RESUMEN
Submaximal functional tests of endurance are ubiquitous in clinical practice. This investigation compared cardiovascular responses, perceived exertion, and performance measures following the completion of three self-paced, 2-minute, functional tests of endurance. A pilot prospective, observational, cross-sectional design with 16 community-dwelling older participants compared heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and performance measures following the completion of three randomly allocated self-paced activities. The three activities included 2 minutes of stepping in standing (2MSTD), 2 minutes of seated stepping (2MSIT), and a 2-minute walk test (2MWT). A within-subjects repeated measures ANOVA analyzed differences in change scores for cardiovascular and RPE responses. Pearson's correlations assessed associations in performance measures between the three tests. Standing stepping compared to seated stepping produced statistically higher change scores in HR, SBP, DBP, and RPE (p < .05). Further, 2MSTD revealed statistically higher SBP and RPE scores compared to 2MWT (p < .05). Large and moderate correlations were observed between number of steps completed in sitting and standing (r = 0.83, p < .01) and between standing steps and distance walked (r = 0.56, p = .02), respectively. This pilot investigation informs home care physical therapists that 2 minutes of self-paced stepping in standing produced the greatest change scores in all cardiovascular and perceived exertion responses. No significant differences were noted in HR between self-paced walking and standing stepping, and between standing and seated stepping. For patients unable to walk or step in standing, self-paced seated stepping may be a viable alternative.