Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(3): 939-943, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225546

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of myopia at the community level. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional study was planned in 40 clusters among children identified with subnormal vision in the urban community of Delhi. House-to-house visits were conducted for visual acuity screening of 20,000 children aged 0-15 years using age appropriate visual acuity charts. All the children with visual acuity of < 6/12 in any eye in the age group between 3 and 15 years and inability to follow light in age group 0-3 years were referred for detailed ophthalmic examination. RESULTS: A total of 13,572 (64.7%) children belonged to the age group of 6-15 years. Of these, a total of 507 (3.7%) were found to be having myopia (spherical equivalent of -0.50 DS or worse in one or both eyes) with positive association with higher age groups. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of myopia is 3.7%; the proportion of uncorrected myopia was 45%, which reflects that refractive error services need to be improved further.


Asunto(s)
Miopía , Errores de Refracción , Baja Visión , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Miopía/diagnóstico , Miopía/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Visión/epidemiología
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 68(2): 311-315, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31957718

RESUMEN

Childhood blindness is one of the priority targets of Vision 2020-Right To Sight due to its impact on the psychological and social growth of the child. An extensive search was performed to locate research papers on childhood blindness prevalence and its causes in the community based and blind schools, respectively, conducted from 1990 onward up to the present. Cross references were also manually searched along with expert consultation to enlarge the reference data. A total of five community-based studies on the prevalence including two refractive error studies conducted all over India in children less than 16 years were found. The causes of childhood blindness from the available blind school studies revealed that causes of childhood blindness have mainly shifted from corneal causes to whole globe abnormalities. This article highlights that though with the availability of proper healthcare facilities, the trend is changing for the causes but still a lot of effort in the form of timely neonatal eye care facilities, pediatric surgical services and proper refraction strategies is required.


Asunto(s)
Ceguera/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas , Agudeza Visual , Personas con Daño Visual/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Humanos , India/epidemiología
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 66(7): 935-939, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29941735

RESUMEN

Purpose: In India, teachers screen middle school children using the 6/9 Snellen's optotype. Recently, the National Program for Control of Blindness included primary school students also. The present cross-sectional study was planned to assess the inclusion of primary school students. Compliance to spectacles was ascertained after 6 months follow-up. Methods: Randomly selected 23 Government primary schools. A total of 30 teachers were nominated and given hands-on training in vision screening and recording formats. Teachers conducted vision screening of primary school students of their respective schools using the 6/12 Snellen's chart and referred students with subnormal vision to optometrist. Optometrist also validated the screening done by teachers. Optometrist screened the vision of 5% randomly selected children screened by teachers as having normal vision. Descriptive statistics used STATA version 13.0. Results: A total of 6056 students screened by the teachers. Sensitivity and specificity of teacher screening were 92.3% (confidence interval [CI] 88.6-95.0) and 72.6% (CI 68.2-76.6)), respectively. About 277 students underwent refraction and 186 prescribed spectacles. The prevalence of myopia, hypermetropia, and astigmatism is 2.5% (2.1-2.9), 0.6% (0.4-0.8), and 1.3% (1.0-1.6), respectively. Compliance to spectacles usage is 36%. Conclusion: Burden of refractive error in primary school is very low. Trained teachers can identify children with subnormal vision, but the false-positive rate is very high. Compliance to spectacle use among primary school children is also less. Vision screening by teachers prioritized in secondary schools and preschool screening should be done by more skilled eye care workers preferably optometrist.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Población Rural , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes , Selección Visual/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Errores de Refracción/diagnóstico , Errores de Refracción/fisiopatología , Agudeza Visual
4.
Trop Med Int Health ; 23(4): 405-414, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29430785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop and implement a community-based programme for screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in urban populations of Delhi. METHODS: Known diabetics (KDs) aged 40 years and older were identified through house-to-house surveys, volunteers and publicity. All KDs were referred to DR screening camps organised locally where procedures included brief medical history, ocular examination and non-mydriatic fundus photography using portable handheld camera. Fundal images were graded on the spot by trained optometrists for DR. Patients with DR were referred to tertiary centre for management. RESULTS: A total of 11 566 KDs were identified, of whom 9435 (81.6%) visited DR screening camps and 8432 (89.4%) had DR gradable images. DR was identified in 13.5% of subjects; 351 cases were mild NPDR, 567 moderate, 92 severe. Seventy-seven had PDR, and 49 had DME, and 2.7% of participants were blind (presenting visual acuity <3/60 in better eye). Non-use of lifestyle management, presence of systemic complications, BMI <18.5 kg/m2 , disease duration of >5 years and uncontrolled diabetes were associated with increased odds of DR. All cases with DR were referred, and 420 (37%) successful referrals to base hospital were observed. CONCLUSION: The programme of creating awareness about DR, identifying KDs and optometrist-led DR screening using non-mydriatic fundus camera based in slums was successful.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Fondo de Ojo , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Fotograbar , Áreas de Pobreza , Pobreza , Población Urbana , Adulto , Anciano , Ceguera/epidemiología , Ceguera/etiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Ciudades , Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico por imagen , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , India , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Midriáticos , Derivación y Consulta , Retina/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...