Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am ; 29(3): 269-280, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28709530

RESUMEN

Because of the common shared risk factors of smoking and heavy alcohol consumption, literature involving oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is often combined with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Human papilloma virus is now confirmed to be a major risk factor of OPSCC with its distinct epidemiology and favorable treatment outcome. The impact of adjuvant chemoradiation in the setting of positive surgical margins remains unclear but is likely influenced by tumor biology. This article reviews the tumor biology of OPSCC and summarizes recent findings on outcomes following surgical treatment of OPSCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virología , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(4): 303-6, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in cosmetic outcome between using cutting diathermy and using a scalpel to make abdominal skin incisions. METHOD: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover study. The primary end point was wound cosmesis as judged by the patient. In each case, one-half of the skin incision was made using diathermy, and one-half using a scalpel blade. Patients were contacted at 6 months post-operatively, and were asked which half of the wound looked better to them. A panel of 18 surgeons was also shown photographs of the wounds taken after 6 months, and were asked the same question. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients with complete follow-up, 11 (35%) reported no difference between the two halves of the wound. Nine (29%) preferred the half incised with diathermy, and 11 (35%) preferred the half incised with the scalpel (P = 0.82, chi-squared test). Twenty-four patients consented to having their wound photographed. There was no difference in the surgeons' preference between the diathermy and scalpel halves of the incision (P = 0.35, signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: We found the use of cutting diathermy to make abdominal skin incisions to be cosmetically equivalent to cutting with the scalpel. As previous studies have not shown adverse wound outcomes using this technique, and considering the safety concerns for theatre staff when the scalpel is used, the routine use of cutting diathermy for skin incisions in abdominal surgery is justified.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Cicatriz/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/instrumentación , Diatermia/instrumentación , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas Cosméticas , Estudios Cruzados , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/métodos , Diatermia/efectos adversos , Diatermia/métodos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...