Neuroimaging Association Scores: reliability and validity of aggregate measures of brain structural features linked to mental disorders in youth.

In genetics, aggregation of many loci with small effect sizes into a single score improved prediction. Nevertheless, studies applying easily replicable weighted scores to neuroimaging data are lacking. Our aim was to assess the reliability and validity of the Neuroimaging Association Score (NAS), which combines information from structural brain features previously linked to mental disorders. Participants were 726 youth (aged 6-14) from two cities in Brazil who underwent MRI and psychopathology assessment at baseline and 387 at 3-year follow-up. Results were replicated in two samples: IMAGEN (n = 1627) and the Healthy Brain Network (n = 843). NAS were derived by summing the product of each standardized brain feature by the effect size of the association of that brain feature with seven psychiatric disorders documented by previous meta-analyses. NAS were calculated for surface area, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes using T1-weighted scans. NAS reliability, temporal stability and psychopathology and cognition prediction were analyzed. NAS for surface area showed high internal consistency and 3-year stability and predicted general psychopathology and cognition with higher replicability than specific symptomatic domains for all samples. They also predicted general psychopathology with higher replicability than single structures alone, accounting for 1-3% of the variance, but without directionality. The NAS for cortical thickness and subcortical volumes showed lower internal consistency and less replicable associations with behavioural phenotypes. These findings indicate the NAS based on surface area might be replicable markers of general psychopathology, but these links are unlikely to be causal or clinically useful yet.

Testing the Stability and Validity of an Executive Dysfunction Classification Using Task-Based Assessment in Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if pediatric executive dysfunction assessed only with cognitive tasks predicts clinically relevant outcomes independently of psychiatric diagnoses. This study tested the stability and validity of a task-based classification of executive function. METHOD: A total of 2,207 individuals (6-17 years old) from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study participated in this study (1,930 at baseline, 1,532 at follow-up). Executive function was measured using tests of working memory and inhibitory control. Dichotomized age- and sex-standardized performances were used as input in latent class analysis and receiver operating curves to create an executive dysfunction classification (EDC). The study tested EDC's stability over time, association with symptoms, functional impairment, a polymorphism in the CADM2 gene, polygenic risk scores (PRS), and brain structure. Analyses covaried for age, sex, social class, IQ, and psychiatric diagnoses. RESULTS: EDC at baseline predicted itself at follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 5.11; 95% CI 3.41-7.64). Participants in the EDC reported symptoms spanning several domains of psychopathology and exhibited impairment in multiple settings, including more adverse school events (OR = 2.530; 95% CI 1.838-3.483). Children in the EDC presented higher attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and lower educational attainment PRS at baseline; higher schizophrenia PRS at follow-up; and lower chances of presenting a polymorphism in a gene previously linked to high performance in executive function (CADM2 gene). They also exhibited smaller intracranial volumes and smaller bilateral cortical surface areas in several brain regions. CONCLUSION: Task-based executive dysfunction is associated with several validators, independently of psychiatric diagnoses and intelligence. Further refinement of task-based assessments might generate clinically useful tools.

Genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease and functional brain connectivity in children and adolescents.

Research suggested accumulation of tau proteins might lead to the degeneration of functional networks. Studies investigating the impact of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) on early brain connections might shed light on mechanisms leading to AD development later in life. Here, we aim to investigate whether the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease (AD-PRS) influences the connectivity among regions susceptible to tau pathology during childhood and adolescence. Participants were youth, aged 6-14 years, and recruited in Porto Alegre (discovery sample, n = 332) and São Paulo (replication sample, n = 304), Brazil. Subjects underwent genotyping and 6-min resting state funcional magnetic resonance imaging. Connections between the local maxima of tau pathology networks were used as dependent variables. The AD-PRS was associated with the connectivity between the right precuneus and the right superior temporal gyrus (discovery sample: ß = 0.180, padjusted = 0.036; replication sample: ß = 0.202, p = 0.031). This connectivity was also associated with inhibitory control (ß = 0.157, padjusted = 0.035) and moderated the association between the AD-PRS and both immediate and delayed recall. These findings suggest the AD-PRS may affect brain connectivity in youth, which might impact memory performance and inhibitory control in early life.

Abordagens ao cyberbullying / Approach to cyber bullying

Na atualidade, frente a tantos avanços tecnológicos, muitos pais, professores e diretores de escola se sentem despreparados para compreender e mesmo a responder ao cyberbullying. Podem não se sentir familiarizados com os termos cibernéticos ou estar convencidos de que nasceram em uma geração incapaz de saber quais comportamentos on-line atuais são apropriados. A intenção dos autores é contribuir para a discussão do tema, propor intervenções para combater o cyberbullying e propiciar novas compreensões para ajudar jovens, pais, professores e escola a lidar com esse problema, de forma neutra e sem juízo de valor.(AU)

Nowadays, with so many technological advances, many parents, teachers and school principals feel unprepared to understand and respond to cyberbullying. They may not feel familiar with cybernetic terms or are convinced they were born in a generation incapable of knowing which current online behaviours are appropriate. The authors aim at contributing to the discussion of the topic, propose interventions to combat cyberbullying and provide new understandings to help young people, parents, teachers and school to deal with this problem neutrally and non-judgmental.(AU)