Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
Pancreas ; 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696457

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is performed to improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Few reports have documented QOL following TPIAT, with none using the pancreatitis-specific Pancreatitis Quality of Life Instrument (PANQOLI). We surveyed patients at our center who underwent TPIAT to document postoperative QOL. METHODS: We collected survey data from 18 adult patients who underwent TPIAT at our medical center from 2012 to 2020. Patients were asked questions assessing QOL following TPIAT and completed the Short Form (SF)-12 and PANQOLI instruments. RESULTS: Forty-three patients who underwent TPIAT were mailed surveys, and 18 were returned. The mean age was 45 years, and 67% of respondents were female. Almost half (44%) had hereditary pancreatitis. Sixty-seven percent believed their overall QOL had improved after surgery. The mean post-operative SF-12 physical score was 38.9 and mean mental score was 44. The mean PANQOLI score was 66 (physical function 20, role function 16, emotional function 14, self-worth 15). Following surgery, 33% were using opiate medications and 67% were using anti-hyperglycemic medications. CONCLUSIONS: TPIAT resulted in improved self-reported QOL in most patients, although post-operative physical and mental QOL are less compared to the average healthy United States adult.

2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 47(1): 25-29, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812021

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Most patients receiving curative-intent surgery for pancreatic cancer will experience cancer recurrence. However, evidence that postoperative surveillance testing improves survival or quality of life is lacking. We evaluated the use and characteristics of surveillance with serial imaging and CA 19-9 tumor marker testing at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who entered surveillance after curative-intent resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We abstracted information from the electronic medical record about oncology office visits, surveillance testing (cross-sectional imaging and CA 19-9 tumor marker testing), and pancreatic cancer recurrence, with follow-up through 2 years after pancreatectomy. We conducted analyses to describe the use of surveillance testing and to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9 tumor marker testing for the identification of cancer recurrence. RESULTS: We identified 90 patients entering surveillance after pancreatectomy. CA 19-9 was the most frequently used surveillance test, followed by CT imaging. Forty-seven patients (52.2%) experienced recurrence within two years of pancreatectomy. Recurrence risk was 58.8% versus 31.8% in patients with elevated versus normal CA 19-9 at diagnosis ( P =0.03). Elevated CA 19-9 at any point during surveillance was significantly associated with 2-year recurrence risk ( P <0.001). Elevated CA 19-9 had a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 0.72-0.95) and specificity of 87% (0.76-0.98) for identification of recurrence within 2 years of pancreatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: CA 19-9 demonstrates clinical validity for identifying recurrence of pancreatic cancer during surveillance. Surveillance approaches with reduced reliance on imaging should be prospectively evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Antígeno CA-19-9 , Pancreatectomía , Biomarcadores de Tumor
3.
Clin Imaging ; 99: 53-59, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116262

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Retractor related liver injuries (RRLI) are reported after upper gastrointestinal tract surgeries; most commonly laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gastric surgeries. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence, identification, type, severity, clinical features and risk factors for RRLI after open and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A 6-year retrospective study of 230 patients was performed. Clinical data was extracted from the electronic medical record. Post-operative imaging was reviewed and graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) liver injury scale. RESULTS: 109 patients met eligibility criteria. RRLI occurred in 23/109 (21.1%), with a higher incidence in the robotic/combinedapproach (4/9) compared with open (19/100). Most common injury was an intraparenchymal hematoma (56.5%), grade II (78.3%), located in segments II/III (77%). 39.1% of injuries were not reported on the CT interpretation. There was a statistically significant elevation of postoperative AST/ALT in the RRLI group [median AST 219.5 vs. 72.0 (p < 0.001), ALT 203.0 vs. 69.0 (p < 0.001)]. Trends toward lower preoperative platelet counts and longer operations were observed in the RRLI group. No significant difference in hospital length of stay or post-operative pain scores were noted. CONCLUSION: RRLI occurred frequently after pancreaticoduodenectomy, however most injuries were low grade and the only clinical significance was a transient increase in transaminases. A trend toward higher injury rates was observed in robotic cases. In this population, RRLI was often unrecognized on postoperative imaging.


Asunto(s)
Hígado , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Transplant Direct ; 8(5): e1314, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35415216

RESUMEN

Background: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) requires a complex islet isolation process of the explanted pancreas. Islet isolation has historically required a specialized laboratory to perform islet isolation. We report our experience with a novel technique of intraoperative islet isolation that does not require a specialized islet laboratory, thereby making the isolation process simpler, more accessible, and less costly. Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative effectiveness analysis of 50 adult patients who underwent TPIAT from 2012 to 2020 (TPIAT with remote isolation [n = 20] versus intraoperative isolation of islet cells [n = 30]). The primary outcome was islet equivalents per body weight (IEQ/kg) for patients in each group. Results: Mean IEQ/kg's (4294 remote group versus 3015 intraoperative group, P = 0.06) and 1-y postoperative C-peptide levels (1.51 ng/mL remote group versus 0.91 ng/mL intraoperative group, P = 0.10) were not different between groups. Mean 1-y HbA1c levels (7.7% in the remote group versus 7.1% intraoperative group, P = 0.67) and 1-y insulin requirements (P = 0.31) were not statistically different. Lower average cost of hospitalization was seen in the intraoperative group, although this was not statistically significant ($104 398 remote versus $78 986 intraoperative, P = 0.81). Conclusions: Intraoperative islet isolation has similar effectiveness in regard to glycemic outcomes compared with the use of a dedicated islet cell isolation laboratory at a lower cost.

6.
Pancreatology ; 21(3): 515-521, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Objectives: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if using Secretin intra-operatively to identify leaks and subsequently target operative intervention would decrease the frequency of clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistula formation. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy were randomized to receive intra-operative Secretin or placebo intra-operatively following the completed pancreaticojejunostomy or closure of the cut remnant stump. If a potential leak was identified, targeted therapy with directed suture placement was performed. RESULTS: 170 patients were randomized; 83 receiving placebo and 87 receiving Secretin. The rate of clinically significant fistula formation was 3% (3/87) in the Secretin group and 6% (5/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.489). The rate of biochemical leak was 29% (25/87) in the Secretin group and 19% (16/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.157). There were no Grade C post-operative fistula in either group. Of the 9% of patients in the Secretin group who had a targeted intra-operative intervention, none developed a clinically significant fistula. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, intra-operative Secretin administration was not associated with an overall reduction in clinically significant pancreatic fistula formation. However, patients with an intra-operative leak identified by Secretin may benefit from intervention (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02160808).


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Hormonas/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Pancreatectomía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Pancreatoyeyunostomía , Secretina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
7.
Front Oncol ; 10: 1461, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042792

RESUMEN

Introduction: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. While there is evidence supporting neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy as well as chemoradiation, more evidence is needed to determine whether systemic chemotherapy with chemoradiation offers benefits over chemoradiation alone. This study compares the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with and without systemic chemotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with and without systemic chemotherapy prior to surgical resection. 149 patients met inclusion criteria, with 75 having resectable cancer and 74 having borderline resectable cancer. Outcomes included recurrence free and overall survival rates at 6, 12, and 36 months. Results: In resectable pancreatic carcinoma, 72% of patients treated with chemoradiation alone achieved 1 year recurrence free survival compared to 78% of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiation (p = 0.55). 28% of patients treated with chemoradiation alone had 3 years recurrence free survival compared to 31% of patients who received systemic and chemoradiation therapy (p = 0.75). In both treatment groups, 92% of patients lived past 1 year (p = 0.92), and 44% of patients survived at least 3 years (p = 0.95). In borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma, 50% of patients treated with chemoradiation alone achieved 1 year recurrence free survival compared to 70% of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiation (p = 0.079). The 3 years recurrence free survival was 26 and 29% for the chemoradiation alone group and the systemic chemotherapy plus chemoradiation group, respectively (p = 0.85). There was no significant difference in 1 year overall survival: 85% of patients treated with chemoradiation alone survived compared to 92% of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiation (p = 0.32). Both groups had 41% 3 years overall survival (p = 0.96). Discussion: In resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, there was no significant difference in overall or recurrence free survival between patients treated with chemoradiation with and without systemic chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy with chemoradiation and chemoradiation alone are efficacious treatments for localized pancreatic carcinoma. This brings into question whether more effective systemic chemotherapy is necessary to increase survival benefit.

8.
Clin Transplant ; 34(7): e13891, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356311

RESUMEN

Islet autotransplantation (IAT) is increasingly being performed to mitigate against the diabetic complications of pancreatic resection in patients with benign inflammatory pancreatic disorders; however, the glycemic benefit of IAT in patients undergoing partial pancreatic resection is not known. We aimed to determine whether IAT improved glycemic outcomes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for benign inflammatory disease. We performed a multicenter, retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent distal pancreatic resection with IAT at two U S tertiary care centers. The primary outcome was the mean change in pre- vs post-operative HgA1c following transplant as well as the development of new post-operative diabetes. Nine patients requiring distal pancreatectomy for benign disease underwent IAT and were compared to 13 historical controls without IAT. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. With a median follow-up of 22 months, those who received an IAT had a smaller increase in their pre- vs post-operative HgA1c (0.42 vs 2.83, P = .004), and one case patient (14.3%) vs three control patients (23.1%) developed new post-operative diabetes (P = .581). We conclude that patients undergoing distal pancreatic resection for benign inflammatory disease should be considered for IAT, as long-term glycemic outcomes appear to be improved in those undergoing transplant.


Asunto(s)
Control Glucémico , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Pancreatitis Crónica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Pancreatectomía , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Mol Biol Cell ; 31(12): 1259-1272, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267199

RESUMEN

Actin-based tubular connections between cells have been observed in many cell types. Termed "tunneling nanotubes (TNTs)," "membrane nanotubes," "tumor microtubes (TMTs)," or "cytonemes," these protrusions interconnect cells in dynamic networks. Structural features in these protrusions vary between cellular systems, including tubule diameter and the presence of microtubules. We find tubular protrusions, which we classify as TMTs, in a pancreatic cancer cell line, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Pancreatic Cancer (DHPC)-018. TMTs are present in DHPC-018-derived tumors in mice, as well as in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer and a subset of primary human tumors. DHPC-018 TMTs have heterogeneous diameter (0.39-5.85 µm, median 1.92 µm) and contain actin filaments, microtubules, and cytokeratin 19-based intermediate filaments. TMTs do not allow intercellular transfer of cytoplasmic GFP. Actin filaments are cortical within the protrusion, as opposed to TNTs, in which filaments run down the center. TMTs are dynamic in length, but are long lived (median >60 min). Inhibition of actin polymerization, but not microtubules, results in TMT loss. Extracellular calcium is necessary for TMT maintenance. A second class of tubular protrusion, which we term cell-substrate protrusion, has similar width range and cytoskeletal features but makes contact with the substratum as opposed to another cell. Similar to previous work on TNTs, we find two assembly mechanisms for TMTs, which we term "pull-away" and "search-and-capture." Inhibition of Arp2/3 complex inhibits TMT assembly by both mechanisms. This work demonstrates that the actin architecture of TMTs in pancreatic cancer cells is fundamentally different from that of TNTs and demonstrates the role of Arp2/3 complex in TMT assembly.


Asunto(s)
Complejo 2-3 Proteico Relacionado con la Actina/metabolismo , Microtúbulos/fisiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Citoesqueleto de Actina/metabolismo , Complejo 2-3 Proteico Relacionado con la Actina/fisiología , Actinas/metabolismo , Línea Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Extensiones de la Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Citoesqueleto/metabolismo , Humanos , Filamentos Intermedios/metabolismo , Microtúbulos/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
10.
Pancreas ; 48(9): 1204-1211, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593020

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A selective therapy for pancreatitis is total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation. Outcomes and geographical variability of patients who had total pancreatectomy (TP) alone or total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) were assessed. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. Weighed univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of measured variables on outcomes. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2013, there were 1006 TP and 825 TPIAT in patients with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, and 1705 TP and 830 TPIAT for any diagnosis of pancreatitis. The majority of the TP and TPIAT were performed in larger urban hospitals. Costs were similar for TP and TPIAT for chronic pancreatitis but were lower for TPIAT compared with TP for any type of pancreatitis. The trend for TP and TPIAT was significant in all geographical areas during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend of both TP and TPIAT. Certain groups are more likely to be offered TPIAT compared with TP alone. More data are needed to understand disparities and barriers to TPIAT, and long-term outcomes of TPIAT such as pain control and glucose intolerance need further study.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante Autólogo , Estados Unidos
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30936197

RESUMEN

A 55-yr-old woman presented with abdominal bloating for approximately 1 year. Imaging studies showed a cyst in the body of the pancreas with proximal pancreatic ductal dilation. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed. Cytologic findings from the cyst fluid were consistent with a mucinous neoplastic cyst, and the possibility of malignancy could not be entirely excluded. A KRAS mutation analysis was performed on the cyst fluid using the Idylla system and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS) cartridge (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium), which tests for actionable mutations in exons 2, 3, and 4 of the KRAS gene. Idylla testing detected a KRAS G12D mutation in the cyst fluid. The patient subsequently underwent a distal subtotal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Microscopic examination of the resected tissue revealed an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with an associated invasive carcinoma. KRAS testing on the resected tumor tissue confirmed the G12D mutation detected in the cyst fluid earlier. The described rapid testing of KRAS directly from the pancreatic cyst fluid can complement cytology assessment to classify pancreatic cysts more reliably and can potentially be of significant help when other cyst findings are nondiagnostic.


Asunto(s)
Líquido Quístico/química , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Pancreatectomía , Quiste Pancreático/genética , Quiste Pancreático/cirugía , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Intraductales Pancreáticas/cirugía , Esplenectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(12): 2608-2609.e1, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664949

RESUMEN

Pain is the most common and most debilitating aspect of chronic pancreatitis and is difficult to treat.1-3 Clinical management of painful chronic pancreatitis includes abstinence from alcohol and tobacco products, analgesic medications (including opioids), antidepressant medications, and pancreatic enzyme replacement.4-8 Medical cannabis has been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain and has shown some efficacy in neuropathic and cancer pain. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of medical cannabis on pain control for chronic pancreatitis.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Pancreatitis Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , New Hampshire/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vermont/epidemiología
13.
Pancreas ; 47(8): 985-989, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30044306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) offers symptom relief to highly selected patients with recurrent acute and/or chronic pancreatitis. However, with variable clinical response, it is important to refine islet manipulation technique and patient selection criteria. This study explores the variables associated with high islet cell yield, a driver of success in TPIAT. METHODS: This study evaluated patients who underwent TPIAT at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center from 2012 to 2016. Odds ratios were calculated for various patient and procedural characteristics. The primary clinical outcome was the number of isolated islet equivalents per kilogram body weight. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with no computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging evidence of chronic pancreatitis, without pancreatic duct stones, and without parenchymal stones were associated with higher odds of success (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, and P = 0.002, respectively). Patients with preoperative glycated hemoglobin greater than 5.6, with islet cell suspensions positive for cultures, and with positive gram stains were associated with lower odds of success (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Factors that diminish a successful islet cell harvest during TPIAT include the presence of infected islets, an elevated preoperative glycated hemoglobin, and the presence of pancreatic duct stones.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Crónica/sangre , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 7(5): 274-281, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043287

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Indeterminate "atypical" or "suspicious for malignancy" diagnoses in the evaluation of pancreatic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens can present challenges in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic masses. A main goal of this study was to identify, via survey, potential differences in perception between cytologists and clinicians with regard to the implications of, and factors contributing to, indeterminate diagnoses. We also evaluated clinical practice at our institution as it relates to such diagnoses and identified clinicopathologic features associated with indeterminate diagnoses, which allowed for correlation with survey results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online surveys were sent to cytologists and clinicians to gather information on the respondents' experiences with pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and their perceptions about the indeterminate diagnostic categories. Cytological specimens and patient medical records were reviewed to collect data on specimen acquisition, cytological features, tumor characteristics, and patient management. RESULTS: Survey responses revealed that cytologists and clinicians held similar perceptions of the clinical impact of the indeterminate categories but had dissimilar ideas on the factors contributing to these diagnoses. Statistically significant associations were identified between indeterminate diagnoses and the following variables: number of passes performed; adequacy on rapid on-site evaluation; repeat FNA procedures; lesions with cystic changes; and well-differentiated tumor cytomorphology. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the perceptions of cytologists and clinicians about, as well as the clinical features and cytologic variables associated with, "indeterminate" cases has the potential to improve patient care.

16.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 112(4): 643-649, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28169284

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is increasingly performed with remote islet cell processing and preparation, i.e., with islet cell isolation performed remotely from the primary surgical site at an appropriately equipped islet isolation facility. We aimed to determine whether TPIAT using remote islet isolation results in comparable long-term glycemic outcomes compared with TPIAT performed with standard local isolation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent TPIAT at three tertiary care centers from 2010 to 2013. Two centers performed remote isolation and one performed local isolation. Explanted pancreata in the remote cohort were transported ∼130 miles to and from islet isolation facilities. The primary outcome was insulin independence 1 year following transplant. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except the remote cohort had higher preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; 5.43 vs. 5.25, P=0.02) and there were more females in the local cohort (58% vs. 76%, P=0.049). At 1 year, 27% of remote and 32% of local patients were insulin independent (P=0.48). Remote patients experienced a greater drop in fasting c-peptide (-1.66 vs. -0.64, P=0.006) and a greater rise in HbA1c (1.65 vs. 0.99, P=0.014) at 1-year follow-up. A preoperative c-peptide >2.7 (odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-14.3) and >3,000 islet equivalents/kg (OR 11.0, 95% CI 3.2-37.3) were associated with one-year insulin independence in the local group. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year after TPIAT, patients undergoing remote surgery have equivalent rates of long-term insulin independence compared with patients undergoing TPIAT locally, but metabolic control is superior with local isolation.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Instituciones de Salud , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Péptido C/metabolismo , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pancreatitis/metabolismo , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Pancreatitis Crónica/metabolismo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Pancreas ; 46(3): 380-384, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129232

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation is increasingly being performed remotely, that is, removing the pancreas in 1 location, isolating the islet cells in another location, then returning the islets to the original location for reimplantation into the patient. We determined the influence of extended cold ischemia time on key clinical outcomes in remote islet autotransplantation. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent remote islet autotransplantation at 2 centers from 2011 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline. The primary clinical outcome was the quantity of isolated islet equivalents per kilogram body weight (IEQs/kg). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 15 had a decrease in C-peptide greater than 50% from baseline and had lower corresponding IEQs/kg compared with those without a decrease greater than 50% (4045 vs 6654 IEQs/kg, P = 0.01). There was no difference in cold ischemia time between the 2 groups (664 vs 600 minutes, P = 0.25). Daily insulin use at 1 year nearly met statistical significance (25.3 vs 8 U, P = 0.06), as did glycated hemoglobin (8.07 vs 6.69 mmol/L, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia time does not influence islet yield in patients undergoing pancreatectomy with remote isolation.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Fría/métodos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Islotes Pancreáticos/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Péptido C/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 84(3): 460-6, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26972022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal type of stent for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with curative intent is unknown. We performed a prospective trial comparing 3 types of biliary stents-fully covered self-expandable metal (fcSEMS), uncovered self-expandable metal (uSEMS), and plastic-to determine which best optimized cost-effectiveness and important clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective randomized trial, consecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction from newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were to start neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were randomized to receive fcSEMSs, uSEMSs, or plastic stents during the index ERCP. The primary outcomes were time to stent occlusion, attempted surgical resection, or death after the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy, and the secondary outcomes were total patient costs associated with the stent, including the index ERCP cost, downstream hospitalization cost due to stent occlusion, and the cost associated with procedural adverse event. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized and reached the primary end point: 16 in the fcSEMS group, 17 in the uSEMS group, and 21 in the plastic stent group. No baseline demographic or tumor characteristic differences were noted among the groups. The fcSEMSs had a longer time to stent occlusion compared with uSEMSs and plastic stents (220 vs 74 and 76 days, P < .01), although the groups had equivalent rates of stent occlusion, attempted surgical resection, and death. Although SEMS placement cost more during the index ERCP (uSEMS = $24,874 and fcSEMS = $22,729 vs plastic = $18,701; P < .01), they resulted in higher procedural AE costs per patient (uSEMS = $5522 and fcSEMS = $12,701 vs plastic = $0; P < .01). Conversely, plastic stents resulted in an $11,458 hospitalization cost per patient due to stent occlusion compared with $2301 for uSEMSs and $0 for fcSEMSs (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective trial comparing fcSEMSs, uSEMSs, and plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy with curative intent for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, no stent type was superior in optimizing cost-effectiveness, although fcSEMSs resulted in fewer days of neoadjuvant treatment delay and a longer time to stent occlusion. (Clincial trial registration number: NCT01038713.).


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Colestasis/cirugía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Anciano , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/economía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentación , Colestasis/etiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metales/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Plásticos/economía , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/economía , Stents/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...