Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(8): 1033-1039, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0-2, 3-5 and 6-10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI). RESULTS: The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels. CONCLUSION: The LT difficulty classification has been validated.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Internación , Europa (Continente) , Tempo Operativo , Isquemia Fría , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...