Real-World Experience with Vismodegib on Advanced and Multiple BCCs: Data from the RELIVIS Study.

BACKGROUND: Vismodegib is approved for advanced cases of basal cell carcinomas not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy. Large studies on the use of vismodegib in clinical practice are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the study was to analyse the evolution and therapeutic management of relapses and lack of response in patients who had received vismodegib for locally advanced and/or multiple basal cell carcinomas in a real-life multicentre setting. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective study collected data on patients treated with vismodegib in 15 specialized centres. We included patients who first received vismodegib until intolerable toxicity, maximum response, or progressive disease. Exploratory research variables referred to patient and tumour characteristics, vismodegib effectiveness and safety, relapse rate and management, and mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of complete clinical response. RESULTS: 133 patients with advanced BCC were included in the registry. The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.5% and nearly half of the patients (45.9%) achieved complete remission. Long-term information and detailed information of subsequent treatments after a regime of vismodegib was available for 115 patients. Only 34% of the patients in this group were subsequently treated with other therapies or vismodegib rechallenge. Sixty-nine percent of the patients who had shown a complete remission with vismodegib remained free of recurrence while 30.7% relapsed. Almost half of the patients who received additional therapies after the first course of vismodegib achieved complete tumour remission. Three and 2 out of 9 patients who were rechallenged with vismodegib achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, with an ORR of 55.5%. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms efficacy of vismodegib in routine clinical practice. The risk of recurrence after achieving complete response with vismodegib was lower than previous reports. Rechallenge with vismodegib is feasible and most patients responded to re-treatment.

Maculopapular eruptions associated to COVID-19: A subanalysis of the COVID-Piel study.

A previous study has defined the maculopapular subtype of manifestations of COVID-19. The objective of our study was to describe and classify maculopapular eruptions associated with COVI-19. We carried out a subanalysis of the maculopapular cases found in the previous cross-sectional study. Using a consensus, we defined seven clinical patterns. We described patient demographics, the therapy received by the patient and the characteristics of each pattern. Consensus lead to the description of seven major maculopapular patterns: morbilliform (45.5%), other maculopapular (20.0%), purpuric (14.2%), erythema multiforme-like (9.7%), pytiriasis rosea-like (5.7%), erythema elevatum diutinum-like (2.3%), and perifollicular (2.3%). In most cases, maculopapular eruptions were coincident (61.9%) or subsequent (34.1%) to the onset of other COVID-19 manifestations. The most frequent were cough (76%), dyspnea (72%), fever (88%), and astenia (62%). Hospital admission due to pneumonia was frequent (61%). Drug intake was frequent (78%). Laboratory alterations associated with maculo-papular eruptions were high C-reactive protein, high D-Dimer, lymphopenia, high ferritin, high LDH, and high IL-6. The main limitation of our study was the impossibility to define the cause-effect relationship of each pattern. In conclusion, we provide a description of the cutaneous maculopapular manifestations associated with COVID-19. The cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 are wide-ranging and can mimic other dermatoses.