Clinical Manifestations and Stool Load of Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Infections in United States Children and Adults.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate whether atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (aEPEC) causes disease in adults. aEPEC is commonly detected in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. aEPEC, in contrast to typical EPEC, lacks bundle-forming pili, altering its pathogenicity. Here, we define for the first time the clinical manifestations of sporadic aEPEC infection in United States children and adults and determine whether EPEC load correlates with disease. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 380 inpatients/outpatients of all ages. EPEC load in stools was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and fever were more prevalent in EPEC-positive cases than in EPEC-negative controls. aEPEC infection caused mostly acute, mild diarrhea lasting for 6 to 13 days. However, some had severe diarrhea with 10 to 40 bowel movements per day or had persistent/chronic diarrhea. Fever, vomiting, and abnormal serum sodium levels were more common in children. Adults more often reported abdominal pain and longer duration of diarrhea. Symptomatic aEPEC infection was associated with leukocytosis in 24% of patients. EPEC load >0.1% was associated with symptomatic infection; however, loads varied greatly. Co-infecting pathogens did not alter diarrhea severity or EPEC load. Longitudinal data reveal that some are colonized for months to years or are repeatedly infected. CONCLUSIONS: aEPEC is associated with a wide array of symptoms in adults, ranging from asymptomatic carriage to severe diarrhea. Higher EPEC loads are associated with presence of symptoms, but bacterial load does not predict disease or severity. Future studies are needed to understand bacterial and host factors that contribute to aEPEC pathogenicity to improve diagnostic tools and clinical care.

Increased Risk of Pancreatitis after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Following a Positive Intraoperative Cholangiogram: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine if patients with a positive intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) who undergo a subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) compared to those who undergo ERCP directly for suspected common bile duct stones. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed from 2010 to 2016. Cases included inpatients with a positive IOC at cholecystectomy who underwent subsequent ERCP. The control group included age-sex matched cohorts who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between PEP and positive IOC, adjusting for matching variables and additional potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients that met the inclusion criteria, there were 91 women (78%) in each group. Nine patients (7.8%) developed PEP in the IOC group, compared to 3 patients in the control group (2.6%). The use of pancreatic duct stents and rectal indomethacin was similar in both groups. After adjusting for age, sex, total bilirubin levels, and any stent placement, patients with a positive IOC had a significantly increased risk of PEP (odds ratio, 4.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-21.89; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this single-center case-control study, there was a five-fold increased risk of PEP following a positive IOC compared to an age-sex matched cohort.

The Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Patients with Isolated Elevations in Serum Amylase and/or Lipase.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with isolated elevated levels of amylase and/or lipase. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a large academic medical center from 2000 to 2016. Patients were selected based on having elevated amylase, lipase, or both, but without a diagnosis of pancreatitis or known pancreatobiliary disease. Patients were excluded if they had abnormal liver function tests or abnormal imaging of the pancreas. RESULTS: Of 299 EUS procedures performed, 38 met inclusion criteria. Symptoms were present in 31 patients, most frequently abdominal pain (87%). In 20 patients (53%), initial EUS most commonly found chronic pancreatitis (n=7; 18%), sludge (5; 13%), or new diagnosis of pancreas divisum (3; 8%). In the asymptomatic patients (7), 3 had a finding on EUS, most importantly sludge (2), stone (1), and pancreas divisum (1). No patients were diagnosed with a mass or pancreatic cyst. During the follow up period, 6 patients (22%) had cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: In our study of patients with isolated elevations in amylase and/or lipase without acute pancreatitis who underwent EUS, approximately 50% had a pancreatobiliary finding, most commonly chronic pancreatitis or biliary sludge.

Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen masquerading as a sarcoma metastasis.

We report a case of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen presenting as an incidental splenic mass in a patient with a history of retroperitoneal spindle cell sarcoma. Imaging studies and preoperative fine needle biopsy failed to differentiate this lesion from other vascular splenic lesions or a metastatic focus of a prior sarcoma. The patient was treated with splenectomy, which has proved both diagnostic and therapeutic in this and other cases of SANT. Although histology can lead to the diagnosis of vascular tumor, immunohistochemistry is the only way to confirm the diagnosis of SANT. The etiology of SANT is unknown. SANT of the spleen is a benign lesion that does not recur after splenectomy.

Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen masquerading as a sarcoma metastasis.

We report a case of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen presenting as an incidental splenic mass in a patient with a history of retroperitoneal spindle cell sarcoma. Imaging studies and preoperative fine needle biopsy failed to differentiate this lesion from other vascular splenic lesions or a metastatic focus of a prior sarcoma. The patient was treated with splenectomy, which has proved both diagnostic and therapeutic in this and other cases of SANT. Although histology can lead to the diagnosis of vascular tumor, immunohistochemistry is the only way to confirm the diagnosis of SANT. The etiology of SANT is unknown. SANT of the spleen is a benign lesion that does not recur after splenectomy.