Concomitant Transthyretin Amyloidosis and Severe Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Indian Population: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of both degenerative severe aortic stenosis (AS) and transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) increases with age. Dual disease (AS+myocardial ATTR-CA) occurs in significant proportion of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ATTR-CA in severe AS in the Indian population, identify noninvasive predictors of its diagnosis, and understand its impact on prognosis. METHODS: Symptomatic severe AS patients aged ≥65 years undergoing SAVR were enrolled. ATTR-CA diagnosis was based on preoperative 99m-technetium pyrophosphate (PYP) scan and intraoperatively obtained basal interventricular septum biopsy for myocardial ATTR-CA, and excised native aortic valve for isolated valvular ATTR-CA. Primary amyloidosis was excluded by serum/urine protein electrophoresis with serum immunofixation. RESULTS: SAVR was performed in 46 AS patients (age 70 ± 5 years, 70% men). PYP scan was performed for 32 patients, with significant PYP uptake in 3 (n = 3 of 32, 9.4%), suggestive of myocardial ATTR-CA. On histopathological examination, none of the interventricular septum biopsy specimens had amyloid deposits, whereas 33 (71.7%) native aortic valves showed amyloid deposits, of which 19 (57.6%) had transthyretin deposition suggestive of isolated valvular amyloidosis. Noninvasive markers of dual disease included low myocardial contraction fraction (median [interquartile range], 28.8% [23.8% to 39.1%] vs 15.3% [9.3% to 16.1%]; P = 0.006), deceleration time (215 [144 to 236] ms vs 88 [60 to 106] ms; P = 0.009) and global longitudinal strain (-18.7% [-21.1% to -16.9%] vs -14.2% [-17.0% to -9.7%]; P = 0.030). At 1-year follow-up, 2 patients died (4.3%); 1 each in myocardial ATTR-CA negative and positive groups (3.4% vs 33.3%; P = 0.477). CONCLUSIONS: Dual disease is not uncommon in India. Isolated valvular amyloidosis in severe AS is much more common.

Detecting sub-clinical disease activity in patients with chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Valve disease progression in rheumatic heart disease(RHD) is generally attributed to recurrent attacks of acute rheumatic fever(ARF). However, persistence of chronic sub-clinical inflammation remains a plausible but unproven cause. Non-invasive means to identify sub-clinical inflammation may facilitate research efforts towards understanding its contribution to disease progression. METHODS: Patients with chronic RHD, without clinical evidence of ARF, undergoing elective valve surgery were enrolled. Sub-clinical inflammation was ascertained by histological evaluation of left atrial appendage and valve tissue excised during surgery. We assessed the diagnostic utility of Gallium-67 scintigraphy imaging, and inflammatory biomarkers, hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha(TNF-α), Interferon-gamma(IFN-γ), and Serum Amyloid A(SAA), in identifying patients with sub-clinical inflammation. RESULTS: Of the 93 RHD patients enrolled(mean age 34 ± 11 years, 45% females), 86 were included in final analysis. Sub-clinical inflammation was present in 27 patients(31.4%). Patients with dominant regurgitant lesions were more likely to have sub-clinical inflammation compared to those with stenotic lesions, though this association was not statistically significant(dominant regurgitant lesions vs isolated mitral stenosis: OR 3.5, 95%CI 0.68-17.96, p = 0.133). Inflammatory biomarkers were elevated in the majority of patients: hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in 44%, 89%, 90%, 79%, and 81% patients, respectively. However, there was no significant association between biomarker elevation and histologically ascertained sub-clinical inflammation. Ga-67 imaging was unable to identify inflammation in the 15 patients in whom it was performed. CONCLUSION: Sub-clinical inflammation is common in RHD patients. Conventional inflammatory markers are elevated in the majority, but aren't discriminatory enough to identify the presence of histologic inflammation.

Herculean mistake: mephentermine associated cardiomyopathy.

Case presentation: A 32-year-old professional bodybuilder presented with acute decompensated heart failure. He gave a history of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) use for >2 years and mephentermine use for the preceding 3 months. Management: Transthoracic echocardiography showed severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with a large pedunculated, mobile thrombus attached to the ventricular apex. The patient had an embolic stroke during the hospital stay, with complete neurological recovery. Following the cessation of mephentermine use, there was a steady improvement in LV function over a follow-up of 2 months. However, at 3 months, his ventricular function showed deterioration, which coincided with mephentermine reuse. Take home message: Though AAS abuse by athletes leading to such a presentation has been documented, to the best of our knowledge, a similar role of mephentermine has not been reported.

Aspirin for primary prevention: Is this the end of the road?

Aspirin is one of the oldest and most commonly used cardiovascular drugs. Despite there being high-quality evidence supporting the use of aspirin for patients with known cardiovascular disease, a definitive consensus regarding its use for patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (and without established cardiovascular disease) has never been reached. Many randomized control trials have produced conflicting results, and consequently, society guidelines have issued differring recommendations. Three major trials were published in 2018, which supplement the existing data on aspirin's role in primary prevention and provide further guidance on this contentious issue. This article reviews the history of aspirin through the last two decades, with special emphasis on these new trials.