A review of the value of point-of-care testing for community-acquired pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an infectious disease associated with high mortality worldwide. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most frequent pathogen in CAP, data from recent studies using molecular tests have shown that respiratory viruses play a key role in adults with pneumonia. The impact of difficult-to-treat pathogens on the outcomes of pneumonia is also important even though they represent only a small proportion of overall cases. Despite improvements in the microbiological diagnosis of CAP in recent decades, the identification of the causative pathogen is often delayed because of difficulties in obtaining good-quality sputum samples, issues in transporting samples, and slow laboratory processes. Therefore, the initial treatment of CAP is usually empirical. Point-of-care testing (POCT) was introduced to avoid treatment delays and reduce reliance on empirical antibiotics. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the main scientific evidence on the role of POCT in the diagnosis and management of patients with CAP. The authors searched for articles on POCT in pneumonia on PubMed from inception to 20 January 2024. The references in the identified articles were also searched. EXPERT OPINION: POCT involves rapid diagnostic assays that can be performed at the bedside especially in cases of severe CAP and immunocompromised patients. These tests can produce results that could help guide initial therapy and management.

The efficacy of telavancin in comparison with linezolid on endotracheal tube biofilm in pigs with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The effect of systemic treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with telavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide with good penetration in vitro biofilms, has not been tested in vivo during mechanical ventilation. This study examined the efficacy of telavancin compared with linezolid against endotracheal tube (ETT) biofilms in a porcine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) VAP. METHODS: VAP was induced in 18 pigs by instilling 107 colony-forming units (CFU/mL) of an MRSA strain susceptible to telavancin and linezolid into each pulmonary lobe. Randomization into three groups was done at pneumonia diagnosis: control (IV glucose 0.5% solution q24); linezolid (10 mg/kg q12) and telavancin groups (22.5 mg/kg q24). After 72 h of MV, data regarding bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tracheal aspirate (TA), ETT MRSA biofilm load and thickness measured by scanning electron microscopy were obtained. RESULTS: All 18 pigs completed the study. MRSA was isolated in 100% of ETTs from the control and linezolid groups and in 67% from the telavancin group. Telavancin treatment presented a lower MRSA load compared to the control and linezolid treatments (telavancin median [interquartile range (IQR)] = 1.94 [0.00-5.45], linezolid 3.99 [3.22-4.68] and control 4.93 [4.41-5.15], P = 0.236). Telavancin treatment also resulted in the lowest biofilm thickness according to the SEM (4.04 [2.09-6.00], P < 0.001). We found a positive correlation between ETT and BAL load (rho = 0.511, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In our VAP model, systemic telavancin treatment reduced ETT MRSA occurrence, load, and biofilm thickness. Our findings may have a bearing on ICU patients' clinical outcomes.

The value of biofilm testing to guide antimicrobial stewardship in chronic respiratory diseases.

Introduction: Biofilm production is an important yet currently overlooked aspect of diagnostic microbiology that has implications for antimicrobial stewardship. In this study, we aimed to validate and identify additional applications of the BioFilm Ring Test® (BRT) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolates from patients with bronchiectasis (BE). Materials and methods: Sputa were collected from BE patients who had at least one PA positive culture in the previous year. We processed the sputa to isolate both mucoid and non-mucoid PA, and determined their susceptibility pattern, mucA gene status, and presence of ciprofloxacin mutations in QRDR genes. The Biofilm production index (BPI) was obtained at 5 and 24 hours. Biofilms were imaged using Gram staining. Results: We collected 69 PA isolates, including 33 mucoid and 36 non-mucoid. A BPI value below 14.75 at 5 hours predicted the mucoid PA phenotype with 64% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Conclusion: Overall, our findings suggest that the fitness-cost associated with the mucoid phenotype or ciprofloxacin resistance is shown through a time-dependent BPI profile. The BRT has the potential to reveal biofilm features with clinical implications.