De-escalating indications for excision when breast core needle biopsy returns fibroepithelial lesion-not further characterized.

PURPOSE: Surgical excision is often performed to exclude phyllodes tumor (PT) when Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) of the breast returns fibroepithelial lesion-not further characterized (FEL-NFC). If imaging or CNB pathology features can be identified that predict a very low probability of borderline/malignant PT, thousands of women could be spared the expense and morbidity of surgical excisions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes 180 FEL-NFC from 164 patients who underwent surgical excisional biopsy. RESULTS: The upgrade rate from FEL-NFC to benign PT was 15%, and to borderline/malignant PT 7%. Imaging features predicting upgrade to borderline/malignant PT included greater size (p = 0.0002) and heterogeneous echo pattern on sonography (p = 0.117). Histologic features of CNB predicting upgrade to borderline/malignant PT included "pathologist favors PT" (p = 0.012), mitoses (p = 0.014), stromal overgrowth (p = 0.006), increased cellularity (p = 0.0001) and leaf-like architecture (p = 0.077). A three-component score including size > 4.5 cm (Size), heterogeneous echo pattern on sonography (Heterogeneity), and stromal overgrowth on CNB (Overgrowth) maximized the product of sensitivity x specificity for the prediction of borderline/malignant PT. When the SHO score was 0 (72% of FEL-NFC) the probability of borderline/malignant PT on excision was only 1%. CONCLUSION: The combination of size ≤ 4.5 cm, homogeneous echo pattern, and absence of stromal overgrowth is highly predictive of a benign excision potentially sparing most patients diagnosed with FEL-NFC the expense and morbidity of a surgical excision.

Diverticulitis in the Under-40 Population.

BACKGROUND: As obesity and lifestyle factors become more prevalent in younger populations, we are diagnosing and treating diverticulitis in younger patients. In this study, the demographics, risk factors for the development, and treatment of acute diverticulitis were assessed focusing on patients under the age of 40. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of a cohort of subjects diagnosed with diverticulitis was performed. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 18-40 who were treated for acute diverticulitis with or without any complications. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients, 40 patients required surgery, and 69 patients were managed conservatively. Analysis showed that the Hinchey classification (p<0.001) was the strongest predictor of treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: As the incidence of diverticulitis has increased in recent decades, so too has the frequency with which elective surgical procedures are performed as treatment. While these procedures are vital components in the management of diverticulitis, the majority of research comparing conservative versus surgical treatments has been done in patients over 50 years old. Although diverticulitis has been classically thought of as a disease of the elderly, it has become more prevalent in younger populations due to the rise of obesity and lifestyle modification in the under-40 population. Although the prevalence of treatment and diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in younger patients has risen, there is a paucity of data surrounding treatment protocols for diverticulitis in association with patient symptoms for patients under the age of 40 years old. Our study has found that there is a higher incidence of complications in diverticulitis in patients under the age of 40. Additionally, when considering the pattern of complication presentation in younger patients with complicated diverticulitis, surgical intervention might not be appropriate. The current treatment algorithm relates diverticulitis complications with surgical interventions. However, our data suggest that patients under the age of 40 presenting with abscesses or strictures may not need surgical intervention. This information could be particularly helpful in guiding physicians and younger patients in selecting the best choice of care and minimizing complications. Additionally, further research should help guide treatment protocol in this specific population of patients, as there is a lack of established guidelines pertaining to diverticulitis surrounding younger patients.

Appropriateness of Information Provided by ChatGPT Regarding Breast Pathologic Diagnoses.

A multidisciplinary physician team rated information provided by ChatGPT regarding breast pathologic diagnoses. ChatGPT responses were mostly appropriate regarding accuracy, consistency, definitions provided, and clinical significance conveyed. Responses were scored lower in terms of management recommendations provided, primarily related to low agreement with recommendations for high-risk lesions.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Radiation: Complications and Oncologic Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers improved, patient-centered outcomes with demonstrated oncologic safety ( Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:344-351). Indications for NSM continue to expand to patients outside of the traditional eligibility criteria, including those with prior breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy. Currently, limited data exist evaluating both short- and long-term outcomes in patients proceeding to NSM after prior BCT. METHODS: All patients undergoing bilateral NSM in a single institution from 2002 through 2017 with history of prior BCT were included in the final cohort, without exclusions. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, operative details, and complications. Outcomes assessed included early complications (<30 days from NSM), late complications (>30 days), rates of prosthetic failure, unplanned reoperations, and reconstructive failures, as well as oncologic safety. Student t , χ 2 , and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze outcomes of paired (BCT vs non-BCT) breasts within each patient. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients undergoing 34 NSMs were included. Each had a history of BCT and either ipsilateral breast recurrence (64.7%), risk-reducing NSM (23.5%), or a new contralateral primary cancer (11.8%). The cohort had a mean age of 51.1 years. With regard to acute complications (ischemia, infection, nipple-areolar complex or flap ischemia or necrosis, and wound dehiscence), there was no significant difference noted between breasts with prior BCT versus no prior BCT overall (41.2% vs 35.3%, respectively; P = 0.724). Complications occurring after 30 days postoperatively (capsular contracture, contour abnormality, animation deformity, bottoming out, rotation, and rippling) in prior BCT breasts versus no prior BCT had no significant differences overall (58.8% vs 41.2% respectively; P = 0.303). The mean follow-up was 5.5 years, during which no patients had a reported locoregional or distant recurrence in either breast. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in early or late complications were identified between breasts in patients undergoing bilateral NSM with a history of unilateral BCT and XRT. In the 5.5 years of follow-up, there were no recurrences, lending support to NSM for management of recurrent disease in addition to National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended total mastectomy. We propose that NSM should not be contraindicated in patients exposed to radiation with BCT.

Prognostic Predictors of Mortality in Male Breast Cancer: Outcomes in an Urban Population.

INTRODUCTION: Male breast cancer (MBC) accounts for 0.5% to 1% of all breast cancers diagnosed annually. The purpose of this study is to evaluate prognostic factors in MBC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with MBC between 2010 and 2021. Demographics, comorbidities, cancer characteristics, recurrence, and mortality were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine prognostic factors. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to plot survival probabilities. RESULTS: A total of 47 male patients were identified. The mean age at presentation was 64.1 y. Twenty eight (59.6%) patients were African American and 14 patients (29.8%) were Caucasian. Most patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (89.4%) and presented with T1 or T2 tumors (40.4% and 38.3%, respectively). Three patients (6.4%) had a recurrence and eight patients (17%) died. Using mortality as an end point, age (≥ 76.1 y) indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.13 (P = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (HR = 5.45, P = 0.023), atrial fibrillation (HR = 8.0, P = 0.009), end-stage renal disease (HR 6.47, P = 0.023), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3 (HR = 7.92, P = 0.024), poorly differentiated grade (HR = 7.21, P = 0.033), and metastatic disease (HR = 30.94, P = 0.015) had an increased risk of mortality. Overall survival at 3 y was 79.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, end-stage renal disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 3, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease are unfavorable prognostic factors in MBC. Compared to female breast cancer, MBC showed poorer overall survival.

A retrospective cohort study comparing reconstructive techniques and outcomes in post-mastectomy triple negative breast cancer patients.

Background: Up to 42% of all breast cancer patients undergo post-mastectomy reconstruction, however reconstructive techniques have not been widely studied in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Reconstructive complications may delay adjuvant treatments; in TNBC, which inherently carries an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, this can greatly affect oncological outcomes. Therefore, we evaluate factors influencing choice of reconstructive techniques following mastectomy in TNBC patients and assess operative and oncologic safety outcomes. Methods: A single institution retrospective chart review identified TNBC patients who underwent post-mastectomy reconstruction between 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics collected included demographics, cancer history, reconstructive techniques [autologous-based reconstruction (ABR) vs. implant-based reconstruction (IBR)] and surgical and oncologic outcomes such as complications, recurrence, and mortality. Factors impacting whether patients underwent ABR versus IBR were assessed, as well as differences in outcomes between the two procedures. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. Results: During the 10-year period, 52.9% (n=127) of all post-mastectomy TNBC patients (n=240) underwent breast reconstruction, most frequently immediately after mastectomy (97.0%). Most patients underwent IBR compared to ABR (82.4% vs. 14.5%). Patients undergoing ABR were older than IBR patients (54.3 vs. 46.4 years; P=0.040) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 30.0 vs. 26.1 kg/m2; P=0.007). Patients more often pursued ABR if they had a prior breast cancer history (36.8% vs. 16.7%; P=0.041) or experienced TNBC recurrence (26.3% vs. 9.3%; P=0.034), while primary TNBC patients more often opted for IBR. Reconstructive type did not impact complications (ABR 31.6% vs. IBR 16.8%, P=0.131), recurrence (ABR 15.8% vs. IBR 13.0%, P=0.719), or mortality (ABR 0.0% vs. IBR 6.5%, P=0.593) rates. Conclusions: Factors such as age, BMI, and breast cancer history impacted choice of reconstructive technique among TNBC women. No differences in complications, recurrence, or mortality occur in these high-risk patients regardless of reconstructive technique, highlighting that neither ABR nor IBR is superior in regard to surgical and oncologic safety in post-mastectomy TNBC patients.

Clinical management of myoid hamartomas of the breast: A case report and literature review.

Background: Myoid Hamartoma of the breast (MHB) is an extremely rare benign breast lesion composed of mammary ducts and lobules, fibrous stroma, adipose tissue, and smooth muscle. Due to its rarity, the clinical management of MHB is not well described. Surgical excision is the most common form of management. This study reviews the current literature on the clinical management of MHB and describes a case report of a young patient presenting with MHB managed with surveillance and shared-decision making. Materials and methods: A healthy 23-year-old female presented with a one-year history of a palpable left breast mass. Her right breast exam was normal. Ultrasound of the left breast revealed a 2.7 cm × 1.4 cm × 2.4 cm lobulated mass at the one o'clock position. The mass caused slight discomfort to palpation but otherwise had no associated skin changes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed a left breast myoid hamartoma. Management options were presented to the patient, and she elected to observe the mass with surveillance imaging. Results: There have been no reported cases in the literature of malignant transformation of MHB. Rather than rely on reflexive surgical excision of MHB, our review suggests that surveillance and routine imaging may be an appropriate form of clinical management in patients who present with a favorable clinical and histopathological profile which includes: a low MIB-1 proliferative index, low breast cancer risk assessment score, lesion size less than 1.2 cm, and radiological-pathological concordance. Conclusion: Further research is needed to determine the clinical significance and threshold levels of these clinical and histopathological factors in patient care. However, given current trends to minimize over treatment in breast pathology, we pose that observation of MHB can be performed when favorable clinical criteria is met.

Postoperative Outcomes following a Multidisciplinary Approach to HIV-positive Breast Cancer Patients.

Improvements in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment resulted in drastic increases in the lifespan of HIV-positive individuals, resulting in higher rates of non-AIDS-defining cancers. We describe our postoperative outcomes in HIV+ breast cancer (BC) patients, highlighting our multidisciplinary experience with this high-risk population. Methods: A 7-year multi-institutional retrospective review of all HIV+ BC patients who underwent surgical intervention was performed. Patient demographics, therapeutic interventions, and treatment outcomes were collected. Results: Twenty-four patients were identified, including one male patient (4.2%). Most patients were African American (83.3%). Mean age was 52.1 + 9.7 years at the time of diagnosis in HIV+ BC patients. Surgical interventions included lumpectomy (n = 16, 66.7%), simple mastectomy (n = 3, 12.5%), and skin-sparing mastectomy (n = 5. 20.8%). All patients were on antiretroviral therapy, and 81.3% had undetectable viral loads at the time of operation. Seventeen patients (70.8%) underwent breast reconstruction, with three (17.7%) undergoing delayed reconstruction. Thirty-day postoperative complications occurred in three patients (17.6%), including flap necrosis (11.8%), infection (11.8%), dehiscence (5.9%), and return to OR (11.8%). Three patients (12.5%) experienced recurrence at a median of 18 months since operation. Mean follow-up was 51.4 + 33.3 months since BC diagnosis. Conclusions: While postoperative complication rates in HIV+ patients trended higher (17.6%) compared with the existing data on breast reconstruction patients overall (10.1%), HIV+ patients did not exhibit increased risk of BC recurrence (12.5%) compared with BC patients overall (12-27%). This highlights the importance of a combined multidisciplinary approach involving infectious disease, breast surgery, and plastic and reconstructive surgery to optimize surgical and oncologic outcomes in these high-risk patients.

Are We Overtreating Patients With T1a HER2+ Breast Cancer? An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

INTRODUCTION: The potential benefit of systemic therapy in patients with T1a HER2+ cancers is not well understood, and no consensus guidelines exist. We sought to investigate practice patterns of chemotherapy use in this population. METHODS: From the National Cancer Database (2013-2018), we identified female patients with HER2+ cancers staged as cT1aN0 or pT1aN0 and stratified by receipt of chemotherapy. Using univariate and multivariable analyses we assessed the clinicopathologic features associated with the receipt of chemotherapy. We also compared rates of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 5176 women with cT1aN0 HER2+ cancers, 88 (2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Younger age and hormone-receptor (HR) negative tumors were factors independently associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (all P < .001). Of 11,688 women with pT1aN0 HER2+ cancers, 5,588 (48%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Rates of use increased over the analysis period from 39% in 2013 to 53% in 2018 (P < .001). Factors independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy included younger age, having a poorly differentiated tumor, exhibiting lymphovascular invasion, undergoing adjuvant radiation (all P < .001). There were no differences in OS when comparing those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ T1a cancers is increasing over time and is, as expected, more common among patients with unfavorable clinicopathologic features. Since no prognostic algorithm currently exists, more prospective data is needed to understand which of these patients may derive benefit from systemic therapy and which may safely avoid the morbidity of chemotherapy.

Triple negative breast cancer and reconstruction: Predictors of recurrence, complications, and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Only 42% of all breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy elect for breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate factors impacting complications, recurrence, and mortality in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing reconstruction. METHODS: Reconstructive TNBC patients at a single institution from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, reconstruction choice, and complications were collected. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were identified. Average age was 47.8 years, 50.4% were Caucasian and 36.4% were African American. Most patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (90.8%), and most underwent nipple-sparing (41.2%) or skin-sparing (38.9%) mastectomies. Twenty-one patients (16.0%) experienced postoperative complications. Patients with complications tended to be older (52.1 versus 46.9 years, p = 0.052). At mean follow-up of 52.1 months, 14.5% experienced cancer recurrence and 5.3% died. Deceased patients were significantly younger at diagnosis (42.2 versus 48.5 years, p = 0.008) and had a lower BMI compared to surviving patients (21.2 versus 26.9 kg/m2; p = 0.014). Patients younger than age 45 years had higher Ki-67 than those older than 45 years (80.0% versus 60.0%, p = 0.013). Outcomes in autologous- versus implant-based reconstruction were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In TNBC post-mastectomy reconstruction patients, age and BMI were predictors of mortality while race, smoking history, reconstruction choice, or type of implant-based reconstruction had no significant effect on these outcomes. SYNOPSIS: The purpose of this study is to evaluate factors that impact complications, recurrence, and mortality in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing reconstruction. We identified BMI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and age as predictors of complications, recurrence, and mortality in TNBC.

Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer.

Introduction: Less than 1% of all breast cancers are diagnosed in males. In females, postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of literature describing reconstructive options for postmastectomy deformity in the male chest. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes in males with breast cancer. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms such as "male breast cancer," "mastectomy," and "reconstruction." No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality rate. Results: A total of 11 articles examining 29 male patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction were included for analysis. Literature was most commonly available in the form of case reports. The average age was 59.6 +/-11.4 years. Reconstruction methods included fat grafting (n = 1, 3.4%), silicone implants (n = 1, 3.4%), and autologous chest wall reconstruction with local flaps (n = 26, 89.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.8%), including partial nipple necrosis (n = 1) and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1). Of the studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients were pleased with the aesthetic appearance of their chest. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed the limited availability of research regarding postmastectomy chest reconstruction in males with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence available suggests that reconstruction can restore a patient's body image and, thus, should be regularly considered and discussed with male patients. Larger studies are warranted to further shed light on this population.

A comparative analysis of males and females with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP).

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature comparing the postoperative outcomes of males and females with breast cancer who undergo mastectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the comorbidities and 30-day post-mastectomy complication rates among males and females. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy from 2014 to 2016 using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Data including patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day surgical and medical complications were collected. Statistical analysis included Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student T-tests for continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 15,167 patients were identified. There were 497 males (3.3%) and 14,670 females (96.7%). Age was significantly higher in females compared to males (63.5 vs. 57.6 years, p < 0.001). Body mass index (BMI) at time of surgery was also higher in males (30.0 vs. 29.3 kg/m2, p = 0.011). There was a higher prevalence of diabetes in males (20.1 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.032). Operative duration was significantly longer in females (114.9 vs. 95.0 min, p < 0.001). Median postoperative length of stay was also longer in females (1.2 vs. 0.8 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day medical or surgical complication rates between the two sexes. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that differences in age, BMI, and comorbidities between males and females do not significantly impact 30-day medical or surgical complications following total mastectomy for breast cancer. Further research is warranted to identify perioperative risk factors that influence post-mastectomy complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).

Risk-reducing surgery in PALB2 mutations carriers with breast cancer: a case series and literature review.

Background: Inherited germline mutations in PALB2 are known to predispose patients to a higher risk of breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer with an estimated risk of developing breast cancer in over half of all affected women by age 80 years. Current guidelines for screening patients with PALB2 mutations include annual mammograms beginning at age 30 years and consideration of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tomosynthesis. Existing evidence regarding risk-reducing surgery with mastectomy is insufficient to make a definitive recommendation to patients. In this case series, we describe the presentation and management of 5 patients with unilateral breast cancer and PALB2 mutations. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case series discussing the role of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) in breast cancer patients with PALB2 mutations. The aim of our study was to evaluate the challenges in managing breast cancer risk in patients with PALB2 pathogenic variants with illustration through real-world clinical cases and a review of the literature. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we present 5 patients with PALB2 mutations between the ages of 29 and 61 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer and underwent surgical management of their breast cancer at our institution between November 2020 and March 2022. Through their clinical courses and a literature review, we discuss the role of CRRM in breast cancer patients with PALB2 gene mutations. Results: Out of the 5 patients, 3 patients underwent CRRM and 2 patients chose unilateral surgery for their breast cancer and active surveillance for the contralateral breast. Of the 3 patients who underwent CRRM, 1 patient experienced a surgical complication from reconstruction on the prophylactic side. None of the patients developed any recurrences with an average length of follow up of 15.4 months. Conclusions: Based on our experience and the currently available literature, CRRM in patients with a PALB2 mutation should be performed on a case-by-case basis through a shared decision-making process taking into consideration overall risk, family history, patient preference and quality of life.

Detecting accurate tumor size across imaging modalities in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Of the most common imaging modalities for breast cancer diagnosis - mammogram (MAM), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - it has not been well established which of these most accurately corresponds to the histological tumor size. OBJECTIVE: To determine which imaging modality (MAM, US, MRI) is most accurate for determining the histological tumor size of breast lesions. METHODS: A retrospective study of 76 breast cancers found in 73 female patients who received MAM, US, and/or MRI was performed. 239 charts were reviewed and 73 patients met inclusion criteria. Analysis was performed using signed rank tests comparing the reported tumor size on the imaging modality to the tumor size on pathology report. RESULTS: Mammography and ultrasonography underestimated tumor size by 3.5 mm and 4 mm (p-values < 0.002), respectively. MRI tends to overestimate tumor size by 3 mm (p-value = 0.0570). Mammogram was equivalent to pathological size within 1 mm 24% of the time and within 2 mm 35% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: No one single modality is the most accurate for detecting tumor size. When interpreting the size reported on breast imaging modalities, the amount of underestimation and overestimation in tumor size should be considered for both clinical staging and surgical decision-making.

COVID-19 induced mesenteric venous infarction.

We present a rare case of mesenteric venous infarction in a 36-year-old man due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Although COVID-19 usually presents with respiratory disease, multi-system manifestations are increasingly reported. Coagulopathy manifestations are also reported on imaging, including in vascular thrombosis, embolus, and organ infarction. Because the clinical variables poorly predict or suspect coagulopathy and its complications, it is important to be aware of imaging manifestations of coagulopathy complications of COVID-19.