Effects of direct renin inhibition on atherosclerotic biomarkers in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, has a more favorable effect compared to amlodipine on atherosclerotic biomarkers in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes currently receiving standard secondary prevention therapy. METHODS: A total of 38 patients were randomly assigned initially to either aliskiren (150 mg daily) or amlodipine (5 mg daily) for 2 weeks after which the dose of either medication was increased to its maximum daily dose for 4 additional weeks. Baseline and 6-week blood samples were analyzed for changes from baseline and between treatment groups for vascular and intracellular cell adhesion molecule, C-reactive protein, nitric oxide, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, 8-isoprostane, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients completed the study. More of the dropouts occurred in patients receiving aliskiren. Systolic blood pressure decreased in both treatment arms with no differences between the groups being noted. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, nitric oxide, and C-reactive protein concentrations increased in both groups from baseline but changes from baseline or between groups were not significant. Vascular and intracellular cell adhesion molecule, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and isoprostane concentrations decreased in each treatment arm from baseline, but these changes were not significant and no differences were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with either aliskiren or amlodipine did not significantly alter surrogate biomarkers of atherosclerosis in patients with both diabetes and established cardiovascular disease already receiving appropriate secondary cardiovascular prevention therapy. The study is limited in its size and duration to see an effect.

Building-associated neurological damage modeled in human cells: a mechanism of neurotoxic effects by exposure to mycotoxins in the indoor environment.

Damage to human neurological system cells resulting from exposure to mycotoxins confirms a previously controversial public health threat for occupants of water-damaged buildings. Leading scientific organizations disagree about the ability of inhaled mycotoxins in the indoor environment to cause adverse human health effects. Damage to the neurological system can result from exposure to trichothecene mycotoxins in the indoor environment. This study demonstrates that neurological system cell damage can occur from satratoxin H exposure to neurological cells at exposure levels that can be found in water-damaged buildings contaminated with fungal growth. The constant activation of inflammatory and apoptotic pathways at low levels of exposure in human brain capillary endothelial cells, astrocytes, and neural progenitor cells may amplify devastation to neurological tissues and lead to neurological system cell damage from indirect events triggered by the presence of trichothecenes.

Lack of effect on coronary atherosclerotic disease biomarkers with modest dosing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker, and the combination.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, used alone or in combination, have been shown to improve outcomes in certain populations, primarily when administered in high doses. For stable coronary atherosclerotic disease, however, the relative physiologic effect of these therapies is unclear. Furthermore, because of the notorious subtarget dosing of such agents in clinical practice, we explored the influence of a modest dosing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, and the combination on common biologic markers of coronary atherosclerotic disease. METHODS: This randomized, cross-over study enrolled stable coronary atherosclerotic disease patients (n=20), each receiving three treatments: candesartan 16 mg daily, ramipril 5 mg daily, and candesartan 8 mg plus ramipril 2.5 mg daily. Treatments were administered for 2 weeks with a 2-week washout. Blood samples were collected before and after each treatment. Markers of endothelial function, fibrinolytic balance, and vascular inflammation were measured. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the pretreatment concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme or of any measured biologic marker. Relative to pretreatment levels, candesartan alone was the only therapy to exhibit an action on any measured biomarker--a trend toward increased nitric oxide concentrations (P=0.054). Otherwise, no effects on biologic markers were observed with the treatments. CONCLUSION: This study of various methods of the renin-angiotensin system inhibition in stable coronary atherosclerotic disease patients demonstrates negligible effects of a modest dosing of ramipril and the combination of ramipril plus candesartan on common biologic markers of coronary atherosclerotic disease. Candesartan at modest doses may favorably influence endothelial function. Overall, however, the results indicate that the commonly practiced subtarget dosing of such treatments provides little, if any, benefit pertaining to key physiologic components of coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Exploring the effects of ACE inhibitor tissue penetration on vascular inflammation following acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Questions remain as to the existence of a class effect amongst angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and some literature suggests that pharmacological effects and outcomes may be determined by an ACE inhibitor's propensity to penetrate and inhibit the ACE enzyme at the vascular tissue level. Because vascular inflammation contributes to adverse outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and angiotensin II influences inflammation at the vascular level, we hypothesized that high-tissue penetrating ACE inhibitors would provide more favorable effects on C-reactive protein (CRP) after AMI compared to low-tissue penetrating ACE inhibitors. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized open-label trial, patients received the high-tissue penetrating quinapril (n = 15) or low-tissue penetrating enalapril (n = 15) following AMI. C-reactive protein was measured at baseline and periodically over 14 days following drug initiation. All baseline characteristics and blood pressure response to treatment between groups were equivalent. Prior to initiating study medication, CRP concentrations (mg/g) were similar between enalapril and quinapril (0.327 +/- 0.571 versus 0.273 +/- 0.380, respectively, p = 0.77). The percent magnitude of change in CRP concentrations favored quinapril at all time points, starting 12 h after treatment initiation. When characterizing CRP production during treatments, the time courses were significantly different and demonstrated lower CRP concentrations with quinapril (p = 0.0107). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this investigation into the importance of ACE inhibitor tissue penetration on a common marker of vascular inflammation, suggests a potential vascular anti-inflammatory benefit with a more highly tissue penetrating ACE inhibitor following AMI. Further investigation into the true pharmacological similarities and differences amongst this class of drugs is warranted.