RESUMEN
The study aimed to: (1) compare the occurrence of postoperative respiratory difficulties (PRD) following primary cleft palate repair (CPR) in infants with an isolated cleft palate (iCP) and infants with Robin sequence (RS), and (2) describe the possible benefit of preoperative analysis with palatal plate in infants with RS. All consecutive infants with an iCP and infants with RS who underwent CPR between January 2009 and June 2022 in the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 127 infants were included of which 74 infants with an iCP and 53 infants with RS. The group of infants with RS consisted of 35 infants with non-isolated RS (niRS) and 18 infants with isolated RS (iRS). Significant more PRD were seen in infants with RS compared to infants with an iCP (14/53 versus 9/74; p = 0.04). Especially infants with niRS have a significant higher risk of developing PRD in comparison with infants with an iCP (OR = 4.16, 95% CI [1.17-15.99], p = 0.031). The preoperative palatal plate screening in infants with RS (n = 25) did not show abnormalities and had no effect on the perioperative policy. Within the limitations of this study it seems that infants with niRS are more prone to develop PRD following primary CPR when compared to infants with iRS or an iCP. No clear benefit was found in postponing surgery until 12 months or later in infants with RS to avoid PRD. The preoperative palatal plate screening did not demonstrate signs of UAO in infants with RS that developed PRD. These findings suggest that preoperative analysis with palatal plate has a low predictive value.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether a tubed fasciocutaneous or jejunal free flap (FCFF and JFF) is preferable for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects. METHODS: All consecutive patients with circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects reconstructed with an FCFF or JFF between 2000 and 2022 were included. Outcomes of interest were rates of fistulas, strictures, and donor-site complications. RESULTS: In total, 112 patients were included (35 FCFFs and 77 JFFs). Fistula and stricture rates were significantly lower following JFF compared to FCFF reconstructions, with 12% versus 34% (p = 0.008) and 29% versus 49% (p = 0.04), respectively. Severe donor-site complications leading to surgical intervention or ICU admittance only occurred after JFF reconstructions (18%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The high fistula and stricture rates in FCFF reconstructions and the rate of severe abdominal complications in JFF reconstructions illustrate inherent procedure-specific advantages and disadvantages. Relative pros and cons should be carefully weighed when tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas , Yeyuno , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Yeyuno/cirugía , Yeyuno/trasplante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipofaringe/cirugía , Adulto , Fascia/trasplante , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to provide an insight into clinical decision-making and surveillance strategy of sarcoma specialists for patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). The secondary aim was to quantify the role of patient- and tumor-specific factors in the perioperative management. METHODS: Members of sarcoma societies were sent a Web-based 21-item survey about eSTS management. The survey concerned only primary resectable high-grade eSTS in adults. RESULTS: The study enrolled 396 respondents. The majority of the surgical specialists thought the evidence for perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) for high-grade eSTS was insufficient. Radiotherapy (RTX) was less frequently offered in Asia than in North America and Europe. The specialties and continents also differed regarding the importance of patient and tumor characteristics influencing RTX and CTX recommendation. For surveillance after initial treatment outpatient visits, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images of the extremity were the methods primarily used. The specialists in North America preferred chest CT scan over chest x-ray, whereas those in Asia and Europe had no clear preference. DISCUSSION: Specialty and continent are important factors contributing to the variation in clinical practice, treatment recommendations, and surveillance of patients with primary resectable high-grade eSTS.