Update on Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Basal Cell Naevus Syndrome or High-frequency Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Some patients with basal cell carcinoma develop a large number of basal cell carcinomas during their lives. The most common underlying genetic disease that causes multiple basal cell carcinomas is basal cell naevus syndrome. Basal cell naevus syndrome is caused by a germline mutation in patched-1 (PTCH1), a tumour suppressor gene of the hedgehog signalling pathway. However, in a significant portion of patients with multiple basal cell carcinomas, no underlying genetic cause is found. Nevertheless, these patients can experience a treatment burden comparable to that of patients with basal cell naevus syndrome. They are referred to as high-frequency basal cell carcinoma patients. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors were the first group of targeted therapy for basal cell carcinomas. This study reviews the literature on hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy for patients with basal cell naevus syndrome and high-frequency basal cell carcinoma, to provide an overview on efficacy, safety, dosing regimens, tumour resistance and reoccurrence, and health-related quality of life.

Cumulative Sum Analysis for the Learning Curve of Optical Coherence Tomography Assisted Diagnosis of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

The amount of training needed to correctly interpret optical coherence tomography scans of the skin is undefined. The aim of this study was to illustrate how cumulative sum charts can be used to determine how many optical coherence tomography scans novice assessors should evaluate in order to obtain competence in diagnosing basal cell carcinoma. Four hundred lesions suspected for non-melanoma skin cancer were evaluated by optical coherence tomography in combination with clinical photographs, using a 5-point confidence scale. The diagnostic error rate (sum of false-negative and false-positive optical coherence tomography results/total number of cases) was used to evaluate performance, with histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard. Acceptable and unacceptable error rates were set at 16% and 25%, respectively. Adequate performance was reached after assessing 183-311 scans, dependent on the cut-off for a positive test result. In conclusion, cumulative sum analysis is useful to monitor the progress of optical coherence tomography trainees. The caseload necessary for training is substantial.

Surgery versus combined treatment with curettage and imiquimod for nodular basal cell carcinoma: One-year results of a noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Nodular basal cell carcinoma (nBCC) is mostly treated with surgical excision. Interest in minimally invasive treatment of these low-risk tumors is increasing. We assessed the effectiveness of nBCC treatment with curettage and imiquimod cream compared with surgical excision. METHODS: Patients with nBCC included in this randomized, controlled noninferiority trial were randomly assigned to either a curettage and imiquimod cream group or a surgical excision group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free from treatment failure 1 year after the end of treatment. A prespecified noninferiority margin of 8% was used. A modified intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02242929). RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were randomized: 73 to the curettage and imiquimod cream group and 72 to the surgical excision group. The proportion of patients free of recurrence after 12 months was 86.3% (63/73) for the curettage and imiquimod group and 100% (72/72) for the surgical excision group. The difference in efficacy was -13.7% (95% confidence interval -21.6% to -5.8%; 1-sided P = .0004) favoring surgical excision. CONCLUSION: Noninferiority of curettage and imiquimod cream cannot be concluded. Given the still high efficacy of curettage and imiquimod cream and the indolent growth pattern of nBCC, curettage and imiquimod could still be a valuable treatment option with the possibility to prevent overuse of excisions. However, it cannot replace surgical excision.

Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Subtyping of Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Noninvasive diagnostic strategies such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) enable detailed examination of skin tissue architecture and have potential for identification and subtyping of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). To evaluate the additional diagnostic value of OCT, a prospective cohort study was performed in 182 patients with 250 lesions suspected for non-melanoma skin premalignancies requiring a biopsy. Accuracy of BCC diagnosis and subtype on the basis of clinical examination (CE) of patients was compared with that on the basis of OCT scans in conjunction with clinical images of lesions (cOCT). Confidence levels were recorded on a 5-point scale, where score 0 indicated absence of BCC and scores 1-4 indicated increasing suspicion of BCC. Diagnostic performance parameters were compared using histopathologic diagnosis as gold standard. The patient-based area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) increased from 85.6% for CE to 91.2% for cOCT (P = 0.061) and the lesion-based AUC from 82.7% to 91.3% (P < 0.001). When confidence scores 1-4 were defined as positive, patient-based specificity increased from 47.5% (CE alone) to 76.8% (cOCT) at similar sensitivity (97.6% and 95.2%, respectively). cOCT slightly improved the ability to discriminate between superficial and nonsuperficial BCC subtypes and seemed to be a valuable addition to CE alone in the diagnosis and subtyping of BCC.