Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Schizophr Bull ; 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The ClozaGene Study is a nationwide cohort of adults who have been treated with clozapine. While clozapine is indicated in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, it is associated with a considerable adverse drug reaction (ADR) burden, and not all patients achieve adequate symptomatic response. The current study focuses on self-reported experiences of clozapine use and response, clozapine-associated ADRs, and mental health comorbidity. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1021 participants (41.0% female; aged 46.2 ±â€…10.6 years [range 18-66]) were recruited via a mail-out based on prescriptions for clozapine. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire. STUDY RESULTS: Most participants (90.1%, n = 912) were living with schizophrenia while 41.5% reported a lifetime diagnosis of depression, 15.6% bipolar disorder, and 8.1% schizoaffective disorder. Clozapine was currently prescribed to 944 (92.5%) participants and 37.8% of these participants self-reported currently taking additional antipsychotic medication. Nearly 3 quarters of participants living with schizophrenia reported that clozapine helped control their schizophrenia symptoms moderately to very well. The most commonly reported ADRs were sialorrhea (80.3%), weight gain (71.0%), constipation (56.9%), and sedation (52.8%). The prevalence of clozapine cessation due to clozapine-induced myocarditis and neutropenia was 1% and 0.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the high rate of psychotic and metabolic symptoms and ADRs among adults prescribed clozapine in the general Australian population. Future genomic analyses will focus on identifying genetic variants influencing clozapine treatment response and side effects.

2.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 57(11): 1428-1442, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Australian Genetics of Bipolar Disorder Study is a nation-wide cohort of adults living with bipolar disorder. The study aims to detect the relationships between genetic risk, symptom severity, and the lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder, treatment response and medication side effects, and patterns and costs of health care usage. METHODS: A total of 6682 participants (68.3% female; aged 44.8 ± 13.6 years [range = 18-90]) were recruited in three waves: a nation-wide media campaign, a mail-out based on prescriptions for lithium carbonate and through the Australian Genetics of Depression Study. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire. A total of 4706 (70%) participants provided a saliva sample and were genotyped and 5506 (82%) consented to record linkage of their Pharmaceutical and Medicare Benefits Schedule data. RESULTS: Most participants were living with bipolar I disorder (n = 4068) while 1622 participants were living with bipolar II disorder and 992 with sub-threshold bipolar disorder. The mean age of bipolar disorder diagnosis was 32.7 ± 11.6 years but was younger in bipolar I (p = 2.0E-26) and females (p = 5.7E-23). Excluding depression with onset prior to bipolar disorder diagnosis, 64.5% of participants reported one or more co-occurring psychiatric disorders: most commonly generalised anxiety disorder (43.5%) and posttraumatic stress disorder (20.7%). Adverse drug reactions were common and resulted in discontinuation rates ranging from 33.4% for lithium to 63.0% for carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the high rate of comorbidities and adverse drug reactions among adults living with bipolar disorder in the general Australian population. Future genomic analyses focus on identifying genetic variants influencing pharmacotherapy treatment response and side effects.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Australia/epidemiología , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Carbonato de Litio
4.
Mol Pharm ; 19(11): 4055-4066, 2022 11 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149013

RESUMEN

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it causes many adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which lead to poor treatment outcomes. Nose-to-brain (N2B) drug delivery offers a promising approach to reduce peripheral ADRs by minimizing systemic drug exposure. The aim of the present study was to develop and characterize clozapine-loaded nanoemulsion sol-gel (CLZ-NESG) for intranasal administration using high energy sonication method. A range of oils, surfactants, and cosurfactants were screened with the highest clozapine solubility selected for the development of nanoemulsion. Pseudoternary phase diagrams were constructed using a low-energy (spontaneous) method to identify the microemulsion regions (i.e., where mixtures were transparent). The final formulation, CLZ-NESG (pH 5.5 ± 0.2), comprising 1% w/w clozapine, 1% w/w oleic acid, 10% w/w polysorbate 80/propylene glycol (3:1), and 20% w/w poloxamer 407 (P407) solution, had an average globule size of ≤30 nm with PDI 0.2 and zeta potential of -39.7 ± 1.5 mV. The in vitro cumulative drug release of clozapine from the nanoemulsion gel at 34 °C (temperature of nasal cavity) after 72 h was 38.9 ± 4.6% compared to 84.2 ± 3.9% with the control solution. The permeation study using sheep nasal mucosa as diffusion barriers confirmed a sustained release of clozapine with 56.2 ± 2.3% cumulative drug permeated after 8 h. Additionally, the histopathological examination found no severe nasal ciliotoxicity on the mucosal tissues. The thermodynamic stability studies showed that the gel strength and viscosity of CLZ-NESG decreased after temperature cycling but was still seen to be in "gel" form at nasal temperature. However, the accelerated storage stability study showed a decrease in drug concentration after 3 months, which can be expected at elevated stress conditions. The formulation developed in this study showed desirable physicochemical properties for intranasal administration, highlighting the potential value of a nanoemulsion gel for improving drug bioavailability of clozapine for N2B delivery.


Asunto(s)
Clozapina , Nanopartículas , Animales , Ovinos , Administración Intranasal , Clozapina/farmacología , Emulsiones/química , Química Farmacéutica , Tamaño de la Partícula , Geles , Mucosa Nasal , Nanopartículas/química
5.
Gels ; 8(1)2022 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35049572

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic. It is, however, associated with many adverse drug reactions. Nose-to-brain (N2B) delivery offers a promising approach. This study aims to develop clozapine-encapsulated thermosensitive sol-gels for N2B delivery. (2) Methods: Poloxamer 407 and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose were mixed and hydrated with water. Glycerin and carbopol solutions were added to the mixture and stirred overnight at 2-8 °C. Clozapine 0.1% w/w was stirred with polysorbate 20 (PS20) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) at RT (25 °C) before being added to the polymer solution. The final formulation was made to 10 g with water, stirred overnight at 2-8 °C and then adjusted to pH 5.5. (3) Results: Formulations F3 (3% PS20) and F4 (3% PS80) were selected for further evaluation, as their gelation temperatures were near 28 °C. The hydrodynamic particle diameter of clozapine was 18.7 ± 0.2 nm in F3 and 20.0 ± 0.4 nm in F4. The results show a crystallinity change in clozapine to amorphous. Drug release studies showed a 59.1 ± 3.0% (F3) and 53.1 ± 2.7% (F4) clozapine release after 72 h. Clozapine permeated after 8 h was 20.8 ± 3.0% (F3) and 17.8 ± 3.1% (F4). The drug deposition was higher with F4 (144.8 ± 1.4 µg/g) than F3 (110.7 ± 2.7 µg/g). Both sol-gels showed no phase separation after 3 months. (4) Conclusions: Binary PS80-P407 mixed micelles were more thermodynamically stable and rigid due to the higher synergism of both surfactants. However, binary mixed PS20-P407 micelles showed better drug permeation across the nasal mucosa tissue and may be a preferable carrier system for the intranasal administration of clozapine.

6.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 238(3): 615-637, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33410989

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-refractory schizophrenia for reducing positive psychotic symptoms. It is associated with a reduction in hospitalisation and overall mortality. In spite of this, clozapine remains underutilised due to its complex adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to investigate the association of clozapine and norclozapine serum levels, and peripheral ADRs. METHODS: Studies were searched from four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) from inception to 12 June 2020. Studies were included if they had adult patients, provided data on steady-state trough clozapine or norclozapine levels and reported on clozapine-associated ADRs. Pregnant women, case reports and series were excluded. RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was found for clozapine serum levels and triglycerides (n = 70; r = 0.303, 95% CI 0.0119-0.546, p = 0.042), heart rate (n = 137; r = 0.269, 95% CI 0.0918-0.486, p = 0.035), and overall combined ADRs (n = 160; r = 0.264, 95% CI 0.110-0.405, p = 0.001), but not for absolute neutrophil count (n = 223; r = - 0.164, 95% CI - 0.529-0.253, p = 0.444) or total white cell count (n = 18; r = 0.0176, 95% CI - 0.203-0.237, p = 0.878). Interestingly, norclozapine serum levels were found to be statistically correlated to triglycerides (n = 120; r = 0.211, 95% CI 0.0305-0.378, p = 0.022), total cholesterol (n = 120; r = 0.272, 95% CI 0.0948-0.432, p = 0.003) and weight gain (n = 118; r = 0.208, 95% CI 0.0261-0.377, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate, triglycerides and combined ADRs are significantly correlated with clozapine levels, and triglycerides, total cholesterol and weight gain with norclozapine levels. Future prospective, randomised controlled studies are needed to identify the cause-effect relationship between clozapine levels and peripheral ADRs.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/sangre , Clozapina/análogos & derivados , Clozapina/sangre , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/sangre , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Triglicéridos/sangre , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Embarazo , Esquizofrenia/sangre , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos
7.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 7(9): 762-774, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with schizophrenia have higher rates of smoking than the general population, and lower quit rates. Several randomised controlled trials have investigated the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation over the past 20 years. We did a systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of smoking abstinence to guide decision making in offering pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to Sept 30, 2019, for randomised controlled trials of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychotic disorders who were smokers at the time of study recruitment. Data were extracted from published studies on smoking abstinence outcomes and psychotic symptoms. We did pairwise and network meta-analyses for the primary outcome of smoking abstinence. Sensitivity analyses were done on study inclusion criteria, duration, quality, and location. This study is registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO, CRD42018102343. FINDINGS: A total of 15 111 records were identified by the database searches, and 163 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 145 articles were then excluded for several reasons including insufficient data, or abstracts published in later studies, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the pairwise meta-analyses, four studies with 394 participants assessed varenicline (RR 3·75, 95% CI 1·96-7·19, p<0·0001; I2=0%), four studies with bupropion and 292 participants (RR 3·40, 95% CI 1·58-7·34, p=0·0002; I2=0%), and three studies with 561 participants assessed nicotine replacement therapy (RR 4·27, 95% CI 1·71-10·65, p=0·0002; I2=0%). All three treatments were deemed superior to placebo. In the network meta-analysis, varenicline was superior to bupropion (RR 2·02, 95% CI 1·04-3·93; p=0·038) but no significant difference was found between varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy, or bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy. No agents were associated with changes in psychiatric symptoms, but varenicline was associated with higher rates of nausea than was placebo. INTERPRETATION: We found evidence to support use of pharmacological agents for smoking cessation for people with psychosis. Varenicline might be superior to bupropion; however, additional direct testing and combination trials of pharmacological agents for smoking cessation are required to inform clinical decision making for people with psychosis. FUNDING: None.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Vareniclina
8.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv ; 17(6): 839-853, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32343186

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Orally-administered antipsychotics are effective in the management of psychosis-related disorders although generation-specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs) significantly hinder clinical outcomes, driven by issues such as patient non-compliance. Direct nose-to-brain (N2B) delivery of antipsychotics via the olfactory epithelium could avert peripheral ADRs by maximizing cerebral drug concentrations, and reducing drug levels in the periphery. However, there exist physicochemical challenges related to psychotropic drugs, alongside biochemical barriers associated with targeting the olfactory region. Nanotechnological approaches present a viable strategy for the development of intranasal antipsychotic formulations where drug stability, mucosal absorption and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-bioavailability can be optimized. AREAS COVERED: This review explores the unique anatomical features of the nasal cavity as a pathway for antipsychotic drug delivery to the brain. Nanocarrier-based approaches to encapsulate antipsychotics, and enhance stability, absorption and bioavailability are explored. The aim of this review is to determine current knowledge gaps for direct N2B psychotropic drug delivery, and identify clinically acceptable strategies to overcome them. EXPERT OPINION: The olfactory epithelium may be the most effective and direct administration route for antipsychotic delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). This research is novel and has the potential to revolutionize the mode of delivery of neurological medicines to the CNS in the future.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Disponibilidad Biológica , Humanos , Nanotecnología , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo
9.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 53(6): 550-558, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30501394

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: People with severe mental illness have similar cancer incidence, but higher mortality than the general population. Participation in cancer screening may be a contributing factor but existing studies are conflicting. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of colorectal, prostate and cervical cancer screening among people with and without severe mental illness in Australia, who have access to universal health care. METHODS: We followed three cohorts using de-identified data from a random 10% sample of people registered for Australia's universal health care system: those aged 50-69 years ( n = 760,058) for colorectal cancer screening; women aged 18-69 years ( n = 918,140) for cervical cancer screening and men aged 50-69 years ( n = 380,238) for prostate cancer screening. We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between severe mental illness and rates of faecal occult blood testing, pap smears and prostate-specific antigen testing. RESULTS: Having severe mental illness was associated with a 17% reduction in rates of pap smear (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.84) and prostate-specific antigen testing (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.85), compared to the general population. By contrast, incidence rates of faecal occult blood testing were only lower in people with severe mental illness among the participants who visited their general practitioner less than an average of five times per year (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval = [0.73, 0.94]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that differences in screening frequency may explain some of the mismatch between cancer incidence and mortality in people with severe mental illness and indicate that action is required to improve preventive screening in this very disadvantaged group.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sangre Oculta , Prueba de Papanicolaou/estadística & datos numéricos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 52(8): 751-767, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29732913

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment refractory schizophrenia, only 40% of people will meet response criteria. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of global literature on clozapine augmentation strategies. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Cochrane Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database for randomised control trials of augmentation strategies for clozapine resistant schizophrenia. We undertook pairwise meta-analyses of within-class interventions and, where possible, frequentist mixed treatment comparisons to differentiate treatment effectiveness Results: We identified 46 studies of 25 interventions. On pairwise meta-analyses, the most effective augmentation agents for total psychosis symptoms were aripiprazole (standardised mean difference: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: -0.89 to -0.07) fluoxetine (standardised mean difference: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: -0.97 to -0.50) and, sodium valproate (standardised mean difference: 2.36 95% confidence interval: -3.96 to -0.75). Memantine was effective for negative symptoms (standardised mean difference: -0.56 95% confidence interval: -0.93 to -0.20). However, many of these results included poor-quality studies. Single studies of certain antipsychotics (penfluridol), antidepressants (paroxetine, duloxetine), lithium and Ginkgo biloba showed potential, while electroconvulsive therapy was highly promising. Mixed treatment comparisons were only possible for antipsychotics, and these gave similar results to the pairwise meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the limited data available, the best evidence is for the use of aripiprazole, fluoxetine and sodium valproate as augmentation agents for total psychosis symptoms and memantine for negative symptoms. However, these conclusions are tempered by generally short follow-up periods and poor study quality.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos/efectos de los fármacos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Terapia Electroconvulsiva , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/terapia
12.
Australas Psychiatry ; 26(3): 267-275, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29417829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary teams in mental health receive limited guidance, leading to inconsistent practices. We undertook a systematic review of the characteristics and practices of multidisciplinary team reviews for patients with severe mental illness or in relevant mental health service settings. METHODS: Sources published since 2000 were located via academic database and web searches. Results were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: A total of 14 sources were analysed. Important characteristics and practices identified included routine monitoring and evaluation, good communication, equality between team members, and clear documentation practices. Success factors included defined leadership and clear team goals. Four sources described considerations for patients with complex clinical needs, including allocating sufficient time for discussion, maintaining connections with community providers, and ensuring culturally sensitive practices. CONCLUSIONS: No single best practice model was found, due to variations in team caseload, casemix, and resourcing levels. However, key ingredients for success were proposed. Sources were mostly descriptive; there remains a lack of evidence-based guidance regarding multidisciplinary team review characteristics and practices.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Humanos
13.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 20(4): 1050-1055, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29194917

RESUMEN

Clozapine causes obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (e.g. exenatide) can counter clozapine-associated GLP-1 dysregulation in animals, and may be beneficial in people on clozapine. This randomized, controlled, open-label, pilot trial evaluated weekly exenatide for weight loss among clozapine-treated obese adults with schizophrenia, with or without T2DM. A total of 28 outpatients were randomized to once-weekly extended-release subcutaneous exenatide or usual care for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of participants with >5% weight loss. All 28 participants completed the study; 3/14 in the exenatide group and 2/14 in the usual care group had T2DM. Six people on exenatide achieved >5% weight loss vs one receiving usual care (P = .029). Compared with usual care, participants on exenatide had greater mean weight loss (-5.29 vs -1.12 kg; P = .015) and body mass index reduction (-1.78 vs -0.39 kg/m2 ; P = .019), and reduced fasting glucose (-0.34 vs 0.39 mmol/L; P = .036) and glycated haemoglobin levels (-0.21% vs 0.03%; P = .004). There were no significant differences in other metabolic syndrome components. Exenatide may be a promising therapeutic agent for glycaemic control and weight loss in clozapine-treated people with obesity, and could assist in reducing clozapine-associated cardio-metabolic morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Clozapina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Exenatida/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/inducido químicamente , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Pérdida de Peso/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto Joven
14.
Schizophr Res ; 192: 50-56, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28392207

RESUMEN

Clozapine is the most effective anti-psychotic medication for treatment refractory schizophrenia. A growing number of case reports have linked infection to high clozapine levels and associated adverse outcomes. We present a systematic review of published cases to clarify the relationship between infection and elevated clozapine levels. The case reports were located through PubMed and Embase. In addition, 8 new cases from two Australian states were included. Demographics, psychiatric diagnoses and medical morbidities, medications, clinical symptoms, clozapine levels, inflammatory markers and final clinical outcome were extracted. 40 cases were identified in 23 publications that demonstrated elevated clozapine levels associated with infection. Infections were commonly respiratory in origin. Adverse events, typically sedation, were associated with raised clozapine levels during infection. In many cases the signs of infection such as fever and white blood cell count were reduced. Severe adverse effects were uncommon, with one case each of seizure, myocarditis and neutropenia. The relationship between infection, clozapine levels and adverse events is complex and multi-factorial. Monitoring of clozapine levels is essential during hospitalisation for infection and consideration should be given to gradual dose reduction to minimise dose related side effects.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones/inmunología , Esquizofrenia/inmunología
15.
Addiction ; 112(5): 765-779, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28299855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Substance use disorders are associated commonly with comorbid physical illness. There are fewer data on dental disease in these conditions, in spite of high rates of dry mouth (xerostomia), as well as the associated indirect or life-style effects such as poverty and lack of access to care. We compared the oral health of people with substance use disorders (SUDs) with non-using controls. METHOD: This was a systematic search for studies from the last 35 years of the oral health of people reporting SUDs. We used MEDLINE, PsycInfo, OVID, Google Scholar, EMBASE and article bibliographies. Results were compared with the general population. Oral health was assessed in terms of dental caries and periodontal disease using the following standardized measures: the mean number of decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) or surfaces (DMFS) and probing pocket depth. Non-carious tooth loss was assessed clinically. RESULTS: We identified 28 studies that had sufficient data for a meta-analysis, comprising 4086 SU patients and 28 031 controls. People with SUD had significantly higher mean scores for DMFT [mean difference = 5.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.61-7.69 and DMFS (mean difference = 17.83, 95% CI = 6.85-28.8]. They had more decayed teeth but fewer restorations, indicating reduced access to dental care. Patients with SUD also exhibited greater tooth loss, non-carious tooth loss and destructive periodontal disease compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Patients with substance use disorders have greater and more severe dental caries and periodontal disease than the general population, but are less likely to have received dental care.


Asunto(s)
Índice CPO , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Salud Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Humanos
16.
PLoS One ; 11(6): e0156208, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27304831

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although clozapine is the gold-standard for treatment refractory schizophrenia, it has the worst metabolic profile of all antipsychotics. This is partly mediated by clozapine's impact on glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). There is an absence of robust evidence for effective treatments for clozapine associated weight gain and metabolic syndrome. Metformin, with its role in increasing GLP-1 may aid weight loss among people on clozapine. METHODS: We conducted a systematic-review and meta-analysis of metformin versus placebo for change in weight and metabolic syndrome for people on clozapine without diabetes mellitus. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trial register, Pubmed and Embase, as well as the following Chinese databases: the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database. This was supplemented by hand searches of key papers. RESULTS: Eight studies, of which three were from Chinese databases, with 478 participants were included. We found that metformin was superior to placebo in terms of weight loss (-3.12kg, 95%CI -4.88kg to -1.37kg) and BMI (-1.18kg/m2, 95%CI -1.76kg/m2 to -0.61kg/m2). Metformin significantly improved three of the five components of metabolic syndrome; waist circumference, fasting glucose and triglycerides. Sensitivity analysis on study quality and duration did not greatly impact results. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin led to clinically meaningful weight loss among people on clozapine, and may reduce the rates of metabolic syndrome. Inclusion of metformin into the treatment protocols of people on clozapine, as tolerated, should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015029723.


Asunto(s)
Metformina/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Ayuno/sangre , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Metabólico/sangre , Síndrome Metabólico/prevención & control , Obesidad/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triglicéridos/sangre , Circunferencia de la Cintura/efectos de los fármacos
17.
Australas Psychiatry ; 24(4): 365-7, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27324147

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilia has been associated with the use of clozapine. Where clozapine associated eosinophilia develops, and is associated with organ specific damage, clozapine is usually ceased. In cases of treatment associated eosinophilia without evidence of organ specific damage, clozapine would also typically be withdrawn. There are small numbers of reports in the literature describing patients who have had a successful rechallenge of clozapine having previously stopped treatment due to eosinophilia without associated organ specific inflammation. We report the case of a man who underwent a successful retrial of clozapine. METHOD: Case from authors' clinical practice reviewed. RESULTS: We present the case of a young man with treatment resistant schizophrenia who underwent a successful re-challenge of clozapine, having previously ceased treatment due to an eosinophilia associated with treatment. CONCLUSION: We believe that the current report provides further evidence that it may be unnecessary to cease treatment in all patients who develop an eosinophilia without organ dysfunction whilst on clozapine. Furthermore, where clozapine has been ceased due to an eosinophilia without evidence of organ specific inflammation, clozapine rechallenge with increased haematological monitoring should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Eosinofilia/inducido químicamente , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino
18.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 24(5): 379-88, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26905048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older people are increasingly "in harm's way" following human-induced disasters (HIDs). There is debate in the literature as to the relative impact of disasters on their psychological health compared with other age groups. Natural disasters and HIDs are thought to affect survivors differentially, and this may extend to older adults as a group. In the absence of existing systematic reviews, we aimed to synthesize the available evidence and conduct meta-analyses of the effects of HIDs on the psychological health of older versus younger adults. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted on papers identified through a systematic review. The primary outcomes measured were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety disorders, adjustment disorder, and psychological distress. RESULTS: We identified 11 papers from 10 studies on HIDs (N = 26,753), of which 8 had sufficient data for a random-effects meta-analysis. Older adults were 2.85 times less likely to experience PTSD symptoms following HID (95% CI: 1.42-5.70) when compared with younger adults. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of anxiety and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Health and emergency services need to be increasingly prepared to meet the psychological needs of older people, given the global rise in the numbers of older adults affected by disasters of all kinds. Preliminary evidence suggests that old age may be a protective factor for the development of PTSD in the wake of HID.


Asunto(s)
Desastres/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Accidentes de Aviación/estadística & datos numéricos , Explosiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/estadística & datos numéricos , Guerra
20.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 28(1): 11-20, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212132

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural disasters affect the health and well-being of adults throughout the world. There is some debate in the literature as to whether older persons have increased risk of mental health outcomes after exposure to natural disasters when compared with younger adults. To date, no systematic review has evaluated this. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the impact of natural disasters on the mental health and psychological distress experienced by older adults. DESIGN: A meta-analysis was conducted on papers identified through a systematic review. The primary outcomes measured were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety disorders, adjustment disorder, and psychological distress. RESULTS: We identified six papers with sufficient data for a random effects meta-analysis. Older adults were 2.11 times more likely to experience PTSD symptoms and 1.73 more likely to develop adjustment disorder when exposed to natural disasters when compared with younger adults. CONCLUSIONS: Given the global rise in the number of older adults affected by natural disasters, mental health services need to be prepared to meet their needs following natural disasters, particularly around the early detection and management of PTSD.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Adaptación/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Desastres , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Anciano , Psiquiatría Geriátrica , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Sesgo de Publicación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...