Stability behaviour of antiretroviral drugs and their combinations. 11: Characterization of interaction products of zidovudine and efavirenz, and evaluation of their anti HIV-1 activity, and physiochemical and ADMET properties.

Zidovudine (ZDV) and efavirenz (EFV), which belong to two separate classes of antiretroviral drugs, viz., NRTI and NNRTI, respectively, were subjected to different stability test conditions alone and in solid mixtures to evaluate possibility of interaction among them. The exposed samples were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a C18 column and a PDA detector. Two new peaks were observed in the sample in which 50 µl CH3CN was added to increase the contact among the drugs, and which was subjected in open beaker to accelerated stability test condition of 40 °C/75%RH for 15 d. Subsequently, liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometric (LC-HRMS) studies were carried out to obtain their accurate mass. The products were also isolated, and subjected to 1H, 13C, DEPT-135, COSY, HSQC and HMBC nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies. The collective information allowed their structural characterization as isomeric cycloaddition products of the two drugs. As these were novel compounds, they were subjected to testing for cytotoxicity and in vitro anti-HIV-1 activity against primary isolates HIV-1UG070 (X4, subtype D) and HIV-1VB59 (R5, subtype C) in TZM-bl cell line. The two were found to show weak activity against the standard drugs. The reason was sought through molecular docking studies, which highlighted that it was perhaps their comparative bigger molecular size than the drugs of both classes used currently in HIV therapy. Being previously unknown molecules, their in silico physicochemical and ADMET properties were also evaluated using ADMET Predictor™ and TOPKAT software.

Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: Evaluation of Two Enzyme Immunoassays, Testing Serum IgG and IgA Response in the Anand District of Central Gujarat,India.

CONTEXT: Validation of an accurate and less cumbersome noninvasive method to detect current Helicobacter pylori infection is a requisite for any laboratory. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to corroborate the usefulness of two commercially available kits NovaTec ELISA-A and ELISA-G, in the detection of ongoing H.pylori infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty eight consecutive serum samples of symptomatic patients who attended the endoscopy unit of "Deep" surgical hospital, Anand, which were collected during the period from 27th February 2008 to 31st august 2011, were studied. The sera were processed and tested for the detection of the H.pylori IgG and IgA antibody by using a solid phase; capture micro well ELISA, procured from Nova Tec immunodiagnostica GmbH Germany. RESULTS: IgG ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and Negative predictive value (NPV), while IgA ELISA was better in terms of specificity (61.4%) and accuracy (63%) as compared to IgG ELISA. We found 7% (16/228) of IgA positive cases with IgG negative response. IgG response was more common in reflux esophagitis patients (OR 1.451, 95%CI-0.850-2.477) and then in gastritis (OR 0.962, 95%CI-0.570-1.621) and duodenitis(OR-0.806, 95%CI-0.112-5.827), while IgA positive response was more common in duodenitis patients (OR-1.383, 95%CI-0.191-9.995) and reflux esophagitis patients (OR 1.289, 95% CI-0.756-2.197) and least in duodenal ulcer patients (OR 0.670, 95%CI-0.222-2.029). CONCLUSION: IgG update is reliable and accurate test and can be expedient as a screening test and thus serve as an alternative to endoscopy. For the purpose of excluding infection with H.pylori, the performance of IgG is moderate (low specificity) but can be improved by conjunctional IgA testing which will offer some additional diagnostic value.