An observational study to understand burden and cost of care in adults diagnosed with refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).

BACKGROUND: Refractory and unexplained chronic cough (RCC and UCC) necessitate frequent referral for specialist evaluations, but data on healthcare resource utilisation and costs are lacking. METHODS: This observational study enrolled adults with RCC or UCC attending a specialist cough clinic and included a control cohort, both from North West England, matched 1:5 for age, gender and smoking history. Primary and secondary care data were obtained for the 5 years prior to and 2 years post initial clinic visit (index). The primary endpoint was the total 5-year healthcare cost to the UK NHS pre-RCC or UCC diagnosis compared to the control cohort. RESULTS: Mean age at index for the 200 RCC or UCC consented patients was 62.2 ± 11.4 years; 71% were female, and 68% had never smoked. Mean duration of symptoms pre-diagnosis was 8.0 ± 9.4 years. Mean cough severity score was 63.7 ± 23.2 mm at index on a Visual Analog Scale, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire total score was 10.9 ± 4.1. GP data were available for 80 patients and mean total cost over the 5 years pre-diagnosis (index date) was 3.0-fold higher (95% CI 2.3, 3.9) than in the control cohort (p < 0.001). Most excess costs were related to visits and procedures carried out in secondary care. RCC- or UCC-associated costs decreased post-diagnosis, but remained higher than those of controls. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of RCC or UCC requires significant health resource utilisation in the 5 years prior to a specialist clinic diagnosis. Resource utilisation was less after diagnosis, but remained higher than in a matched control cohort.

The Therapeutic Landscape in Chronic Cough.

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the development of antitussive therapies and the first new therapy, gefapixant has been licenced in Europe. This review describes current unlicenced treatments for chronic cough and details treatments currently in development for refractory chronic cough and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as well as compounds previously explored.

Influence of highly effective modulator therapy on the sputum proteome in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There have been dramatic clinical improvements in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) commenced on the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Sputum proteomics is a powerful research technique capable of identifying important airway disease mechanisms. Using this technique, we evaluated how ETI changes the sputum proteome in PwCF. METHODS: Sputum samples from 21 CF subjects pre- and post- ETI, 6 CF controls ineligible for ETI, and 15 healthy controls were analysed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Post-ETI, mean FEV1 % increased by 13.7 % (SD 7.9). Principal component and hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that the post-ETI proteome shifted to an intermediate state that was distinct from pre-ETI and healthy controls, even for those achieving normal lung function. Functional analysis showed incomplete resolution of neutrophilic inflammation. The CF control sputum proteome did not alter. At the protein-level many more proteins increased in abundance than decreased following ETI therapy (80 vs 30; adjusted p value <0.05), including many that have anti-inflammatory properties. Of those proteins that reduced in abundance many were pro-inflammatory neutrophil-derived proteins. Several important respiratory proteases were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Sputum proteomics can provide insights into CF lung disease mechanisms and how they are modified by therapeutic intervention, in this case ETI. This study identifies imbalances in pro- and anti- inflammatory proteins in sputum that partially resolve with ETI even in those achieving normal spirometry values. This post-ETI intermediate state could contribute to ongoing airway damage and therefore its relevance to clinical outcomes needs to be established.

How often do healthy people cough?

Objective cough frequency has been reported in several respiratory conditions but the amount that healthy individuals cough daily is unclear. Seventy-nine healthy volunteers (38 males, median [IQR] age 41y [IQR 30-53]) completed 24-hour ambulatory cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™). The audio recording was filtered using a custom written algorithm to remove non-cough sounds and then all individual explosive cough sounds in the filtered file were tagged electronically by trained cough counters. Most coughing occurred during the day and cough numbers over 24 h were generally low (geometric mean of 4.6 coughs) but there was large variability; ranging from 0 to 136 coughs overall. Cough frequency was independent of participant characteristics apart from sex with males coughing significantly, 4-5 fold, more than females during the day and over 24 h (median [IQR] 16.1 [3.8-33.4] vs. 4.1 [1.0-15.0] total coughs; p = 0.015). This is the first report to describe cough frequency in a balanced group of healthy adults using an accurate cough monitoring system. The data reveal a further example of sexual dimorphism in cough, which warrants additional investigation.

Consensus goals and standards for specialist cough clinics: the NEUROCOUGH international Delphi study.

Background: Current guidelines on the management of chronic cough do not provide recommendations for the operation of specialist cough clinics. The objective of the present study was to develop expert consensus on goals and standard procedures for specialist cough clinics. Methods: We undertook a modified Delphi process, whereby initial statements proposed by experts were categorised and presented back to panellists over two ranking rounds using an 11-point Likert scale to identify consensus. Results: An international panel of 57 experts from 19 countries participated, with consensus reached on 15 out of 16 statements, covering the aims, roles and standard procedures of specialist cough clinics. Panellists agreed that specialist cough clinics offer optimal care for patients with chronic cough. They also agreed that history taking should enquire as to cough triggers, cough severity rating scales should be routinely used, and a minimum of chest radiography, spirometry and measurements of type 2 inflammatory markers should be undertaken in newly referred patients. The importance of specialist cough clinics in promoting clinical research and cough specialty training was acknowledged. Variability in healthcare resources and clinical needs between geographical regions was noted. Conclusions: The Delphi exercise provides a platform and guidance for both established cough clinics and those in planning stages.

Efficacy and Safety of Eliapixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: The Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b PAGANINI Study.

INTRODUCTION: The PAGANINI study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective P2X3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC). METHODS: PAGANINI was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding, phase 2b study. Adults with RCC lasting ≥ 12 months and cough severity ≥ 40 mm on a visual analog scale at screening were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to twice-daily 25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg oral eliapixant or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-h cough count after 12 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 310 participants were randomized to twice-daily eliapixant 25 mg (n = 75), 75 mg (n = 78), 150 mg (n = 80), or placebo (n = 77). A statistically significant dose-response signal with eliapixant was detected for the primary endpoint (all dose-response models, adjusted p < 0.1; one-sided). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 39 (51%) participants with placebo and 43-51 (57-65%) participants receiving eliapixant. The most common AE was dysgeusia, occurring in 1% (n = 1) of the placebo group and 1-16% (n = 1-13) of the eliapixant groups in a dose-related manner. One case of a moderate drug-induced liver injury occurred in a participant receiving 150 mg twice-daily eliapixant. CONCLUSION: Eliapixant demonstrated efficacy and a favorable taste tolerability profile in RCC. However, a drug-induced liver injury contributed to intensified liver monitoring in clinical trials with eliapixant and discontinuation of the entire development program in all indications by Bayer AG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04562155; registered September 18, 2020.

The Burden and Impact of Cough in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Analysis of the Prospective Observational PROFILE Study.

Rationale: Cough is a commonly reported symptom in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) that negatively impacts patient-reported quality of life (QoL). However, both the burden of cough at diagnosis and the behavior of cough over time have not been systematically described in patients with IPF. Objectives: By utilizing data prospectively collected as part of the PROFILE study, we sought to assess cough burden and the impact that this has on QoL within a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed IPF. We also reexamined the previously described relationship between cough and mortality and the association of cough with the MUC5B promoter polymorphism. Methods: The PROFILE study is a multicenter, prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of incident IPF. Scores on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) were recorded at baseline in 632 subjects and then repeated 6 monthly in a subset (n = 216) of the cohort. Results: The median LCQ score at diagnosis was 16.1 (interquartile range, 6.5). LCQ scores remained stable over the subsequent year in the majority of patients. There was a weak association between LCQ score and baseline lung function, with worse cough-related QoL associated with more severe physiological impairment. Cough scores were not associated with subsequent mortality after correcting for baseline lung function. Furthermore, there was no relationship between LCQ score and MUC5B promoter polymorphism status. Conclusions: The burden of cough in IPF is high. Although cough is weakly associated with disease severity at baseline, cough-specific QoL, as measured by the LCQ, confers no prognostic value. Cough-specific QoL burden remains relatively stable over time and does not associate with MUC5B promoter polymorphism.

Novel capsaicin cough endpoints effectively discriminate between healthy controls and patients with refractory chronic cough.

RATIONALE: Chronic cough is a common problem, substantially affecting quality of life. Effective treatments and diagnostic clinical tools for refractory chronic cough are lacking which remains a diagnosis of exclusion. OBJECTIVES: To investigate capsaicin evoked cough responses in healthy volunteers and refractory chronic cough patients and assess the discriminatory ability of novel endpoints. METHODS: Dose-response capsaicin cough challenges were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves constructed to evaluate the discriminatory value of novel endpoints; Emax (maximum number of coughs evoked by any capsaicin concentration) and ED50 (capsaicin concentration evoking at least half of Emax). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-three healthy volunteers (median age 39yrs(IQR; 29-52), 47 females) and 51 refractory chronic cough patients (59yrs(53-67), 31 females) were studied. Emax was significantly higher in the patient group compared to healthy volunteers (p < 0.001) and ED50 was significantly lower (p = 0.001). Both parameters were influenced by gender; females had a higher Emax (p = 0.009) and more sensitive ED50 (p < 0.001) but there were no correlations with other patient demographics. There was a significant relationship between Emax and cough frequency in the patient group (p < 0.001). Emax effectively discriminated between the groups (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI; 0.75-0.90, p < 0.001) independently of ED50 which was less favourable (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI; 0.57-0.76, p = 0.002). Emax and ED50 were shown to be repeatable, and the dose-response method well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Novel capsaicin dose-response endpoints effectively discriminate between healthy controls and refractory chronic cough patients, which may better represent pathophysiological mechanisms and show promise for development as a tool to identify patients with cough hyper-excitability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.isrctn.com; ISRCTN23684347.

Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome data from 2 global, phase 3 trials of chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: The current characterization of patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC and UCC, respectively) primarily stems from relatively small clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To report the baseline medical history and clinical characteristics of individuals with RCC or UCC who were enrolled in COUGH-1 and COUGH-2, 2 large, global, phase 3 trials of gefapixant, a P2 × 3-receptor antagonist. METHODS: Adults with a chronic cough lasting for more than 1 year, diagnosis of RCC or UCC, and score greater than 40 mm on a 100-mm cough severity visual analog scale at both screening and baseline were eligible for enrollment. Demographics, medical history, and cough characteristics were collected at baseline. Cough-related measures included objective cough frequency, cough severity visual analog scale, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, and Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 2044 participants, 75% were women; mean age was 58 years, and mean cough duration was approximately 11 years. Among all participants, 73% were previously diagnosed with asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or upper airway cough syndrome. The mean Leicester Cough Questionnaire total score was 10.4, with domain scores reflecting impaired cough-specific quality of life across physical, psychological, and social domains. The mean Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire score was 39.6, with some of the most burdensome reported items being consistent with features of cough-reflex hypersensitivity. Participant characteristics and cough burden were comparable across geographic regions. CONCLUSION: Participants with RCC or UCC had characteristics consistent with published demographics associated with chronic cough. These data reflect a global population with burdensome cough of long duration and substantial impairment to quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: COUGH-1, NCT03449134 (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03449134); COUGH-2, NCT03449147 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03449147).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Phase 2b Trial of P2X3 Receptor Antagonist Sivopixant for Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the optimal dose of sivopixant, a highly selective P2X3 receptor antagonist, for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC/UCC). METHODS: In this phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial, patients received sivopixant 50, 150, or 300 mg or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency (coughs/h) with sivopixant vs placebo. RESULTS: Overall, 390/406 randomized patients completed the study. Placebo-adjusted changes in hourly cough count over 24 h were 13.17% (P = 0.3532), - 1.77% (P = 0.8935), and - 12.47% (P = 0.3241) and in cough severity (visual analog scale) were 1.75 mm (P = 0.5854), - 1.21 mm (P = 0.7056), and - 6.55 mm (P = 0.0433) with sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg, respectively. Placebo-adjusted changes from baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire total scores were - 0.37 (P = 0.4207), - 0.07 (P = 0.8806), and 0.69 (P = 0.1473) with sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg, respectively. Additionally, 61.3%, 78.3%, 86.8%, and 71.4% of patients receiving sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg and placebo, respectively, reported any improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 25.7%, 32.0%, 49.0%, and 20.6% in sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively; all TEAEs in the sivopixant group were mild-to-moderate. CONCLUSION: Sivopixant did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference vs placebo in change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency. The dose of 300 mg has potential for RCC/UCC, showing the greatest improvements in cough frequency and patient-reported outcomes and dose-related mild to moderate reversible taste disturbance, although further trials are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04110054; registered September 26, 2019.

Mini-review: Hypertussivity and allotussivity in chronic cough endotypes.

In recent years our understanding of the neurophysiological basis of cough has increased substantially. In conjunction, concepts around the drivers of chronic coughing in patients have also significantly evolved. Increasingly it is recognised that dysregulation of the neuronal pathways mediating cough play an important role in certain phenotypes of chronic cough and therefore pathological processes affecting the nervous system are likely to represent key endotypes in patients. Taking inspiration from the study of neuropathic pain, the term hypertussia has been employed to describe the phenomenon of abnormal excessive coughing in response to airway irritation and allotussia to describe coughing in response to stimuli not normally provoking cough. This review aims to summarise current clinical evidence supporting a role for the hyperexcitability of neuronal pathways contributing to chronic coughing and suggest how these might align with the clinical features observed in patients.

Nalbuphine Tablets for Cough in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There are no approved therapies for cough in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In this small crossover trial we administered nalbuphine extended-release tablets (NAL ER) as a potential cough therapy for such patients. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial involved two 22-day treatment periods (NAL ER→placebo and placebo→NAL ER) separated by a 2-week washout period. NAL ER was started at a dose of 27 mg once daily and was titrated up to 162 mg twice daily at day 16. The primary end point was percent change from baseline in hourly daytime objective cough frequency as measured by an electronic cough monitor. The daytime period was defined as the patient-reported time of awakening and bedtime. Secondary end points included change in objective 24-hour cough frequency, changes in cough frequency, cough severity, and breathlessness, per patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were randomly assigned and received one or more doses of study medication. There was a 75.1% reduction in daytime objective cough frequency during the NAL ER treatment period versus the placebo treatment period of 22.6%, a 52.5 percentage point placebo-adjusted decrease from baseline (P<0.001) at day 21. There was a 76.1% (95% confidence interval, 83.1 to 69.1) decrease in the 24-hour objective cough frequency with NAL ER, versus a 25.3% (43.9 to 6.7) decrease with placebo, a 50.8 percentage point placebo-adjusted change. Nausea, fatigue, constipation, and dizziness were more common with NAL ER than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term crossover trial, NAL ER reduced cough in individuals with IPF. Larger and longer trials are needed to assess the impact on cough versus drug adverse effects. (Funded by Trevi Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04030026.)

Validation and Meaningful Change Thresholds for an Objective Cough Frequency Measurement in Chronic Cough.

PURPOSE: Objective cough frequency is used to assess efficacy of chronic cough (CC) treatments. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between objective cough frequency and cough-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and estimate a clinically meaningful change threshold (MCT) for objective cough frequency. METHODS: Data collected in a phase 2b study in participants with refractory or unexplained CC were used to investigate the relationship between 24-h cough frequency (measured using an ambulatory cough monitor) and cough-specific PROs (i.e., cough severity visual analog scale, cough severity diary, Leicester Cough Questionnaire). Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman ρ. An MCT for 24-h cough frequency was estimated using the patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale as an anchor. RESULTS: Correlations between 24-h cough frequency and cough-specific PROs at baseline, Week 4, and Week 12 were significant (P < 0.0001) but low to moderate in strength (ρ = 0.30-0.58). Participants categorized as very much improved/much improved (i.e., PGIC of 1 or 2) or minimally improved (i.e., PGIC of 3) had mean 24-h cough frequency reductions of 55% and 30%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that a 24-h cough frequency reduction of 38% optimizes sensitivity and specificity for predicting a PGIC score of 1-3. CONCLUSION: Objective 24-h cough frequency is significantly associated with cough-specific PROs, but cough frequency and PROs most likely capture distinct aspects of CC. A ≥ 30% reduction in 24-h cough frequency is a reasonable MCT to define treatment response in CC clinical trials.

The relationship between lung disease severity and the sputum proteome in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Proteomics can reveal molecular pathways of disease and provide translational perspectives to inform clinical decision making. Although several studies have previously reported the cystic fibrosis airway proteome, the relationship with severity of lung disease has not been characterised. The objectives of this observational study were to investigate differences in the CF sputum proteome associated with disease severity and identify potential markers of disease with translational potential. METHODS: Sputum samples from healthy volunteers and cystic fibrosis subjects (some prescribed modulator therapies) were analysed using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Severity of lung disease was based on baseline spirometry (percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1%). RESULTS: Multiple sputum proteins (108 increased; 202 decreased) were differentially expressed in CF (n = 38) and healthy volunteers (n = 32). Using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, differences in sputum proteome were observed associated with progressive lung function impairment. In CF subjects, baseline FEV1% correlated with 87 proteins (positive correlation n = 20, negative n = 67); most were either neutrophil derived, or opposed neutrophil-driven oxidant and protease activity. CONCLUSION: Predictable and quantifiable changes in the CF sputum proteome occurred associated with progressive lung function impairment, some of which might have value as markers of disease severity in CF sputum. Further work validating these markers in other patient cohorts and exploring their clinical utility is needed.

Treatment with the P2X3-Receptor Antagonist Gefapixant for Acute Cough in Induced Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Available therapies for acute cough, a condition frequently caused by a viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), have shown limited evidence of efficacy. Gefapixant, a P2X3-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in studies of the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough, but its efficacy for treating acute cough has not been previously studied. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot study. Healthy volunteers were randomized 1:1 to receive twice-daily gefapixant 45 mg or placebo and inoculated with human rhinovirus 16 to induce URTI and cough. Participants were observed while quarantined for 7 days after the start of treatment. The primary endpoint was awake cough frequency on day 3, which was objectively measured with a cough-recording device. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to day 3 in subjective cough severity measures (cough severity visual analog scale, Cough Severity Diary) and cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire-acute). RESULTS: Of the 46 participants who met inclusion criteria [mean (standard deviation, SD) age, 24.6 (6.5) years; females, n = 8], 40 completed the study (gefapixant, n = 21; placebo, n = 19). There was no significant difference in awake cough frequency on day 3 between the gefapixant and placebo groups [least squares means, 2.4 versus 2.7 coughs per hour, respectively; mean difference (95% confidence interval, CI), -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7); P = 0.75]. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the secondary endpoints. Peak cough frequency was low and occurred later in the study than expected (days 4-5). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies of gefapixant. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, gefapixant did not reduce the frequency or severity of acute cough secondary to induced URTI. Induced viral URTI produced mild symptoms, including lower cough frequency than observed in previous studies of patients selected for acute cough associated with naturally occurring URTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569033; EudraCT, 2017-000472-28; protocol number, MK-7264-013.

Improvements in Objective and Subjective Measures of Chronic Cough with Gefapixant: A Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Analysis of Predefined Subgroups.

INTRODUCTION: In phase 3 trials (COUGH-1/COUGH-2), gefapixant 45 mg twice daily significantly reduced 24-h cough frequency vs placebo in refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC). METHODS: Here, the efficacy of gefapixant 45 mg vs placebo was evaluated across COUGH-1/COUGH-2 in predefined subgroups based on sex, region, age, cough duration, cough severity, cough frequency, and diagnosis (RCC, UCC). Awake cough frequency reductions at Week 12 and LCQ response rates (i.e., ≥ 1.3-point improvement) at Week 24 were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1360 participants analyzed, gefapixant 45 mg resulted in consistent awake cough frequency reductions overall and across predefined subgroups at Week 12. Gefapixant also resulted in improved LCQ scores across subgroups at Week 24; ≥ 70% of participants in each subgroup treated with gefapixant 45 mg had an LCQ response. CONCLUSION: These data suggest gefapixant 45 mg provides consistent objective and subjective efficacy across subgroups of individuals with RCC or UCC.