Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 29(5): 710-712, 2023 09 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36994972

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to determine whether retention of a post-pyloric Dobhoff tube (DHT) in position to serve as a visual guide through the pylorus during gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube placement results in a reduction in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and estimated radiation dose. A retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent GJ tube placement or gastric to GJ conversion from January 1, 2017, to April 1, 2021. Demographic and procedural data were collected, and results were evaluated using descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing through an unpaired Student's t-test. Of the 71 GJ tube placements included for analysis, 12 patients underwent placement with a post-pyloric DHT in position, and 59 patients underwent placement without a post-pyloric DHT in position. The mean fluoroscopy time and estimated radiation dose were significantly reduced in patients who underwent GJ tube placement with a post-pyloric DHT in position compared with those without (7.08 min vs. 11.02 min, P = 0.004; 123.12 mGy vs. 255.19 mGy, P = 0.015, respectively). The mean total procedure time was also reduced in patients who underwent GJ tube placement with a post-pyloric DHT in position compared with those who had no post-pyloric DHT, but this finding lacked statistical significance (18.55 min vs. 23.15 min; P = 0.09). Post-pyloric DHT retention can be utilized during GJ tube placement to reduce radiation exposure to both the patient and interventionalist.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Derivación Gástrica , Humanos , Píloro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fluoroscopía , Dosis de Radiación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36743257

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Modern medicine necessitates the delivery of increasingly complex health care while minimizing cost. Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures is becoming more common as accumulating data demonstrate fewer complications, improved patient satisfaction, and high rates of treatment success compared with the transfemoral access (TFA) approach; however, disparities in cost between these approaches remain unclear. We compared supply and equipment costs between TRA and TFA for diagnostic cerebral angiography and evaluate the specific items that account for these differences. METHODS: We reviewed all adult patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography from July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Data related to patient demographics, vascular access site, catheters used, cost of catheters, arterial access sheath use, cost of sheaths, closure devices used, and cost of closure devices were collected. RESULTS: The transradial approach resulted in higher price of radial access sheath; however, the overall cost of closure devices was much lower in TRA group than in the TFA cohort. There was no significant difference in the cost of catheters. Overall, the total supply costs for TRA cerebral angiography were significantly lower than those of TFA cerebral angiography. The relative materials cost difference of using TRA was 20.9%. CONCLUSION: This study is the first itemized materials cost analysis of TRA versus TFA cerebral angiography. TRA necessitates the use of a more expensive access sheath device; however, this cost is offset by the increased cost of devices used for femoral arteriotomy closure. Overall, the supply and equipment costs were significantly lower for TRA than TFA.

3.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 214: 107171, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, limited studies have been conducted regarding the safe timing of valvular repair for infectious endocarditis (IE) in patients with radiographic findings consistent with embolic stroke or infectious intracranial aneurysm (IIA). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of valvular surgeries for IE was performed (2011-2019). Outcomes for patients who underwent cranial image screening and those who did not were subsequently compared. RESULTS: 276 patients underwent valvular repair for IE; 186 (67.4%) were male. The mean age was 51.0 (17.4) years. Mean time from imaging to surgery was 7.5 days. 124 (44.9%) underwent baseline cranial imaging. Of these, 22 (17.7%) had findings concerning for ischemic stroke from embolic origin. 65 patients underwent baseline diagnostic cerebral angiography. 10 (15%) of these patients harbored an IIA. Four out of these 10 (40%) underwent intervention for an IIA. Two of the four who underwent intervention (50.0%) had ruptured IIAs. The remaining six (60%) patients with IIAs received treatment with antibiotics alone. None of the patients with IIAs suffered from symptomatic hemorrhage after valvular surgery. No significant difference in symptomatic hemorrhage after valvular surgery between those with ischemic embolic stroke compared to those without (ischemic stroke-4.5% vs. no ischemic stroke-1.0%; p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with radiographic evidence of ischemic stroke from septic emboli can safely undergo valvular surgery for IE without increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. We advocate for baseline CTA screening to evaluate for IIA in patients who present with a primary diagnosis of IE and propose a management algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Accidente Cerebrovascular Embólico , Embolia , Endocarditis , Aneurisma Infectado/complicaciones , Angiografía Cerebral/métodos , Endocarditis/complicaciones , Endocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...