Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2362-2367, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35448932

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: On any given day, there are >550,000 homeless persons in the United States. Little research has examined the relationship between the homeless population and traumatic injuries. We hypothesized that homeless trauma patients have a higher mortality compared to those who are not homeless. METHODS: The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was retrospectively queried from 2003-2018 for all adult (age ≥15) patients admitted to trauma centers in Pennsylvania. Homelessness was defined as homeless on admission or homeless as their discharge status. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical variables were compared between homeless and non-homeless patients. Logistic regression was used to control for age, gender, injury severity, injury type, admission Glasgow Coma Scale, and systolic blood pressure to assess morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 773 patients were identified upon query. Homeless trauma patients were more likely to be male, younger, black, and of Hispanic ethnicity. Compared to non-homeless, they were more likely to have a positive drug screen or mental illness at the time of injury. They were not more significantly injured than their counterparts; however, in adjusted analysis, the homeless had significantly higher odds of both complications (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 3.11; 95%CI: 2.64-3.66, P < .001) and mortality (AOR: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.29-2.50, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Although homeless patients were not more severely injured than the general trauma population, they had significantly higher odds of both complications and mortality. This population represents a very vulnerable community in need of medical intervention and injury prevention programs.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Refugiados , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Centros Traumatológicos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
2.
Am Surg ; 88(8): 1754-1759, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337209

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In trauma patients using warfarin, current guidelines recommend computed tomography of the brain (CTH), 24-hour observation, and repeat CTH to monitor for stability. Despite growing evidence of uncommon delayed hemorrhage, this remains standard practice even in mild traumatic brain injury without intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Our study sought to determine the incidence and outcomes of delayed ICH (DICH) in trauma patients on supra-therapeutic warfarin without initial ICH. METHODS: A retrospective, single institutional study was performed of all adult trauma patients (>18 years old) who presented on prehospital warfarin with an international normalized ratio (INR) >3 and initial CTH that did not demonstrate ICH. Each of these patients underwent subsequent CTH within 24 hours and any DICH was identified. Those who demonstrated DICH were further examined to identify potential risk factors and outcomes such as need for further imaging or surgical intervention. Analyses were performed using Fisher's exact tests and Student's t-tests. RESULTS: 225 patients were identified from January 2015 to April 2021 that met inclusion criteria. Of those identified, only 3 (1.33%) were found to develop any DICH on routine repeat CTH. Identified characteristics did not reach statistical significance due to the low number of DICH. None of the patients with DICH went on to require intervention. CONCLUSION: In patients with identified traumatic injury on supra-therapeutic warfarin, an initial CTH without identified ICH alone is an adequate survey. DICH in these patients is uncommon and routine reimaging within 24 hours is unlikely to change clinical management in patients with intact neurologic status.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Warfarina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(1): 206-211, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34144564

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) modulate peripheral γ-amino-butyric acid type A on macrophages causing immunomodulation. They inhibit proinflammatory cytokines increasing infections. Prior studies have also shown that infections can increase thrombotic complications. We sought to examine this relationship in trauma patients. We hypothesized that the presence of BZDs on admission urine drug screen (UDS) would increase rates of both complications. METHODS: All patients submitted to the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database from 2003 to 2018 were queried. Those with a positive UDS for BZDs were analyzed. Infectious complications were defined as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis, wound, and soft tissue infection, and thrombotic complications were defined as presence of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. Logistic regressions controlling for demographic and injury covariates assessed the adjusted impact of BZDs on infectious and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: A total of 3,393 patients (2.08%) had infectious complications, and 3,048 (1.87%) had thrombotic complications. Furthermore, 33,260 patients (20.4%) had a positive UDS for BZDs on admission. Univariate analysis showed that those positive for BZDs had higher rates of infectious (3.33% vs. 1.76%, p < 0.001) and thrombotic (2.84% vs. 1.62%, p < 0.001) complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that BZDs significantly increased the odds of infectious and thrombotic complications. Patients who tested positive for BZDs and subsequently developed infection had increased odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; p < 0.001) of developing thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients with a positive UDS for BZDs had higher odds of both infectious and thrombotic complications. Moreover, odds of thrombotic complications were higher in those with infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Infecciones/epidemiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Benzodiazepinas/orina , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/orina , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Admisión del Paciente , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis/orina , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...