Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e63880, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39104990

RESUMEN

Corroborative evidence for discectomy in pediatric or adolescent patients remains scarce, with this single-arm meta-analysis investigating discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) within this population. PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients under 21 years of age with a diagnosis of LDH that was treated surgically with discectomy. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023463358). Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria (n=1182). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain at baseline were 5.34 (95% CI: 4.48, 6.20, I2=98.9%). Postoperative VAS back pain scores after 12 months were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.19, I2=95.6%). VAS scores for leg pain at baseline were 7.03 (95% CI: 6.63, 7.43, I2=93.5%). Postoperative VAS leg pain scores after 12 months were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.36, I2=97.0%). Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at baseline were 55.46 (95% CI: 43.69, 67.24, I2=99.9%). Postoperative ODI scores after 12 months were 7.82 (95% CI: 4.95, 10.69, I2=99.4%). VAS back, VAS leg and ODI scores demonstrated a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at all postoperative points. Perioperative outcomes demonstrated operative time as 85.71 mins (95% CI: 73.96, 97.46, I2=99.4%) and hospital length of stay as 3.81 days (95% CI: 3.20, 4.41, I2=98.5%). The postoperative reoperation rate at the same level was 0.01 (95% CI: <0.00, 0.02, I2=0%). Discectomy appears safe and effective in pediatric and adolescent patients suffering from LDH. The findings here provide groundwork for future randomized control trials against conservative measures to elaborate on optimal management and elucidate long-term outcomes.

2.
Skeletal Radiol ; 2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080029

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the yield and clinical impact of image-guided bone biopsy for osteomyelitis of the appendicular skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of several databases was conducted from inception to August 2023. Eligible studies reported patients who underwent image-guided bone biopsy for investigation of osteomyelitis of the appendicular skeleton. The pooled proportions were analyzed using a random-effects model. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023466419). RESULTS: From 370 initial studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 700 patients. The pooled technical success rate was 99.6% (95% CI: 0.992, 1.001; I2 = 0%). Positive bone cultures were pooled at 31.9% (95% CI: 0.222, 0.416; I2 = 87.83%) and negative cultures at 68.1% (95% CI: 0.584, 0.778; I2 = 87.83%). Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus yield was 24.5% (95% CI: 0.096, 0.394; I2 = 90.98%) and 7.6% (95% CI: 0.031, 0.121; I2 = 34.42%) respectively. Group A Streptococcus yield was 7.0% (95% CI: 0.014, 0.127; I2 = 70.94%). Polymicrobial culture yield was 15.7% (95% CI: 0.018, 0.297; I2 = 88.90%). Post-procedural management change rate was 36.5% (95% CI: 0.225, 0.504; I2 = 92.39%). No complications were reported across studies. CONCLUSION: For patients under investigation of osteomyelitis of the appendicular skeleton, image-guided bone biopsy demonstrates a good rate of technical success. Additional studies may provide further support for the use of image-guided bone biopsy in this population. Image-guided bone biopsy results lead to change in antibiotics therapy in a portion of patients with suspected osteomyelitis suggesting its potential utility in select patients.

3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(10): 3846-3856, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) procedurally samples liver tissue through the internal jugular vein. It is indicated in the presence of coagulopathies and/or ascites. AIMS: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of TJLB in children. METHODS: A literature search of several databases was conducted from inception to August 2022. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients (< 18 years old) who underwent TJLB. The pooled proportion was analyzed using a random-effects model. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022354421). RESULTS: From 921 initial studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 361 pediatric patients who underwent 374 TJLBs. All eight studies reported pooled rates of technical success at 99.1% (95% CI 0.982, 1.001; I2 = 0%) and histological adequacy of sampling at 97.5% (95% CI 0.954, 0.995; I2 = 27.66%). A total of 49 complications were reported across six studies, the most common being bleeding from the entry site (38.78%), fevers for less than 24 h (12.24%), red blood cells transfusion requirement (10.2%), supraventricular tachycardia (8.16%), and pain requiring analgesia (8.16%). CONCLUSION: Pediatric TJLB demonstrates high rates of technical success and adequate liver core biopsy samples, with a low rate of complications. These results suggest that TJLB is an effective method for diagnostic yield and postprocedural outcomes, especially in patients with preexisting coagulopathies and ascites where percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated. Additional studies evaluating larger groups of pediatric patients may provide further support for the use of TJLB in this population.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Hepatopatías , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Ascitis , Hígado/patología , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Dolor , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico , Hepatopatías/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Orthop Res ; 41(1): 7-20, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36250611

RESUMEN

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an alternative to corticosteroid (CS) injections in managing rotator cuff disease. This meta-analysis investigated differences between PRP and CS for function and pain scores in significance and minimal clinical important difference (MCID). A literature search of Ovid Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Epub, and Scopus was conducted from inception to October 28, 2021. Eligible studies reported patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of rotator cuff disease. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021278740). Twelve studies met eligibility criteria (n = 639) of patients receiving either PRP or CS. At short-term follow-up, a difference favored CS compared to PRP in baseline change for disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score (MD = -5.08, 95% CI: -8.00, -2.15; p = 0.0007; I2 = 0%) and simple shoulder test (SST) (MD = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.33, 2.18; p = 0.008; I2 = 0%). At intermediate follow-up, a difference favored PRP to CS baseline change of the DASH score (MD = 3.41, 95% CI: 0.67, 6.15; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). At medium-term, a difference favored PRP to CS baseline change of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score (MD = -4.42, 95% CI: -8.16, -0.67; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). Both treatments achieved individual MCID for each score. Despite favoring CS at short-term follow-up and PRP at intermediate- and medium-term follow-up, functional and pain scores did not demonstrate any clinical difference between the two treatment modalities in management of rotator cuff disease at all follow-up periods.


Asunto(s)
Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Humanos , Dolor
5.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956137

RESUMEN

COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations have recently been implicated in causing myocarditis. Therefore, the primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with myocarditis following mRNA vaccination. The secondary aims were to report common imaging and laboratory findings, as well as treatment regimes, in these patients. A literature search was performed from December 2019 to June 2022. Eligible studies reported patients older than 18 years vaccinated with mRNA, a diagnosis of myocarditis, and subsequent outcomes. Pooled mean or proportion were analyzed using a random-effects model. Seventy-five unique studies (patient n = 188, 89.4% male, mean age 18-67 years) were included. Eighty-six patients had Moderna vaccines while one hundred and two patients had Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. The most common presenting symptoms were chest pain (34.5%), fever (17.1%), myalgia (12.4%), and chills (12.1%). The most common radiologic findings were ST-related changes on an electrocardiogram (58.7%) and hypokinesia on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or echocardiography (50.7%). Laboratory findings included elevated Troponin I levels (81.7%) and elevated C-reactive protein (71.5%). Seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The most common treatment modality was non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (36.6%) followed by colchicine (28.5%). This meta-analysis presents novel evidence to suggest possible myocarditis post mRNA vaccination in certain individuals, especially young male patients. Clinical practice must therefore take appropriate pre-cautionary measures when administrating COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.

6.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 33(2): 90-112, 2022 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980833

RESUMEN

AstraZeneca coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations have recently been implicated in thromboembolism formations. Our aim was to investigate the outcomes of patients with thromboembolic events following the AstraZeneca vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, AZD1222). A literature search was performed from December 2019 to September 2021. Eligible studies must report participants older than 18 years vaccinated with AstraZeneca and outcomes of thromboembolic events. Pooled mean or proportion were analyzed using a random-effects model. A total of 45 unique studies (number of patients = 144, 64.6% women, mean age 21-68 years) were included. The most common presenting adverse events were headache (12.1%), intracerebral hemorrhage (7.5%), and hemiparesis (7%). The most common thromboembolic adverse events were cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (38.5%) and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (21.1%). The most common radiologic finding were intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral venous thrombosis. Laboratory findings included thrombocytopenia (75%) and hypofibrinogenemia (41%). On admission, 64 patients tested positive for PF4-Heparin ELISA assay (80%). Seventy-four patients were hospitalized with 22 being admitted to the ICU. A total of 78 patients recovered while 39 patients died. This meta-analysis presents evidence to suggest vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following AstraZeneca vaccine. Clinical practice must, therefore, account for the possibility of VITT and subsequent embolic events in certain individuals' postvaccination with adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines. Serum anti-PF4 suggests diagnostic value for VITT and could subsequently inform treatment choices in such instances.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tromboembolia , Adulto , Anciano , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...