Prevalence and Clinico-Radiologic Spectrum of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease-Related Stroke: An Observation from a Single Center in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is an important etiologic subtype of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, little direct evidence is available regarding ICAD-related stroke in Saudi Arabia (SA). This study aimed to identify the prevalence and describe the clinico-radiological spectrum of ICAD-related AIS in a SA cohort. METHODS: This was a hospital-based retrospective study enrolling patients with ICAD-related AIS between 2017 and 2020. The electronic charts were reviewed. The mechanisms of stroke were identified as artery-to-artery embolization (AAE), in situ thrombotic occlusion, hypoperfusion, or perforator branch occlusion. Pearson's χ 2 test was performed to calculate the P values to establish the statistical significance of factors that could correlate with the mechanisms of stroke and functional outcome. RESULTS: ICAD was found in 133 of AIS comprising 26% of total. Data from all patients were reviewed. Left ICA (25%) was the most frequently affected vessel. Territorial pattern (63.9%) was the most common infarct pattern, and AAE (44.3%) was the most common underlying mechanism. Perforator branch occlusion was more prevalent in women than in men. Malignant and hemorrhagic transformation ( P =0.00) were more prevalent in the AAE group. Left-sided vascular involvement was statistically associated with unfavorable outcomes than the right ( P =0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ICAD in our cohort from Western Asia did not differ from that in Southern Asia. ICA involvement was observed more frequently than previously reported. Further research from SA is required to better understand ICAD-related strokes in this region.

An Observational Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Conventional Anticoagulation Versus New Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of conventional anticoagulants with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST).Methods: This was a retrospective, prospective cohort study of patients who presented with CVST to a tertiary stroke center in the Middle East from January 2012 to October 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of CVST were identified, and data were analyzed for demographic characteristics. Specific consideration was given to compare the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulation treatments.Results: A total of 36 patients were included in the final analysis, with 15 (41%) men and 21 (59%) women and a male to female ratio of 1:1.4. Most of the patients (n = 22, 61%) were Saudi. Their ages ranged between 15 and 82 years (mean ± SD age of 34.22 ± 13.16 years). Headache was the most common feature, present in 22 (61%) of the patients, followed by unilateral weakness in 15 (41%) and cranial nerve palsies in 11 (30%). The most common etiology was prothrombotic state (both hereditary and acquired thrombophilia: n = 16, 45%). Other etiologies were postpartum state/oral contraceptive pill usage in 7 (19%), infections in 7 (19%), and trauma in 3 (8%). Most of the patients (n = 24, 67%) still received conventional anticoagulation (warfarin/low molecular weight heparin), but 9 (25%) of the patients consented to start NOACs. Efficacy (as measured by clinical improvement plus rate of recanalization of previously thrombosed venous sinuses) showed no statistically significant difference, although it proved to be better tolerated, as none of the patients stopped the treatment due to adverse events and risk of major bleeding was significantly low in the NOAC group. Nine patients in the warfarin group stopped medication, while none in the NOAC group did so (P = .034).Conclusion: NOACs were found to be at least as good as conventional anticoagulation for the management of CVST. However, efficacy was almost similar, a finding that is consistent with most of the published case series and the few recently published prospective studies. Larger prospective and population-based studies are needed to clarify our preliminary results.