Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214609

RESUMEN

Although maternal pertussis vaccination is recommended, uptake is suboptimal in New Zealand (NZ), despite full funding in general practice and hospitals. We determined whether funding maternal pertussis vaccination in community pharmacy increases its uptake. Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy was compared between non-contiguous, demographically similar regions of NZ. The pertussis vaccine was funded at pharmacies from Nov 2016 in one NZ region (Waikato), but not in comparator regions (Northland, Hawkes Bay). Vaccinations during pregnancy were determined from the National Immunisation Register, general practice and pharmacy claims data, and a maternity database. Comparisons were made using adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for Nov 2015 to Oct 2016 versus Nov 2016 to Oct 2019. The odds of pregnancy pertussis vaccination increased in the post-intervention versus pre-intervention period with this increase being larger (p = 0.0014) in the intervention (35% versus 21%, OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.89-2.27) versus the control regions (38% versus 26%, OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.52-1.84). Coverage was lower for Maori versus non-Maori, but increased more for Maori in the intervention versus control regions (117% versus 38% increase). It was found that funding maternal pertussis vaccination in pharmacy increases uptake, particularly for Maori women. Measures to increase coverage should include reducing barriers to vaccines being offered by non-traditional providers, including pharmacies.

4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(1)2022 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35062737

RESUMEN

The uptake of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccinations is often suboptimal. This study explores the factors influencing pregnant women's and health care professionals' (HCPs) behaviour regarding maternal vaccinations (MVs). Pregnant/recently pregnant women, midwives, pharmacists and general practice staff in Waikato, New Zealand, were interviewed. The analysis used the behaviour change wheel model. Interviews of 18 women and 35 HCPs revealed knowledge about MVs varied with knowledge deficiencies hindering the uptake, particularly for influenza vaccination. HCPs, especially midwives, were key in raising women's awareness of MVs. Experience with vaccinating, hospital work (for midwives) and training increased HCPs' knowledge and proactivity about MVs. A "woman's choice" philosophy saw midwives typically encouraging women to seek information and make their own decision. Women's decisions were generally based on knowledge, beliefs, HCPs' emphasis and their perceived risk, with little apparent influence from friends, family, or online or promotional material. General practice's concentration on children's vaccination and minimal antenatal contact limited proactivity with MVs. Busyness and prioritisation appeared to affect HCPs' proactivity. Multi-pronged interventions targeting HCPs and pregnant women and increasing MV access are needed. All HCPs seeing pregnant women should be well-informed about MVs, including how to identify and address women's questions or concerns about MVs to optimise uptake.

5.
J Prim Health Care ; 14(4): 352-362, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36592768

RESUMEN

Introduction Uptake of maternal vaccinations (MVs) is suboptimal in Aotearoa New Zealand, particularly for Maori. Aim To describe Maori women's journeys regarding maternal pertussis and influenza vaccinations and explore influences on uptake. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Waikato, Aotearoa New Zealand, with pregnant or recently pregnant Maori women, and separately with Maori healthcare professionals (HCPs) to understand women's decisions regarding MVs and enablers and barriers to uptake. Results Nine women and nine HCPs were interviewed. Verbal communications from midwives, general practice and pharmacy strongly influenced women's journeys. Women's decisions appeared largely straight-forward, with influences including awareness, knowledge, underlying beliefs and previous MVs. Enablers for MV uptake included HCPs' discussions, pro-vaccination beliefs, and accessibility. Barriers for MV uptake included poverty (and transport), lack of awareness, insufficient knowledge of benefits, late presentation to the midwife and other commitments or challenges in the women's lives affecting prioritisation of the vaccine. Misconceptions, seasonality, and lower HCP emphasis impaired influenza vaccination uptake. Discussion With multiple barriers to accessing MVs, HCPs who see pregnant women are the primary resource to improve awareness, knowledge, and access through korero (discussions) with the woman and, where possible, being able to administer the vaccinations. These HCPs need to be well-informed, aware of likely concerns women may have and how to address them, encourage these discussions and preferably be trusted.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pueblo Maorí , Nueva Zelanda , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Vacunación
8.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(4): 339-344, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067310

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if administration of oral prednisolone to preschool children with acute wheeze alters respiratory outcomes. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled equivalence trial. SETTING: Three hospitals in New Zealand. PATIENTS: 477 children aged 24-59 months with acute wheeze associated with respiratory illness. INTERVENTIONS: 2 mg/kg (maximum 40 mg) oral prednisolone or similar placebo, once daily for 3 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was change in Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score 24 hours after intervention. Secondary outcomes included PRAM score at 4 hours, length of emergency department and inpatient stays, admission and representation rates, time to return to normal activities and use of additional oral prednisolone or intravenous medications. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups for change in PRAM score at 24 hours (difference between means -0.39, 95% CI -0.84 to 0.06, p=0.09). Absolute PRAM score was lower in the prednisolone group at 4 hours (median (IQR) 1 (0-2) vs 2 (0-3), p=0.01) and 24 hours (0 (0-1) vs 0 (0-1), p=0.01), when symptoms had resolved for most children regardless of initial treatment. Admission rate, requirement for additional oral prednisolone and use of intravenous medication were lower in the prednisolone group, although there were no differences between groups for time taken to return to normal activities or rates of representation within 7 days. CONCLUSION: Oral prednisolone does not alter respiratory outcomes at 24 hours or beyond in preschool children presenting with acute wheeze.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Ruidos Respiratorios/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración Oral , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Ruidos Respiratorios/fisiopatología
9.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 8(2)2020 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32235360

RESUMEN

Background: A policy to extend funding of maternal pregnancy influenza and pertussis vaccinations to community pharmacies could address low pregnancy vaccine uptake. The policy has been implemented in one region in New Zealand. This study explored the views and experiences of women eligible for the vaccines and health care professionals regarding funded maternal vaccinations in pharmacy. Methods: Women in late pregnancy or with an infant, and midwives, pharmacists, and general practice staff were selected purposively and interviewed regarding maternal vaccinations and the new policy, including their awareness and views of the funded vaccinations in pharmacies, and how this policy worked in practice. Enablers and barriers to vaccination by pharmacists were explored. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a framework approach. Results: Fifty-three interviews were conducted. Most women and health care professionals viewed funded maternal vaccinations in pharmacies positively with respect to increasing awareness and providing delivery options. Many women received messages from pharmacies. Most pharmacies used posters, leaflets and/or verbal explanation to pregnant women to raise awareness of the vaccinations. Not all pharmacies provided these vaccinations, and frontline staff could help to raise awareness. Conclusion: Funded maternal vaccinations in pharmacies are generally well accepted and provide an opportunity to increase uptake and prevent disease.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...