Total Intravenous Anesthesia Is Preferred Over Volatile Agents in Cardiac Surgery.

The choice of maintenance anesthetic during cardiopulmonary bypass has been a subject of ongoing debate. Systematic reviews on the topic have so far failed to demonstrate a difference between volatile agents and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in terms of mortality, myocardial injury, and neurological outcomes. Studies using animal models and noncardiac surgical populations suggest numerous mechanisms whereby TIVA has been associated with more favorable outcomes. However, even if the different anesthetic methods are assumed to equivalent in terms of patient outcomes in the context of cardiac surgery, additional factors, namely variables of occupational exposure and environmental impact, strongly support the preferred use of TIVA.

2023 Update on Vascular Anesthesia.

The authors thank the editors for this opportunity to review the recent literature on vascular surgery and anesthesia and provide this clinical update. The last in a series of updates on this topic was published in 2019.1 This review explores evolving discussions and current trends related to vascular surgery and anesthesia that have been published since then. The focus is on the major points discussed in the recent literature in the following areas: carotid artery surgery, infrarenal aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and the preoperative evaluation of vascular surgical patients.

The influence of needleless connectors and inserted catheters on flow rates through vascular introducer sheaths.

SummaryA vascular introducer sheath is often used for rapid volume replacement. However, common manipulations such as the addition of needleless connectors to infusion ports and the insertion of catheters or other devices through the introducer sheath may impede flow. In this study we utilised a rapid infuser to deliver room-temperature normal saline through two introducer sheath configurations with and without the addition of needleless connectors and the placement of catheters through the introducer sheaths. The maximal flow rate delivered by the rapid infuser was 1000 mL/min, which was observed with both introducer sheath sizes tested without additional resistive elements. However, with the addition of a needleless connector, flow rates through the introducer sheaths were substantially lower (64 (standard deviation (SD) 6) mL/min and 61 (SD 7) mL/min for the 8.5 Fr and 9 Fr introducers, respectively). Flow rates were also reduced when catheters were placed within the sheaths (298 (SD 9) mL/min with the 7 Fr catheter and 74 (SD 9) mL/min with the 8 Fr catheter placed in an 8.5 Fr sheath; 649 (SD 6) mL/min with the 7 Fr catheter and 356 (SD 14) mL/min with the 8 Fr catheter placed in the 9 Fr sheath). These findings indicated that both needleless connectors and the placement of catheters through vascular introducer sheaths substantially reduced potential flow rates. Even 'large' vascular introducer sheaths capable of delivering high flow rates could be rendered minimally effective for rapid fluid administration when used in this way. Clinicians should consider these impediments to flow when rapid fluid administration is required, and obtain alternative vascular access if necessary.

The Promise of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Perioperative Care.

The role of point-of-care ultrasonography in the perioperative setting has expanded rapidly over recent years. Revolutionizing this technology further is integrating artificial intelligence to assist clinicians in optimizing images, identifying anomalies, performing automated measurements and calculations, and facilitating diagnoses. Artificial intelligence can increase point-of-care ultrasonography efficiency and accuracy, making it an even more valuable point-of-care tool. Given this topic's importance and ever-changing landscape, this review discusses the latest trends to serve as an introduction and update in this area.

The Perfect Med Bag is One that Doesn't Fall Off a Cliff: A Combat Mass Casualty Case.

Military trauma provides a unique pattern of injuries due to the high velocity, high kinetic energy ammunition utilized, and the high prevalence of blast injury. To further complicate this, military trauma often occurs in austere environments with limited logistical support. Therefore, military medical providers are forced to learn nonstandard techniques and when necessary, practice a level of improvisation not commonly seen in other medical fields. The case presented in this manuscript is a prime example of these challenges. At the onset of fighting both the medic's rucksack, carrying with it the primary source of medical gear and the precious supply of cold-stored blood products are lost. The scenario was further complicated by rough mountainous terrain and a prolonged evacuation time. The medical provider was forced to utilize nonstandard devices such as an improvised junctional tourniquet which used a rock to focus the devices pressure. They also adapted their basic understanding of surgical procedures to conduct a vascular cutdown procedure for wound exposure and effectively pack an otherwise non-compressible wound to a major artery. Despite a significant loss of equipment, the medic and their team were able to successfully care for a number of patients in this mass casualty scenario.

Should All Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Be Managed by Cardiothoracic Fellowship-Trained Anesthesiologists?

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences in practice patterns and outcomes related to the induction of general anesthesia for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) performed by anesthesiologists who have completed a cardiothoracic fellowship (CTA group) vs those who have not (non-CTA group). DESIGN: Retrospective study with propensity score matching. SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients with PH undergoing general anesthesia requiring intubation at a single academic center over 5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Patient baseline characteristics, peri-induction management variables, post-induction mean arterial pressure (MAP), and other outcomes were compared between CTA and non-CTA groups. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Following propensity scoring matching, 402 patients were included in the final model, 100 in the CTA group and 302 in the non-CTA group. Also following matching, only cases of mild to moderate PH without right ventricular dysfunction remained in the analysis. Matched groups were overall statistically similar with respect to baseline characteristics; however, there was a greater incidence of higher ASA class (P = .025) and cardiology and thoracic procedures (P < .001) being managed by the CTA group. No statistical differences were identified in practice patterns or outcomes related to the induction of anesthesia between groups, except for longer hospital length of stay in the CTA group (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide early evidence to suggest the induction of general anesthesia of patients with non-severe PH disease can be comparably managed by either anesthesiologists with or without a cardiothoracic fellowship. However, these findings should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Comparison of Landmark-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Cerebrospinal Fluid Drain-Related Complications After Aortic Repairs.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) are efficacious in preventing spinal cord injury after thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with extensive coverage. Increasingly, fluoroscopy is used to guide placement instead of the traditional landmark-based approach, but it is unknown which approach is associated with fewer complications. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: In the operating room. PARTICIPANTS: Patients having undergone thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with a CSFD over a 7-year period at a single center. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Groups were reviewed and statistically compared with respect to baseline characteristics, ease of CSFD placement, and major and minor complications directly related to placement. A total of 150 CSFDs were placed with landmark guidance as opposed to 95 with fluoroscopy guidance. Compared to the landmark group, patients with fluoroscopy-guided CSFDs were older (p < 0.008), had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores (p = 0.008), required fewer CSFD placement attempts (p = 0.011), had the CSFD in place for longer duration (p < 0.001), and had a similar incidence of CSFD-related complications (p > 0.999). Composites of both major (4.5% of cases) and minor CSFD-related complications (6.1% of cases), the primary outcomes of the study, occurred with similar incidences between the 2 groups (p > 0.999 for both comparisons) after adjusting potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repairs, there were no significant differences in the risk of major and minor CSFD-related complications between fluoroscopic guidance and the landmark approach. Although the authors' institution is a high-volume center for this type of procedure, the study was limited by a small sample size. Hence, regardless of the technique used for the placement of CSFD, the risks related to the placement should be balanced carefully against the potential benefits resulting from spinal cord injury prevention. Fluoroscopy-aided insertion of CSFD requires fewer attempts and, hence, may be better tolerated by patients.

Hypothermia and Prolonged Time From Procedure End to Extubation After Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative hypothermia (core temperature <36°C) occurs in 50%-to-80% of patients recovering from thoracic aortic surgery, though its effects have not been described fully in this context. The authors, therefore, sought to characterize the incidence of perioperative hypothermia and its association with time from procedure end to extubation in endovascular aortic surgical patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: At a single academic tertiary center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients recovering from thoracic aortic surgery with lumbar drains. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in this study, 55 of whom were hypothermic with temperatures <35.0°C at the end of surgery. Though the unadjusted time to extubation was not statistically different in the hypothermic group (median 8 minutes, IQR 5-13.5 minutes) compared to the normothermic group (median 7 minutes, IQR 4-12 minutes; p = 0.062), multivariate predictors of increased time from procedure end to extubation included hypothermia (p = 0.011), age (p = 0.009), diabetes (p = 0.015), history of carotid disease (p = 0.040), and crystalloid volume (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermia in patients recovering from endovascular aortic surgery was associated with prolonged time from procedure end to extubation. Because of the retrospective observational nature of the authors' analysis, it was not possible to determine the extent to which prolonged mechanical ventilation was influenced by low temperature.

Evaluation of the Simpson's Method to Determine Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using the Transgastric Two-Chamber View.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular chamber size and functional assessment by transesophageal echocardiography can be difficult if visualization is poor in the mid-esophageal views. However, the accuracy of using the Simpson's method in the transgastric 2-chamber (TG2C) as an alternative approach has not been assessed. METHODS: The Simpson's method was performed by 2 independent reviewers using midesophageal 2-chamber (ME2C) and TG2C views. Echocardiographic images were retrieved retrospectively for 49 adult cardiac surgical patients. RESULTS: Two-way random effects intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated no significant interobserver variability. Linear mixed effects models showed no significant differences in ME2C and TG2C measurements with regard to EDV (P=.4407), ESV (P=.5113), or EF (P=.0610).Compared to the ME2C view, the TG2C view had better image quality of the LV walls (image quality score median [interquartile range]: 2.00 [.00] vs 1.00 [1.00]; P<.0001), but worse image quality of the mitral annulus (1.00 [1.00] vs 2.00 [.00]; P<.0001) and LV apex (.00 [1.00] vs 2.00 [1.00]; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the Simpson's method can be applied to the TG2C view as an alternative to the standard midesophageal method to estimate chamber volumes and EF.

Propofol Versus Remifentanil Sedation for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single Academic Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of remifentanil versus propofol for sedation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures to analyze the risk of sedation-related hypoxemia and hypotension. Secondary outcomes included the rate of conversion to general anesthesia, procedure length, rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and 30-day mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single tertiary teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients who had propofol or remifentanil sedation for TAVR between March 2017 and March 2020. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 130 patients (50.2%) in the propofol cohort and 129 patients (49.8%) in the remifentanil cohort. The primary outcomes were oxygen saturation nadir values and vasopressor infusion use. Remifentanil was associated with a lower oxygen saturation nadir, as compared to propofol (91.3% v . 95.4%, p < 0.001). Risk factors associated with hypoxemia (defined as <92%) were body mass index (p = 0.0004), obstructive sleep apnea (p = 0.004), and remifentanil maintenance (p < 0.001). Vasopressor infusion use was significantly higher with propofol (64.9% v . 8.5%, p < 0.001). Propofol maintenance and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor-blocker use were the only variables identified as risk factors for vasopressor use (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing TAVR with conscious sedation, remifentanil was associated with more hypoxemia while propofol was associated with a higher rate of vasopressor use.

Dollars for Diagnosis: A Single-Institutional Analysis of Billing for Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Examinations.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to identify correctable reasons for the failed completion of required billing elements necessary for the reimbursement of services for intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was completed at a single institution and large academic center. PARTICIPANTS: The patient population included all adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single academic center over one year. INTERVENTIONS: This retrospective review of TEE documentation and billing data was performed for the all adults undergoing cardiac surgery over the course of one year. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Documentation characteristics were compared between examinations that were reimbursed and those that were not. Out of 504 TEE examinations, 30% were not reimbursed. For these examinations, there was a lower compliance in the completion of minimum billing requirements, compared with those that were reimbursed; designation as "diagnostic" (29% v 93%, respectively, p < 0.0001), procedure note (70% v 99%, p < 0.0001), and procedure order (67% v 98%, p = 0.0002). The total estimated annual loss in revenue was $36,000. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding documentation requirements for TEE is an overlooked but important part of anesthesiology practice that may lead to substantial cost savings. Completion of a procedure note, procedure order, and documentation of an examination as "diagnostic" was associated with successful billing.