH testing if hypercalcaemia was identified. METHODS: All laboratory requests for adjusted calcium and PTH samples sent from primary care in Glasgow were analysed over a 12 month period. This covered approximately 125 GP practices and a patient population of over 590,000. RESULTS: There were 78,845 requests for adjusted calcium and 2053 PTH requests from 62,745 patients aged 16-105 years (median age 57, IQ range 30 years). Of these requests 1423 (2.3%) of patients had biochemical evidence of hypercalcaemia (adjusted calcium ≥ 2.61 mmol/L). Of the 1423 patients with hypercalcaemia, 368 patients (45.8%) had a single raised calcium level that was within the normal range on repeat testing. Of the 400 patients with persistent hypercalcaemia on 2 or more samples, 210 (52.5%) had a PTH measured. Eight patients had a PTH < 2.0 pmol/L, whilst 202 (96.1%) had a PTH ≥ 2.0 pmol/L (range 2.1-106.1 pmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Serum calcium was checked in 10.6% of the population per year within primary care. In the 2.4% with a raised calcium on initial testing, approximately half (45.8%) will normalise on repeat testing. Of those who remained persistently hypercalcaemic, only half (52.5%) had a PTH measured and the majority (96.1%) were in keeping with primary hyperparathyroidism being the most common cause of hypercalcaemia.


Asunto(s)
Hipercalcemia , Hiperparatiroidismo , Humanos , Adulto , Calcio , Hipercalcemia/etiología , Hormona Paratiroidea , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
Bone ; 120: 38-43, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30292817

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Adequate dietary protein intake is important for the maintenance of bone health; however, data in this area is ambiguous with some suggestion that high protein intake can have deleterious effects on bone health. The aim of the current study was to explore the associations of protein intake with bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We used baseline data from the UK Biobank (participants aged 40-69 years) to examine the association of protein intake with BMD (measured by ultrasound). These associations were examined, in women (n = 39,066) and men (n = 31,149), after adjustment for socio-demographic and lifestyle confounders and co-morbidities. RESULTS: Protein intake was positively and linearly associated with BMD in women (ß-coefficient 0.010 [95% CI 0.005; 0.015, p < 0.0001]) and men (ß-coefficient 0.008 [95% CI 0.000; 0.015, p = 0.044]); per 1.0 g/kg/day increment in protein intake, independently of socio-demographics, dietary factors and physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: The current data have demonstrated that higher protein intakes are positively associated with BMD in both men and women. This indicates that higher protein intakes may be beneficial for both men and women.


Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...