Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
2.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154: 3773, 2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39462475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on hospitals worldwide. In such a context of tension in healthcare systems, efficiently allocating hospital resources is a crucial aspect of crisis management. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of readmitted patients and to determine risk factors for hospital readmission using data from the Swiss COVID-19 Hospital-Based Surveillance system (CH-SUR). METHODS: We investigated hospital readmissions within 60 days after discharge of patients from the CH-SUR surveillance system with a first hospitalisation between 1 December 2020 and 1 December 2021. Only community-acquired cases were considered. We compared the baseline characteristics of readmitted and non-readmitted patients. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate the risk factors for hospital readmission. FINDINGS: Of the 8039 eligible patients, 239 (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-3.3%) were readmitted to hospital within 60 days of discharge, with no significant variations observed over the study period; 80% of all readmissions occurred within 10 days of discharge of the index hospital stay. Based on our multivariable logistic regression models, factors increasing the odds of hospital readmission were age ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.24-2.15), male sex (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.93), being discharged to home after first hospitalisation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.19-2.62), having oncological pathology (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.61) and being immunosuppressed (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.67-3.29). INTERPRETATIONS: Age, sex, cardiovascular diseases, oncological pathologies and immunosuppression were the main risk factors identified for hospital readmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Readmisión del Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Adulto , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
Infect Prev Pract ; 6(3): 100386, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39205825

RESUMEN

Single room isolation for respiratory viral infections (RVI), like influenza, puts hospitals under pressure. During the influenza season 2019/20, we implemented Droplet precautions on-site (DroPS) for RVI in two acute care hospitals and prospectively assessed the rate of hospital-acquired RVI (HARVI). 318 patients were admitted with RVI, 85 had Influenza or RSV, 75 stayed in multi-bed rooms with DroPS. From 764 patients at risk, hospitalised ≥ three days in a multi-bed room, 11 (1.4%) developed a clinical HARVI, and three tested positive (3/764, 0.4%; 2x RSV, 1x influenza). DroPS may represent an alternative strategy to deal with respiratory viral infections.

4.
JAMA ; 332(7): 541-549, 2024 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884982

RESUMEN

Importance: Preoperative skin antisepsis is an established procedure to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). The choice of antiseptic agent, povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate, remains debated. Objective: To determine whether povidone iodine in alcohol is noninferior to chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol to prevent SSIs after cardiac or abdominal surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, cluster-randomized, investigator-masked, crossover, noninferiority trial; 4403 patients undergoing cardiac or abdominal surgery in 3 tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland between September 2018 and March 2020 were assessed and 3360 patients were enrolled (cardiac, n = 2187 [65%]; abdominal, n = 1173 [35%]). The last follow-up was on July 1, 2020. Interventions: Over 18 consecutive months, study sites were randomly assigned each month to either use povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate, each formulated in alcohol. Disinfectants and skin application processes were standardized and followed published protocols. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after abdominal surgery and within 1 year after cardiac surgery, using definitions from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. A noninferiority margin of 2.5% was used. Secondary outcomes included SSIs stratified by depth of infection and type of surgery. Results: A total of 1598 patients (26 cluster periods) were randomly assigned to receive povidone iodine vs 1762 patients (26 cluster periods) to chlorhexidine gluconate. Mean (SD) age of patients was 65.0 years (39.0-79.0) in the povidone iodine group and 65.0 years (41.0-78.0) in the chlorhexidine gluconate group. Patients were 32.7% and 33.9% female in the povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate groups, respectively. SSIs were identified in 80 patients (5.1%) in the povidone iodine group vs 97 (5.5%) in the chlorhexidine gluconate group, a difference of 0.4% (95% CI, -1.1% to 2.0%) with the lower limit of the CI not exceeding the predefined noninferiority margin of -2.5%; results were similar when corrected for clustering. The unadjusted relative risk for povidone iodine vs chlorhexidine gluconate was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.69-1.23). Nonsignificant differences were observed following stratification by type of surgical procedure. In cardiac surgery, SSIs were present in 4.2% of patients with povidone iodine vs 3.3% with chlorhexidine gluconate (relative risk, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.82-1.94]); in abdominal surgery, SSIs were present in 6.8% with povidone iodine vs 9.9% with chlorhexidine gluconate (relative risk, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.46-1.02]). Conclusions and Relevance: Povidone iodine in alcohol as preoperative skin antisepsis was noninferior to chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol in preventing SSIs after cardiac or abdominal surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03685604.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Antisepsia , Clorhexidina , Etanol , Povidona Yodada , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Abdomen/cirugía , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antisepsia/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Estudios Cruzados , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Piel/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Incidencia
5.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 64, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, masking has been widely accepted in healthcare institutions to mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated infection. Evidence, however, is still scant and the role of masks in preventing healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition remains unclear.We investigated the association of variation in institutional mask policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in acute care hospitals in Switzerland during the BA.4/5 2022 wave. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients between June 1 and September 5, 2022, were obtained from the "Hospital-based surveillance of COVID-19 in Switzerland"-database and classified as healthcare- or community-associated based on time of disease onset. Institutions provided information regarding institutional masking policies for healthcare workers and other prevention policies. The percentage of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections was calculated per institution and per type of mask policy. The association of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections with mask policies was tested using a negative binominal mixed-effect model. RESULTS: We included 2'980 SARS-CoV-2 infections from 13 institutions, 444 (15%) were classified as healthcare-associated. Between June 20 and June 30, 2022, six (46%) institutions switched to a more stringent mask policy. The percentage of healthcare-associated infections subsequently declined in institutions with policy switch but not in the others. In particular, the switch from situative masking (standard precautions) to general masking of HCW in contact with patients was followed by a strong reduction of healthcare-associated infections (rate ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). In contrast, when compared across hospitals, the percentage of health-care associated infections was not related to mask policies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest switching to a more stringent mask policy may be beneficial during increases of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections at an institutional level.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Máscaras , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Suiza/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Hospitales , Anciano , Personal de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Política Organizacional , Anciano de 80 o más Años
6.
Br J Surg ; 111(6)2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the impact of surgery- and patient-dependent factors on surgical-site infections (SSIs) have been studied extensively, their influence on the microbial composition of SSI remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to identify patient-dependent predictors of the microbial composition of SSIs across different types of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 538 893 patients from the Swiss national infection surveillance programme. Multilabel classification methods, adaptive boosting and Gaussian Naive Bayes were employed to identify predictors of the microbial composition of SSIs using 20 features, including sex, age, BMI, duration of surgery, type of surgery, and surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. RESULTS: Overall, SSIs were recorded in 18 642 patients (3.8%) and, of these, 10 632 had microbiological wound swabs available. The most common pathogens identified in SSIs were Enterobacterales (57%), Staphylococcus spp. (31%), and Enterococcus spp. (28%). Age (mean feature importance 0.260, 95% c.i. 0.209 to 0.309), BMI (0.224, 0.177 to 0.271), and duration of surgery (0.221, 0.180 to 0.269) were strong and independent predictors of the microbial composition of SSIs. Increasing age and duration of surgical procedure as well as decreasing BMI were associated with a shift from Staphylococcus spp. to Enterobacterales and Enterococcus spp. An online application of the machine learning model is available for validation in other healthcare systems. CONCLUSION: Age, BMI, and duration of surgery were key predictors of the microbial composition of SSI, irrespective of the type of surgery, demonstrating the relevance of patient-dependent factors to the pathogenesis of SSIs.


Local infections are a frequent problem after surgery. The risk factors for surgical infections have been identified, but it is unclear which factors predict the type of microorganisms found in such infections. The aim of the present study was to assess patient factors affecting the composition of microorganisms in surgical infections. Data from 538 893 patients were analysed using standard statistics and machine learning methods. The results showed that age, BMI, and the duration of surgery were important in determining the bacteria found in the surgical-site infections. With increasing age, longer operations, and lower BMI, more bacteria stemming from the intestine were found in the surgical site, as opposed to bacteria from the skin. This knowledge may help in developing more personalized treatments for patients undergoing surgery in the future.


Asunto(s)
Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Tempo Operativo
7.
Ann Surg ; 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881461

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) versus absence of SAP is associated with a decreased risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after low-risk cholecystectomies (LR-CCE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current guidelines do not recommend routine SAP administration prior to LR-CCE. METHODS: This cohort study included adult patients who underwent LR-CCE and were documented by the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between 1/2009-12/2020 at 66 Swiss hospitals. LR-CCE was specified as elective endoscopic surgery, age <70, no active cholecystitis, ASA score <3, operating time <120 minutes without implantation of foreign material. Exposure was defined as the administration of cefuroxime or cefazoline ± metronidazole within 120 minutes prior to incision versus no SAP administration. Our main outcome was occurrence of SSI until day 30. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for institutional, patient, and perioperative variables. RESULTS: Of 44 682 surveilled adult cholecystectomy patients, 12 521 (8 726 women [69.7%]; median [IQR] age, 49.0 [38.1-58.2] years), fulfilled inclusion criteria. SSI was identified in 143 patients (1.1%). SAP was administered in 9 269 patients (74.0%) and was associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.70; P < 0.001). The number needed to treat to prevent one SSI episode is 100. CONCLUSIONS: The overall LR-CCE SSI rate was 1.1%. SAP was associated with a 50% lower overall SSI rate. Patients undergoing LR-CCE may benefit from routine surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(4): 543-545, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086644

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in long-term care facilities are often correlated with high case fatality rates. We describe the association of administration of an mRNA booster with the control of an outbreak. Our findings highlight the possibility of vaccine booster early in an outbreak as a promising method to mitigate the spread of infection.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Suiza/epidemiología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Casas de Salud , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control
9.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 134, 2023 11 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, the national surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance program showed a modest decrease in SSI rates for different procedures over the last decade. The study aimed to determine whether a multimodal, targeted intervention program in addition to existing SSI surveillance is associated with decreased SSI rates in the participating hospitals. METHODS: Prospective multicenter pre- and postintervention study conducted in eight Swiss acute care hospitals between 2013 and 2020. All consecutive patients > 18 years undergoing cardiac, colon, or hip/knee replacement surgery were included. The follow-up period was 30 days and one year for implant-related surgery. Patients with at least one follow-up were included. The intervention was to optimize three elements of preoperative management: (i) hair removal; (ii) skin disinfection; and (iii) perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. We compared SSI incidence rates (main outcome measure) pre- and postintervention (three years each) adjusted for potential confounders. Poisson generalized linear mixed models fitted to quarter-yearly confirmed SSIs and adjusted for baseline differences between hospitals and procedures. Adherence was routinely monitored through on-site visits. RESULTS: A total of 10 151 patients were included, with a similar median age pre- and postintervention (69.6 and IQR 60.9, 76.8 years, vs 69.5 and IQR 60.4, 76.8 years, respectively; P = 0.55) and similar proportions of females (44.8% vs. 46.1%, respectively; P = 0.227). Preintervention, 309 SSIs occurred in 5 489 patients (5.6%), compared to 226 infections in 4 662 cases (4.8%, P = 0.09) postintervention. The adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) for overall SSI after intervention implementation was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96, P = 0.02). For cardiac surgery (n = 2 927), the aIRR of SSI was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.72, P < 0.001). For hip/knee replacement surgery (n = 4 522), the aIRR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.48, P = 0.63), and for colon surgery (n = 2 702), the aIRR was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.14, P = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The SSI intervention bundle was associated with a statistically significant decrease in SSI cases. A significant association was observed for cardiac surgery. Adding a specific intervention program can add value compared to routine surveillance only. Further prevention modules might be necessary for colon and orthopedic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Rev Med Suisse ; 19(845): 1824-1829, 2023 Oct 11.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819178

RESUMEN

Infections associated with arterial reconstructions of the lower limbs are associated with high morbidity. This article reviews the risk factors for infection associated with this surgery and the preventive measures. These include smoking cessation and glycemic control preoperatively; avoiding unnecessary exposure to antibiotics or corticosteroids; optimal peripheral wound care; rigorous antisepsis and antibiotic prophylaxis in the operating theatre ; and finally, meticulous post-operative wound monitoring. The benefit of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization in vascular surgery is less clearly established than in cardiac and thoracic surgery, but it is still recommended in cases of implant placement or where there is a high risk of S. aureus infection, depending on the planned approach and type of surgery.


Les infections associées aux reconstructions artérielles des membres inférieurs sont grevées d'une morbidité élevée. Cet article revoit les facteurs de risque d'infection associés à cette chirurgie et les mesures de prévention. Ces dernières incluent l'arrêt du tabac et le contrôle glycémique en préopératoire ; l'absence d'exposition inutile aux antibiotiques ou aux corticostéroïdes ; les soins de plaies périphériques optimaux ; une antisepsie et une antibioprophylaxie au bloc opératoire rigoureuses et, finalement, un suivi de plaie postopératoire minutieux. Le bénéfice de la décolonisation à Staphylococcus aureus dans le cadre de la chirurgie vasculaire est moins clairement établi qu'en chirurgies cardiaque et thoracique, mais celle-ci reste recommandée en cas de mise en place d'implant ou de risque élevé d'infection à S. aureus, selon la voie d'abord et le type de chirurgie prévue.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
11.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 153: 40095, 2023 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37769356

RESUMEN

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Remdesivir has shown benefits against COVID-19. However, it remains unclear whether, to what extent, and among whom remdesivir can reduce COVID-19-related mortality. We explored whether the treatment response to remdesivir differed by patient characteristics. METHODS: We analysed data collected from a hospital surveillance study conducted in 21 referral hospitals in Switzerland between 2020 and 2022. We applied model-based recursive partitioning to group patients by the association between treatment levels and mortality. We included either treatment (levels: none, remdesivir within 7 days of symptom onset, remdesivir after 7 days, or another treatment), age and sex, or treatment only as regression variables. Candidate partitioning variables included a range of risk factors and comorbidities (and age and sex unless included in regression). We repeated the analyses using local centring to correct the results for the propensity to receive treatment. RESULTS: Overall (n = 21,790 patients), remdesivir within 7 days was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratios 1.28-1.54 versus no treatment). The CURB-65 score caused the most instability in the regression parameters of the model. When adjusted for age and sex, patients receiving remdesivir within 7 days of onset had higher mortality than those not treated in all identified eight patient groups. When age and sex were included as partitioning variables instead, the number of groups increased to 19-20; in five to six of those branches, mortality was lower among patients who received early remdesivir. Factors determining the groups where remdesivir was potentially beneficial included the presence of oncological comorbidities, male sex, and high age. CONCLUSIONS: Some subgroups of patients, such as individuals with oncological comorbidities or elderly males, may benefit from remdesivir.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Masculino , Humanos , Suiza/epidemiología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Hospitales , Antivirales/uso terapéutico
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2317370, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289455

RESUMEN

Importance: World Health Organization guidelines recommend administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), including cefuroxime, within 120 minutes prior to incision. However, data from clinical settings supporting this long interval is limited. Objective: To assess whether earlier vs later timing of administration of cefuroxime SAP is associated with the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adult patients who underwent 1 of 11 major surgical procedures with cefuroxime SAP, documented by the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between January 2009 and December 2020 at 158 Swiss hospitals. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to April 2023. Exposures: Timing of cefuroxime SAP administration before incision was divided into 3 groups: 61 to 120 minutes before incision, 31 to 60 minutes before incision, and 0 to 30 minutes before incision. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed with time windows of 30 to 55 minutes and 10 to 25 minutes as a surrogate marker for administration in the preoperating room vs in the operating room, respectively. The timing of SAP administration was defined as the start of the infusion obtained from the anesthesia protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Occurrence of SSI according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for institutional, patient, and perioperative variables were applied. Results: Of 538 967 surveilled patients, 222 439 (104 047 men [46.8%]; median [IQR] age, 65.7 [53.9-74.2] years), fulfilled inclusion criteria. SSI was identified in 5355 patients (2.4%). Cefuroxime SAP was administered 61 to 120 minutes prior to incision in 27 207 patients (12.2%), 31 to 60 minutes prior to incision in 118 004 patients (53.1%), and 0 to 30 minutes prior to incision in 77 228 patients (34.7%). SAP administration at 0 to 30 minutes was significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; P < .001), as was SAP administration 31 to 60 minutes prior to incision (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P = .01) compared with administration 61 to 120 minutes prior to incision. Administration 10 to 25 minutes prior to incision in 45 448 patients (20.4%) was significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97; P = .009) vs administration within 30 to 55 minutes prior to incision in 117 348 patients (52.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, administration of cefuroxime SAP closer to the incision time was associated with significantly lower odds of SSI, suggesting that cefuroxime SAP should be administrated within 60 minutes prior to incision, and ideally within 10 to 25 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Cefuroxima , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(2): e2255599, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36790812

RESUMEN

Importance: With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to assess the current burden of disease of community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in hospitalized patients to tailor appropriate public health policies. Comparisons with better-known seasonal influenza infections may facilitate such decisions. Objective: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant with patients with influenza. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was based on a national COVID-19 and influenza registry. Hospitalized patients aged 18 years and older with community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection who were admitted between January 15 and March 15, 2022 (when B.1.1.529 Omicron predominance was >95%), and hospitalized patients with influenza A or B infection from January 1, 2018, to March 15, 2022, where included. Patients without a study outcome by August 30, 2022, were censored. The study was conducted at 15 hospitals in Switzerland. Exposures: Community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant vs community-acquired seasonal influenza A or B. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary and secondary outcomes were defined as in-hospital mortality and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant or influenza. Cox regression (cause-specific and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models) was used to account for time-dependency and competing events, with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounders with right-censoring at day 30. Results: Of 5212 patients included from 15 hospitals, 3066 (58.8%) had SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection in 14 centers and 2146 patients (41.2%) had influenza A or B in 14 centers. Of patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, 1485 (48.4%) were female, while 1113 patients with influenza (51.9%) were female (P = .02). Patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant were younger (median [IQR] age, 71 [53-82] years) than those with influenza (median [IQR] age, 74 [59-83] years; P < .001). Overall, 214 patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (7.0%) died during hospitalization vs 95 patients with influenza (4.4%; P < .001). The final adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (sdHR) for in-hospital death for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant vs influenza was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.18-2.01; P = .002). Overall, 250 patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (8.6%) vs 169 patients with influenza (8.3%) were admitted to the ICU (P = .79). After adjustment, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was not significantly associated with increased ICU admission vs influenza (sdHR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.88-1.32; P = .50). Conclusions and Relevance: The data from this prospective, multicenter cohort study suggest a significantly increased risk of in-hospital mortality for patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant vs those with influenza, while ICU admission rates were similar.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Suiza/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitales , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 487, 2022 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606726

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Future prevalence of colonization with extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL-) producing K. pneumoniae in humans and the potential of public health interventions against the spread of these resistant bacteria remain uncertain. METHODS: Based on antimicrobial consumption and susceptibility data recorded during > 13 years in a Swiss region, we developed a mathematical model to assess the comparative effect of different interventions on the prevalence of colonization. RESULTS: Simulated prevalence stabilized in the near future when rates of antimicrobial consumption and in-hospital transmission were assumed to remain stable (2025 prevalence: 6.8% (95CI%:5.4-8.8%) in hospitals, 3.5% (2.5-5.0%) in the community versus 6.1% (5.0-7.5%) and 3.2% (2.3-4.2%) in 2019, respectively). When overall antimicrobial consumption was set to decrease by 50%, 2025 prevalence declined by 75% in hospitals and by 64% in the community. A 50% decline in in-hospital transmission rate led to a reduction in 2025 prevalence of 31% in hospitals and no reduction in the community. The best model fit estimated that 49% (6-100%) of observed colonizations could be attributable to sources other than human-to-human transmission within the geographical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Projections suggests that overall antimicrobial consumption will be, by far, the most powerful driver of prevalence and that a large fraction of colonizations could be attributed to non-local transmissions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Escherichia coli , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/prevención & control , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Modelos Teóricos , Prevalencia , Salud Pública , beta-Lactamasas/genética
15.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 47, 2022 03 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35264215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Agrobacterium spp. are infrequent agents of bloodstream infections linked to healthcare-associated outbreaks. However, it is unclear if outbreaks also occur across larger geographic areas. Triggered by two local clusters from putative point sources, our aim was to detect potential additional clusters in Switzerland. METHODS: We performed a nationwide descriptive study of cases in Switzerland based on a prospective surveillance system (Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance, anresis.ch), from 2008 to 2019. We identified patients with Agrobacterium spp. isolated from blood cultures and used a survey to collect clinical-epidemiological information and susceptibility testing results. We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) of available clinical isolates and determined their relatedness by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variant calling analysis. RESULTS: We identified a total of 36 cases of Agrobacterium spp. from blood samples over 10 years. Beyond previously known local clusters, no new ones were identified. WGS-based typing was performed on 22 available isolates and showed no clonal relationships between newly identified isolates or to those from the known clusters, with all isolates outside these clusters being at least 50 SNPs apart. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Agrobacterium spp. bacteraemia is infrequently detected and, given that it may be healthcare-associated and stem from a point source, occurrence of multiple episodes should entail an outbreak investigation. With the help of the national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system we identified multiple clinical cases of this rare pathogen but found no evidence by WGS that suggested a nation-wide outbreak.


Asunto(s)
Agrobacterium , Bacteriemia , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suiza/epidemiología
16.
Infect Prev Pract ; 4(2): 100211, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35330753

RESUMEN

Background: The optimal screening strategy in hospitals to identify secondary cases after contact with a meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) index patient in a low prevalence setting is not well defined. We aimed at identifying factors associated with documented MRSA transmissions. Method: Single center, retrospective, nested case-control study. We evaluated the screening strategy in our 950 bed tertiary care hospital from 2008 - 2014. Room and ward contacts of MRSA index patients present at time of MRSA identification were screened. We compared characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Protein A (spa)-type matched contact patients (cases) to negative or spa-type mismatched contact patients (controls). Results: Among 270,000 inpatients from 2008 - 2014, 215 MRSA screenings yielded 3013 contact patients, and 6 (0.2%) spa-type matched pairs. We included 225 controls for the nested case-control study. The contact type for the cases was more frequently "same room" and less frequently "same ward" compared with the controls (P = 0.001). Also, exposure time was longer for cases (median of 6 days [IQR 3-9]) than for controls (1 day [0-3], P=0.016). Conclusion: The extensive MRSA screening strategy revealed only few index/contact matches based on spa-typing. Prolonged exposure time and a shared room were significantly associated with MRSA transmission. A targeted screening strategy may be more useful in a low prevalence setting than screening entire wards.

17.
Cell Rep ; 38(5): 110303, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108544

RESUMEN

Across the animal kingdom, multivalency discriminates antibodies from all other immunoglobulin superfamily members. The evolutionary forces conserving multivalency above other structural hallmarks of antibodies remain, however, incompletely defined. Here, we engineer monovalent either Fc-competent or -deficient antibody formats to investigate mechanisms of protection of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) and non-neutralizing antibodies (nnAbs) in virus-infected mice. Antibody bivalency enables the tethering of virions to the infected cell surface, inhibits the release of virions in cell culture, and suppresses viral loads in vivo independently of Fc gamma receptor (FcγR) interactions. In return, monovalent antibody formats either do not inhibit virion release and fail to protect in vivo or their protective efficacy is largely FcγR dependent. Protection in mice correlates with virus-release-inhibiting activity of nAb and nnAb rather than with their neutralizing capacity. These observations provide mechanistic insights into the evolutionary conservation of antibody bivalency and help refining correlates of nnAb protection for vaccine development.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH/farmacología , Receptores Fc/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/farmacología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Epítopos/efectos de los fármacos , Epítopos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Receptores de IgG/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores de IgG/inmunología
18.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 152: w30110, 2022 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147391

RESUMEN

This article reviews the available evidence on the effectiveness of gloves in preventing infection during care provided to patients under contact precautions, and analyses the risks and benefits of their systematic use. Although hand hygiene with alcohol-based handrub was shown to be effective in preventing nosocomial infections, many publications put the effectiveness and usefulness of gloves into perspective. Instead, literature and various unpublished experiences point towards reduced hand hygiene compliance and increased risk of spreading pathogens with routine glove use. Therefore, hospitals should emphasise hand hygiene in their healthcare staff and, instead of the routine use of gloves when caring for patients under contact precautions, limit their use to the indications of standard precautions, i.e., mainly for contact with body fluids. Wide and easy access to alcohol-based handrub and continual teaching are essential. If such conditions are met and adherence to hand hygiene is excellent and regularly assessed, the routine use of gloves for patients under contact precautions seems no longer indicated.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Higiene de las Manos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guantes Protectores , Adhesión a Directriz , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones
19.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 19, 2022 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35090563

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) are on the rise in many European hospitals. In 2018, Switzerland experienced its largest nosocomial VRE outbreak. The national center for infection prevention (Swissnoso) elaborated recommendations for controlling this outbreak and published guidelines to prevent epidemic and endemic VRE spread. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate adherence to this new guideline and its potential impact on the VRE epidemiology in Swiss acute care hospitals. METHODS: In March 2020, Swissnoso distributed a survey among all Swiss acute care hospitals. The level of adherence as well as changes of infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies in the years 2018 and 2019 after publication of the national guidelines were asked along with an inventory on VRE surveillance and outbreaks. RESULTS: Data of 97/146 (66%) participants were available, representing 81.6% of all acute care beds operated in Switzerland in 2019. The vast majority-72/81 (88%) responding hospitals-have entirely or largely adopted our new national guideline. 38/51 (74.5%) hospitals which experienced VRE cases were significantly more likely to have changed their IPC strategies than those 19/38 (50%) hospitals without VRE cases p = 0.017). The new IPC guidelines included (1) introduction of targeted admission screening in 89.5%, (2) screening of close contacts of VRE cases in 56%, and (3) contact precaution for suspected VRE cases 58% of these hospitals. 52 (54%) hospitals reported 569 new VRE cases in 2018 including 14 bacteremia, and 472 new cases in 2019 with 10 bacteremia. The ten largest outbreaks encountered between 2018 and 2019 included 671 VRE cases, of which most (93.4%) consisted of colonization events, 29 (4.3%) infections and 15 (2.2%) bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Wide adoption of this VRE control guideline seemed to have a positive effect on VRE containment in Swiss acute care hospitals over two years, even if its long-term impact on the VRE epidemiology remains to be evaluated. Broad dissemination and strict implementation of a uniform national guideline may therefore serve as model for other countries to fight VRE epidemics on a national level.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Hospitales , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/fisiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Suiza
20.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 2, 2022 01 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The guideline-driven and widely implemented single room isolation strategy for respiratory viral infections (RVI) such as influenza or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can lead to a shortage of available hospital beds. We discuss our experience with the introduction of droplet precautions on-site (DroPS) as a possible alternative. METHODS: During the 2018/19 influenza season we introduced DroPS on several wards of a single tertiary care center, while other wards maintained the traditional single room isolation strategy. On a daily basis, we evaluated patients for the development of respiratory symptoms and screened those with a clinical diagnosis of hospital-acquired respiratory viral infection (HARVI) for influenza/RSV by molecular rapid test. If negative, it was followed by a multiplex respiratory virus PCR. We report the concept of DroPS, the feasibility of the strategy and the rate of microbiologically confirmed HARVI with influenza or RSV infection on the DroPS wards compared to wards using the traditional single room isolation strategy. RESULTS: We evaluated all hospitalised patients at risk for a HARVI, 741 (72%) on the DroPS wards and 293 (28%) on the regular wards. The hospital-acquired infection rate with influenza or RSV was 2/741 (0.3%; 1× influenza A, 1× RSV) on the DroPS wards and 2/293 (0.7%; 2× influenza A) on the regular wards. CONCLUSIONS: Droplet precautions on-site (DroPS) may be a simple and potentially resource-saving alternative to the standard single room isolation strategy for respiratory viral infections. Further studies in a larger clinical context are needed to document its safety.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estaciones del Año , Suiza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...