"Doctor, can I have less frequent injection with highly efficient treatment?" A patient centered study using an electronic choice-based conjoint analysis (ePRO) to assess real world preferences regarding erythropoiesis stimulating agent to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease (PERCEPOLIS study).

OBJECTIVES: Patient's perception analysis appears recently in numerous studies. Conjoint analysis has been used extensively by market researchers for studying how people value the characteristics of products and services. This technique was used in a clinical study to describe perceptions and preferences of anaemic patients suffering from chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKDnd), regarding erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA). METHODS: PERCEPOLIS was a French multicenter prospective non-interventional study designed to describe the relative importance of ESA attributes according to CKDnD patients. Patients fulfilled questionnaires using an electronic device (digital tablet) at baseline and after 6 months under continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) treatment. Choice-based conjoint (CBC) questionnaires were developed with multiple components: 7 ESA attributes (2 or 3 levels per attribute), 2 partial profiles per task (2 out of the 7 attributes), and 7 tasks per questionnaire. Analyses were performed according to previous ESA treatment or not. RESULTS: From 789 analyzed patients, 433 non ESA-naive patients were more than 80% to declare treatment efficacy as the most important expectative in ESA choice process (direct question) but CBC analyses revealed that frequency of injections was more crucial (relative mean weight: ∼30% versus ∼20% for efficacy). Pain at injection site and haemoglobin not exceeding the recommended target were confirmed as important criteria for patients (relative mean weights: ∼15%). No new or unexplained safety signals were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Using CBC design for the first time in a non-interventional ESA study with an electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) in an elderly population, these data showed that monthly injections and treatment efficacy were key patients' expectations relative to ESAs. CERA efficacy to maintain stable haemoglobin within the recommended range was confirmed in real-life conditions.

[Impact of comorbidities on hemoglobin stability in patients with chronic kidney insufficiency on hemodialysis, treated with CERA in current practice: The MIRIADE study]. / Impact des comorbidités sur la stabilité de l'hémoglobine chez des patients insuffisants rénaux chroniques en hémodialyse, traités par CERA en pratique courante : l'étude MIRIADE.

This national, prospective and multicenter study aimed to describe the real-life impact of comorbidities on hemoglobin stability in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, treated with CERA in relay of an erythropoietin stimulating agent. Comorbidities were defined by the Charlson Index (adjusted on age) and hemoglobin stability as a variation of ±1g/dL after the 6-month treatment period. The 585 analyzed patients were distributed as follows according to the adjusted Charlson index: score≤3 (12% of patients), 4≤score≤5 (17%), 6≤score≤7 (31%) and score≥8 (40%). At CERA start, its median monthly dose was of 100µg for the overall population, with no changes during the treatment period and with little variation according to the comorbidity score. Patients with stable hemoglobin (56%, 67% if score≤3) were more numerous to reach the therapeutic target range between 10 and 12g/dL after 6 months (85% versus 43% if not stable hemoglobin). Patients with low C-reactive protein value (≤5mg/L ; P=0.04), no red blood cell transfusion (P=0.03), or no/low dose of intravenous iron (≤200mg ; P=0.03) were more likely to reach stable hemoglobin under CERA after 6 months. Among the 644 CERA-treated patients, 4 patients (<1%) had one serious adverse event related to treatment. A stable hemoglobin within the therapeutic target was reached in the majority of the patients after 6 months in current practice with a lower CERA dose, regardless of the comorbidities scores of patients on hemodialysis.

Corticosteroid-Sparing and Optimization of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus: A Randomized, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized multicenter open-label trial in de novo liver transplant recipients to assess the feasibility and potential benefit of a corticosteroid (CS)-free regimen coupled with tacrolimus (Tac) and dose-intensified mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) further adjusted individually. METHODS: Adult liver transplant recipients were randomized on the day of transplantation to a CS-free regimen with Tac and MMF starting at 3 g/d and dose adjusted from day 5 according to mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure (arm A) or a regimen with CS maintained up to 6 months, Tac and fixed-dose MMF (2 g/d) (arm B). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who experienced treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) during the first year posttransplant. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were randomized, and 174 comprised the per-protocol population (87 in each arm). The primary objective of noninferiority was met: 7 patients in arm A (8%) and 8 in arm B (9%) experienced treated BPAR in the first year. Two patients in arm A (2%) and 5 in arm B (6%) lost their graft, and 12-month patient survival was similar in both arms (90.8% vs 89.8%; P = 0.86). Adverse events were comparable between arms, except for a lower incidence of de novo diabetes (19.8% vs 32.6%, P = 0.049) and a higher incidence of leukopenia less than 2000/mm (28.6% vs 9.8%; P = 0.001) and neutropenia (26.7% vs 7.9%; P < 0.001) in arm A. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil at intensified and individually adjusted dose in combination with Tac in de novo liver transplant recipients allows CS discontinuation from day 1 posttransplant with good tolerance and very low rejection incidence.

An in vitro study of epoetin beta intravenous injection site at the end of hemodialysis.

The aim of this study (SITEPO) is to evaluate the influence of the intravenous injection site (drip chamber injection site, venous injection site or venous fistula needle) on plasma concentration of epoetin beta (Neorecormon, Roche), a recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rHuEPO), at the end of in vitro hemodialysis sessions. No practical administration guidelines are available. Twenty 1-h dialysis sessions are performed. Before each dialysis, the circuit is filled with 270ml, of heparinized total human blood whose hematocrit is adjusted to 35%. A common dosage of epoetin beta in clinical practice (3000IU) is studied for the three injection sites and for reference experiments in which rHuEPO is not injected into the dialysis circuit. Plasma concentrations of erythropoietin are measured by ELISA. The physiologically endogenous erythropoietin concentration is systematically determined and removed from the total epoetin beta concentration. Average epoetin beta plasma levels returned are not significantly different between the three injection sites and no significant rHuEPO loss is observed after injection into the drip chamber, the venous injection site and the venous fistula needle compared with reference experiments. The three intravenous injection sites of rHuEPO can be used at the end of dialysis without significant epoetin beta loss.