Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the ability of preoperative Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores to predict postoperative achievement of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in outcome scores following lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PROMIS is a computer adaptive testing system that has been validated in spine surgery patients. PROMIS allows for more efficient and personalized data collection compared to legacy assessment tools. METHODS: A total of 138 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery at a single institution completed PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PROMIS scores and clinical factors were performed. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine the ability of preoperative scores to predict postoperative achievement of an MCID of 8. PF and PI t score MCID achievement threshold values with 90% specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores were significantly correlated to achievement of postoperative MCID after multivariate analysis. Patients with worse preoperative scores were more likely to achieve MCID. Preoperative PF and PI scores showed strong predictive value in determining ability to achieve postoperative MCID with respective area under the curve of 0.85 and 0.82. A preoperative PF threshold T-score of 31.6 had a 64% chance of achieving postoperative MCID, while a preoperative PI threshold t score of 67.8 had an 86% chance of achieving postoperative MCID. CONCLUSION: Preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores predicted improvement in postoperative PROMIS scores in lumbar spine surgery patients as worse preoperative scores correlated to improved PROMIS scores postoperatively. The calculated threshold t scores showed the ability to predict improvement in postoperative PROMIS scores. Preoperative PROMIS data may be useful in surgical decision-making and improved patient education regarding postoperative outcomes.Level of Evidence: 4.

Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on Postoperative Patient-reported Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the impact of preoperative opioid use on postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. BACKGROUND DATA: The PROMIS has demonstrated reliability and validity in conditions such as lumbar stenosis, disc herniation, and cervical spondylosis. Although previous studies have identified the negative impact of preoperative opioid use on legacy patient-reported outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery, no study to date has utilized PROMIS computer adaptive tests. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery at a single institution between 2014 and 2016 completed PROMIS PF and PI scores at baseline preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Preoperative opioid use was defined as >1 month before surgery. Univariate and linear mixed model multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate for correlation of preoperative opioid use, as well as patient risk factors, with postoperative PROMIS PI and PF scores at each time point. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients met inclusion criteria with PROMIS scores at every time point. A total of 36 (39.6%) patients self-reported taking opioids at the time of surgery. Mean duration of opioid use among opioid users was 6.5±7.4 months. Patients taking preoperative opioids had significantly less improvement at all time points out to 24 months. At 24 months, patients in the nonopioid group had mean PI improvement of -13.0±14.2 versus -4.9±15.4 in the opioid group (P=0.014). The mean postoperative improvement in the opioid group did not achieve minimally clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who do not use opioids preoperatively show significant postsurgical improvement in PI scores compared with patients who use preoperative opioids. Mean improvement in PROMIS PI scores failed to meet an MCID of 8 in opioid users, whereas mean improvement exceeded this MCID in opioid naive patients. The results of this study help elucidate the deleterious impact of opioids, allowing surgeons to better set patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Needlestick and sharps injuries in orthopedic surgery residents and fellows.

OBJECTIVE: Needlestick and sharps injury (NSSI) is a common occupational hazard of orthopedic surgery training. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and surrounding circumstances of intraoperative NSSI in orthopedic surgery residents and fellows and to examine postexposure reporting. DESIGN: A 35-question cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The study was conducted by orthopedic surgery residents and faculty at a nonprofit regional hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was distributed to US allopathic orthopedic surgery residency and fellowship programs; 300 orthopedic surgery trainees participated in the survey. RESULTS: Of 223 trainees who had completed at least 1 year of residency, 172 (77.1%) sustained an NSSI during residency, and 57 of 63 trainees (90.5%) who had completed at least 4 years sustained an NSSI during residency. The most common causes of NSSI were solid needles, followed by solid pins or wires. The surgical activity most associated with NSSI was wound closure, followed by fracture fixation. The type of surgery most frequently associated with NSSI was orthopedic trauma, followed by hip and knee arthroplasty. Of 177 trainees who had sustained a prior NSSI, 99 (55.9%) failed to report all events to their institution's occupational health department. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NSSI during residency training is high, with >90% of trainees in their fifth year or later of training having received an injury during their training, with a mean of >4 separate events. Most trainees with an NSSI did not report all of their events, which implies that changes are needed in the incident reporting process universally.

Harvest of Iliac Crest Autograft Not Associated With Localized Pain.

BACKGROUND: There exists a wide variety of bone grafts, substitutes, and extenders, which are utilized in spinal arthrodesis surgery. While iliac crest autograft is the traditional gold standard for use in spinal arthrodesis, there is considerable discrepancy in the literature regarding its associated complications. Primarily among these is the perception that the procedure is painful and has a high infection rate. The purpose of this study is to determine if patients experience more pain postoperatively on the iliac crest autograft donor side of the pelvis than the contralateral side. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart analysis of prospectively collected data on 76 patients who underwent elective lumbar arthrodesis with iliac crest autograft performed by one surgeon. The patients filled out a pain diagram with a five-region visual analogue scale, including each iliac crest, at the preoperative and each postoperative visit. Patient-reported pain data at various time points was compared from donor and contralateral sides and analysis included trends over time. Additionally, complications were noted when they occurred. The surgical approach involved a midline skin incision in all patients with epifascial and subperiosteal dissection to the posterior superior iliac spine. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in reported pain between donor and nondonor side. There was no significant main effect of side of measurement (P = .75) and no significant side by time of measurement interaction effect (P = .95). There was a significant main effect of time of measurement for both sides (P < .001). There were no cases of donor site complications. CONCLUSIONS: Iliac crest harvest and reconstruction utilizing this technique does not result in increased pain on the side of the harvest. This study supports a low morbidity rate for iliac crest autograft harvest as no complications were seen in this series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.