Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
In Vivo ; 33(5): 1615-1620, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471413

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a circulating tumor cell (CTC) test by comparison between healthy volunteers and patients with localized prostate cancer including those under active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTC counts in peripheral blood were compared between patients with prostate cancer (n=45) and healthy volunteers (n=17). CTCs were identified based on the expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and counted using a SMART BIOPSY™ SYSTEM. RESULTS: The number of EpCAM+ cells was significantly higher in patients with cancer than in healthy volunteers. Among the low-risk patients (n=9), two had up-staging and six had up-grading. Among those up-staged, there was one case which was EpCAM+ Among those cases up-graded, three were EpCAM+ In those with stage T2 tumors, the presence of Gleason pattern 5 was positively correlated with EpCAM positivity (rho=0.59, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CTC counts in localized prostate cancer were associated with Gleason pattern 5. Active treatment should be considered for patients with low-risk disease during active surveillance who are found to have EpCAM+ CTCs because of a risk of up-staging and up-grading.


Asunto(s)
Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Recuento de Células , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espera Vigilante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...