Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932238

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has posed significant health challenges worldwide. While children generally experience less severe illness compared to adults, pneumonia remains a substantial risk, particularly for those under five years old. This study examines the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of pediatric COVID-19 pneumonia patients treated with favipiravir in Thailand, aiming to identify associated factors for pneumonia. A retrospective review was performed on pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, from 13 January 2020 to 15 November 2021. Data on demographics, clinical symptoms, treatment, and outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with pneumonia. Among 349 hospitalized children, the median age was 8 years, with 51.9% being male. Symptoms included a fever (100%), a cough (74.2%), and a rash (24.9%). COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed in 54.7% of the children. Favipiravir was administered as the standard treatment, showing mild adverse effects, including a rash (4.3%) and nausea (2.8%). Monocytosis was significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia (aOR 30.85, 95% CI: 9.03-105.41, p < 0.001), with an ROC curve area of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83). Pediatric COVID-19 patients typically exhibit mild-to-moderate symptoms, with pneumonia being common in the early pandemic phase. Monocytosis is a significant factor associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. Favipiravir demonstrated mild adverse effects. Further studies are needed to validate these findings across different settings and phases of the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Amidas , Antivirales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pirazinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Amidas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Lactante , Tailandia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hospitalización
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 399, 2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898404

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Influenza is a main cause of illnesses during seasonal outbreaks. Identifying children with influenza who may need hospitalization may lead to better influenza outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with the severity of influenza infection, specifically among children who were admitted to the hospital after being diagnosed with influenza at the emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with a positive influenza rapid test who visited the emergency department at Srinagarind hospital between January2015-December2019. The dependent variable was hospital admission, while the independent variables included clinical parameters, laboratory results, and emergency severity index(ESI). The association between these variables and hospital admission was analyzed. RESULTS: There were 542 cases of influenza included in the study. The mean age was 7.50 ± 4.52 years. Males accounted for 52.4% of the cases. A total of 190(35.05%) patients, needed hospitalization. Patients with pneumonia, those who required hospitalization or were admitted to the critical care unit, consistently exhibited an elevated absolute monocyte count and a reduced lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Various factors contribute to an increased risk for hospitalization, including ESI level 1-2, co-morbidity in patients, age < 1 year old, and an LMR below 2. CONCLUSIONS: ESI level 1-2 and co-morbidity in patients represent significant risk factors that contribute to higher hospitalization admissions. A LMR below 2 can be used as a prognostic marker for hospitalization in children with influenza infection.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitalización , Gripe Humana , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Niño , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Preescolar , Pronóstico , Lactante , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Children (Basel) ; 11(5)2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790592

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Sepsis management in children is crucial, especially in emergency services. This study aims to evaluate Thai physicians' knowledge gaps in the emergency management of sepsis in children and to evaluate their adherence to the current sepsis clinical practice guidelines. (2) Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey of Thai physicians' management of septic shock in children. The survey was conducted through online questionnaires from March 2019-April 2019. (3) Results: Of the 366 responders, 362 (98.9%) were completed. Most of the responders were general practitioners (89.2%) and pediatricians (10.8%). The time from positive sepsis screening to being evaluated by physicians within 15 min was reported by 83.9%. The most common choice of fluid resuscitation was normal saline solution (77.3%). The practice of a fluid loading dose (20 mL/kg) consistent with the guidelines was 56.3%. The selection of the first vasoactive agent in warm shock (norepinephrine) and cold shock (epinephrine) according to recommendations in the guidelines was 74.3% and 36.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference between general practitioners and pediatricians in terms of knowledge about initial fluid resuscitation and the optimal vasoactive agent in cold shock (p-value < 0.001). In the multivariate model, factors associated with the guideline-based decision-making of vasoactive agent choice for cold shock were specialist training (pediatrician) and the completion of sepsis management training certification, with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of 7.81 and 2.96, but working experience greater than ten years was inconsistent with the guideline-based decision-making (AOR 0.14). (4) Conclusions: Thai clinicians were unfamiliar with pediatric sepsis therapy standards, specifically the quantity of early fluid resuscitation and the appropriate vasoactive medications for cold shock. To encourage adherence to the guidelines, we propose a regularly required training course on pediatric sepsis management.

4.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0297991, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394318

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in children hospitalized due to COVID-19 during the era of pre-Omicron and Omicron variants. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary academic medical center in Thailand between June 2021 and August 2022. We collected the data of children aged under 18-year who were hospitalized from SARS-CoV-2 infection. After hospital discharge, we scheduled clinical follow-up 60 to 90 days post-infection clinical follow-up. We measured antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain in the serum during a follow-up visit and compared the mean difference of antibody levels between children infected with COVID-19 during the pre-Omicron and Omicron eras. RESULTS: A total of 119 children enrolled into the study. There were 58 and 61 children hospitalized due to COVID-19 during pre-Omicron and Omicron era, respectively. The median (interquartile range, IQR) of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in all cases was 206.1 (87.9-424.1) U/mL at follow-up. Children infected during pre-Omicron had SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels at follow-up higher than children infected during Omicron era [mean difference 292.57 U/mL, 95% CI 53.85-531.28, p = 0.017). There was no difference in SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels between the children based on gender, age, co-morbidities, chest radiograph classification, or diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The antibodies response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was weaker during the Omicron era than previous variant of concern. Immunization strategies and policies should be implemented in children even if they had been previously infected.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Niño , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Estudios de Cohortes , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes
5.
Children (Basel) ; 9(12)2022 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36553433

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study sought to determine the epidemiology, seasonal variations, morbidity, and mortality of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection among hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infection in Thailand. In addition, we assessed the risk factors associated with severe RSV lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)-related morbidity and mortality. Methods: The data were reviewed retrospectively from the National Health Security Office for hospitalized children younger than 18 years old diagnosed with RSV-related LRTI in Thailand, between the fiscal years of 2015 to 2020. The RSV-related LRTIs were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Thai Modification. ICD-10-TM codes J12.1, J20.5, and J21.0, which represent respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia, acute bronchitis due to respiratory syncytial virus, and acute bronchiolitis due to respiratory syncytial virus, respectively, were studied. Results: During the study period, RSV-related LRTI accounted for 19,340 of the 1,610,160 hospital admissions due to LRTI. RSV pneumonia was the leading cause of hospitalization (13,684/19,340; 70.76%), followed by bronchiolitis (2849/19,340; 14.73%) and bronchitis (2807/19,340; 14.51%), respectively. The highest peak incidence of 73.55 percent occurred during Thailand's rainy season, from August to October. The mortality rate of RSV-related LRTI in infants younger than 1 year of age was 1.75 per 100,000 person years, which was significantly higher than that of children 1 to younger than 5 years old and children 5 to younger than 18 years old (0.21 per 100,000 person years and 0.01 per 100,000 person years, respectively, p-value < 0.001). Factors associated with mortality were congenital heart disease, hematologic malignancy, malnutrition, and neurological disease. Conclusions: In children with RSV LRTI, pneumonia was the leading cause of hospitalization. The admission rate was highest during the rainy season. Mortality from RSV-related LRTI was higher in children under 1 year old and in children with underlying illnesses; future preventive interventions should target these groups of patients.

6.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 7(8)2022 Jul 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006243

RESUMEN

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak emerged in January 2020 and remains present in 2022. During this period, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been used to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infection. Nationwide data analysis should be pushed as the new standard to demonstrate the impact of COVID-19 infection on other respiratory illnesses and the reliability of NPIs during treatment. Objective: This study aims to identify and compare the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) among children in Thailand before and after the emergence of COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out in hospitalized children under the age of 18 in Thailand from October 2015 to September 2020. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Thai Modification, was used to identify patient diagnoses (ICD-10-TM). The data were extracted from the Universal Coverage Health Security Scheme Database. Results: A total of 1,610,160 admissions were attributed to LRTIs. The most common diagnosis was pneumonia (61.9%). Compared to the 2019 fiscal year, the number of hospitalizations due to LRTIs decreased by 33.9% in the 2020 fiscal year (COVID-19 period) (282,590 vs. 186,651). The incidence of all three diagnostic groupings was substantially lower in the pre- and post-COVID-19 eras, with a decrease of 28% in the pneumonia group (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71 to 0.72), 44% in the bronchiolitis group (IRR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.57), and 34% in the bronchitis group (IRR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.67). Between fiscal years 2019 and 2020, the overall monthly cost of all hospitalizations for LRTIs decreased considerably (p value < 0.001). Conclusions: NPIs may decrease the number of pediatric hospitalizations related to LRTIs. All policies designed to prevent the spread of COVID-19 must be continually utilized to maintain the prevention of LRTIs.

7.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 16(1): 142-150, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523811

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are the most common cause for hospitalization in pediatric patients. Pediatric patients with LRTIs are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The national data analysis of epidemiologic variations facilitates awareness and develops solutions to prevent these conditions in the future. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the epidemiology, causative pathogens, morbidity, and mortality of LRTIs in pediatric patients of Thailand from 2015 to 2019. METHODS: This was a retrospective study among pediatric patients aged between 0 and 18 years old admitted in hospitals due to LRTIs in Thailand from January 2015 to December 2019. The data were extracted from National Health Security Office using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Thai Modification; ICD-10-TM of J09 to J22. RESULTS: A total of 1,423,509 children hospitalized due to LRTIs were identified. Most of the patients were of age 1-5 years. Pneumonia was the most common LRTI (876,557 children, 61.58%) in hospitalized children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main etiologic pathogen of bronchiolitis, which presents in approximately 10.86% of all episodes. Influenza viruses were found predominantly in children with pneumonia (15.52%). The mortality rate since 2015-2019 was highest in pneumonia under 1 year old (P < 0.001). Pneumonia in children under 5 years old had the highest mortality rate, which accounted for 11.85 per 100,000 children in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: LRTIs had a high incidence rate of hospitalization and mortality, especially in children under 5 years old. Influenza virus was the most common pathogen of pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Orthomyxoviridae , Neumonía , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis de Datos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Neumonía/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tailandia/epidemiología
8.
Transl Pediatr ; 11(12): 1892-1898, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36643676

RESUMEN

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, national measures have affected health care services. Children with asthma were a vulnerable population who were advised to avoid needless hospital visits. Telemedicine was utilized in this circumstance. However, data in Thailand is limited. This study aimed to evaluate asthma control in patients who were followed up by telemedicine compared with in-person visits at an outpatient clinic in Thailand's tertiary academic medical center. Methods: This was a retrospective study among pediatric patients with asthma who were followed up in the pediatric pulmonary and allergy clinic of Srinagarind Hospital from 1 January to 31 May 2021. We offered telemedicine (telephone visit) and in-person visits at the hospital by their willingness during this period. All patients were asked about asthma clinical control symptoms, medication compliance, exacerbation events, and hospital admissions by pediatric pulmonologists and allergists. Then, we decided to prescribe in controller medications. In the telemedicine groups, we used the postal service to deliver controller medicine to patients. Results: Among 195 asthmatic children, 83 (42.56%) were followed up by telemedicine. Children who were followed up by telemedicine had more controlled symptoms than the in-person visit group [adjusted relative risk (aRR): 1.219; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.062-1.400; P value =0.005]. In the in-person visit group, children had more asthma exacerbation events than telemedicine (5 vs. 0, respectively, P value =0.073). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine follow-up in asthmatic children resulted in well-controlled symptoms and few asthma exacerbation events.

9.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211018013, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009056

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the prevalence of and possible risk factors for hand eczema with respect to the dissemination of information about new hand hygiene habits to protect against ongoing COVID-19 cross-transmission. The authors conducted a survey among health care workers (HCWs) and non-HCW populations in Khon Kaen, Thailand. RESULTS: A total of 805 participants participated. The prevalence of hand eczema in the study population was 20.87%. There were several risk factors, including working as a HCW, having a history of previous hand eczema, having underlying atopic dermatitis, wearing gloves in everyday life, and washing hands frequently (more than 10 times/day). Hand hygiene with alcohol-based products was shown to be a risk factor for hand eczema, (OR (95% CI) 1.86 (1.03-3.35), P = .04). CONCLUSION: In terms of hand eczema prevention, we suggest that the use of alcohol-based products should be discontinued if other handwashing methods are available. The following factors increase the risk of hand eczema: being a HCW, having previous hand eczema, and having underlying atopic dermatitis. Proper strategies in terms of hand eczema prevention should be addressed, especially in this group, since we need to continue performing hand hygiene during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Higiene de las Manos , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/etiología , Eccema/prevención & control , Hábitos , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Humanos , Pandemias , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Tailandia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...